If, with respect to a child whose father was determined pursuant to the provisions of Article 772, paragraph (3), the presumption that the child is the father's child in wedlock has been rebutted pursuant to the provisions of Article 774, an action to rebut the presumption of the child in wedlock pertaining to the exercise of a right to rebut the presumption set forth in each of the following items must, notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding Article, be filed within one year from the time specified respectively in those items.
第七百七十二条第三項の規定により父が定められた子について第七百七十四条の規定により嫡出であることが否認されたときは、次の各号に掲げる否認権の行使に係る嫡出否認の訴えは、前条の規定にかかわらず、それぞれ当該各号に定める時から一年以内に提起しなければならない。
the right to rebut the presumption of a person newly determined to be the father of the child pursuant to the provisions of Article 772, paragraph (3) as replaced pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (4) of that Article: the time when the person newly determined to be the father of the child learns that the judgment to rebut the presumption of the child in wedlock concerning that child has become final and binding;
第七百七十二条第四項の規定により読み替えられた同条第三項の規定により新たに子の父と定められた者の否認権 新たに子の父と定められた者が当該子に係る嫡出否認の裁判が確定したことを知った時
the child's right to rebut the presumption: the time when the child learns that the judgment referred to in the preceding item has become final and binding;
子の否認権 子が前号の裁判が確定したことを知った時
the mother's right to rebut the presumption: the time when the mother learns that the judgment referred to in item (i) has become final and binding;
母の否認権 母が第一号の裁判が確定したことを知った時
the former husband's right to rebut the presumption: the time when the former husband learns that the judgment referred to in item (i) has become final and binding.