Supplementary Provisions, Article 8Transitional Measures Concerning Trial Examiners
第八条（審判官に関する経過措置）
Until the affairs relating to the trial proceedings for which the provisions then in force continue to govern pursuant to Articles 2 through 4 of the Supplementary Provisions are completed, in the application of Article 35, paragraph (3) of the New Act, the phrase "administrative affairs" in that paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "administrative affairs (excluding affairs that the Japan Fair Trade Commission has had trial examiners it designated carry out, through the procedure for designating trial examiners for which the provisions then in force continue to govern pursuant to Articles 2 through 4 of the Supplementary Provisions of the Act Partially Amending the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (Act No. 100 of 2013))".
附則第二条から第四条までの規定によりなお従前の例によることとされる審判手続に係る事務が終了するまでの間は、新法第三十五条第三項の規定の適用については、同項中「局務」とあるのは、「局務（私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律の一部を改正する法律（平成二十五年法律第百号）附則第二条から第四条までの規定によりなお従前の例によることとされる審判官の指定の手続により、公正取引委員会が審判官を指定して行わせることとした事務を除く。）」とする。
The provisions of Article 35, paragraphs (7) through (9) of the Former Act remain in force until the affairs relating to the trial proceedings for which the provisions then in force continue to govern pursuant to Articles 2 through 4 of the Supplementary Provisions are completed.
旧法第三十五条第七項から第九項までの規定は、附則第二条から第四条までの規定によりなお従前の例によることとされる審判手続に係る事務が終了するまでの間は、なおその効力を有する。
the Former Actmachine translation
「旧法」
This Act as it stood before Act No. 100 of 2013 amended it.
Short name set inSupplementary Provisions, Article 2, paragraph (1)
the New Actmachine translation
「新法」
This Act as amended by Act No. 100 of 2013.
Short name set inSupplementary Provisions, Article 5, paragraph (1)
Fair Trade Commission
公正取引委員会
The body the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (独占禁止法, the Antimonopoly Act) sets up to achieve that Act's purpose — among other things, to promote fair and free competition by banning private monopolization, unreasonable restraint of trade and unfair trade practices, and so to protect the interests of general consumers and the democratic and sound development of the national economy (Antimonopoly Act, Articles 1 and 27, paragraph (1)). It comes under the Prime Minister's jurisdiction, but its chairperson and four commissioners — appointed by the Prime Minister with the consent of both Houses of the Diet — exercise their authority independently (Articles 27, paragraph (2), 28 and 29). Under the Act against Unjustifiable Premiums and Misleading Representations, businesses and trade associations may, with the approval of both the Prime Minister and the Fair Trade Commission, conclude or set agreements or rules (協定又は規約) on premiums or representations (Article 36, paragraph (1)).
Written by AI using Antimonopoly Act, Arts. 1, 27, 28, 29 and Act against Unjustifiable Premiums and Misleading Representations, Art. 36 as a reference.