Domestic Relations Case Procedure Act

The provisions of Articles 41 through 43 apply mutatis mutandis to the intervention in or exclusion from proceedings for mediation of domestic relations; the provisions of Article 44 apply mutatis mutandis to the taking over of proceedings for the mediation of domestic relations; the provisions of Articles 51 through 55 apply mutatis mutandis to a date for proceedings for mediation of domestic relations; the provisions of Articles 56 through 62 and Article 64 apply mutatis mutandis to the investigation of facts and examination of evidence in proceedings for mediation of domestic relations; the provisions of Article 65 apply mutatis mutandis to understanding the intention of a child, etc. in proceedings for mediation of domestic relations; the provisions of Articles 73, 74, 76 (excluding the proviso to paragraph (1)), 77, and 79 apply mutatis mutandis to a ruling regarding mediation of domestic relations; and the provisions of Article 81 apply mutatis mutandis to a judicial decision other than a ruling regarding mediation of domestic relations.

A court that is commissioned to examine the facts in proceedings for mediation of domestic relations pursuant to the provisions of Article 61, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the preceding paragraph may, when it finds it to be appropriate, have a court clerk conduct the investigation of facts as commissioned; provided, however, that this does not apply when a commissioned family court finds it to be appropriate to have a family court investigating officer conduct the examination of facts as commissioned.

The provisions of Article 152-2 apply mutatis mutandis to a mediation case for a disposition regarding cooperation and mutual assistance between a husband and wife, a mediation case for a disposition regarding the sharing of living expenses (meaning a mediation case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 2, row (2)), a mediation case for a disposition regarding the custody of a child (limited to a mediation case for a disposition regarding the sharing of expenses required for the custody of a child), a mediation case for a disposition regarding the division of property (meaning a mediation case regarding the matters set forth in row (4) of that table), and a mediation case regarding divorce; the provisions of Article 152-3 apply mutatis mutandis to a mediation case for a disposition regarding the custody of a child (excluding a mediation case for a disposition regarding the sharing of expenses required for the custody of a child) and a mediation case regarding divorce; and the provisions of Article 184-2 apply mutatis mutandis to a mediation case for a determination of the extent or method of support, and change or revocation of the determination (meaning a mediation case regarding the matters set forth in row (10) of that table), respectively.

Proceedings for mediation of domestic relations conducted by a mediation committee are subject to the control of a judge who composes the mediation committee.

When a mediation committee conducts a mediation of domestic relations, the power of a court in relation to the following matters is exercised by the mediation committee:

permission, etc. for a counsel under the provisions of Article 22;

permission, etc. for an assistant in court under the provisions of Article 60, paragraphs (1) and (2) of the Code of Civil Procedure as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27;

permission for attendance under the provisions of proviso to Article 33;

consolidation of proceedings, etc. under the provisions of Article 35;

amendment to a petition under the provisions of Article 50, paragraphs (3) and (4) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the provisions of Article 255, paragraph (4); and

intervention in proceedings under the provisions of Article 41, paragraphs (1) and (2) and Article 42, paragraphs (1) through (3) and (5), exclusion from proceedings under the provisions of Article 43, paragraph (1), taking over of proceedings under the provisions of Article 44, paragraphs (1) and (3), summoning a person concerned with a case under the provisions of Article 51, paragraph (1), conducting proceedings by the method of communication through audio transmissions under the provisions of Article 54, paragraph (1), and the investigation of facts and examination of evidence (excluding the particulars concerning a non-criminal fine and subpoena) under the provisions of Article 56, paragraph (1), Article 59, paragraphs (1) through (3) (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 60, paragraph (2)), Article 61, paragraph (1), Article 62, and Article 64, paragraph (5), as well as under the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 64, paragraph (1), as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 258, paragraph (1).

A judge who composes a mediation committee may, by a resolution of the mediation committee, investigate facts and examine evidence.

In the case referred to in the preceding paragraph, a judge may have a family court investigating officer examine facts or a technical official of the court who is a physician diagnose the physical and mental condition of a person concerned with a case.

In the case referred to in paragraph (1), a judge may, when the judge finds it to be appropriate, have a court clerk investigate facts; provided, however, that this does not apply when the judge finds it to be appropriate to have a family court investigating officer examine facts.

A judge who composes a mediation committee may, by a resolution of the mediation committee, have a family court investigating officer take the measures under the provisions of Article 59, paragraph (4).

A mediation committee may, when it finds it to be appropriate, have a domestic relations mediation commissioner who composes the mediation committee investigate facts; provided, however, that this does not apply when it finds it to be appropriate to have a family court investigating officer examine the facts.

A mediation committee may commission another family court or a summary court to hear the opinion of a party concerned with a case with regard to the resolution of a dispute.

A family court that is commissioned to hear opinions under the provisions of the preceding paragraph may, when it finds it to be appropriate, have a domestic relations mediation commissioner hear opinions as commissioned.

A mediation committee may, when it finds it to be necessary, hear the opinions of a domestic relations mediation commissioner who is not a member of the mediation committee, based on the commissioner's expert knowledge and experience.

A domestic relations mediation commissioner whose opinions are heard pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph is designated by a family court.

A domestic relations mediation commissioner who is designated under the provisions of the preceding paragraph is to attend a mediation committee and state opinions.

A mediation committee may mediate a case at an appropriate place outside a court, in consideration of the circumstances of the case.

While a case for mediation of domestic relations is pending, a mediation committee may issue a disposition that it finds to be necessary for mediation.

If there are pressing circumstances, a judge who composes a mediation committee may order the disposition set forth in the preceding paragraph (hereinafter referred to as a "disposition prior to mediation").

A disposition prior to mediation does not have enforceability.

If a party or interested party intervenor who has been ordered to take a necessary measure as a disposition prior to mediation does not comply with the order without justifiable grounds, a family court punishes the party or interested party intervenor by a non-criminal fine of up to 100,000 yen.

When proceedings for mediation of domestic relations are conducted by a sole judge, a family court may, when it finds it to be appropriate, have a court clerk investigate the facts; provided, however, that this does not apply when it finds it to be appropriate to have a family court investigating officer investigate the facts.

The provisions of Article 263 through the preceding Article apply mutatis mutandis where proceedings for mediation of domestic relations are conducted by a sole judge.

When an agreement is reached between the parties with regard to part of a case for mediation of domestic relations, mediation may be successfully achieved with regard to the part of the case. The same applies when an agreement is reached with regard to one of the cases for mediation of domestic relations for which the consolidation of proceedings has been ordered.

In a mediation case regarding divorce or dissolution in an adoptive relationship, mediation may not be successfully achieved by the method prescribed in Article 54, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 258, paragraph (1); provided, however, that this does not apply where it is done by a method by which the family court and both parties are able to converse while mutually recognizing each other's condition through video and audio transmissions.

The provisions of paragraphs (1) and (2) do not apply to mediation cases regarding the matters prescribed in Article 277, paragraph (1).