With respect to a request for examination under Article 26, the head of the public prosecutors office must make the determination specified in the relevant item, according to the category of cases listed in the following items:
検察庁の長は、第二十六条の規定による審査の申立てについては、次の各号に掲げる場合の区分に応じ、当該各号に定める裁決をしなければならない。
in the case where the request for examination was filed after the period within which a request for examination may be filed, as prescribed in Article 26, paragraph (1), has elapsed, or is otherwise unlawful: a determination dismissing the request for examination;
当該審査の申立てが第二十六条第一項に規定する審査の申立てをすることができる期間が経過した後にされたものである場合その他不適法である場合 当該審査の申立てを却下する裁決
in the case where the request for examination is groundless: a determination rejecting the request for examination;
当該審査の申立てに理由がない場合 当該審査の申立てを棄却する裁決
in the case where the disposition, etc. to which the request for examination relates is other than a de facto act, and the request for examination is well-founded: a determination revoking or modifying all or part of the disposition, etc. to which the request for examination relates; and
当該審査の申立てに係る処分等が事実上の行為以外のものである場合において、当該審査の申立てに理由があるとき 当該審査の申立てに係る処分等の全部又は一部を取り消し、又は変更する裁決
in the case where the disposition, etc. to which the request for examination relates is a de facto act made by a public prosecutor, and the request for examination is well-founded: a determination declaring that all or part of the de facto act is unlawful and, at the same time, ordering the public prosecutor who performed the de facto act to abolish or modify all or part of the de facto act (in the case where the de facto act was performed by the head of the public prosecutors office, a determination declaring that all or part of the de facto act is unlawful and, at the same time, abolishing or modifying all or part of the de facto act).
当該審査の申立てに係る処分等が検察官のした事実上の行為である場合において、当該審査の申立てに理由があるとき 当該事実上の行為の全部又は一部が違法である旨を宣言するとともに、当該事実上の行為をした検察官に対し、当該事実上の行為の全部又は一部を撤廃し、又は変更すべき旨を命ずる裁決（当該事実上の行為が検察庁の長のしたものである場合にあっては、当該事実上の行為の全部又は一部が違法である旨を宣言するとともに、当該事実上の行為の全部又は一部を撤廃し、又は変更する裁決）
In a determination provided for in item (iii) or (iv) of the preceding paragraph, the head of the public prosecutors office may not modify the disposition, etc. to the detriment of the requestor for examination, nor order or effect a modification of the de facto act to the detriment of the requestor for examination.