Act on Comprehensively Advancing Labor Measures, and Stabilizing the Employment of Workers, and Enriching Workers' Vocational Lives

• ChangedChapter 10

  Chapter X Measures to Be Taken by Employers in Connection with Problems Arising as a Result of Behavior that Constitutes Bullying in the Workplace, etc.

  第十章　職場における優越的な関係を背景とした言動等に起因する問題に関して事業主の講ずべき措置等

• ChangedCaption

  (Measures in Terms of Employment Management) concerning Problems Attributable to Behavior that Constitutes Bullying in the Workplace

  職場における優越的な関係を背景とした言動に起因する問題に関する雇用管理上の措置等

• RemovedArticle 30-3, paragraph (1)

  The national government must endeavor to take such measures as organizing public relations activities or enlightenment activities to inform employers and the general public that the behavior prescribed in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article as harmful to the work environment of workers is prohibited and to deepen their interest and understanding with respect to problems attributable to that behavior (hereinafter referred to as the "problems of behavior that constitutes bullying").

  国は、労働者の就業環境を害する前条第一項に規定する言動を行つてはならないことその他当該言動に起因する問題（以下この条において「優越的言動問題」という。）に対する事業主その他国民一般の関心と理解を深めるため、広報活動、啓発活動その他の措置を講ずるように努めなければならない。

• RemovedArticle 30-3, paragraph (2)

  An employer must endeavor to deepen the interest and understanding of workers employed with respect to the problems of behavior that constitutes bullying, to provide training courses and give due consideration to ensure that those workers pay necessary attention to their behavior toward other workers, as well as cooperate in the national government's implementation of the measures referred to in the preceding paragraph.

  事業主は、優越的言動問題に対するその雇用する労働者の関心と理解を深めるとともに、当該労働者が他の労働者に対する言動に必要な注意を払うよう、研修の実施その他の必要な配慮をするほか、国の講ずる前項の措置に協力するように努めなければならない。

• RemovedArticle 30-3, paragraph (3)

  An employer (if this employer is a corporation, its officers) must endeavor to deepen the employer's own interest in and understanding of the problems of behavior that constitutes bullying and to pay necessary attention to their own behavior toward workers.

  事業主（その者が法人である場合にあつては、その役員）は、自らも、優越的言動問題に対する関心と理解を深め、労働者に対する言動に必要な注意を払うように努めなければならない。

• RemovedArticle 30-3, paragraph (4)

  Workers must endeavor to deepen their interest in and understanding of the problems of behavior that constitutes bullying, to pay necessary attention to their behavior toward other workers, and to cooperate in the employer's implementation of the measures referred to in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article.

  労働者は、優越的言動問題に対する関心と理解を深め、他の労働者に対する言動に必要な注意を払うとともに、事業主の講ずる前条第一項の措置に協力するように努めなければならない。

• ChangedCaption

  (Requests)Responsibilities of the National Government, Employers, and Workers concerning Problems Attributable to Behavior that Constitutes Bullying in the Workplace

  要請職場における優越的な関係を背景とした言動に起因する問題に関する国、事業主及び労働者の責務

• ChangedArticle 32, paragraph (1)

  When the head of a localThe national government finds that a large number of workers has separated from employmentmust endeavor to take such measures as organizing public relations activities or finds it likely that a large number of workers will separate from employment withinenlightenment activities to inform employers and the general public that the area under the jurisdiction behavior prescribed in paragraph (1) of the local government, or otherwise finds it necessary forpreceding Article as harmful to the employment securitywork environment of workers, the head of the local government may request the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare is prohibited and to deepen their interest and understanding with respect to problems attributable to implement measures necessary for the employment security that behavior (hereinafter referred to as the "problems of workersbehavior that constitutes bullying").

  地方公共団体の長は、当該地方公共団体の区域内において、多数の離職者が発生し、又はそのおそれがあると認めるとき国は、労働者の就業環境を害する前条第一項に規定する言動を行つてはならないことその他当該言動に起因する問題（以下この条において「優越的言動問題」という。）に対する事業主その他労働者の職業の安定のため必要があると認めるときは、厚生労働大臣に対し、労働者の職業の安定に関し必要な措置の実施を要請することができる国民一般の関心と理解を深めるため、広報活動、啓発活動その他の措置を講ずるように努めなければならない。

• ChangedArticle 32, paragraph (2)

  When the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare implements measures necessary forAn employer must endeavor to deepen the employment security interest and understanding of workers upon request under employed with respect to the provisionsproblems of the preceding paragraph (hereinafter referredbehavior that constitutes bullying, to as a "request for measures" in this Article), or findsprovide training courses and give due consideration to ensure that it is notthose workers pay necessary to implement measures associated with a request for measures, the Minister must notify the head ofattention to their behavior toward other workers, as well as cooperate in the local government that has madenational government's implementation of the relevant request for measures to that effect without delay, withreferred to in the reason for finding such measures not necessary if that is the casepreceding paragraph.

  厚生労働大臣は、前項の規定による要請（以下この条において「措置要請」という。）に基づき事業主は、優越的言動問題に対するその雇用する労働者の職業の安定に関し必要な措置を実施するときはその旨を関心と理解を深めるとともに、当該措置要請に係る措置を実施する必要がないと認めるときはその旨及びその理由を、遅滞なく、当該措置要請をした地方公共団体の長に通知し労働者が他の労働者に対する言動に必要な注意を払うよう、研修の実施その他の必要な配慮をするほか、国の講ずる前項の措置に協力するように努めなければならない。

• ChangedArticle 32, paragraph (3)

  In judging whether it is necessary to implement measures associated withAn employer (if this employer is a request for measures, the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare must hearcorporation, its officers) must endeavor to deepen the opinions of academic expertsemployer's own interest in and other persons specified by Orderunderstanding of the Ministryproblems of Health, Labour and Welfare in advance, pursuantbehavior that constitutes bullying and to the provisions of Order of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfarepay necessary attention to their own behavior toward workers.

  厚生労働大臣は、措置要請に係る措置を行う必要があるか否かを判断するに当た事業主（その者が法人である場合にあつては、あらかじめ、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより、学識経験者その他の厚生労働省令で定める者の意見を聴かその役員）は、自らも、優越的言動問題に対する関心と理解を深め、労働者に対する言動に必要な注意を払うように努めなければならない。

• ChangedArticle 32, paragraph (4)

  Any person whose opinion was sought pursuant to the provisionsWorkers must endeavor to deepen their interest in and understanding of the preceding paragraph must not divulge any secret learned in connection with problems of behavior that constitutes bullying, to pay necessary attention to their behavior toward other workers, and to cooperate in the case for whichemployer's implementation of the opinion was soughtmeasures referred to in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article.

  前項の規定により意見を求められた者は、その意見を求められた事案に関して知り得た秘密を漏らしては労働者は、優越的言動問題に対する関心と理解を深め、他の労働者に対する言動に必要な注意を払うとともに、事業主の講ずる前条第一項の措置に協力するように努めなければならない。

• AddedArticle 33, paragraph (1)

  In order for an employer to preclude any behavior in the workplace by customers, business counterparties, users of facilities, or other persons having a relationship with the business conducted by the employer (referred to as "customers, etc." in paragraph (5) of the following Article) which exceeds the scope permissible under generally accepted social norms in light of the nature of the duties in which the workers employed by the employer are engaged and other circumstances (hereinafter referred to as "behavior by customers, etc." in this paragraph and paragraph (1) of the following Article) from damaging the work environment of those workers, the employer must provide consultation to those workers and take measures necessary in terms of employment management, such as developing a necessary system for appropriately handling such behavior, and taking measures to deter behavior by customers, etc. that is harmful to the work environment of workers, which are necessary for ensuring the effectiveness of the response to that behavior.

  事業主は、職場において行われる顧客、取引の相手方、施設の利用者その他の当該事業主の行う事業に関係を有する者（次条第五項において「顧客等」という。）の言動であつて、その雇用する労働者が従事する業務の性質その他の事情に照らして社会通念上許容される範囲を超えたもの（以下この項及び次条第一項において「顧客等言動」という。）により当該労働者の就業環境が害されることのないよう、当該労働者からの相談に応じ、適切に対応するために必要な体制の整備、労働者の就業環境を害する当該顧客等言動への対応の実効性を確保するために必要なその抑止のための措置その他の雇用管理上必要な措置を講じなければならない。

• AddedArticle 33, paragraph (2)

  It is prohibited for any employer to dismiss any worker, or otherwise treat any worker in a disadvantageous manner, on the grounds that the worker received the consultation referred to in the preceding paragraph or stated facts when cooperating in the employer's response to that consultation.

  事業主は、労働者が前項の相談を行つたこと又は事業主による当該相談への対応に協力した際に事実を述べたことを理由として、当該労働者に対して解雇その他不利益な取扱いをしてはならない。

• AddedArticle 33, paragraph (3)

  If an employer is requested by another employer to provide necessary cooperation in connection with the implementation of the measures referred to in paragraph (1) that the other employer takes, the employer must endeavor to comply with the request.

  事業主は、他の事業主から当該他の事業主が講ずる第一項の措置の実施に関し必要な協力を求められた場合には、これに応ずるように努めなければならない。

• AddedArticle 33, paragraph (4)

  With respect to measures, etc. that employers should take under the provisions of the preceding three paragraphs, the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare is to establish guidelines necessary for ensuring the proper and effective implementation of such measures, etc. (referred to as the "guidelines" in the following paragraph).

  厚生労働大臣は、前三項の規定に基づき事業主が講ずべき措置等に関して、その適切かつ有効な実施を図るために必要な指針（次項において「指針」という。）を定めるものとする。

• AddedArticle 33, paragraph (5)

  The provisions of Article 31, paragraphs (4) and (5) apply mutatis mutandis to the establishment and modification of the guidelines.

  第三十一条第四項及び第五項の規定は、指針の策定及び変更について準用する。

• AddedArticle 34, paragraph (1)

  The national government must endeavor, while taking into account the characteristics of each business sector, to take such measures as organizing public relations activities or enlightenment activities to inform employers and the general public that behavior by customers, etc. that is harmful to the work environment of workers is prohibited and to deepen their interest and understanding with respect to problems attributable to that behavior by customers, etc. (hereinafter referred to as the "problems of behavior by customers, etc." in this Article).

  国は、労働者の就業環境を害する顧客等言動を行つてはならないことその他当該顧客等言動に起因する問題（以下この条において「顧客等言動問題」という。）に対する事業主その他国民一般の関心と理解を深めるため、各事業分野の特性を踏まえつつ、広報活動、啓発活動その他の措置を講ずるように努めなければならない。

• AddedArticle 34, paragraph (2)

  An employer must endeavor to deepen the interest and understanding of workers employed with respect to the problems of behavior by customers, etc., to provide training courses and give due consideration to ensure that those workers pay necessary attention to their behavior toward workers employed by other employers, as well as cooperate in the national government's implementation of the measures referred to in the preceding paragraph.

  事業主は、顧客等言動問題に対するその雇用する労働者の関心と理解を深めるとともに、当該労働者が他の事業主が雇用する労働者に対する言動に必要な注意を払うよう、研修の実施その他の必要な配慮をするほか、国の講ずる前項の措置に協力するように努めなければならない。

• AddedArticle 34, paragraph (3)

  An employer (if this employer is a corporation, its officers) must endeavor to deepen the employer's own interest in and understanding of the problems of behavior by customers, etc. and to pay necessary attention to their own behavior toward workers employed by other employers.

  事業主（その者が法人である場合にあつては、その役員）は、自らも、顧客等言動問題に対する関心と理解を深め、他の事業主が雇用する労働者に対する言動に必要な注意を払うように努めなければならない。

• AddedArticle 34, paragraph (4)

  Workers must endeavor to deepen their interest in and understanding of the problems of behavior by customers, etc., to pay necessary attention to their behavior toward workers employed by other employers, and to cooperate in the employer's implementation of the measures referred to in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article.

  労働者は、顧客等言動問題に対する関心と理解を深め、他の事業主が雇用する労働者に対する言動に必要な注意を払うとともに、事業主の講ずる前条第一項の措置に協力するように努めなければならない。

• AddedArticle 34, paragraph (5)

  Customers, etc. must endeavor to deepen their interest in and understanding of the problems of behavior by customers, etc., and to pay necessary attention so that their behavior toward workers does not harm the work environment of those workers.

  顧客等は、顧客等言動問題に対する関心と理解を深めるとともに、労働者に対する言動が当該労働者の就業環境を害することのないよう、必要な注意を払うように努めなければならない。

• ChangedArticle 35, paragraph (1)

  The provisions of Article 4, Article 5, and Articles 12 through 19 of the Act on Promoting the Resolution of Individual Labor-Related Disputes (Act No. 112 of 2001) do not apply to disputes between workers and employers with respect to the particulars prescribed in Article 30-231, paragraphs (1) and (2), and Article 33, paragraphs (1) and (2), and such disputes are as provided for in the following Article through Article 30-839.

  第三十条の二第一条第一項及び第二項並びに第三十三条第一項及び第二項に定める事項についての労働者と事業主との間の紛争については、個別労働関係紛争の解決の促進に関する法律（平成十三年法律第百十二号）第四条、第五条及び第十二条から第十九条までの規定は適用せず、次条から第三十条の八九条までに定めるところによる。

• ChangedArticle 36, paragraph (2)

  The provisions of Article 30-2, paragraph (2) apply mutatis mutandis to It is prohibited for any employer to dismiss any worker, or otherwise treat any worker in a disadvantageous manner, on the case where agrounds that the worker requestsrequested the assistance referred to in the preceding paragraph.

  第三十条の二第二項の規定事業主は、労働者が前項の援助を求めた場合について準用することを理由として、当該労働者に対して解雇その他不利益な取扱いをしてはならない。

• ChangedArticle 37, paragraph (1)

  On finding it necessary in resolving a dispute referred to in Article 30-435 when both or either of the parties to the dispute files an application for conciliation, the director of the relevant prefectural labor bureau is to have the dispute coordinating committee referred to in Article 6, paragraph (1) of the Act on Promoting the Resolution of Individual Labor-Related Disputes conduct the conciliation.

  都道府県労働局長は、第三十条の四五条に規定する紛争について、当該紛争の当事者の双方又は一方から調停の申請があつた場合において当該紛争の解決のために必要があると認めるときは、個別労働関係紛争の解決の促進に関する法律第六条第一項の紛争調整委員会に調停を行わせるものとする。

• ChangedArticle 37, paragraph (2)

  The provisions of Article 30-2, paragraph (2) apply mutatis mutandis to It is prohibited for any employer to dismiss any worker, or otherwise treat any worker in a disadvantageous manner, on the case where agrounds that the worker makes anmade the application as referred to in the preceding paragraph.

  第三十条の二第二項の規定事業主は、労働者が前項の申請をした場合について準用することを理由として、当該労働者に対して解雇その他不利益な取扱いをしてはならない。

• ChangedArticle 38, paragraph (1)

  The provisions of Articles 1925 through 2632 of the Act on Securing, Etc. of Equal Opportunity and Treatment between Men and Women in Employment (Act No. 113 of 1972) apply mutatis mutandis to the procedure of the conciliation referred to in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article. In this case, the term "paragraph 1 of the preceding Article" in Article 1925, paragraph (1) of the same Act is deemed to be replaced with "Article 30-637, paragraph (1) of the Act on Comprehensively Advancing Labor Measures, and Stabilizing the Employment of Workers, and Enriching Workers' Vocational Lives (Act No. 132 of 1966)"; the term "workplace" in Article 2026 of the Act on Securing, Etc. of Equal Opportunity and Treatment between Men and Women in Employment is deemed to be replaced with "place of business"; and the term "Article 1824, paragraph 1" in Article 2531, paragraph (1) of the same Act is deemed to be replaced with "Article 30-435 of the Act on Comprehensively Advancing Labor Measures, and Stabilizing the Employment of Workers, and Enriching Workers' Vocational Lives."

  雇用の分野における男女の均等な機会及び待遇の確保等に関する法律（昭和四十七年法律第百十三号）第十九二十五条から第二十六三十二条までの規定は、前条第一項の調停の手続について準用する。この場合において、同法第十九二十五条第一項中「前条第一項」とあるのは「労働施策の総合的な推進並びに労働者の雇用の安定及び職業生活の充実等に関する法律（昭和四十一年法律第百三十二号）第三十条の六七条第一項」と、同法第二十六条中「事業場」とあるのは「事業所」と、同法第二十五三十一条第一項中「第十八二十四条第一項」とあるのは「労働施策の総合的な推進並びに労働者の雇用の安定及び職業生活の充実等に関する法律第三十条の四五条」と読み替えるものとする。

Its words stay the same; only its number changes.

Its words stay the same; only its number changes.

• ChangedCaption

  Requests

  No English for the wording before the change.

  要請

• ChangedArticle 41, paragraph (1)

  A person When the head of a local government finds that a large number of workers has failed to submit a report separated from employment or finds it likely that a large number of workers will separate from employment within the area under the provisionsjurisdiction of Article 36, paragraph (1)the local government, or that has submitted a false report is punished by a fine otherwise finds it necessary for the employment security of workers, the head of not more than 200,000 yenthe local government may request the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare to implement measures necessary for the employment security of workers.

  第三十六条第一項の規定による報告をせず、又は虚偽の報告をした者は、二十万円以下の過料に処す地方公共団体の長は、当該地方公共団体の区域内において、多数の離職者が発生し、又はそのおそれがあると認めるときその他労働者の職業の安定のため必要があると認めるときは、厚生労働大臣に対し、労働者の職業の安定に関し必要な措置の実施を要請することができる。

• AddedArticle 41, paragraph (2)

  When the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare implements measures necessary for the employment security of workers upon request under the provisions of the preceding paragraph (hereinafter referred to as a "request for measures" in this Article), or finds that it is not necessary to implement measures associated with a request for measures, the Minister must notify the head of the local government that has made the relevant request for measures to that effect without delay, with the reason for finding such measures not necessary if that is the case.

  厚生労働大臣は、前項の規定による要請（以下この条において「措置要請」という。）に基づき労働者の職業の安定に関し必要な措置を実施するときはその旨を、当該措置要請に係る措置を実施する必要がないと認めるときはその旨及びその理由を、遅滞なく、当該措置要請をした地方公共団体の長に通知しなければならない。

• AddedArticle 41, paragraph (3)

  In judging whether it is necessary to implement measures associated with a request for measures, the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare must hear the opinions of academic experts and other persons specified by Order of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare in advance, pursuant to the provisions of Order of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare.

  厚生労働大臣は、措置要請に係る措置を行う必要があるか否かを判断するに当たつては、あらかじめ、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより、学識経験者その他の厚生労働省令で定める者の意見を聴かなければならない。

• AddedArticle 41, paragraph (4)

  Any person whose opinion was sought pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph must not divulge any secret learned in connection with the case for which the opinion was sought.

  前項の規定により意見を求められた者は、その意見を求められた事案に関して知り得た秘密を漏らしてはならない。

• ChangedArticle 42, paragraph (2)

  In the case where the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare has given recommendations under the provisions of the preceding paragraph to an employer that has violated any of the provisions of Article 30-231, paragraphs (1) and (2) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to, Article 30-5, paragraph (233, paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 30-636, paragraph (2); the same applies in Article 35, and Article 3637, paragraph (1)2), and if the employer that has received the recommendations has not complied with these recommendations, the Minister may make this public.

  厚生労働大臣は、第三十条の二一条第一項及び第二項（、第三十条の五第二三条第一項及び第三十条の六第二項において準用する場合を含む。二項、第三十五条及び六条第二項並びに第三十六条第一項において同じ。）七条第二項の規定に違反している事業主に対し、前項の規定による勧告をした場合において、その勧告を受けた者がこれに従わなかつたときは、その旨を公表することができる。

Its words stay the same; only its number changes.

• ChangedArticle 44, paragraph (1)

  The Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare may request an employer to submit necessary materials and to give explanations if the Minister finds them necessary for the enforcement of this Act (excluding Article 27, paragraph (1), Article 28, paragraph (1), Article 31, paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 30-233, paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 36, paragraph (2), and Article 37, paragraph (2)).

  厚生労働大臣は、この法律（第二十七条第一項、第二十八条第一項並びに、第三十条の二第一条第一項及び第二項、第三十三条第一項及び第二項、第三十六条第二項並びに第三十七条第二項を除く。）を施行するために必要があると認めるときは、事業主に対して、必要な資料の提出及び説明を求めることができる。

• ChangedArticle 45, paragraph (1)

  The Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare may request an employer to report on particulars necessary for the enforcement of the provisions of Article 30-231, paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 33, paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 36, paragraph (2), and Article 37, paragraph (2).

  厚生労働大臣は、事業主から第三十条の二第一条第一項及び第二項、第三十三条第一項及び第二項、第三十六条第二項並びに第三十七条第二項の規定の施行に関し必要な事項について報告を求めることができる。

Its words stay the same; only its number changes.

• ChangedArticle 47, paragraph (1)

  The provisions of this Act (excluding Article 1, Article 4, paragraph (1), item (xv), paragraph (2), and paragraph (4), Chapter X (excluding Articles 30-738 and 30-839), Article 3342, Article 3645, paragraph (1), paragraph (1) of the preceding Article, and Article 4151) do not apply to mariners prescribed in Article 6, paragraph (1) of the Mariners' Employment Security Act (Act No. 130 of 1948) (hereinafter referred to as "mariners" in the following paragraph).

  この法律（第一条、第四条第一項第十五号、第二項及び第四項、第十章（第三十条の七八条及び第三十条の八九条を除く。）、第三十三四十二条、第三十六四十五条第一項、前条第一項並びに第四五十一条を除く。）の規定は、船員職業安定法（昭和二十三年法律第百三十号）第六条第一項に規定する船員（次項において「船員」という。）については、適用しない。

• ChangedArticle 47, paragraph (2)

  With respect to mariners, the term "Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare" in Article 30-2, paragraphs31, paragraph (3) through (5), and paragraphs (4) and (5) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (6) of the same Article and Article 33, paragraph (5)), Article 33, paragraph (4), Article 36, 42, Article 45, paragraph (1), and paragraph (1) of the preceding Article is deemed to be replaced with "Minister for Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism"; the term "Labor Policy Council" in Article 30-231, paragraph (4) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (6) of the same Article and Article 33, paragraph (5)) is deemed to be replaced with "Council for Transport Policy"; the term "through Article 30-839" in Article 30-435 is deemed to be replaced with "Article 30-637, and Article 3847, paragraph (3)"; the term "director of the relevant prefectural labor bureau" in Article 30-536, paragraph (1), Article 30-637, paragraph (1), and paragraph (1) of the preceding Article is deemed to be replaced with "district transport bureau chief (including the chief of the maritime traffic control division)"; the term "the dispute coordinating committee referred to in Article 6, paragraph (1)" in Article 30-637, paragraph (1) is deemed to be replaced with "a conciliator appointed from among those listed in the mediator candidate list set forth in Article 21, paragraph (3)"; the term "Article 35 and Article 36, paragraph (1)" in Article 33, paragraph (2) is deemed to be replaced with "Article 36, paragraph (1)"; and the term "Order of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare" in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article is deemed to be replaced with "Order of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism."

  船員に関しては、第三十条の二一条第三項から第五項まで並びに第四項及び第五項（これらの規定を同条第六項及び第三十三条第五項において準用する場合を含む。）、第三十三条、第三十六条第一項及び第四項、第四十二条、第四十五条第一項並びに前条第一項中「厚生労働大臣」とあるのは「国土交通大臣」と、第三十条の二一条第四項（同条第六項及び第三十三条第五項において準用する場合を含む。）中「労働政策審議会」とあるのは「交通政策審議会」と、第三十条の四五条中「から第三十条の八九条まで」とあるのは「、第三十条の六七条及び第三十八四十七条第三項」と、第三十条の五六条第一項、第三十条の六七条第一項及び前条第一項中「都道府県労働局長」とあるのは「地方運輸局長（運輸監理部長を含む。）」と、第三十条の六七条第一項中「第六条第一項の紛争調整委員会」とあるのは「第二十一条第三項のあつせん員候補者名簿に記載されている者のうちから指名する調停員」と、第三十三条第二項中「第三十五条及び第三十六条第一項」とあるのは「第三十六条第一項」と、前条第一項中「厚生労働省令」とあるのは「国土交通省令」とする。

• ChangedArticle 47, paragraph (3)

  The provisions of Articles 2026 through 2733 and Article 3137, paragraphs (3) and (4) of the Act on Securing, Etc. of Equal Opportunity and Treatment between Men and Women in Employment apply mutatis mutandis to conciliation conducted by a conciliator appointed pursuant to the provisions of Article 30-637, paragraph (1) applied following the deemed replacement of terms pursuant to the preceding paragraph. In this case, the term "Commission" in Articles 2026 through 2329 and Article 2632 of the same Act is deemed to be replaced with "conciliator"; the term "workplace" in Article 2026 of the same Act is deemed to be replaced with "place of business"; the term "Prefectural Labor Office where the relevant Commission is established" in Article 2127 of the same Act is deemed to be replaced with "district transport bureau (including the maritime traffic control division) to which the district transport bureau chief (including the chief of the maritime traffic control division) who appointed the conciliator is assigned"; the term "Article 1824, paragraph 1" in Article 2531, paragraph (1) of the same Act is deemed to be replaced with "Article 30-435 of the Act on Comprehensively Advancing Labor Measures, and Stabilizing the Employment of Workers, and Enriching Workers' Vocational Lives (Act No. 132 of 1966)"; the term "pending before the Commission" in Article 2632 of the Act on Securing, Etc. of Equal Opportunity and Treatment between Men and Women in Employment is deemed to be replaced with "being handled by the conciliator"; the terms "this section," "Conciliation," and "OrdinanceOrder of the Ministry of Health, LaborLabour and Welfare" in Article 2733 of the same Act are deemed to be replaced with "Article 2026 through the preceding Article and Article 3137, paragraphs (3) and (4) applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 3847, paragraph (3) of the Act on Comprehensively Advancing Labor Measures, and Stabilizing the Employment of Workers, and Enriching Workers' Vocational Lives" "council and Conciliation," and "Order of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism," respectively; and the term "preceding paragraph" in Article 3137, paragraph (3) of the Act on Securing, Etc. of Equal Opportunity and Treatment between Men and Women in Employment is deemed to be replaced with "Article 30-637, paragraph (1) of the Act on Comprehensively Advancing Labor Measures, and Stabilizing the Employment of Workers, and Enriching Workers' Vocational Lives."

  雇用の分野における男女の均等な機会及び待遇の確保等に関する法律第二十六条から第二十七三十三条まで並びに第三十一七条第三項及び第四項の規定は、前項の規定により読み替えて適用する第三十条の六七条第一項の規定により指名を受けて調停員が行う調停について準用する。この場合において、同法第二十六条から第二十三九条まで及び第二十六三十二条中「委員会は」とあるのは「調停員は」と、同法第二十六条中「事業場」とあるのは「事業所」と、同法第二十一七条中「当該委員会が置かれる都道府県労働局」とあるのは「当該調停員を指名した地方運輸局長（運輸監理部長を含む。）が置かれる地方運輸局（運輸監理部を含む。）」と、同法第二十五三十一条第一項中「第十八二十四条第一項」とあるのは「労働施策の総合的な推進並びに労働者の雇用の安定及び職業生活の充実等に関する法律（昭和四十一年法律第百三十二号）第三十条の四五条」と、同法第二十六三十二条中「当該委員会に係属している」とあるのは「当該調停員が取り扱つている」と、同法第二十七三十三条中「この節」とあるのは「労働施策の総合的な推進並びに労働者の雇用の安定及び職業生活の充実等に関する法律第三十八四十七条第三項において準用する第二十六条から前条まで並びに第三十一七条第三項及び第四項」と、「調停」とあるのは「合議体及び調停」と、「厚生労働省令」とあるのは「国土交通省令」と、同法第三十一七条第三項中「前項」とあるのは「労働施策の総合的な推進並びに労働者の雇用の安定及び職業生活の充実等に関する法律第三十条の六七条第一項」と読み替えるものとする。

• ChangedArticle 48, paragraph (1)

  The provisions of Articles 6 through 9, Chapter VI (excluding Article 27), Chapter VII, Articles 30-435 through 30-839, Article 3342, paragraph (1) (limited to the part pertaining to the enforcement of the provisions of Chapter X), paragraph (2), and Article 3645, paragraph (1) do not apply to national public employees and local public employees; the provisions of Chapter VIII and Articles 30-2 and 30-331 through 34 do not apply to national public employees in the regular service (excluding employees falling under Article 2, item (ii) of the Act on Labor Relations of Agency Engaged in Administrative Execution (Act No. 257 of 1948)), court officials to whom the Act on Temporary Measures concerning Court Officials (Act No. 299 of 1951) applies, the Diet officers prescribed in Article 1 of the Diet Officers Act (Act No. 85 of 1947), and the personnel prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (5) of the Self-Defense Forces Act (Act No. 165 of 1954).

  第六条から第九条まで、第六章（第二十七条を除く。）、第七章、第三十条の四五条から第三十条の八九条まで、第三十三四十二条第一項（第十章の規定の施行に関するものに限る。）及び第二項並びに第三十六四十五条第一項の規定は国家公務員及び地方公務員について、第八章、及び第三十条の二及び一条から第三十条の三四条までの規定は一般職の国家公務員（行政執行法人の労働関係に関する法律（昭和二十三年法律第二百五十七号）第二条第二号の職員を除く。）、裁判所職員臨時措置法（昭和二十六年法律第二百九十九号）の適用を受ける裁判所職員、国会職員法（昭和二十二年法律第八十五号）第一条に規定する国会職員及び自衛隊法（昭和二十九年法律第百六十五号）第二条第五項に規定する隊員については、適用しない。

• ChangedArticle 49, paragraph (1)

  A person that has violated the provisions of Article 3241, paragraph (4) is punished by imprisonment for a term of not more than six months or a fine of not more than 500,000 yen.

  第三十二四十一条第四項の規定に違反した者は、六月以下の拘禁刑又は五十万円以下の罰金に処する。

• ChangedArticle 50, paragraph (1)

  A person falling underIn any of the following itemscases, the person that has committed the violation is punished by a fine of not more than 300,000 yen:

  次の各号のいずれかに該当する場合には、当該違反行為をした者は、三十万円以下の罰金に処する。

• ChangedArticle 50, paragraph (1), item (i)

  where a person that has failed to give notification or has given false notification, in violation of the provisions of Article 27, paragraph (1);

  第二十七条第一項の規定に違反して届出をせず、又は虚偽の届出をした者とき。

• ChangedArticle 50, paragraph (1), item (ii)

  where a person that has failed to give notification under the provisions of Article 28, paragraph (1) or that has given false notification;

  第二十八条第一項の規定による届出をせず、又は虚偽の届出をした者とき。

• ChangedArticle 50, paragraph (1), item (iii)

  where a person that has failed to submit a report under the provisions of Article 3443, paragraph (1) or that has submitted a false report, a person that has failed to answer, or has given a false statement in response to a question asked by the relevant personnel under the provisions of the same paragraph, or a person that has refused, obstructed, or evaded an inspection under the provisions of the same paragraph; or

  第三十四四十三条第一項の規定による報告をせず、若しくは虚偽の報告をし、又は同項の規定による当該職員の質問に対して答弁せず、若しくは虚偽の陳述をし、若しくは同項の規定による検査を拒み、妨げ、若しくは忌避した者とき。

• ChangedArticle 50, paragraph (1), item (iv)

  where a person that has failed to submit a report under the provisions of Article 3645, paragraph (2) or that has submitted a false report.

  第三十六四十五条第二項の規定による報告をせず、又は虚偽の報告をした者とき。

• AddedArticle 51, paragraph (1)

  A person that has failed to submit a report under the provisions of Article 45, paragraph (1) or that has submitted a false report is subject to a civil fine of not more than 200,000 yen.

  第四十五条第一項の規定による報告をせず、又は虚偽の報告をした者は、二十万円以下の過料に処する。