内閣総理大臣は、次に掲げる事実のいずれかがあると認めるときは、当該事実に係る事件について審判手続開始の決定をしなければならない。
If the Prime Minister finds that any of the following facts have occurred, the Prime Minister must issue a decision to commence trial procedures for a case that involves that fact:
条文、法令、用語を検索します
この条文はまだされていません施行日は未確定
いまの条文を読む →第六章の二 課徴金(第百七十八条)
金融商品取引法及び資金決済に関する法律の一部を改正する法律(令和八年法律第六十四号)による改正後の条文です。変わる言葉に印をつけています。
本則は章ごとのページで読みます。長い章は、さらに条のまとまりごとに分けています。本則の全条文と、この改正が変える附則・別表を示します。この改正が触れていない附則や別表は、いま施行されている条文のページでご覧ください。
内閣総理大臣は、次に掲げる事実のいずれかがあると認めるときは、当該事実に係る事件について審判手続開始の決定をしなければならない。
If the Prime Minister finds that any of the following facts have occurred, the Prime Minister must issue a decision to commence trial procedures for a case that involves that fact:
第百七十二条第一項、第二項(同条第四項において準用する場合を含む。)又は第三項に該当する事実
a fact that falls under Article 172, paragraph (1) or paragraph (2) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (4) of that Article) or paragraph (3) of that Article;
第百七十二条の二第一項(同条第四項において準用する場合を含む。)、第二項(同条第五項において準用する場合を含む。)又は第六項に該当する事実
a fact that falls under Article 172-2, paragraph (1) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (4) of that Article), paragraph (2) of that Article (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (5) of that Article), or paragraph (6) of that Article;
第百七十二条の三各項に該当する事実
a fact that falls under any of the paragraphs of Article 172-3;
第百七十二条の四第一項又は第二項(同条第三項において準用する場合を含む。)に該当する事実
a fact that falls under Article 172-4, paragraph (1) or paragraph (2) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (3) of that Article);
第百七十二条の五に該当する事実
a fact that falls under Article 172-5;
第百七十二条の六第一項(同条第二項において準用する場合を含む。)に該当する事実
a fact that falls under Article 172-6, paragraph (1) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (2) of that Article);
第百七十二条の七に該当する事実
a fact that falls under Article 172-7;
第百七十二条の八に該当する事実
a fact that falls under Article 172-8;
第百七十二条の九に該当する事実
a fact that falls under Article 172-9;
第百七十二条の十各項に該当する事実
a fact that falls under the paragraphs of Article 172-10;
第百七十二条の十一第一項に該当する事実
a fact that falls under Article 172-11, paragraph (1);
第百七十二条の十二第一項に該当する事実
the fact which falls under Article 172-12, paragraph (1);
第百七十三条第一項に該当する事実
a fact that falls under Article 173, paragraph (1);
第百七十四条第一項に該当する事実
a fact that falls under Article 174, paragraph (1);
第百七十四条の二第一項に該当する事実
a fact that falls under Article 174-2, paragraph (1);
第百七十四条の三第一項に該当する事実
a fact that falls under Article 174-3, paragraph (1); or
第百七十五条第一項(同条第九項において準用する場合を含む。)又は第二項に該当する事実
a fact that falls under Article 175, paragraph (1) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (9) of that Article) or paragraph (2) of that Article;
第百七十五条の二第一項(同条第十三項において準用する場合を含む。)又は第二項(同条第十四項において準用する場合を含む。)に該当する事実
a fact which falls under Article 175-2, paragraph (1) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (13) of that Article) or paragraph (2) of that Article (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (14) of that Article).
内閣総理大臣は、審判手続開始の決定をした場合においては、当該決定に係る前項各号に掲げる事実が当該各号のうち他の号に掲げる事実にも該当することを理由として、審判手続開始の決定をすることができない。
Once the Prime Minister issues a decision to commence trial procedures, the Prime Minister may not decide to commence trial procedures on the grounds that a fact set forth in the item of the preceding paragraph on which that decision is based also falls under other facts set forth in the items of that paragraph.
第四条第一項の規定による届出を必要とする有価証券の募集若しくは売出し、同条第二項の規定による届出を必要とする適格機関投資家取得有価証券一般勧誘又は同条第三項の規定による届出を必要とする特定投資家等取得有価証券一般勧誘を開始した日から五年を経過したときは、内閣総理大臣は、当該募集若しくは売出し、適格機関投資家取得有価証券一般勧誘又は特定投資家等取得有価証券一般勧誘に係る第一項第一号に掲げる事実(第百七十二条第一項に該当する事実に限る。)について、審判手続開始の決定をすることができない。
Once five years have elapsed since the opening day of a public offering or secondary distribution of securities for which a notification under Article 4, paragraph (1) is required, the opening day of a general solicitation involving securities acquired by a qualified institutional investor for which a notification under paragraph (2) of that Article is required, or the opening day of a general solicitation involving securities acquired by a professional investor for which a notification under paragraph (3) of that Article is required, the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (i) in connection with that public offering or secondary distribution, general solicitation involving securities acquired by a qualified institutional investor, or general solicitation involving securities acquired by a professional investor (limited to a fact that falls under Article 172, paragraph (1)).
第十五条第一項(第二十七条において準用する場合を含む。)の規定に違反して、同項に規定する有価証券を募集又は売出しにより取得させ、又は売り付けた日から五年を経過したときは、内閣総理大臣は、当該取得させ、又は売り付けた有価証券に係る第一項第一号に掲げる事実について、審判手続開始の決定をすることができない。
Once five years have elapsed since the day on which a person prescribed in Article 15, paragraph (1) violates the provisions of Article 15, paragraph (1) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27) in causing the securities specified in that paragraph to be acquired or selling those securities through a public offering or secondary distribution, the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (i) in connection with the Securities that the person causes to be acquired or sells.
第十五条第二項(第二十七条において準用する場合を含む。)の規定に違反して、目論見書を交付しないで売出しにより有価証券を売り付けた日から五年を経過したときは、内閣総理大臣は、当該売り付けた有価証券に係る第一項第一号に掲げる事実について、審判手続開始の決定をすることができない。
Once five years have elapsed since the day on which a person prescribed in Article 15, paragraph (2) violates the provisions of Article 15, paragraph (2) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27) in selling securities through a secondary distribution without having delivered a prospectus, the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (i) in connection with the securities that the person sells.
第二十三条の八第一項(第二十七条において準用する場合を含む。)の規定に違反して、同項に規定する有価証券を募集又は売出しにより取得させ、又は売り付けた日から五年を経過したときは、内閣総理大臣は、当該取得させ、又は売り付けた有価証券に係る第一項第一号に掲げる事実について、審判手続開始の決定をすることができない。
Once five years have elapsed since the day on which a person prescribed in Article 23-8, paragraph (1) violates the provisions of Article 23-8, paragraph (1) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27) in causing the securities prescribed in that paragraph to be acquired or selling those securities through a public offering or secondary distribution, the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (i) in connection with the securities that the person causes to be acquired or sells.
重要な事項につき虚偽の記載があり、又は記載すべき重要な事項の記載が欠けている第百七十二条の二第三項に規定する発行開示書類を提出した日から五年を経過したときは、内閣総理大臣は、当該発行開示書類に係る第一項第二号に掲げる事実について、審判手続開始の決定をすることができない。
Once five years have elapsed since the day of submission of a disclosure document for offerings prescribed in Article 172-2, paragraph (3) that contains a false statement about a material particular or that omits a statement as to a material particular that is required to be stated, the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (ii) in connection with that disclosure document for offerings.
第百七十二条の二第四項に規定する重要な事項につき虚偽の記載があり、又は記載すべき同項に規定する重要な事項の記載が欠けている目論見書に係る売出しを開始した日から五年を経過したときは、内閣総理大臣は、当該目論見書に係る第一項第二号に掲げる事実について、審判手続開始の決定をすることができない。
Once five years have elapsed since the opening day of a secondary distribution under a prospectus that contains a false statement about a material particular provided for in Article 172-2, paragraph (4) or lacks a statement on a material particular provided for in that paragraph that is required to be stated, the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (ii) in connection with that Prospectus.
発行開示訂正書類を提出しないで募集又は売出しにより有価証券を取得させ、又は売り付けた日から五年を経過したときは、内閣総理大臣は、当該発行開示訂正書類に係る第一項第二号に掲げる事実(第百七十二条の二第六項に該当する事実に限る。)について、審判手続開始の決定をすることができない。
Once five years have elapsed since the day on which the issuer causes securities to be acquired or sells securities through a public offering or secondary distribution without having submitted an amended offering disclosure document, the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (ii) in connection with the amended offering disclosure document (limited to a fact that falls under Article 172-2, paragraph (6)).
有価証券報告書又は半期報告書のそれぞれの提出期限(第二十四条第三項(同条第五項において準用し、及びこれらの規定を第二十七条において準用する場合を含む。)の規定による有価証券報告書にあつては当該有価証券報告書を提出しなければならない事由が生じた日)から五年を経過したときは、内閣総理大臣は、当該有価証券報告書又は半期報告書に係る第一項第三号に掲げる事実について、審判手続開始の決定をすることができない。
Once five years have elapsed since the respective due dates for the submission of an annual securities report or semiannual securities report (for the annual securities report prescribed in Article 24, paragraph (3) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (5) of that Article and also including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27), from the day on which any grounds for the submission of the annual securities report arise), the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (iii) in connection with that annual securities report or semiannual securities report.
重要な事項につき虚偽の記載があり、又は記載すべき重要な事項の記載が欠けている有価証券報告書等又は半期・臨時報告書等のそれぞれを提出した日から五年を経過したときは、内閣総理大臣は、当該有価証券報告書等又は半期・臨時報告書等に係る第一項第四号に掲げる事実について、審判手続開始の決定をすることができない。
Once five years have elapsed since the respective days of submission of an annual securities report, etc. or a semiannual securities or extraordinary report, etc. that contains a false statement about a material particular or that omits a statement as to a material particular that is required to be stated, the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (iv) in connection with that annual securities report, etc. or semiannual securities or extraordinary report, etc.
臨時報告書を提出しなければならない事由が生じた日から五年を経過したときは、内閣総理大臣は、当該臨時報告書に係る第一項第四号に掲げる事実(第百七十二条の四第三項において準用する同条第二項に該当する事実に限る。)について審判手続開始の決定をすることができない。
Once five years have elapsed since the day on which any ground for the submission of an extraordinary report arises, the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (iv) in connection with that extraordinary report (limited to the fact which falls under Article 172-4, paragraph (2), as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (3) of that Article).
第二十七条の三第一項(第二十七条の二十二の二第二項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定に違反して、公開買付開始公告を行わないで株券等又は上場株券等の買付け等が行われた日から五年を経過したときは、内閣総理大臣は、当該買付け等に係る第一項第五号に掲げる事実について、審判手続開始の決定をすることができない。
Once five years have elapsed since the day on which a purchase, etc. of share certificates, etc. or listed share certificates, etc. violates the provisions of Article 27-3, paragraph (1) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-22-2, paragraph (2)) in being conducted without a public notice of the commencement of a tender offer having been given, the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (v) in connection with that purchase, etc.
重要な事項につき虚偽の表示があり、又は表示すべき重要な事項の表示が欠けている公開買付開始公告等を行つた日から五年を経過したときは、内閣総理大臣は、当該公開買付開始公告等に係る第一項第六号に掲げる事実について、審判手続開始の決定をすることができない。
Once five years have elapsed since the day of issuance of public notice of the commencement of a tender offer, etc. which contains a false representation about a material particular or which omits a representation as to a material particular that is required to be represented, the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (vi) in connection with that public notice for commencement of tender offer, etc.
重要な事項につき虚偽の記載があり、又は記載すべき重要な事項の記載が欠けている公開買付届出書等を提出した日から五年を経過したときは、内閣総理大臣は、当該公開買付届出書等に係る第一項第六号に掲げる事実について、審判手続開始の決定をすることができない。
Once five years have elapsed since the day of submission of a tender offer statement, etc. that contains a false statement about a material particular or that omits a statement as to a material particular that is required to be stated, the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (vi) in connection with that tender offer statement, etc.
公開買付訂正届出書等の提出期限(第二十七条の八第二項(第二十七条の二十二の二第二項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定による訂正届出書又は第二十七条の十第十二項において準用する第二十七条の八第二項の規定による訂正報告書にあつては、これらの書類のそれぞれを提出しなければならない事由が生じた日)から五年を経過したときは、内閣総理大臣は、当該公開買付訂正届出書等に係る第一項第六号に掲げる事実(第百七十二条の六第二項において準用する同条第一項に該当する事実に限る。)について、審判手続開始の決定をすることができない。
Once five years have elapsed since the due date for the submission of an amended tender offer statement, etc. (or, for an amended statement under Article 27-8, paragraph (2) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-22-2, paragraph (2)) or an amended report under Article 27-8, paragraph (2) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-10, paragraph (12), from the day on which any ground for the submission of any of these documents arises), the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (vi) in connection with that amended tender offer statement, etc. (limited to a fact that falls under Article 172-6, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (2) of that Article).
大量保有・変更報告書の提出期限から五年を経過したときは、内閣総理大臣は、当該大量保有・変更報告書に係る第一項第七号に掲げる事実について、審判手続開始の決定をすることができない。
Once five years have elapsed since the due date for the submission of a statement of large-volume holdings or changes, the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (vii) involving that statement of large-volume holdings or changes.
重要な事項につき虚偽の記載があり、又は記載すべき重要な事項の記載が欠けている大量保有・変更報告書等を提出した日から五年を経過したときは、内閣総理大臣は、当該大量保有・変更報告書等に係る第一項第八号に掲げる事実について、審判手続開始の決定をすることができない。
Once five years have elapsed since the day on which a person submits a statement of large-volume holdings or changes, etc. that contains a false statement about a material particular or that omits a statement as to a material particular that is required to be stated, the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (viii) in connection with that statement of large-volume holdings or statement of changes, etc.
特定勧誘等を開始した日から五年を経過したときは、内閣総理大臣は、当該特定勧誘等に係る第一項第九号に掲げる事実について、審判手続開始の決定をすることができない。
Once five years have elapsed since the day on which a person commences a specified solicitation, etc., the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (ix) in connection with that specified solicitation, etc.
虚偽等のある特定証券等情報を提供し、又は公表した日から五年を経過したときは、内閣総理大臣は、当該虚偽等のある特定証券等情報に係る第一項第十号に掲げる事実について、審判手続開始の決定をすることができない。
Once five years have elapsed since the day on which a person provides or discloses specified information on securities, etc. that contains a falsity, etc., the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (x) in connection with that specified information on securities, etc. that contains a falsehood, etc.
虚偽等のある発行者等情報を提供し、又は公表した日から五年を経過したときは、内閣総理大臣は、当該虚偽等のある発行者等情報に係る第一項第十一号に掲げる事実について、審判手続開始の決定をすることができない。
Once five years have elapsed since the day on which a person provides or discloses information on the issuer, etc. that contains a falsity, etc., the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (xi) in connection with that Information on the issuer, etc. that contains a falsity, etc.
第百七十二条の十二第一項に規定する開示書類提出者等が同項に規定する虚偽開示書類等を提出し、提供し又は公表した日から七年を経過したときは、内閣総理大臣は、当該虚偽開示書類等に係る第一項第十一号の二に掲げる事実について、審判手続開始の決定をすることができない。
When seven years have elapsed from the day when a person submitting disclosure documents, etc. prescribed in Article 172-12, paragraph (1) submitted, provided or publicly announced the fake disclosure documents, etc. prescribed in that paragraph, the Prime Minister may not issue a decision on the commencement of trial procedures concerning the facts specified in paragraph (1), item (xi)-2 related to the relevant fake disclosure documents, etc.
第百七十三条第一項に規定する違反行為が終了した日から五年を経過したときは、内閣総理大臣は、当該違反行為に係る第一項第十二号に掲げる事実について、審判手続開始の決定をすることができない。
Once five years have elapsed since the day on which the violation set forth in Article 173, paragraph (1) ends, the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (xii) in connection with that violation.
第百七十四条第一項に規定する違反行為が終了した日から五年を経過したときは、内閣総理大臣は、当該違反行為に係る第一項第十三号に掲げる事実について、審判手続開始の決定をすることができない。
Once five years have elapsed since the day on which the violation prescribed in Article 174, paragraph (1) ends, the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (xiii) in connection with that violation.
第百七十四条の二第一項に規定する違反行為が終了した日から五年を経過したときは、内閣総理大臣は、当該違反行為に係る第一項第十四号に掲げる事実について、審判手続開始の決定をすることができない。
Once five years have elapsed since the day on which the violation prescribed in Article 174-2, paragraph (1) ends, the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (xiv) in connection with that violation.
第百七十四条の三第一項に規定する違反行為が終了した日から五年を経過したときは、内閣総理大臣は、当該違反行為に係る第一項第十五号に掲げる事実について、審判手続開始の決定をすることができない。
Once five years have elapsed since the day on which a violation prescribed in Article 174-3, paragraph (1) ends, the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (xv) in connection with that violation.
第百六十六条第一項に規定する売買等が行われた日から五年を経過したときは、内閣総理大臣は、当該売買等に係る第一項第十六号に掲げる事実について、審判手続開始の決定をすることができない。
Once five years have elapsed since the day on which a purchase and sale, etc. prescribed in Article 166, paragraph (1) is conducted, the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (xvi) in connection with that purchase and sale, etc.
第百六十七条第一項に規定する特定株券等若しくは関連株券等に係る買付け等又は同項に規定する株券等に係る売付け等が行われた日から五年を経過したときは、内閣総理大臣は、当該買付け等又は売付け等に係る第一項第十六号に掲げる事実について、審判手続開始の決定をすることができない。
Once five years have elapsed since the day on which a purchase, etc. of specified share certificates, etc. or related share certificates, etc. prescribed in Article 167, paragraph (1) or a sale, etc. of share certificates, etc. prescribed in that paragraph is made, the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (xvi) in connection with that purchase, etc. or sale, etc.
第百七十五条の二第一項若しくは第二項に規定する違反行為又は同条第十三項若しくは第十四項に規定する特定伝達等行為が行われた日から五年を経過したときは、内閣総理大臣は、当該違反行為又は特定伝達等行為に係る第一項第十七号に掲げる事実について、審判手続開始の決定をすることができない。
When five years have elapsed from the day when the violation prescribed in Article 175-2, paragraph (1) or (2) or the specified act of providing information, etc. prescribed in paragraph (13) or (14) of that Article was conducted, the Prime Minister may not issue a decision on the commencement of trial procedures concerning the facts specified in paragraph (1), item (xvii) related to the violation or the specified act of providing information, etc.