Section 23 Adjudication Cases Prescribed in the Child Welfare Act
The law as Act on the Arrangement of Related Acts to Promote the Use of Information and Communications Technology in Civil Procedures, etc. (Act No. 53 of 2023) leaves it, with the words it changes marked.
The main text is read a page at a time: a chapter to a page, and a long chapter in runs of articles. The whole main text, and the supplementary provisions and appended tables this amendment changes. Those it leaves untouched are on the page for the text in force.
Section 23 Adjudication Cases Prescribed in the Child Welfare Act第二十三節 児童福祉法に規定する審判事件
Article 234第二百三十四条
Jurisdiction(管轄)
Article 234, paragraph (1)
An adjudication case for the approval of prefectural measures (meaning an adjudication case regarding matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (127); the same applies in the following Article), an adjudication case for the approval of a renewal of the period for a measure taken by a prefecture (meaning the adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in the Appended Table 1, row (128); the same applies in the Article), an adjudication case for approval of the director of the child guidance center or the prefectural governor for the subsequent temporary protection (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in the table, row (128-2); the same applies in the Article), and an adjudication case for confirmation of the eligibility for a special adoption upon petition by the director of the child guidance center (meaning an adjudication case for the matters in the table row (128-3); hereinafter the same applies in this Section) is under the jurisdiction of the family court that governs the address of the child.
The provisions of Article 118 apply mutatis mutandis to a person who actually cares for a child, a person who exercises parental authority over a child, a guardian of a minor, and a child in an adjudication case for the approval of a measure taken by a prefecture, an adjudication case for the approval of a renewal of the period for a measure taken by a prefecture, and an adjudication case for the approval of continued temporary custody by a child guidance center's director or prefectural governor, and to a child and the parents in an adjudication case for confirmation of eligibility for a special adoption upon petition by the director of a child guidance center.
When making a ruling on a petition for the approval of a measure taken by a prefecture, the approval of a renewal of the period for a measure taken by a prefecture, or the approval of continued temporary custody by a child guidance center's director or prefectural governor, the family court must hear statements from the persons prescribed in the preceding Article (in the case of a child, limited to a child of 15 years of age or older), except when the petition is unlawful or the petition is clearly groundless.
In the case referred to in the preceding paragraph, the family court may seek the opinion of the petitioner concerning the statements from a person who actually cares for a child, a person who exercises parental authority over a child, and a guardian of a minor.
The provisions of Article 164-2, paragraphs (6) and (8) apply mutatis mutandis to an adjudication case for confirmation of the eligibility for a special adoption upon petition by the director of a child guidance center.
Notice of a ruling on the approval of a measure taken by a prefecture, the approval of a renewal of the period for a measure taken by a prefecture, or the approval of continued temporary custody by a child guidance center's director, or prefectural governor must be given to a person who actually cares for a child, a person who exercises parental authority over a child, and a guardian of a minor, beyond the persons prescribed in Article 74, paragraph (1).
The provisions of Article 164-2, paragraphs (9) through (11), apply mutatis mutandis to an adjudication case for confirmation of the eligibility for a special adoption upon petition by the director of a child guidance center.
An immediate appeal may be filed against the rulings set forth in the following items by the persons specified respectively in these items:
次の各号に掲げる審判に対しては、当該各号に定める者は、即時抗告をすることができる。
Article 238, paragraph (1), item (i)
a ruling of the approval of a measure taken by a prefecture:a person who actually cares for a child, a person who exercises parental authority over a child, and a guardian of a minor;
a ruling to dismiss a petition for the approval of a measure taken by a prefecture:the petitioner;
都道府県の措置についての承認の申立てを却下する審判 申立人
Article 238, paragraph (1), item (iii)
a ruling of the approval of a renewal of the period for a measure taken by a prefecture:a person who actually cares for a child, a person who exercises parental authority over a child, and a guardian of a minor;
a ruling to dismiss a petition for the approval of a renewal of the period for a measure taken by a prefecture:the petitioner;
都道府県の措置の期間の更新についての承認の申立てを却下する審判 申立人
Article 238, paragraph (1), item (v)
a ruling of the approval of continued temporary custody by a child guidance center's director or prefectural governor:a person who actually cares for a child, a person who exercises parental authority over a child, and a guardian of a minor; and
a ruling to dismiss a petition for the approval of continued temporary custody by a child guidance center's director or prefectural governor:the petitioner.
児童相談所長又は都道府県知事の引き続いての一時保護についての承認の申立てを却下する審判 申立人
Article 238, paragraph (2)
The provisions of Article 164-2, paragraphs (12) and (13) apply mutatis mutandis to an adjudication case for confirmation of the eligibility for a special adoption upon petition by the director of a child guidance center.
Special Rules for a Ruling to Confirm the Eligibility for a Special Adoption upon Petition of the Director of Child Guidance Center(児童相談所長の申立てによる特別養子適格の確認の審判の特則)
Article 239, paragraph (1)
The family court may not, by the day on which two months have elapsed from the date of birth of a child and after the day of the child's reaching 18 years of age, make a ruling upon petition by the director of a child guidance center to confirm the eligibility of a special adoption.
The provisions of Article 164-2, paragraph (5) apply mutatis mutandis to a petition made by the director of a child guidance center for an adjudication case for confirmation of the eligibility for a special adoption.
The day a law or an amendment starts to apply. It is often months or years after promulgation, so that people have time to prepare. The Ministry of Justice's English usually says a law "comes into force" or "comes into effect", and sometimes calls the day its "enforcement date". Its "enforcement" more often means the word's other sense, carrying a law out, as in an Order for Enforcement (施行令), the Cabinet Order (政令) that sets out the details for carrying out an Act.
Rules made by the Cabinet to carry out the Constitution and Acts. A Cabinet Order cannot impose duties, restrict rights or set penalties unless an Act delegates that to it.
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
An adjudication case for the approval of prefectural measures (meaning an adjudication case regarding matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (127); the same applies in the following Article), an adjudication case for the approval of a renewal of the period for a measure taken by a prefecture (meaning the adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in the Appended Table 1, row (128); the same applies in the Article), an adjudication case for approval of the director of the child guidance office or the prefectural governor for the subsequent temporary protection (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in the table, row (128-2); the same applies in the Article), and an adjudication case for confirmation of the eligibility for a special adoption upon petition by the director of the child guidance center (meaning an adjudication case for the matters in the table row (128-3); hereinafter the same applies in the following Article) is under the jurisdiction of the family court that governs the address of the child.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
The provisions of Article 164-2, paragraphs (6) and (8) applies mutatis mutandis to an adjudication case for confirmation of the eligibility for a special adoption upon petition by the director of a child guidance center.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
The provisions of Article 164-2, paragraphs 9 through 11, apply mutatis mutandis to an adjudication case for confirmation of the eligibility for a special adoption upon petition by the director of a child guidance center.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)