Section 1 Investigation of Criminal Tax Cases
第一節 犯則事件の調査
Article 131Questioning, Inspection, Retention, etc.
第百三十一条(質問、検査又は領置等)
When it is necessary in order to investigate a criminal case concerning national taxes (hereinafter referred to as a "criminal tax case" in this Section, except in Article 135 (On-Site Inspection, Search, or Seizure in Flagrant Offense Cases) and Article 153, paragraph (2) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of Investigations)), the relevant officials of the National Tax Agency, etc. (hereinafter referred to as the "relevant officials" up to Article 152 (Preparation of Written Records) and in Article 155 (Accusation of Criminal Tax Cases, etc. concerning National Taxes Other than Indirect National Taxes)) may request a suspect or witness (hereinafter referred to as a "suspect, etc." in this paragraph and paragraph (1) of the following Article) to appear, question a suspect, etc., inspect articles possessed or left behind by a suspect, etc., or retain articles voluntarily submitted or left behind by a suspect, etc.
国税庁等の当該職員(以下第百五十二条(調書の作成)まで及び第百五十五条(間接国税以外の国税に関する犯則事件等についての告発)において「当該職員」という。)は、国税に関する犯則事件(第百三十五条(現行犯事件の臨検、捜索又は差押え)及び第百五十三条第二項(調査の管轄及び引継ぎ)を除き、以下この節において「犯則事件」という。)を調査するため必要があるときは、犯則嫌疑者若しくは参考人(以下この項及び次条第一項において「犯則嫌疑者等」という。)に対して出頭を求め、犯則嫌疑者等に対して質問し、犯則嫌疑者等が所持し、若しくは置き去つた物件を検査し、又は犯則嫌疑者等が任意に提出し、若しくは置き去つた物件を領置することができる。
The relevant officials may, with regard to the investigation of a criminal tax case, make inquiries to public agencies or public or private organizations and request reports on necessary matters.
Article 132On-Site Inspection, Search, Seizure, etc.
第百三十二条(臨検、捜索又は差押え等)
When it is necessary in order to investigate a criminal tax case, the relevant officials may, by a warrant issued in advance by a judge of the district court or summary court having jurisdiction over the location of the government office to which they belong, carry out an on-site inspection, a search of the body, articles, dwelling, or other place of a suspect, etc., a seizure of anything considered to be articles of evidence or an article to be confiscated, or a seizure with a recording order (meaning having a person who keeps electronic or magnetic records or any other person who has the authority to use electronic or magnetic records record necessary electronic or magnetic records on a recording medium or print them out by ordering that person to do so, and then seizing that recording medium; the same applies hereinafter); provided, however, that a search of the body, articles, dwelling, or other place of a witness may be carried out only if there are circumstances sufficient to find that articles to be seized exist there.
当該職員は、犯則事件を調査するため必要があるときは、その所属官署の所在地を管轄する地方裁判所又は簡易裁判所の裁判官があらかじめ発する許可状により、臨検、犯則嫌疑者等の身体、物件若しくは住居その他の場所の捜索、証拠物若しくは没収すべき物件と思料するものの差押え又は記録命令付差押え(電磁的記録を保管する者その他電磁的記録を利用する権限を有する者に命じて必要な電磁的記録を記録媒体に記録させ、又は印刷させた上、当該記録媒体を差し押さえることをいう。以下同じ。)をすることができる。ただし、参考人の身体、物件又は住居その他の場所については、差し押さえるべき物件の存在を認めるに足りる状況のある場合に限り、捜索をすることができる。
If the article to be seized is a computer, that computer or another recording medium may be seized after electronic or magnetic records created or modified using that computer, or electronic or magnetic records that may be modified or erased using that computer, have been copied onto that computer or that other recording medium from a recording medium that is connected to that computer through a telecommunications line and that is found in circumstances sufficient to show that it is used to store those electronic or magnetic records.
差し押さえるべき物件が電子計算機であるときは、当該電子計算機に電気通信回線で接続している記録媒体であつて、当該電子計算機で作成若しくは変更をした電磁的記録又は当該電子計算機で変更若しくは消去をすることができることとされている電磁的記録を保管するために使用されていると認めるに足りる状況にあるものから、その電磁的記録を当該電子計算機又は他の記録媒体に複写した上、当該電子計算機又は当該他の記録媒体を差し押さえることができる。
In the cases referred to in the preceding two paragraphs, if the matter is urgent, the relevant officials may carry out the dispositions referred to in the preceding two paragraphs by a warrant issued in advance by a judge of the district court or summary court having jurisdiction over the location of the articles or place to be inspected, the body, articles, or place to be searched, the articles to be seized, or the person to be ordered to record or print electronic or magnetic records.
When requesting the warrant referred to in paragraph (1) or the preceding paragraph (hereinafter referred to as a "warrant", except in Article 147 (Commissioning of Expert Opinions, etc.)), the relevant officials must provide materials by which a criminal tax case is found to exist.
If a request has been made under the provisions of the preceding paragraph, the judge of the district court or summary court must issue to the relevant official a warrant stating the name of the suspect (for a corporation, its name), the name of the offense, the articles or place to be inspected, the body, articles, or place to be searched, the articles to be seized, or the electronic or magnetic records to be recorded or printed and the person to be ordered to record or print them, as well as the official title and name of the requesting person, the period of validity, a statement that execution may not be commenced after that period has expired and that the warrant must then be returned, the date of issuance, and the name of the court, and bearing the judge's name and seal.
In the case referred to in paragraph (2), the warrant must state, in addition to the matters prescribed in the preceding paragraph, the scope of the recording media connected through a telecommunications line to the computer to be seized from which the electronic or magnetic records are to be copied.
The relevant officials may deliver a warrant to other relevant officials to have them carry out an on-site inspection, search, seizure, or seizure with a recording order.
Article 133Seizure from Persons Handling Communications Affairs
第百三十三条(通信事務を取り扱う者に対する差押え)
When it is necessary in order to investigate a criminal tax case, the relevant officials may, upon being issued a warrant, seize postal items, items of correspondence delivery, or documents concerning telegrams that were sent by or addressed to a suspect and that are kept or possessed by a person handling communications affairs pursuant to the provisions of laws and regulations.
With regard to postal items, items of correspondence delivery, or documents concerning telegrams that do not fall under the preceding paragraph and that are kept or possessed by a person handling communications affairs pursuant to the provisions of laws and regulations, the relevant officials may seize them upon being issued a warrant, limited to those for which there are circumstances sufficient to find that they are related to the criminal tax case.
When the relevant officials have carried out a disposition under the provisions of the preceding two paragraphs, they must notify the sender or the recipient to that effect; provided, however, that this does not apply if the notification is likely to obstruct the investigation of the criminal tax case.
When it is necessary in order to carry out a seizure or a seizure with a recording order, the relevant officials may, specifying those that are necessary from among the electronic or magnetic records of the transmission source, destination, date and time of communication, and other communication history of telecommunications recorded in the course of business and setting a period not exceeding 30 days, request in writing a person engaged in the business of providing telecommunications facilities for the communications of others, or a person who has installed telecommunications facilities capable of intermediating the communications of an unspecified or large number of persons for that person's own business, not to erase them. In this case, if the relevant officials come to find that there is no need to carry out a seizure or a seizure with a recording order with regard to those electronic or magnetic records, they must withdraw that request.
The period for which non-erasure is requested pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph may, if particularly necessary, be extended within a period not exceeding 30 days; provided, however, that the period for which non-erasure is requested may not exceed 60 days in total.
前項の規定により消去しないよう求める期間については、特に必要があるときは、三十日を超えない範囲内で延長することができる。ただし、消去しないよう求める期間は、通じて六十日を超えることができない。
In making a request under the provisions of paragraph (1), if it is necessary, the person may be requested not to divulge matters concerning that request without good reason.
第一項の規定による求めを行う場合において、必要があるときは、みだりに当該求めに関する事項を漏らさないよう求めることができる。
Article 135On-Site Inspection, Search, or Seizure in Flagrant Offense Cases
第百三十五条(現行犯事件の臨検、捜索又は差押え)
In a criminal tax case concerning indirect national taxes (meaning consumption tax imposed on the taxable goods prescribed in Article 47, paragraph (2) (Declaration, etc. of the Amount of Tax Basis and Tax Amount for Taxable Goods Received) of the Consumption Tax Act and other national taxes specified by Cabinet Order; the same applies hereinafter), if there is a person who is committing or has just committed the criminal tax offense, and it is necessary in order to collect items found to be evidence of it, the matter is urgent, and a warrant cannot be obtained, the relevant officials may carry out the on-site inspection, search, or seizure referred to in Article 132, paragraph (1) (On-Site Inspection, Search, Seizure, etc.) at the scene of that offense.
The relevant official may, in the case where, with regard to a criminal tax case concerning indirect national tax, there is a person who possesses an article currently used for an offense or an article obtained through an offense, or who, there being conspicuous traces of an offense, is clearly found to have committed the offense only a short time before, if it is necessary in order to collect anything found to serve as evidence of the offense, the matter is urgent, and the official cannot have a warrant issued, carry out the inspection, search or seizure referred to in Article 132, paragraph (1) with respect to the articles in that person's possession.
第百三十六条(電磁的記録に係る記録媒体の差押えに代わる処分)
When the article to be seized is a recording medium containing an electronic or magnetic record, the relevant official may carry out either of the following dispositions in lieu of the seizure:
copying, printing or transferring the electronic or magnetic record recorded on the recording medium to be seized onto another recording medium, and then seizing that other recording medium; or
差し押さえるべき記録媒体に記録された電磁的記録を他の記録媒体に複写し、印刷し、又は移転した上、当該他の記録媒体を差し押さえること。
having the person subject to the seizure copy, print or transfer the electronic or magnetic record recorded on the recording medium to be seized onto another recording medium, and then seizing that other recording medium.
差押えを受ける者に差し押さえるべき記録媒体に記録された電磁的記録を他の記録媒体に複写させ、印刷させ、又は移転させた上、当該他の記録媒体を差し押さえること。
Article 137Necessary Dispositions in Carrying Out Inspection, Search, Seizure, etc.
第百三十七条(臨検、捜索又は差押え等に際しての必要な処分)
When it is necessary in order to carry out an inspection, search, seizure or seizure with a recording order, the relevant official may remove locks, open seals or carry out any other necessary disposition.
The disposition referred to in the preceding paragraph may also be carried out with respect to retained articles, seized articles or articles seized with a recording order.
前項の処分は、領置物件、差押物件又は記録命令付差押物件についても、することができる。