The law as Act on the Arrangement of Related Acts to Promote the Use of Information and Communications Technology in Civil Procedures, etc. (Act No. 53 of 2023) leaves it, with the words it changes marked.
The main text is read a page at a time: a chapter to a page, and a long chapter in runs of articles. The whole main text, and the supplementary provisions and appended tables this amendment changes. Those it leaves untouched are on the page for the text in force.
An adjudication case for the commencement of curatorship (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (17); the same applies hereinafter) is subject to the jurisdiction of the family court which has jurisdiction over the place of domicile of a person who is to be a person under curatorship.
Adjudication cases regarding curatorship (meaning the adjudication cases regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, rows (17) through (35)), except for an adjudication case for the commencement of curatorship, are subject to the jurisdiction of a family court that has made a ruling of the commencement of curatorship (if the court in charge of an appeal has made a judicial decision of commencement of curatorship, the family court that is the court of first instance); provided, however, that if an adjudication case for the commencement of curatorship is pending before a family court, these cases are subject to the jurisdiction of that family court.
The provisions of Article 118 apply mutatis mutandis to a person who is to be a person under curatorship and to a person under curatorship in the following adjudication cases (including adjudication cases for a provisional order sought by designating the adjudication cases set forth in items (i), (vii), and (ix) as cases on the merits):
an adjudication case for the commencement of curatorship;
保佐開始の審判事件
Article 129, paragraph (1), item (ii)
an adjudication case for the determination of acts which require the consent of a curator (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (18));
an adjudication case for permission in lieu of the consent of a curator (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (19));
保佐人の同意に代わる許可の審判事件(別表第一の十九の項の事項についての審判事件をいう。)
Article 129, paragraph (1), item (iv)
an adjudication case for the revocation of a ruling of the commencement of curatorship (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (20));
保佐開始の審判の取消しの審判事件(別表第一の二十の項の事項についての審判事件をいう。)
Article 129, paragraph (1), item (v)
an adjudication case for the revocation of a ruling to determine acts which require the consent of a curator (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (21));
an adjudication case for the appointment of a curator (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (22));
保佐人の選任の審判事件(別表第一の二十二の項の事項についての審判事件をいう。)
Article 129, paragraph (1), item (vii)
an adjudication case for the dismissal of a curator (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (24); the same applies in Article 135);
an adjudication case for the appointment of a supervisor of a curator (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (26));
保佐監督人の選任の審判事件(別表第一の二十六の項の事項についての審判事件をいう。)
Article 129, paragraph (1), item (ix)
an adjudication case for the dismissal of a supervisor of a curator (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (28); the same applies in Article 135);
an adjudication case for vesting the authority of representation in a curator (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (32));
保佐人に対する代理権の付与の審判事件(別表第一の三十二の項の事項についての審判事件をいう。)
Article 129, paragraph (1), item (xi)
an adjudication case for the revocation of a ruling to vest the authority of representation in a curator (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (33)); and
an adjudication case for the supervision of the affairs of curatorship (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (34)).
保佐の事務の監督の審判事件(別表第一の三十四の項の事項についての審判事件をいう。)
Article 130第百三十条
Hearing Statements and Opinions(陳述及び意見の聴取)
Article 130, paragraph (1)
When making the rulings set forth in the following items, the family court must hear statements from the persons specified respectively in these items (in items (i), (ii), (iv), and (v), excluding the petitioner):
a ruling of the commencement of curatorship:the person who is to be a person under curatorship;
保佐開始の審判 被保佐人となるべき者
Article 130, paragraph (1), item (ii)
a ruling to determine acts which require the consent of a curator:the person who is or is to be a person under curatorship;
保佐人の同意を得なければならない行為の定めの審判 被保佐人となるべき者又は被保佐人
Article 130, paragraph (1), item (iii)
a ruling of permission in lieu of the consent of a curator:the curator;
保佐人の同意に代わる許可の審判 保佐人
Article 130, paragraph (1), item (iv)
a ruling to revoke a ruling of the commencement of curatorship (limited to the case under the provisions of Article 14, paragraph (1) of the Civil Code):the person under curatorship and the curator;
保佐開始の審判の取消しの審判(民法第十四条第一項の規定による場合に限る。) 被保佐人及び保佐人
Article 130, paragraph (1), item (v)
a ruling of the appointment of a curator or a supervisor of a curator:the person who is or is to be a person under curatorship;
保佐人又は保佐監督人の選任の審判 被保佐人となるべき者又は被保佐人
Article 130, paragraph (1), item (vi)
a ruling of the dismissal of a curator:the curator; and
保佐人の解任の審判 保佐人
Article 130, paragraph (1), item (vii)
a ruling of the dismissal of a supervisor of a curator:the supervisor of a curator.
保佐監督人の解任の審判 保佐監督人
Article 130, paragraph (2)
When making the rulings set forth in the following items, the family court must hear the opinions of the persons specified respectively in these items:
家庭裁判所は、次の各号に掲げる審判をする場合には、当該各号に定める者の意見を聴かなければならない。
Article 130, paragraph (2), item (i)
a ruling of the appointment of a curator:the person who is to be a curator; and
保佐人の選任の審判 保佐人となるべき者
Article 130, paragraph (2), item (ii)
a ruling of the appointment of a supervisor of a curator:the person who is to be a supervisor of a curator.
保佐監督人の選任の審判 保佐監督人となるべき者
Article 131第百三十一条
Notice of Rulings(審判の告知)
Article 131, paragraph (1)
Notice of the rulings set forth in the following items must be given to the persons specified respectively in these items, beyond the persons prescribed in Article 74, paragraph (1):
a ruling of the commencement of curatorship:the person who is appointed as a curator pursuant to the provisions of Article 876-2, paragraph (1) of the Civil Code, and the voluntarily appointed guardian and the supervisor of the voluntarily appointed guardian under a voluntary guardianship contract that is to terminate pursuant to Article 10, paragraph (3) of the Voluntary Guardianship Contract Act;
a ruling to determine acts which require the consent of a curator:the curator and the supervisor of the curator (if this ruling is made simultaneously upon making a ruling of the appointment of a curator or a supervisor of a curator, the person who is to be a curator or the person who is to be a supervisor of a curator);
a ruling of permission in lieu of the consent of a curator:the curator and the supervisor of the curator;
保佐人の同意に代わる許可の審判 保佐人及び保佐監督人
Article 131, paragraph (1), item (iv)
a ruling to revoke a ruling of the commencement of curatorship:the curator and the supervisor of the curator;
保佐開始の審判の取消しの審判 保佐人及び保佐監督人
Article 131, paragraph (1), item (v)
a ruling to revoke a ruling to determine acts which require the consent of a curator:the curator and the supervisor of the curator;
保佐人の同意を得なければならない行為の定めの審判の取消しの審判 保佐人及び保佐監督人
Article 131, paragraph (1), item (vi)
a ruling to vest the authority of representation in a curator:the person under curatorship and the supervisor of a curator (if this ruling is made simultaneously upon making a ruling of the appointment of a supervisor of a curator, the person who is to be a supervisor of a curator); and
a ruling to revoke a ruling to vest the authority of representation in a curator:the person under curatorship and the supervisor of a curator.
保佐人に対する代理権の付与の審判の取消しの審判 被保佐人及び保佐監督人
Article 132第百三十二条
Immediate Appeals(即時抗告)
Article 132, paragraph (1)
An immediate appeal may be filed against the rulings set forth in the following items by the persons specified respectively in these items (in items (i) and (iv), excluding the petitioner):
a ruling of the commencement of curatorship:the persons prescribed in the main clause of Article 11 of the Civil Code and those prescribed in Article 10, paragraph (2) of the Voluntary Guardianship Contract Act;
保佐開始の審判 民法第十一条本文及び任意後見契約法第十条第二項に規定する者
Article 132, paragraph (1), item (ii)
a ruling to dismiss a petition for the commencement of curatorship:the petitioner;
保佐開始の申立てを却下する審判 申立人
Article 132, paragraph (1), item (iii)
a ruling to dismiss a petition for revocation of a ruling of the commencement of curatorship:the persons prescribed in Article 14, paragraph (1) of the Civil Code;
保佐開始の審判の取消しの申立てを却下する審判 民法第十四条第一項に規定する者
Article 132, paragraph (1), item (iv)
a ruling to determine acts which require the consent of a curator:the person under curatorship;
保佐人の同意を得なければならない行為の定めの審判 被保佐人
Article 132, paragraph (1), item (v)
a ruling to dismiss a petition for permission in lieu of the consent of a curator:the petitioner;
保佐人の同意に代わる許可の申立てを却下する審判 申立人
Article 132, paragraph (1), item (vi)
a ruling of the dismissal of a curator:the curator;
保佐人の解任の審判 保佐人
Article 132, paragraph (1), item (vii)
a ruling to dismiss a petition for the dismissal of a curator:the petitioner, the supervisor of the curator, as well as the person under curatorship and their relative;
保佐人の解任の申立てを却下する審判 申立人、保佐監督人並びに被保佐人及びその親族
Article 132, paragraph (1), item (viii)
a ruling of the dismissal of a supervisor of a curator:the supervisor of a curator; and
保佐監督人の解任の審判 保佐監督人
Article 132, paragraph (1), item (ix)
a ruling to dismiss a petition for the dismissal of a supervisor of a curator:the petitioner, as well as the person under curatorship and the person's relative.
保佐監督人の解任の申立てを却下する審判 申立人並びに被保佐人及びその親族
Article 132, paragraph (2)
The period for filing an immediate appeal against a ruling of the commencement of curatorship to be filed by a person other than a person who receives notice of a ruling and by a person who is to be a person under curatorship runs from the latest day, out of the day on which the person who is to be a person under curatorship received notice of a ruling and the day on which the person who is appointed as a curator pursuant to the provisions of Article 876-2, paragraph (1) of the Civil Code received notice of a ruling.
Application Mutatis Mutandis of Provisions Concerning Adjudication Cases Regarding Guardianship of Adults(成年後見に関する審判事件の規定の準用)
Article 133, paragraph (1)
The provisions of Article 119 apply mutatis mutandis to the expert examination and hearing of opinions concerning the mental state of a person who is or is to be a person under curatorship; the provisions of Article 121 apply mutatis mutandis to the withdrawal of a petition for the commencement of curatorship and the withdrawal of a petition for the appointment of a curator; and the provisions of Article 124 apply mutatis mutandis to the supervision of the affairs of curatorship.
Provisional Order during a Case on the Merits to Adjudicate Commencement of Curatorship(保佐開始の審判事件を本案とする保全処分)
Article 134, paragraph (1)
The provisions of Article 126, paragraph (1) apply mutatis mutandis to a provisional order sought by designating an adjudication case for the commencement of curatorship as a case on the merits.
保佐開始の審判事件を本案とする保全処分については、第百二十六条第一項の規定を準用する。
Article 134, paragraph (2)
When a petition for the commencement of curatorship is filed, and when it is particularly necessary for the preservation of the property of a person who is to be a person under curatorship, the family court (or a high court in the case set forth in Article 105, paragraph (2)) may, upon the petition of the person who has filed the petition, order that the person who is to be a person under curatorship be subject to the curatorship of the administrator of property to be appointed pursuant to the provisions of Article 126, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the preceding paragraph (hereinafter simply referred to as an "administrator of property" in this Article) in performing acts in relation to property (limited to the acts prescribed in Article 13, paragraph (1) of the Civil Code; the same applies in paragraph (5)), until a ruling on the petition for the commencement of curatorship becomes effective.
Notice of a ruling under the provisions of the preceding paragraph (hereinafter referred to as a "ruling to order curatorship" in the following paragraph and paragraph (5)) must be given to an administrator of property, beyond the persons prescribed in Article 74, paragraph (1).
The period for filing an immediate appeal against a ruling to order curatorship to be filed by a person other than a person who receives notice of a ruling and by a person who is to be a person under curatorship runs from the latest day, out of the day on which the person who is to be a person under curatorship receives notice of a ruling and the day on which the administrator of property receives notice of a ruling under the provisions of the preceding paragraph.
When a ruling to order curatorship is made, the person who is to be a person under curatorship and the administrator of property may rescind acts performed in relation to property by the person who is to be a person under curatorship without obtaining consent from the administrator of property. In this case, the provisions of the Civil Code concerning the rescission of acts performed by a person with limited capacity to act apply mutatis mutandis.
The provisions of Article 125, paragraphs (1) through (6), as well as the provisions of Articles 27 through 29 of the Civil Code (excluding Article 27, paragraph (2) of the Code) apply mutatis mutandis to an administrator of property. In this case, the term "an adult under guardianship" in Article 125, paragraph (3) is deemed to be replaced with "a person who is to be a person under curatorship."
Provisional Order Sought by Designating an Adjudication Case for the Dismissal of Curators as a Case on Merits(保佐人の解任の審判事件等を本案とする保全処分)
Article 135, paragraph (1)
The provisions of Article 127, paragraphs (1) through (4) apply mutatis mutandis to a provisional order sought by designating an adjudication case for the dismissal of a curator or an adjudication case for the dismissal of a supervisor of a curator as a case on the merits.
The day a law or an amendment starts to apply. It is often months or years after promulgation, so that people have time to prepare. The Ministry of Justice's English usually says a law "comes into force" or "comes into effect", and sometimes calls the day its "enforcement date". Its "enforcement" more often means the word's other sense, carrying a law out, as in an Order for Enforcement (施行令), the Cabinet Order (政令) that sets out the details for carrying out an Act.
Rules made by the Cabinet to carry out the Constitution and Acts. A Cabinet Order cannot impose duties, restrict rights or set penalties unless an Act delegates that to it.
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
Adjudication cases regarding curatorship (meaning the adjudication cases regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, rows (17) through (35)), except for an adjudication case for the commencement of curatorship, are subject to the jurisdiction of a family court that has made a ruling of the commencement of curatorship (if the court in charge of an appeal has made a judicial decision of commencement of curatorship, the family court that is the court of first instance); provided, however, that if an adjudication case for the commencement of curatorship is pending before a family court, these cases are subject to that family court.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
The provisions of Article 126, paragraph (1) applies mutatis mutandis to a provisional order sought by designating an adjudication case for the commencement of curatorship as a case on the merits.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)