1 article
Article 778-3Restriction on Reimbursement of Costs Required for Child Custody
第七百七十八条の三（子の監護に要した費用の償還の制限）
Even if the presumption of the child in wedlock is rebutted pursuant to the provisions of Article 774, the child is not obligated to reimburse the costs required for the custody of the child that were expended by the person who was the father.
第七百七十四条の規定により嫡出であることが否認された場合であっても、子は、父であった者が支出した子の監護に要した費用を償還する義務を負わない。
This names a provision as it read when this amending Act was made. It may have been amended since, so today's text can say something else. That is why it is not a link.This names a law that is not in this collection, so there is nothing here to open.We could not tell which provision this names, so it is not a link.