Supplementary Provisions, Article 5
第五条
With regard to a violation prescribed in Article 7-2, paragraph (1) (including as applied mutatis mutandis following the deemed replacement of terms pursuant to Article 8-3) or paragraph (2) of the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade after amendment by the Act Partially Amending the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (Act No. 100 of 2013) (hereinafter referred to as the "New Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization" in this Article and Articles 7 and 8 of the Supplementary Provisions) (excluding one prescribed in Article 7-2, paragraph (1) of the Former Act (including as applied mutatis mutandis following the deemed replacement of terms pursuant to Article 8-3 of the Former Act)), in the case where notification is given pursuant to Article 50, paragraph (1) of the New Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization as applied mutatis mutandis following the deemed replacement of terms pursuant to Article 62, paragraph (4) of the New Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and that violation began before January 4, 2006 and ceased on or after that date, payment of a surcharge cannot be ordered for the part of that violation relating to the period before that date.
私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律の一部を改正する法律（平成二十五年法律第百号）による改正後の私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律（以下この条並びに附則第七条及び第八条において「新私的独占禁止法」という。）第七条の二第一項（新私的独占禁止法第八条の三において読み替えて準用する場合を含む。）又は第二項に規定する違反行為（旧法第七条の二第一項（旧法第八条の三において読み替えて準用する場合を含む。）に規定するものを除く。）について新私的独占禁止法第六十二条第四項において読み替えて準用する新私的独占禁止法第五十条第一項の規定による通知をする場合において当該違反行為が平成十八年一月四日前に開始され、同日以後になくなったものであるときは、当該違反行為のうち同日前に係るものについては、課徴金の納付を命ずることができない。
With regard to a violation prescribed in Article 7-2, paragraph (1) of the New Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization (including as applied mutatis mutandis following the deemed replacement of terms pursuant to Article 8-3 of the New Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization) or paragraph (2) of that Article (limited to one prescribed in Article 7-2, paragraph (1) of the Former Act (including as applied mutatis mutandis following the deemed replacement of terms pursuant to Article 8-3 of the Former Act)), in the case where notification is given pursuant to Article 50, paragraph (1) of the New Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization as applied mutatis mutandis following the deemed replacement of terms pursuant to Article 62, paragraph (4) of the New Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and that violation began before January 4, 2006 and ceased on or after that date, the provisions then in force continue to govern the calculation of the amount of the surcharge (limited to the rate by which the amount of sales is multiplied) for the part of that violation relating to the period before that date.
新私的独占禁止法第七条の二第一項（新私的独占禁止法第八条の三において読み替えて準用する場合を含む。）又は第二項に規定する違反行為（旧法第七条の二第一項（旧法第八条の三において読み替えて準用する場合を含む。）に規定するものに限る。）について新私的独占禁止法第六十二条第四項において読み替えて準用する新私的独占禁止法第五十条第一項の規定による通知をする場合において当該違反行為が平成十八年一月四日前に開始され、同日以後になくなったものであるときは、当該違反行為のうち同日前に係るものについての課徴金の額の計算（売上額に乗ずる率に限る。）については、なお従前の例による。
With regard to the application of Article 7-2, paragraph (1) of the New Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization (including as applied mutatis mutandis following the deemed replacement of terms pursuant to Article 8-3 of the New Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization) in the case referred to in the preceding paragraph, the phrase "the period until the day on which the business activities in implementing that act cease (the period" in the main clause of Article 7-2, paragraph (1) of the New Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization is deemed to be replaced with "the period obtained by adding together the period until the day preceding January 4, 2006 and the period from January 4, 2006 until the day on which the business activities in implementing that act cease (the period so added together".
前項の場合における新私的独占禁止法第七条の二第一項（新私的独占禁止法第八条の三において読み替えて準用する場合を含む。）の規定の適用については、同項本文中「当該行為の実行としての事業活動がなくなる日までの期間（当該期間」とあるのは、「平成十八年一月四日の前日までの期間と平成十八年一月四日から当該行為の実行としての事業活動がなくなる日までの期間とを合算した期間（当該合算した期間」とする。
With regard to the application of Article 7-2, paragraph (19), main clause and Article 63, paragraph (1), main clause of the New Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization in the case referred to in paragraph (2), the phrase "that amount" in these provisions is deemed to be replaced with "the portion of that amount corresponding to the part of the violation relating to the period on or after January 4, 2006", and the phrase "the amount after deduction" is deemed to be replaced with "the total of the amount after deduction (or zero yen, where the amount of that corresponding portion is less than one-half of the amount of the fine) and the amount of the portion corresponding to the part of the violation relating to the period before that date".
With regard to the application of the proviso to Article 7-2, paragraph (19) of the New Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization in the case referred to in paragraph (2), the phrase "if the amount calculated pursuant to paragraph (1), paragraphs (4) through (9), paragraph (11), or paragraph (12) does not exceed the amount equivalent to one-half of the amount of the fine, or if the amount after that deduction" in the proviso to Article 7-2, paragraph (19) of the New Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization is deemed to be replaced with "the total amount prescribed in the main clause of this paragraph as applied following the deemed replacement of terms pursuant to Article 5, paragraph (4) of the Supplementary Provisions of the Act Partially Amending the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (Act No. 35 of 2005)".
第二項の場合における新私的独占禁止法第七条の二第十九項ただし書の規定の適用については、同項ただし書中「第一項、第四項から第九項まで、第十一項若しくは第十二項の規定により計算した額が当該罰金額の二分の一に相当する金額を超えないとき、又は当該控除後の額」とあるのは、「私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律の一部を改正する法律（平成十七年法律第三十五号）附則第五条第四項の規定により読み替えて適用されるこの項本文に規定する合計額」とする。
With regard to the application of the proviso to Article 63, paragraph (1) of the New Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization in the case referred to in paragraph (2), the phrase "the amount of the surcharge in the payment order does not exceed the amount equivalent to one-half of the amount of the fine or if the amount after the modification" in the proviso to Article 63, paragraph (1) of the New Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization is deemed to be replaced with "the total amount prescribed in the main clause of this paragraph as applied following the deemed replacement of terms pursuant to Article 5, paragraph (4) of the Supplementary Provisions of the Act Partially Amending the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (Act No. 35 of 2005)".
第二項の場合における新私的独占禁止法第六十三条第一項ただし書の規定の適用については、同項ただし書中「当該納付命令に係る課徴金の額が当該罰金額の二分の一に相当する金額を超えないとき、又は当該変更後の額」とあるのは、「私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律の一部を改正する法律（平成十七年法律第三十五号）附則第五条第四項の規定により読み替えて適用されるこの項本文に規定する合計額」とする。
payment order
「納付命令」
An order the Japan Fair Trade Commission makes under Article 7-2, paragraph (1) (including as applied by Article 8-3), Article 7-9, paragraph (1) or (2) or Articles 20-2 to 20-6, requiring an enterprise to pay a surcharge (課徴金) to the national treasury; it is given in a written payment order stating the amount, its basis, the violation and the deadline.
Short name set inArticle 62, paragraph (1)
the Former Actmachine translation
「旧法」
This Act as it stood before Act No. 35 of 2005 amended it.
Short name set inSupplementary Provisions, Article 2, paragraph (1)
New Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolizationmachine translation
「新私的独占禁止法」
The Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade as amended by the Act Partially Amending the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (Act No. 100 of 2013).
Short name set inSupplementary Provisions, Article 5, paragraph (1)· applies only in this article and in Supplementary Provisions, Articles 7 and 8
fine
罰金
A criminal punishment of paying money to the state, of 10,000 yen or more, or less where it is reduced (Penal Code, Article 15). It ranks below imprisonment (拘禁刑) and above penal detention (拘留) and a petty fine (科料) (Articles 9 and 10, paragraph (1)). A person who cannot pay it in full is held in a workhouse (労役場) for one day to two years, or up to three years where fines are imposed together, a period set when the sentence is passed (Article 18, paragraphs (1), (3) and (4)); not within thirty days of the sentence becoming final without the person's consent (paragraph (5)). If it is not enforced for three years after the sentence becomes final, the person is released from it by prescription (Articles 31 and 32, item (v)); the three years do not run while its execution is suspended under law or the person is abroad, and an act of execution interrupts them (Articles 33 and 34, paragraph (2)).
Written by AI using Penal Code, Arts. 9, 10, 15, 18, 31 to 34 as a reference.