Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

This text is not in force yetIt on 1 April 2027, in 5 months

Read the text in force →

Act on Proper Technical Intern Training and Protection of Technical Intern Trainees

外国人の技能実習の適正な実施及び技能実習生の保護に関する法律(がいこくじんのぎのうじっしゅうのてきせいなじっしおよびぎのうじっしゅうせいのほごにかんするほうりつ)

Chapter II Employment-for-Skill-Development (Articles 9-3 to 12-2)

The law as Act Partially Amending the Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act and the Act on Proper Technical Intern Training and Protection of Technical Intern Trainees (Act No. 60 of 2024) leaves it, with the words it changes marked.

The main text is read a page at a time: a chapter to a page, and a long chapter in runs of articles. The whole main text, and the supplementary provisions and appended tables this amendment changes. Those it leaves untouched are on the page for the text in force.

Article 9-3第九条の三Caption added

Accreditation Criteria under Article 8-6, paragraph (1)

第八条の六第一項の認定の基準

6 changes in this article
Article 9-3, paragraph (1)(第八条の六第一項の認定の基準)(Accreditation Criteria under Article 8-6, paragraph (1))Added

When an application for accreditation as provided for in Article 8-6, paragraph (1) has been made, and the Commissioner of the Immigration Services Agency and the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare find that the applied employment-for-skill-development plan conforms to all of the following items, they are to accredit that plan provided, however, that when an unavoidable circumstance provided for in order of the competent ministries is found for engaging the skill development employee in the duties requiring skills that are not the same as those specified in the previous accredited employment-for-skill-development plan or the operations requiring skills in the employment-for-skill-development industrial fields that are not the same as the employment-for-skill-development industrial fields specified in the previous accredited employment-for-skill-development plan when the fact referred to in paragraph (2), item (v), subitem (a) of the same Article is found, the period referred to in subitem (b) of the same item does not exceed two years, and the fact referred to in subitem (c) of the same item is not found, the plan is not required to conform to item (iii).

出入国在留管理庁長官及び厚生労働大臣は、第八条の六第一項の認定の申請があった場合において、その育成就労計画が次の各号のいずれにも適合するものであると認めるときは、その認定をするものとする。ただし、同条第二項第五号イの事実があり、同号ロの期間が二年を超えず、同号ハの事実がない場合において、従前の認定育成就労計画に定められていた技能と同一でない技能を要する業務又は従前の認定育成就労計画に定められていた育成就労産業分野と同一でない育成就労産業分野に属する技能を要する業務に従事させることについて主務省令で定めるやむを得ない事情があると認められるときは、第三号に適合することを要しない。

Article 9-3, paragraph (1), item (i)(第八条の六第一項の認定の基準)(Accreditation Criteria under Article 8-6, paragraph (1))Added

the plan conforms to all of the items (excluding item (iii)) of Article 9, paragraph (1) (or, in the case of Article 8, paragraph (2) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 8-6, paragraph (1), the items of Article 9, paragraph (2) (or, in the case of item (i), excluding the parts relating to paragraph (1), item (iii) of the same Article));

第九条第一項各号(第三号を除く。)(第八条の六第一項において準用する第八条第二項の場合にあっては、第九条第二項各号(第一号にあっては、同条第一項第三号に係る部分を除く。))のいずれにも該当すること。

Article 9-3, paragraph (1), item (ii)(第八条の六第一項の認定の基準)(Accreditation Criteria under Article 8-6, paragraph (1))Added

the aggregate employment-for-skill-development period is a maximum of three years (or, when the employment-for-skill-development period is extended pursuant to the provision of Article 11, paragraph (1), a maximum of four years), including the period set forth in Article 8-6, paragraph (2), item (iv);

育成就労の期間が、第八条の六第二項第四号の期間と通算して三年以内(第十一条第一項の規定により育成就労の期間が延長されている場合にあっては、四年以内)であること。

Article 9-3, paragraph (1), item (iii)(第八条の六第一項の認定の基準)(Accreditation Criteria under Article 8-6, paragraph (1))Added

the plan conforms to both of the following (a) and (b);

次のイ及びロのいずれにも適合すること。

Article 9-3, paragraph (1), item (iii), (a)(第八条の六第一項の認定の基準)(Accreditation Criteria under Article 8-6, paragraph (1))Added

the skills required for the duties to be conducted and the employment-for-skill-development industrial fields related to those skills are the same as those specified in the previous accredited employment-for-skill-development plan; and

従事させる業務において要する技能及び当該技能の属する育成就労産業分野が従前の認定育成就労計画に定められていたものとそれぞれ同一であること。

Article 9-3, paragraph (1), item (iii), (b)(第八条の六第一項の認定の基準)(Accreditation Criteria under Article 8-6, paragraph (1))Added

it is found that there is an unavoidable circumstance as provided for in order of the competent ministries for newly providing employment for skill development for foreign national relevant to the applicant who is no longer the subject of employment for skill development.

当該申請に係る育成就労の対象でなくなった外国人を対象として新たに育成就労を行わせることについて主務省令で定めるやむを得ない事情があると認められること。

Article 10第十条

Reasons for Not Qualifying for Accreditation(認定の欠格事由)
5 changes in this article
Article 10, paragraph (1)(認定の欠格事由)(Reasons for Not Qualifying for Accreditation)Changed

If a person falls under any of the following items, that person is not able to obtain the accreditation set forth under Article 8, paragraph (1); Article 8-5, paragraph (1), and Article 8-6, paragraph (1):

次の各号のいずれかに該当する者は、第八条第一項、第八条の五第一項及び第八条の六第一項の認定を受けることができない。

Article 10, paragraph (1), item (i)(認定の欠格事由)

a person who has been sentenced to imprisonment or a heavier punishment, and for whom five years have not yet passed since the completion of the sentence or since the day on which the person ceased to be subject to the execution of the sentence;

拘禁刑以上の刑に処せられ、その執行を終わり、又は執行を受けることがなくなった日から起算して五年を経過しない者

Article 10, paragraph (1), item (ii)(認定の欠格事由)

a person subject to a fine under the provisions of this Act, the provisions of other laws specified by Cabinet Order relating to immigration or labor (excluding the provisions prescribed in item (iv)), or any order under these provisions, if five years have not yet passed since the completion of the sentence or since the date on which the person ceased to be subject to the sentence;

この法律の規定その他出入国若しくは労働に関する法律の規定(第四号に規定する規定を除く。)であって政令で定めるもの又はこれらの規定に基づく命令の規定により、罰金の刑に処せられ、その執行を終わり、又は執行を受けることがなくなった日から起算して五年を経過しない者

Article 10, paragraph (1), item (iii)(認定の欠格事由)

a person subject to a fine under the provisions of the Act on Prevention of Unjust Acts by Organized Crime Group Members (Act No. 77 of 1991)(excluding the provisions of Article 50 (limited to the part related item (ii)) and Article 52 of the same Act), or subject to a fine for having committed an offence under Article 204, Article 206, Article 208, Article 208-2, Article 222, or Article 247 of the Penal Code(Act No. 45 of 1907) or the Act on Punishment of Physical Violence and Other Related Matters (Act No. 60 of 1926), if five years have not yet passed since the completion of the sentence or since the date on which the person ceased to be subject to the sentence;

暴力団員による不当な行為の防止等に関する法律(平成三年法律第七十七号)の規定(同法第五十条(第二号に係る部分に限る。)及び第五十二条の規定を除く。)により、又は刑法(明治四十年法律第四十五号)第二百四条、第二百六条、第二百八条、第二百八条の二、第二百二十二条若しくは第二百四十七条の罪若しくは暴力行為等処罰に関する法律(大正十五年法律第六十号)の罪を犯したことにより、罰金の刑に処せられ、その執行を終わり、又は執行を受けることがなくなった日から起算して五年を経過しない者

Article 10, paragraph (1), item (iv)(認定の欠格事由)

a person subject to a fine under the provisions of Article 208, Article 213-2, or Article 214, paragraph (1) of the Health Insurance Act (Act No. 70 of 1922), Article 156, Article 159, or Article 160, paragraph (1) of the Mariners Insurance Act (Act No. 73 of 1939), the first sentence of Article 51 or Article 54, paragraph (1) (limited to the part related to the first sentence of Article 51) of the Workers Accident Compensation Insurance Act (Act No. 50 of 1947), Article 102, Article 103-2, or Article 104, paragraph (1) (limited to the part related to the first sentence of Article 102 or Article 103-2) of the Welfare Pension Insurance Act (Act No. 115 of 1954), the first sentence of Article 46 or Article 48, paragraph (1) (limited to the part related to the first sentence of Article 46) of the Act Concerning the Collection of Premiums on Labor Insurance (Act No. 84 of 1969), or Article 83 or Article 86 (limited to the part related to the first sentence of Article 83) of the Employment Insurance Act (Act No. 116 of1974), if five years have not yet passed since the completion of the sentence or since the date on which the person ceased to be subject to the sentence;

健康保険法(大正十一年法律第七十号)第二百八条、第二百十三条の二若しくは第二百十四条第一項、船員保険法(昭和十四年法律第七十三号)第百五十六条、第百五十九条若しくは第百六十条第一項、労働者災害補償保険法(昭和二十二年法律第五十号)第五十一条前段若しくは第五十四条第一項(同法第五十一条前段の規定に係る部分に限る。)、厚生年金保険法(昭和二十九年法律第百十五号)第百二条、第百三条の二若しくは第百四条第一項(同法第百二条又は第百三条の二の規定に係る部分に限る。)、労働保険の保険料の徴収等に関する法律(昭和四十四年法律第八十四号)第四十六条前段若しくは第四十八条第一項(同法第四十六条前段の規定に係る部分に限る。)又は雇用保険法(昭和四十九年法律第百十六号)第八十三条若しくは第八十六条(同法第八十三条の規定に係る部分に限る。)の規定により、罰金の刑に処せられ、その執行を終わり、又は執行を受けることがなくなった日から起算して五年を経過しない者

Article 10, paragraph (1), item (v)(認定の欠格事由)(Reasons for Not Qualifying for Accreditation)Changed

a person specified by provided for in order of a competent ministry as a person who is unable to properly perform work related to technical intern trainingthe responsibilities as an organization implementing employment for skill development due to a physical or mental disorder;

心身の故障により技能実習に関する業務を適正に行う育成就労実施者としての責務を果たすことができない者として主務省令で定めるもの

Article 10, paragraph (1), item (vi)(認定の欠格事由)

a person that has received an order to commence bankruptcy proceedings and has yet to have their rights restored;

破産手続開始の決定を受けて復権を得ない者

Article 10, paragraph (1), item (vii)(認定の欠格事由)(Reasons for Not Qualifying for Accreditation)Changed

a person whose accreditation of employment for technical intern training skill development under paragraph (1) of the following Article was revoked under the provisions of Article 16, paragraph (1), if and for whom five years have not yet passed since the date of revocation (excluding a person who has provided the employment for skill development at a corporation with a close relationship or the supervising-organization-type employment for skill development through worker dispatch, etc., and is provided for in order of the competent ministries as reasonable to hold that the person does not fall under this item in consideration of whether and how much the person is responsible for the fact constituting the reason for the revocation);

第十六条第一項の規定により実習次条第一項に規定する育成就労認定を取り消され、当該取消しの日から起算して五年を経過しない者(密接関係法人育成就労又は労働者派遣等監理型育成就労を行わせていた者であって、当該取消しの処分の理由となった事実に関して当該者が有していた責任の有無及び程度を考慮してこの号に該当しないこととすることが相当であると認められるものとして主務省令で定めるものを除く。)

Article 10, paragraph (1), item (viii)(認定の欠格事由)(Reasons for Not Qualifying for Accreditation)Changed

if an organization whose accreditation of technical intern training employment for skill development referred to in paragraph (1) of the following Article was revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 16, paragraph (1) is a corporation (if the accreditation of intern training employment for skill development was revoked under the provisions of item (iii) of the sameArticle 16, paragraph, the relevant case (1), item (iii), this is limited to those in whichwhen the corporation falls under a person prescribed in item (ii) or (iv)), the relevanta person who was an actually the officer (meaning members, directors, executive officers or any other equivalent personpersons executing business; and, including consultants, advisers, or any other persons who, irrespective of their title, are found to have the power of control that is equivalent to or greater than members, directors, executive officers or other equivalent persons executing business over the corporation; the same applies in item (xii) of this Article,; Article 25, paragraph (1), item (v), and; Article 26, item (v)); and Article 39, paragraph (5)) of the corporation at the time of the occurrence of the event that caused the corporation to be subject to the revocation, and for whom five years have not yet passed since the date of the revocation (excluding a person who has provided the employment for skill development at a corporation with a close relationship or the supervising-organization-type employment for skill development through worker dispatch, etc., and is provided for in order of the competent ministries as reasonable to hold that the person does not fall under this item in consideration of whether and how much the person is responsible for the fact constituting the reason for the revocation);

第十六条第一項の規定により実習次条第一項に規定する育成就労認定を取り消された者が法人である場合(同第十六条第一項第三号の規定により実習当該育成就労認定を取り消された場合については、当該法人が第二号又は第四号に規定する者に該当することとなったことによる場合に限る。)において、当該取消しの処分を受ける原因となった事項が発生した当時現に当該法人の役員(業務を執行する社員、取締役、執行役又はこれらに準ずる者をいい、相談役、顧問その他いかなる名称を有する者であるかを問わず、法人に対し業務を執行する社員、取締役、執行役又はこれらに準ずる者と同等以上の支配力を有するものと認められる者を含む。第十二号、第二十五条第一項第五号及び、第二十六条第五号及び第三十九条第五項において同じ。)であった者で、当該取消しの日から起算して五年を経過しないもの(密接関係法人育成就労又は労働者派遣等監理型育成就労を行わせていた者であって、当該取消しの処分の理由となった事実に関して当該者が有していた責任の有無及び程度を考慮してこの号に該当しないこととすることが相当であると認められるものとして主務省令で定めるものを除く。)

Article 10, paragraph (1), item (ix)(認定の欠格事由)(Reasons for Not Qualifying for Accreditation)Changed

a person that committed a wrongful or extremely unjust act with regard to laws or regulations relating to immigration or labor within five years prior to the date offor whom five years have not yet passed since the day on which the person has committed a wrongful or significantly unjust act with regard to the application of accreditation set forth under Article 8, paragraph (1)laws or regulations related to immigration or labor;

第八条第一項の認定の申請の日前五年以内に出入国又は労働に関する法令に関し不正又は著しく不当な行為をした日から起算して五年を経過しない者

Article 10, paragraph (1), item (x)(認定の欠格事由)

a person that is a member of an organized crime group as prescribed in Article 2, item (vi) of the Act on Prevention of Unjust Acts by Organized Crime Group Members(hereinafter referred to as "organized crime group member" in this item); or who was a member of the organized crime group if five years have not yet passed since that person ceased to be that member (those persons are referred to as "organized crime group member, etc." in item (xiii) of this Article and Article 26, item (vi));

暴力団員による不当な行為の防止等に関する法律第二条第六号に規定する暴力団員(以下この号において「暴力団員」という。)又は暴力団員でなくなった日から五年を経過しない者(第十三号及び第二十六条第六号において「暴力団員等」という。)

Article 10, paragraph (1), item (xi)(認定の欠格事由)

a minor who does not possess the same capacity to act as an adult with regard to business, and whose legisrative representative falls under any of the preceding items or the following item;

営業に関し成年者と同一の行為能力を有しない未成年者であって、その法定代理人が前各号又は次号のいずれかに該当するもの

Article 10, paragraph (1), item (xii)(認定の欠格事由)

a corporation in which one of its officers falls under any of the preceding items; or

法人であって、その役員のうちに前各号のいずれかに該当する者があるもの

Article 10, paragraph (1), item (xiii)(認定の欠格事由)

a person whose business activities are controlled by a member of an organized crime group, etc.

暴力団員等がその事業活動を支配する者

Article 11第十一条Caption changed

Changes to Technical Intern Training PlansChanges to Employment-for-Skill-Development Plans

技能実習育成就労計画の変更

2 changes in this article
Article 11, paragraph (1)(育成就労計画の変更)(Changes to Employment-for-Skill-Development Plans)Changed

IfWhen an implementing organization intends for employment for skill development seeks to make a changechanges (excluding minor changes provided for by Orderin order of the competent ministryministries) to any of the matters givenparticulars stated in any of the items ofthe employment-for-skill-development plan accredited under Article 8, paragraph (2) (excluding item (v)) 1); Article 8-5, paragraph (1); or Article 8-6, paragraph (1) (including an accreditation of the technical intern training plan for training that was accredited change under the provision of this paragraph; hereinafter referred to as "accreditation of employment for skill development") (hereinafter referred to as "accredited employment-for-skill-development plan"), it must obtain approval under the items (excluding item (v)) of Article 8, paragraph (3); Article 8-5, paragraph (2), items (i) and (ii) (excluding the parts related to do so Article 8, paragraph (3), item (v)); or Article 8-6, paragraph (2), items (i) and (ii) (excluding the parts related to Article 8, paragraph (3), item (v)), it must receive accreditation from the Commissioner of the Immigration Services Agency and the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare. In this case, when the employment for skill development provided by the implementing organization for employment for skill development is the employment for skill development at a corporation with a close relationship or the supervising-organization-type employment for skill development through worker dispatch, etc., all of the relevant implementing organizations must jointly apply for the accreditation.

実習育成就労実施者は、実習認定を第八条第一項、第八条の五第一項又は第八条の六第一項の認定(この項の規定による変更の認定を含む。以下「育成就労認定」という。)を受けた技能実習育成就労計画(以下「認定育成就労計画」という。)について第八条第二三項各号(第五号を除く。)に、第八条の五第二項第一号及び第二号(第八条第三項第五号に係る部分を除く。)又は第八条の六第二項第一号及び第二号(第八条第三項第五号に係る部分を除く。)に掲げる事項の変更(主務省令で定める軽微な変更を除く。)をしようとするときは、出入国在留管理庁長官及び厚生労働大臣の認定を受けなければならない。この場合において、当該育成就労実施者の行わせている育成就労が密接関係法人育成就労又は労働者派遣等監理型育成就労であるときは、当該育成就労実施者の全員が共同して当該認定の申請をしなければならない。

Article 11, paragraph (2)(育成就労計画の変更)(Changes to Employment-for-Skill-Development Plans)Changed

The provisions of Article 8, paragraphs (34) through (5) 6) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 8-5, paragraph (3) and Article 8-6, paragraph (3)) apply mutatis mutandis to the two application for accreditation under the preceding Articles paragraph, and the provisions of Article 9 through the preceding Article apply mutatis mutandis to the approval accreditation under the same paragraph, respectively. In this case, the phrase "a maximum of three years" set forth in Article 9, paragraph (1), item (iii) is deemed to be replaced with "a maximum of three years (or, when it is provided for in order of the competent ministries as there being reasonable grounds for extension of the employment-for-skill-development period, a maximum of four years"; the term "an applicant" set forth in items (viii) and (x) of the same paragraph, and paragraph (2), item (vi) of the same Article is deemed to be replaced with "a person who applies for accreditation under Article 11, paragraph (1)"; and the preceding phrase "when the employment-for-skill-development period is extended pursuant to the provision of Article 11, paragraph. 1" in Article 9-2, item (ii) and Article 9-3, item (ii) is deemed to be replaced with "when it is provided for in order of the competent ministries as there being reasonable grounds for extension of the employment-for-skill-development period."

第八条第三四項から第五六項まで及び前二条の(これらの規定を第八条の五第三項及び第八条の六第三項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定は、前前項の認定の申請について、第九条から前条までの規定は同項の認定について準用、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、第九条第一項第三号中「三年以内」とあるのは「三年以内(育成就労の期間を延長することについて相当の理由があるものとして主務省令で定める場合にあっては、四年以内)」と、同項第八号及び第十号並びに同条第二項第六号中「申請者」とあるのは「第十一条第一項の認定の申請をする者」と、第九条の二第二号及び第九条の三第二号中「第十一条第一項の規定により育成就労の期間が延長されている場合」とあるのは「育成就労の期間を延長することについて相当の理由があるものとして主務省令で定める場合」と読み替えるものとする。

Article 12第十二条

Accreditation by the ESDO(機構による認定の実施)
4 changes in this article
Article 12, paragraph (1)(機構による認定の実施)(Accreditation by the ESDO)Changed

The Commissioner of the Immigration Services Agency and the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare may entrust all or a part of the administrative affairs relating to the accreditation set forth under Article 8, paragraph (1) (including approval of the changes set forth under paragraph (1) of the preceding Article; the same applies in paragraph (4))employment for skill development (hereinafter referred to as "administrative affairs for accreditation") to the Organization for Technical Intern Training (hereinafter referred to as "the OTIT" in this Chapter) in this Article, Article 14, paragraph (1), and Article 87, paragraph (1), item (i), sub-item (c)) to the ESDO.

出入国在留管理庁長官及び厚生労働大臣は、外国人技能実習機構機構に、育成就労認定に関する事務(以下この章において「機構」という。)に、第八条、第十四条第一項の認定(前及び第八十七条第一項の規定による変更の認定を含む。第四項第一号ハにおいて同じ。)に関する事務(以下「認定事務」という。)の全部又は一部を行わせることができる。

Article 12, paragraph (2)(機構による認定の実施)

If the Commissioner of the Immigration Services Agency and the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare entrust all or a part of the administrative affairs for accreditation to the ESDO pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph, that Commissioner or Minister is not to perform the relevant administrative affairs for accreditation that they entrusted in whole or in a part.

出入国在留管理庁長官及び厚生労働大臣は、前項の規定により機構に認定事務の全部又は一部を行わせるときは、当該認定事務の全部又は一部を行わないものとする。

Article 12, paragraph (3)(機構による認定の実施)(Accreditation by the ESDO)Changed

IfFor the OTIT performs purpose of application of the provisions of Article 8, paragraphs (1) and (2); Article 8-5, paragraph (1); Article 8-6, paragraph (1); Articles 9 through 9-3; and paragraph (1) of the preceding Article when the ESDO handles all or a part of the administrative affairs for accreditation, for the phrase "the provisionsCommissioner of Article 8 through the Immigration Services Agency and the preceding Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare" in Article 8, paragraph (1) is to be applied, replaced with "the ESDO (meaning the organization provided for in Article 8-3, paragraph (1); the term "same applies in the following paragraph)," and the phrase "the Commissioner of the Immigration Services Agency and the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare" in paragraph (2) of the same Article 8; Article 8-5, paragraph (1),; Article 9, 8-6, paragraph (1); Articles 9 through 9-3; and paragraph (1) of the preceding Article is to be replaced with "the OTIT"."ESDO."

機構が認定事務の全部又は一部を行う場合における第八条から前条まで第一項及び第二項、第八条の五第一項、第八条の六第一項、第九条から第九条の三まで並びに前条第一項の規定の適用については、第八条第一項、第九条中「出入国在留管理庁長官及び厚生労働大臣」とあるのは「機構(第八条の三第一項に規定する機構をいう。次項において同じ。)」と、同条第二項、第八条の五第一項、第八条の六第一項、第九条から第九条の三まで及び前条第一項中「出入国在留管理庁長官及び厚生労働大臣」とあるのは、「機構」とする。

Article 12, paragraph (4)(機構による認定の実施)(Accreditation by the ESDO)Changed

If the OTITESDO has issued the accreditation as providedof employment for in Article 8, paragraph (1)skill development, it must report to that effect toinform the Commissioner of the Immigration Services Agency and the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare to that effect without delay.

機構は、第八条第一項の育成就労認定を行ったときは、遅滞なく、その旨を出入国在留管理庁長官及び厚生労働大臣に報告しなければならない。

Article 12, paragraph (5)(機構による認定の実施)(Accreditation by the ESDO)Changed

If the Commissioner of the Immigration Services Agency and the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare have entrustedentrust all or a part of the administrative affairs offor accreditation to the OTITESDO pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1), the applicant a person who applies for accreditation of employment for skill development must pay the fee prescribed in Article 8, paragraph (56) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 8-5, paragraph (3); Article 8-6, paragraph (3); and paragraph (2) of the preceding Article) to the OTITESDO, as provided for in order of the competent ministries.

出入国在留管理庁長官及び厚生労働大臣が第一項の規定により機構に認定事務の全部又は一部を行わせるときは、申請育成就労認定の申請をする者は、主務省令で定めるところにより、第八条第五項(六項(第八条の五第三項、第八条の六第三項及び前条第二項において準用する場合を含む。)に規定する手数料を機構に納付しなければならない。

Article 12, paragraph (6)(機構による認定の実施)

Any fees paid to the ESDO pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph are considered as revenue of the ESDO.

前項の規定により機構に納付された手数料は、機構の収入とする。

Article 12, paragraph (7)(機構による認定の実施)

If the Commissioner of the Immigration Services Agency and the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare have entrusted all or a part of the administrative affairs of accreditation to the ESDO pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1), or if they are to cease entrusting all or a part of the administrative affairs of accreditation that had been entrusted to the ESDO, they must give public notice to that effect.

出入国在留管理庁長官及び厚生労働大臣は、第一項の規定により機構に認定事務の全部若しくは一部を行わせることとするとき、又は機構に行わせていた認定事務の全部若しくは一部を行わせないこととするときは、その旨を公示しなければならない。

Article 12-2第十二条の二Caption added

Suspension and Resumption of Accreditation

認定の停止及び再開

4 changes in this article
Article 12-2, paragraph (1)(認定の停止及び再開)(Suspension and Resumption of Accreditation)Added

When finding under the field-specific operation policies that human resources required in the individual employment-for-skill-development industrial fields have been secured, the head of the relevant administrative organ with jurisdiction over the individual employment-for-skill-development industrial fields is to request the competent ministers to take measures to temporarily suspend the accreditation of employment for skill development (excluding that related to the skill development employee and the foreign national who is no longer the subject of employment for skill development because the accreditation of employment for skill development has been revoked pursuant to the provision of Article 16, paragraph (1)).

個別育成就労産業分野を所管する関係行政機関の長は、分野別運用方針に基づき、当該個別育成就労産業分野において必要とされる人材が確保されたと認めるときは、主務大臣に対し、一時的に育成就労認定(育成就労外国人及び育成就労認定が第十六条第一項の規定により取り消されたことにより育成就労の対象でなくなった外国人に係るものを除く。)の停止の措置をとることを求めるものとする。

Article 12-2, paragraph (2)(認定の停止及び再開)(Suspension and Resumption of Accreditation)Added

If a request pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph has been made, the competent ministers are to take measures to temporarily suspend the accreditation under the same paragraph in accordance with the field-specific operation policies.

主務大臣は、前項の規定による求めがあったときは、分野別運用方針に基づき、一時的に同項の停止の措置をとるものとする。

Article 12-2, paragraph (3)(認定の停止及び再開)(Suspension and Resumption of Accreditation)Added

When the measures to suspend have been taken pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph, and the head of the relevant administrative organ with jurisdiction over the individual employment-for-skill-development industrial fields finds a human resource shortage in the individual employment-for-skill-development industrial fields under the field-specific operation policies, the head may request the competent ministers to take measures to resume the accreditation of employment for skill development.

前項の規定により停止の措置がとられた場合において、当該個別育成就労産業分野を所管する関係行政機関の長は、分野別運用方針に基づき、当該個別育成就労産業分野において人材が不足すると認めるときは、主務大臣に対し、育成就労認定の再開の措置をとることを求めることができる。

Article 12-2, paragraph (4)(認定の停止及び再開)(Suspension and Resumption of Accreditation)Added

If a request pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph has been made, the competent ministers may take measures to resume the accreditation under the same paragraph in accordance with the field-specific operation policies.

主務大臣は、前項の規定による求めがあったときは、分野別運用方針に基づき、同項の再開の措置をとることができる。

Change 1 of 22
© 2026 japanlaw.orgA copy for reading and reference — not an official source, and not legal advice. Only the Japanese text published by the government has legal effect.Run by Genjido LLC (Genjido 合同会社) · [email protected]ContactSourcesTermsPrivacy