Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

This text is not in force yetIt by 13 June 2028, on a day set by — at the latest in 2 years

Read the text in force →

Civil Enforcement Act

民事執行法(みんじしっこうほう)

Section 2 Judicial Enforcement of Claims for Payment of Money (Articles 167-13 to 167-17)

The law as Act on the Arrangement of Related Acts to Promote the Use of Information and Communications Technology in Civil Procedures, etc. (Act No. 53 of 2023) leaves it, with the words it changes marked.

The main text is read a page at a time: a chapter to a page, and a long chapter in runs of articles. The whole main text, and the supplementary provisions and appended tables this amendment changes. Those it leaves untouched are on the page for the text in force.

Article 167-13第百六十七条の十三

Application of the General Provisions(総則規定の適用関係)
1 change in this article
Article 167-13, paragraph (1)(総則規定の適用関係)(Application of the General Provisions)Changed

To apply the provisions of Chapter I and Chapter II, Section 1 to enforcement against a claim arising from a small claims action, the phrase "proceedings that take place in theprocedures with an enforcement court" in Article 13, paragraph (1) is deemed to be replaced with "proceedingsprocedures for enforcement against a claim arising from a small claims action prescribed in Article 167-2, paragraph (2)",," the term "enforcement court" in Article 16, paragraph (1) is deemed to be replaced with "court clerk",," the phrase "civil enforcement carried out by an enforcement court" in Article 17 , paragraph (1), Article 17-2, paragraphs (1) through (3), and Article 17-3 is deemed to be replaced with "the enforcement against a claim arising from a small claims action prescribed in Article 167-2, paragraph (2)",," the phrase "the enforcement court or court enforcement officer" in Article 40, paragraph (1) is deemed to be replaced with "the court clerk",," and the phrase "a court clerk of the enforcement court" in Article 42, paragraph (4) is deemed to be replaced with "a court clerk".."

少額訴訟債権執行についての第一章及び第二章第一節の規定の適用については、第十三条第一項中「執行裁判所でする手続」とあるのは「第百六十七条の二第二項に規定する少額訴訟債権執行の手続」と、第十六条第一項中「執行裁判所」とあるのは「裁判所書記官」と、第十七条第一項、第十七条の二第一項から第三項まで及び第十七条の三中「執行裁判所の行う民事執行」とあるのは「第百六十七条の二第二項に規定する少額訴訟債権執行」と、第四十条第一項中「執行裁判所又は執行官」とあるのは「裁判所書記官」と、第四十二条第四項中「執行裁判所の裁判所書記官」とあるのは「裁判所書記官」とする。

Article 167-14第百六十七条の十四

Application Mutatis Mutandis of the Provisions on Enforcement Against Claims(債権執行の規定の準用)
Article 167-14, paragraph (1)

The provisions of Articles 146 through 152, Article 155, Article 156 (excluding paragraph (3)), Article 157, Article 158, Article 164, paragraphs (5) and (6), and Article 165 (excluding items (iii) and (iv)) apply mutatis mutandis to enforcement against a claim arising from a small claims action. In this case, the term "enforcement court" in Article 146, Article 155, paragraphs (4) through (6) and (8) and Article 156, paragraph (4) is deemed to be replaced with "court clerk", the phrase "issue an order of seizure" in Article 146, paragraph (1) is deemed to be replaced with "make a disposition of seizure", the term "order of seizure" in Article 147, paragraph (1), Article 148, paragraph (2), Article 150, Article 155, paragraphs (1), (6) and (7) and Article 156, paragraph (1) is deemed to be replaced with "disposition of seizure", the phrase "claim subject to a seizure" in Article 147, paragraph (1) and Article 148, paragraph (1) is deemed to be replaced with "monetary claim subject to a seizure", the phrase "an order of seizure is issued" in Article 149 is deemed to be replaced with "a disposition of seizure is made", the phrases "a judicial decision" and "the decision" in Article 155, paragraph (7) are deemed to be replaced with "a disposition by a court clerk" and "the disposition by a court clerk" respectively, the phrase "an order setting aside the order of seizure" in Article 164, paragraph (5) is deemed to be replaced with "an order setting aside the disposition of seizure or a disposition by a court clerk setting aside the disposition of seizure", and the term "distribution or payment" in Article 165 (including the caption) is deemed to be replaced with "delivery of payment money".

第百四十六条から第百五十二条まで、第百五十五条、第百五十六条(第三項を除く。)、第百五十七条、第百五十八条、第百六十四条第五項及び第六項並びに第百六十五条(第三号及び第四号を除く。)の規定は、少額訴訟債権執行について準用する。この場合において、第百四十六条、第百五十五条第四項から第六項まで及び第八項並びに第百五十六条第四項中「執行裁判所」とあるのは「裁判所書記官」と、第百四十六条第一項中「差押命令を発する」とあるのは「差押処分をする」と、第百四十七条第一項、第百四十八条第二項、第百五十条、第百五十五条第一項、第六項及び第七項並びに第百五十六条第一項中「差押命令」とあるのは「差押処分」と、第百四十七条第一項及び第百四十八条第一項中「差押えに係る債権」とあるのは「差押えに係る金銭債権」と、第百四十九条中「差押命令が発せられたとき」とあるのは「差押処分がされたとき」と、第百五十五条第七項中「決定」とあるのは「裁判所書記官の処分」と、第百六十四条第五項中「差押命令の取消決定」とあるのは「差押処分の取消決定若しくは差押処分を取り消す旨の裁判所書記官の処分」と、第百六十五条(見出しを含む。)中「配当等」とあるのは「弁済金の交付」と読み替えるものとする。

Article 167-14, paragraph (2)

The provisions of Article 167-5, paragraphs (6) through (8) apply mutatis mutandis to cases where a disposition is made by a court clerk under Article 155, paragraph (6) which is replaced and applied mutatis mutandis in the preceding paragraph.

第百六十七条の五第六項から第八項までの規定は、前項において読み替えて準用する第百五十五条第六項の規定による裁判所書記官の処分がされた場合について準用する。

Subsection 5 Special Provisions on Judicial Enforcement for a Monetary Claim Related to Duty to Support第五款 扶養義務等に係る金銭債権についての強制執行の特例

Article 167-15第百六十七条の十五

Indirect Judicial Enforcement for a Monetary Claim Related to Duty to Support(扶養義務等に係る金銭債権についての間接強制)
Article 167-15, paragraph (1)

Judicial enforcement for a monetary claim related to any of the duties stated in the items of Article 151-2, paragraph (1) is carried out pursuant to the provisions of the preceding Subsections, and also, when a petition has been filed by the obligee, is carried out by the enforcement court by the method prescribed in Article 172, paragraph (1); provided, however, that this does not apply when the obligor is unable to perform the obligation related to that monetary claim due to a lack of the ability to pay or when the obligor is to fall into extreme poverty through performance of the obligation.

第百五十一条の二第一項各号に掲げる義務に係る金銭債権についての強制執行は、前各款の規定により行うほか、債権者の申立てがあるときは、執行裁判所が第百七十二条第一項に規定する方法により行う。ただし、債務者が、支払能力を欠くためにその金銭債権に係る債務を弁済することができないとき、又はその債務を弁済することによつてその生活が著しく窮迫するときは、この限りでない。

Article 167-15, paragraph (2)

In the case of carrying out judicial enforcement for the monetary claim prescribed in the preceding paragraph pursuant to the provisions of the paragraph by the method prescribed in Article 172, paragraph (1), the enforcement court must, when determining the amount of money to be paid by the obligor to the obligee, particularly take into account the disadvantages to be incurred by the obligee through default of the obligation and the financial resources of the obligor and the mode of their performance of the obligation in the past.

前項の規定により同項に規定する金銭債権について第百七十二条第一項に規定する方法により強制執行を行う場合において、債務者が債権者に支払うべき金銭の額を定めるに当たつては、執行裁判所は、債務不履行により債権者が受けるべき不利益並びに債務者の資力及び従前の債務の履行の態様を特に考慮しなければならない。

Article 167-15, paragraph (3)

When there has been a change in circumstances, an enforcement court may, upon petition by the obligor, set aside an order under paragraph (1) retroactively as of the time when that petition is filed (or, if there is a change in circumstances after that petition is filed, the time of the change in circumstances).

事情の変更があつたときは、執行裁判所は、債務者の申立てにより、その申立てがあつた時(その申立てがあつた後に事情の変更があつたときは、その事情の変更があつた時)までさかのぼつて、第一項の規定による決定を取り消すことができる。

Article 167-15, paragraph (4)

When the petition referred to in the preceding paragraph has been filed, an enforcement court may order a stay of enforcement for an order under paragraph (1) until a judicial decision on the petition becomes effective, while either requiring or not requiring security to be provided.

前項の申立てがあつたときは、執行裁判所は、その裁判が効力を生ずるまでの間、担保を立てさせ、又は立てさせないで、第一項の規定による決定の執行の停止を命ずることができる。

Article 167-15, paragraph (5)

No appeal may be entered against an order under the preceding paragraph.

前項の規定による決定に対しては、不服を申し立てることができない。

Article 167-15, paragraph (6)

The provisions of Article 172, paragraph (2) through (5) apply mutatis mutandis to the case referred to in paragraph (1), the provisions of paragraph (3) and paragraph (5) of that Article apply mutatis mutandis to the case referred to in paragraph (3), and the provisions of Article 173, paragraph (2) apply mutatis mutandis to the enforcement court referred to in paragraph (1).

第百七十二条第二項から第五項までの規定は第一項の場合について、同条第三項及び第五項の規定は第三項の場合について、第百七十三条第二項の規定は第一項の執行裁判所について準用する。

Article 167-16第百六十七条の十六

Special Provisions on Cases of Enforcing a Claim for Periodic Payments Related to Duty to Support(扶養義務等に係る定期金債権を請求する場合の特例)
Article 167-16, paragraph (1)

If the obligee has a claim for periodic payments with provisions on fixed due dates related to any of the duties stated in the items of Article 151-2, paragraph (1), if any part of the claim is in default, judicial enforcement by the method prescribed in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article may be commenced even for the portion of the claim for periodic payments for which the fixed due date is to arrive within six months, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 30, paragraph (1).

債権者が第百五十一条の二第一項各号に掲げる義務に係る確定期限の定めのある定期金債権を有する場合において、その一部に不履行があるときは、第三十条第一項の規定にかかわらず、当該定期金債権のうち六月以内に確定期限が到来するものについても、前条第一項に規定する方法による強制執行を開始することができる。

Article 167-17第百六十七条の十七

Special Provisions on Petitions for Asset Disclosure Procedures, etc. Based on a Claim Related to Duty to Support(扶養義務等に係る債権に基づく財産開示手続等の申立ての特例)
2 changes in this article
Article 167-17, paragraph (1)(扶養義務等に係る債権に基づく財産開示手続等の申立ての特例)

If an obligee who has an authenticated copy of an enforceable title of obligation on a claim related to the obligations stated in the items of Article 151-2, paragraph (1) has filed a petition stated in any of the following items, the obligee is deemed to have filed the petition provided for in that item at the same time as that petition; provided, however, that this does not apply if the obligee has expressed a contrary intention at the time of filing the petition stated in that item.

第百五十一条の二第一項各号に掲げる義務に係る請求権について執行力のある債務名義の正本を有する債権者が次の各号に掲げる申立てをした場合には、当該申立てと同時に、当該各号に定める申立てをしたものとみなす。ただし、当該債権者が当該各号に掲げる申立ての際に反対の意思を表示したときは、この限りでない。

Article 167-17, paragraph (1), item (i)(扶養義務等に係る債権に基づく財産開示手続等の申立ての特例)

a petition under Article 197, paragraph (1): a petition for an order of seizure against a claim (limited to a claim prescribed in the items of Article 206, paragraph (1)) disclosed by the obligor (or, if the obligor has a statutory agent, the statutory agent) in the procedure related to that petition, or against a claim whose information has been provided pursuant to the provisions of the following paragraph;

第百九十七条第一項の申立て 当該申立てに係る手続において債務者(債務者に法定代理人がある場合にあつては、当該法定代理人)が開示した債権(第二百六条第一項各号に規定する債権に限る。)又は次項の規定によりその情報が提供された債権に対する差押命令の申立て

Article 167-17, paragraph (1), item (ii)(扶養義務等に係る債権に基づく財産開示手続等の申立ての特例)

a petition under Article 206, paragraph (1): a petition for an order of seizure against a claim prescribed in the items of that paragraph whose information has been provided by a person stated in the items of that paragraph in the procedure related to that petition.

第二百六条第一項の申立て 当該申立てに係る手続において同項各号に掲げる者がその情報を提供した同項各号に規定する債権に対する差押命令の申立て

Article 167-17, paragraph (2)(扶養義務等に係る債権に基づく財産開示手続等の申立ての特例)

In the case prescribed in the preceding paragraph (limited to the case where a petition stated in item (i) of that paragraph has been filed), if the obligor (or, if the obligor has a statutory agent, the statutory agent) who was summoned by the enforcement court does not disclose their property, the enforcement court must, except where the obligee has expressed a different intention, order the municipality (including special wards; the same applies in Article 206, paragraph (1), item (i)) in which the obligor's address is located to provide information on the matters specified in that item.

前項に規定する場合(同項第一号に掲げる申立てをした場合に限る。)において、執行裁判所の呼出しを受けた債務者(債務者に法定代理人がある場合にあつては、当該法定代理人)がその財産を開示しなかつたときは、債権者が別段の意思を表示した場合を除き、執行裁判所は、債務者の住所のある市町村(特別区を含む。第二百六条第一項第一号において同じ。)に対し、同号に定める事項について情報の提供をすべき旨を命じなければならない。

Article 167-17, paragraph (3)(扶養義務等に係る債権に基づく財産開示手続等の申立ての特例)

The provisions of Article 205, paragraphs (3) through (5) apply mutatis mutandis to a judicial decision under the preceding paragraph, and the provisions of Article 208 apply mutatis mutandis to the provision of information ordered by that judicial decision, respectively.

第二百五条第三項から第五項までの規定は前項の規定による裁判について、第二百八条の規定は当該裁判により命じられた情報の提供について、それぞれ準用する。

Article 167-17, paragraph (4)(扶養義務等に係る債権に基づく財産開示手続等の申立ての特例)Special Provisions on Petitions for Asset Disclosure Procedures, etc. Based on a Claim Related to Duty to SupportChanged

A request under Article 17, paragraph (1), under Article 91, paragraph (4) of the Code of Civil Procedure as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17, paragraph (2), and under Article 17-2, paragraphs (1) through (3) and Article 17-3 regarding the portion of the record of an asset disclosure case that relates to the provision of information under Article 208, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the preceding paragraph may be made only by the following persons:

財産開示事件の記録中前項において準用する第二百八条第一項の情報の提供に関する部分についての第十七条第一項の規定、同条第二項において準用する民事訴訟法第九十一条第四項の規定並びに第十七条の二第一項から第三項まで及び第十七条の三の規定による請求は、次に掲げる者に限り、することができる。

Article 167-17, paragraph (4), item (i)(扶養義務等に係る債権に基づく財産開示手続等の申立ての特例)

the petitioner;

申立人

Article 167-17, paragraph (4), item (ii)(扶養義務等に係る債権に基づく財産開示手続等の申立ての特例)

obligee having an authenticated copy of an enforceable title of obligation on a claim related to the obligations stated in the items of Article 151-2, paragraph (1) or a right to demand compensation for damage for infringement on human life or body from an obligor;

債務者に対する第百五十一条の二第一項各号に掲げる義務に係る請求権又は人の生命若しくは身体の侵害による損害賠償請求権について執行力のある債務名義の正本を有する債権者

Article 167-17, paragraph (4), item (iii)(扶養義務等に係る債権に基づく財産開示手続等の申立ての特例)Special Provisions on Petitions for Asset Disclosure Procedures, etc. Based on a Claim Related to Duty to SupportChanged

obligee who has submitted a document or electronic or magnetic record proving that the obligeeit has a general statutory lien (limited to one pertaining to Article 306, item (iii) of the Civil Code) for property of thean obligor;

債務者の財産について一般の先取特権(民法第三百六条第三号に係るものに限る。)を有することを証する文書又は電磁的記録を提出した債権者

Article 167-17, paragraph (4), item (iv)(扶養義務等に係る債権に基づく財産開示手続等の申立ての特例)

obligor; or

債務者

Article 167-17, paragraph (4), item (v)(扶養義務等に係る債権に基づく財産開示手続等の申立ての特例)

person who has provided the information.

当該情報の提供をした者

Article 167-17, paragraph (5)(扶養義務等に係る債権に基づく財産開示手続等の申立ての特例)

The provisions of Article 210, paragraph (2) apply mutatis mutandis to a person stated in item (ii) or (iii) of the preceding paragraph who has obtained information on the portion of the record of an asset disclosure case that relates to the provision of information under Article 208, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (3).

第二百十条第二項の規定は、前項第二号又は第三号に掲げる者であつて、財産開示事件の記録中の第三項において準用する第二百八条第一項の情報の提供に関する部分の情報を得たものについて準用する。

Article 167-17, paragraph (6)(扶養義務等に係る債権に基づく財産開示手続等の申立ての特例)

If a petition for an order of seizure against a claim is deemed to have been filed pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1), and the enforcement court is still unable to specify the claim to be seized even after carrying out the procedure on the asset disclosure date prescribed in Article 197, paragraph (3) or making a judicial decision under paragraph (2) or Article 206, paragraph (1), the enforcement court may specify a reasonable period and order the obligee to make, within that period, a proposal of the matters necessary for specifying the claim to be seized. In this case, if the obligee does not make a proposal of the matters necessary for specifying the claim to be seized within that period, the petition for an order of seizure is deemed to have been withdrawn.

第一項の規定により債権に対する差押命令の申立てがされたものとみなされた場合において、執行裁判所が第百九十七条第三項に規定する財産開示期日における手続の実施又は第二項若しくは第二百六条第一項の規定による裁判をしてもなお差し押さえるべき債権を特定することができないときは、執行裁判所は、債権者に対し、相当の期間を定め、その期間内に差し押さえるべき債権を特定するために必要な事項の申出をすべきことを命ずることができる。この場合において、債権者がその期間内に差し押さえるべき債権を特定するために必要な事項の申出をしないときは、差押命令の申立ては、取り下げたものとみなす。

Change 1 of 3
© 2026 japanlaw.orgA copy for reading and reference — not an official source, and not legal advice. Only the Japanese text published by the government has legal effect.Run by Genjido LLC (Genjido 合同会社) · [email protected]ContactSourcesTermsPrivacy