Chapter III Disqualification and Challenge to Court Officials
The law as Act on the Arrangement of Related Acts to Promote the Use of Information and Communications Technology in Civil Procedures, etc. (Act No. 53 of 2023) leaves it, with the words it changes marked.
The main text is read a page at a time: a chapter to a page, and a long chapter in runs of articles. The whole main text, and the supplementary provisions and appended tables this amendment changes. Those it leaves untouched are on the page for the text in force.
Chapter III Disqualification and Challenge to Court Officials第三章 裁判所職員の除斥及び忌避
Article 10第十条
Disqualification of Judges(裁判官の除斥)
Article 10, paragraph (1)
In the following cases, a judge is disqualified from fulfilling the judge's duties; provided, however, that in the case set forth in item (vi), this does not preclude a judge from fulfilling the judge's duties as a commissioned judge based on a commission from another court:
where a judge or the judge's spouse or a person who was the judge's spouse is a party to the case or any other person who is to be subject to adjudication (meaning a person who is to be subject to adjudication when a ruling is made (excluding a ruling to dismiss a petition); the same applies hereinafter), or is related to such party or person in relation to the case as a joint obligee, joint obligor, or obligor for redemption;
when a judge is or was a blood relative within the fourth degree or relative by marriage within the third degree of, or relative living together with, a party to the case or any other person who is to be subject to adjudication;
when a judge is a guardian, supervisor of a guardian, curator, supervisor of a curator, assistant, or supervisor of an assistant for a party to the case or any other person who is to be subject to adjudication;
when a judge has served as a witness or appraiser or is to be heard in relation to the case;
裁判官が事件について証人若しくは鑑定人となったとき、又は審問を受けることとなったとき。
Article 10, paragraph (1), item (v)
when a judge is or has been a representative or assistant in court of a party to the case or any other person who is to be subject to adjudication; and
when a judge has participated in making an arbitral award in relation to the case or participated in making a judicial decision in the prior instance against which an appeal has been entered.
裁判官が事件について仲裁判断に関与し、又は不服を申し立てられた前審の裁判に関与したとき。
Article 10, paragraph (2)
If any of the grounds for disqualification prescribed in the preceding paragraph exist, the court makes a judicial decision of disqualification upon petition or by its own authority.
前項に規定する除斥の原因があるときは、裁判所は、申立てにより又は職権で、除斥の裁判をする。
Article 11第十一条
Challenge to Judge(裁判官の忌避)
Article 11, paragraph (1)
If there are circumstances with regard to a judge that would prejudice the impartiality of a judicial decision or mediation, a party may challenge the judge.
If a party has argued a case before a judge, the party may not challenge that judge; provided, however, that this is not the case if the party did not know the grounds for a challenge had already existed or they came about afterwards.
Judicial Decision of Disqualification or Challenge, and Stay of Proceedings(除斥又は忌避の裁判及び手続の停止)
Article 12, paragraph (1)
A judicial decision of disqualification or a challenge to a judge who is a member of a panel or a single judge of a family court is to be made by the court to which the judge belongs, and a judicial decision on the disqualification or a challenge to a judge of a summary court who is to serve as a commissioned judge are to be made by the district court which has jurisdiction over the venue of that summary court.
The judicial decision in a family court and a district court as set forth in the preceding paragraph is to be made by a panel.
家庭裁判所及び地方裁判所における前項の裁判は、合議体でする。
Article 12, paragraph (3)
A judge may not participate in the judicial proceeding on the disqualification or a challenge to themselves.
裁判官は、その除斥又は忌避についての裁判に関与することができない。
Article 12, paragraph (4)
When a motion for disqualification or challenge is filed, the proceedings of the domestic relations case must be stayed until the judicial decision on the motion becomes final and binding; provided, however, that this does not apply to any urgent action.
The provisions of paragraph (3) do not apply when dismissing a motion for a challenge on any of the following grounds:
次に掲げる事由があるとして忌避の申立てを却下する裁判をするときは、第三項の規定は、適用しない。
Article 12, paragraph (5), item (i)
when it is clear that the motion for recusal is filed merely for the purpose of delaying the proceedings of the domestic relations case;
家事事件の手続を遅滞させる目的のみでされたことが明らかなとき。
Article 12, paragraph (5), item (ii)
when the motion is in violation of the provisions of paragraph (2) of the preceding Article; or
前条第二項の規定に違反するとき。
Article 12, paragraph (5), item (iii)
when the motion is in violation of a procedure specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court.
最高裁判所規則で定める手続に違反するとき。
Article 12, paragraph (6)
Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraphs (1) and (2), the judicial decision set forth in the preceding paragraph may be made by an authorized judge, etc. (meaning an authorized judge, a commissioned judge, a judge who composes a mediation committee, or a judge of a family court handling a domestic relations case; the same applies in the proviso to paragraph (3) of the following Article) who has been challenged.
When the judicial decision set forth in paragraph (5) is made, the proceedings of the domestic relations case will not be stayed, notwithstanding the provisions of main clause of paragraph (4).
第五項の裁判をした場合には、第四項本文の規定にかかわらず、家事事件の手続は停止しない。
Article 12, paragraph (8)
No appeal may be entered against a judicial decision which finds that the disqualification or challenge is well-grounded.
除斥又は忌避を理由があるとする裁判に対しては、不服を申し立てることができない。
Article 12, paragraph (9)
An immediate appeal may be filed against a judicial decision to dismiss a motion for a disqualification or challenge.
除斥又は忌避の申立てを却下する裁判に対しては、即時抗告をすることができる。
Article 13第十三条
Disqualification and Challenge to Court Clerk(裁判所書記官の除斥及び忌避)
Article 13, paragraph (1)
With regard to disqualification and a challenge to a court clerk, the provisions of Article 10, Article 11, and paragraphs (3), (5), (8), and (9) of the preceding Article apply mutatis mutandis.
When a motion for disqualification or a challenge to a court clerk is filed, the court clerk may not participate in the domestic relations case in which the motion is filed until a judicial decision on the motion becomes final and binding; provided, however, that this does not apply if the motion for a challenge is denied on any of the grounds set forth in the items of paragraph (5) of the preceding Article as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the preceding paragraph.
A judicial decision of the disqualification or a challenge to a court clerk is to be made by the court to which the court clerk belongs; provided, however, that the judicial decision set forth in the proviso to the preceding paragraph may be made by an authorized judge, etc. (an authorized judge or commissioned judge may make such a decision only when a motion for a challenge is filed with regard to a court clerk who is to attend the proceedings handled by the judge).
Disqualification of and Challenge to Counselor(参与員の除斥及び忌避)
Article 14, paragraph (1)
With regard to disqualification and a challenge to a counselor, the provisions of Article 10, Article 11, and Article 12, paragraphs (2), (8), and (9) apply mutatis mutandis.
When a motion for disqualification or challenge to a counselor is filed, the counselor may not participate in the domestic relations case in which the motion is filed until a judicial decision on the motion becomes final and binding; provided, however, that this does not apply if the motion for a challenge is denied on any of the grounds set forth in the items of Article 12, paragraph (5).
A judicial decision of disqualification or a challenge to a counselor is to be made by the family court to which the counselor belongs:provided, however, that the judicial decision set forth in the proviso to the preceding paragraph may be made by an authorized judge (an authorized judge may make such a decision only when a motion for recusal is filed with regard to a counselor who is to attend the proceedings handled by the judge) or by a judge of a family court handling a domestic relations case.
Disqualification of and Challenge to Domestic Relations Mediator(家事調停官の除斥及び忌避)
Article 15, paragraph (1)
With regard to disqualification of and a challenge to a domestic relations mediator, the provisions of Article 10, Article 11, and Article 12, paragraphs (2) through (4), (8) and (9) apply mutatis mutandis.
When a motion for a challenge is denied on any of the grounds set forth in the items of Article 12, paragraph (5), the proceedings of the domestic relations case will not be stayed, notwithstanding the provisions of the main clause of paragraph (4) of the Article as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the preceding paragraph.
A judicial decision on the disqualification of or a challenge to a domestic relations mediator is to be made by the family court to which the domestic relations mediator belongs; provided, however, that the judicial decision set forth in the preceding paragraph may be made by a domestic relations mediator who has been challenged.
Disqualification of Family Court Investigating officer and Domestic Relations Mediation Commissioner(家庭裁判所調査官及び家事調停委員の除斥)
Article 16, paragraph (1)
With regard to the disqualification of a family court investigating officer and a domestic relations mediation commissioner, the provisions of Article 10, and Article 12, paragraphs (2), (8), and (9) (excluding the parts concerning a challenge) apply mutatis mutandis.
When a motion for disqualification of a family court investigating officer or domestic relations mediation commissioner is filed, the family court investigating officer or domestic relations mediation commissioner may not participate in the domestic relations case pertaining to the motion until a judicial decision on the motion becomes final and binding.
A judicial decision on the disqualification of a family court investigating officer or domestic relations mediation commissioner is to be made by the court to which the family court investigating officer or domestic relations mediation commissioner belongs.
The day a law or an amendment starts to apply. It is often months or years after promulgation, so that people have time to prepare. The Ministry of Justice's English usually says a law "comes into force" or "comes into effect", and sometimes calls the day its "enforcement date". Its "enforcement" more often means the word's other sense, carrying a law out, as in an Order for Enforcement (施行令), the Cabinet Order (政令) that sets out the details for carrying out an Act.
Rules made by the Cabinet to carry out the Constitution and Acts. A Cabinet Order cannot impose duties, restrict rights or set penalties unless an Act delegates that to it.
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
where a judge or the judge's spouse or a person who was the judge's spouse is a party to the case or any other person who is to be subject to adjudication (meaning a person who is to be subject to adjudication when a ruling is made (excluding a ruling to dismiss a petition); the same apply hereinafter), or is related to such party or person in relation to the case as a joint obligee, joint obligor, or obligor for redemtion;
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
If any of the grounds for disqualification prescribed in the preceding paragraph exist, the court make a judicial decision of disqualification upon petition or by its own authority.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
If there are circumstances with regard to a judge that would prejudice the impartiality of a judicial decision or conciliation, a party may challenge the judge.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
When a motion for disqualification or challenge is filed, the proceedings of the domestic relations case must be stayed until the case becomes final and binding; provided, however, that this does not apply to any urgent action.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraphs (1) and (2), the judicial decision set forth in the preceding paragraph may be made by an authorized judge, etc. (meaning an authorized judge, a commissioned judge, a judge who composes a conciliation committee, or a judge of a family court handling a domestic relations case; the same applies in the proviso to paragraph (3) of the following Article) who has been challenged.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
When a motion for disqualification or a challenge to a court clerk is filed, the court clerk may not participate in the domestic relations case pertaining to the underlying case until a judicial decision on the motion becomes final and binding; provided, however, that this does not apply if the motion for a challenge is denied on any of the grounds set forth in the items of paragraph (5) of the preceding Article as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the preceding paragraph.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
With regard to disqualification and a challenge to a counselor, the provisions of Article 10, Article 11, and Article 12, paragraphs (2), (8), and (9) applies mutatis mutandis.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
When a motion for disqualification or challenge to a counselor is filed, the counselor may not participate in the domestic relations case in which the motion is filed until the case becomes final and binding; provided, however, that this does not apply if the motion for a challenge is denied on any of the grounds set forth in the items of Article 12, paragraph (5).
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
With regard to disqualification of and a challenge to a domestic relations conciliator, the provisions of Article 10, Article 11, and Article 12, paragraphs (2) through (4), (8) and (9) apply mutatis mutandis.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
A judicial decision on the disqualification of or a challenge to a domestic relations conciliator is to be made by the family court to which the domestic relations conciliator belongs; provided, however, that the judicial decision set forth in the preceding paragraph may be made by a domestic relations conciliator who has been challenged.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
With regard to the disqualification of a family court investigating officer and a domestic relations conciliation commissioner, the provisions of Article 10, and Article 12, paragraphs (2), (8), and (9) (excluding the parts concerning a challenge) apply mutatis mutandis.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
When a motion for a challenge to a family court investigating officer or domestic relations conciliation commissioner is filed, the family court investigating officer or domestic relations conciliation commissioner may not participate in the domestic relations case pertaining to the motion until a judicial decision on the motion becomes final and binding.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
A judicial decision on the disqualification of a family court investigating officer or domestic relations conciliation commissioner is to be made by the court to which the family court investigating officer or domestic relations conciliation commissioner belongs.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)