Article 165-5Exclusion of Allocated Expenses from Necessary Expenses If Documents on Allocated Expenses Are Not Retained
第百六十五条の五(配賦経費に関する書類の保存がない場合における配賦経費の必要経費不算入)
If a Nonresident is subject to the provisions of Article 165, paragraph (2), item (ii) (Calculation of the Tax Base and Amount of Income Taxes Imposed on Aggregate Income), and documents used as the basis for calculating the allocation and other documents prescribed by Ministry of Finance Order are not retained with regard to the amount allocated pursuant to Cabinet Order as prescribed in that item (hereinafter referred to as "allocated expenses" in this Article), the allocated expenses for which those documents were not retained are not included in necessary expenses or the amount expended in calculating the Nonresident's real property income, business income, timber income, or miscellaneous income, or occasional income for each year, calculated in accordance with Article 165, paragraph (1) with regard to the Nonresident's income attributable to a permanent establishment for that year.
非居住者が第百六十五条第二項第二号(総合課税に係る所得税の課税標準、税額等の計算)の規定の適用を受ける場合において、同号に規定する政令で定めるところにより配分した金額(以下この条において「配賦経費」という。)につき、その配分に関する計算の基礎となる書類その他の財務省令で定める書類の保存がないときは、その書類の保存がなかつた配賦経費については、その非居住者の各年分の恒久的施設帰属所得につき第百六十五条第一項の規定により準じて計算する不動産所得の金額、事業所得の金額、山林所得の金額若しくは雑所得の金額又は一時所得の金額の計算上、必要経費又は支出した金額に算入しない。
Even if the documents referred to in the preceding paragraph have not been retained with regard to all or part of the allocated expenses, the district director may decide not to apply the provisions of that paragraph to the allocated expenses for which those documents were not retained, if the district director finds that there were unavoidable circumstances for the failure to retain them, but only if those documents are submitted.
Read this with the articles around it
Nonresident
「非居住者」
An individual who is not a resident.
Defined inArticle 2, paragraph (1), item (v)· applies throughout the law
income taxes imposed on aggregate incomemachine translation
「総合課税に係る所得税」
The income tax levied on the domestic source income of the nonresidents listed in Article 164, paragraph (1), worked out broadly as for residents.
Short name set inArticle 165, paragraph (1)· applies only in this section
income attributable to a permanent establishmentmachine translation
「恒久的施設帰属所得」
The domestic source income (国内源泉所得) of a nonresident with a permanent establishment in Japan listed in Article 164, paragraph (1), item (i), (a): income attributable to the permanent establishment (Article 161, paragraph (1), item (i)) and profits distributed under a partnership contract (組合契約) from a business carried on through a permanent establishment (Article 161, paragraph (1), item (iv)).
Short name set inArticle 165, paragraph (2)· applies only in this subsection
allocated expensesmachine translation
「配賦経費」
Expenses shared between a nonresident's business through its permanent establishment in Japan and its other business, allocated to the permanent establishment as a Cabinet Order (政令) sets under Article 165, paragraph (2), item (ii); they can be deducted only if the documents behind the allocation are kept.
Short name set inArticle 165-5, paragraph (1)· applies only in this article
district director
税務署長
The head of a tax office (税務署), the local office of the National Tax Agency that deals with taxpayers in its district (Act for Establishment of the Ministry of Finance, Article 24). It is the office a person usually deals with: an income tax return is filed with a district director (Income Tax Act, Article 120, paragraph (1)), and reassessments, determinations and the collection of national tax are done by the district director for the taxpayer's current place for tax payment (Act on General Rules for National Taxes, Articles 30 and 43). A person who objects to what a district director has decided can ask that director to look at it again (再調査の請求) or go straight to the National Tax Tribunal (Article 75, paragraph (1), item (i)) — unless the notice of the decision says officials of a Regional Taxation Bureau or of the National Tax Agency investigated, in which case it counts as the regional commissioner's decision, with the same choice, or as the Commissioner of the National Tax Agency's, which can only be challenged by a request for review to the Commissioner (Article 75, paragraph (2)).
Written by AI using Act for Establishment of the Ministry of Finance, Art. 24, Act on General Rules for National Taxes, Arts. 30, 43, 75 and Income Tax Act, Art. 120 as a reference.