Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

on a date not yet set

Companies Act

会社法かいしゃほう

Amended by

Act on the Arrangement, etc. of Related Acts upon the Enforcement of the Act on Security Assignment Contracts and Retention of Title Contracts

譲渡担保契約及び所有権留保契約に関する法律の施行に伴う関係法律の整備等に関する法律

The whole text as amended, on e-Gov

On the day Act No. 56 of 2025 (譲渡担保契約及び所有権留保契約に関する法律) . The exact day is not fixed yet.

The same amending law also changes

6 provisions changed · 6 provisions added

Each provision the amendment changes, before and after in one: words it removes are struck through, words it adds are highlighted. The Japanese is the law; the icon beside each English column says whose English it is.

Article 516 · (Order to Suspend Procedures to Enforce Security Interests)第五百十六条担保権の実行の手続等の中止命令

Read it in the amended law
  • ChangedArticle 516, paragraph (1)

    If the court issues an order to commence special liquidation, the court may, in response to a petition by the liquidators, company auditors, creditors or shareholders or ex officio, prescribing a reasonable period of time, order the suspension of the procedures to enforce athe security interest (including the prohibition of the enforcement of a pledge over a claim; the same applies in the following paragraph), the suspension of the procedures to enforce the charge on whole company assets or the suspension of the judicial enforcement procedures if the court finds that it suits the general interests of the creditors and that those who petitioned for the procedures to enforce have a security interest in the assets of the security interest (meaning proceduresliquidating stock company (referred to enforce the as "security interest the assets ofholders" in the liquidating stock company, following paragraph and Article 891), those who petitioned for procedures to enforce charge on whole company assets or those who petitioned for judicial enforcement procedures based on the general liens and other claims that have general priority that have already been enforced against the assets of the liquidating stock company; hereinafter the same applies (referred to as "general lien holders, etc." in thisthat Article) are not likely to suffer undue loss.

    裁判所は、特別清算開始の命令があった場合において、債権者の一般の利益に適合し、かつ、担保権の実行の手続等(清算株式会社の財産につき存する担保権を有する者(次項及び第八百九十一条において「担保権の実行の手続者」という。)、企業担保権の実行の手続の申立人又は清算株式会社の財産に対して既にされている一般の先取特権その他一般の優先権がある債権に基づく強制執行の手続をいう。以下このの申立人(同条において同じ。)の申立人「一般先取特権者等」という。)に不当な損害を及ぼすおそれがないものと認めるときは、清算人、監査役、債権者若しくは株主の申立てにより又は職権で、相当の期間を定めて、当該担保権の実行の手続の中止(債権を目的とする質権の実行の禁止を含む。次項において同じ。)、当該企業担保権の実行の手続の中止又は当該強制執行の手続の中止を命ずることができる。

  • AddedArticle 516, paragraph (2)

    An order to suspend under the provisions of the preceding paragraph (limited to one relating to the suspension of procedures to enforce a security interest that exists in the assets of the liquidating stock company) may be issued with conditions attached that are necessary to prevent undue loss to the security interest holders.

    前項の規定による中止の命令(清算株式会社の財産につき存する担保権の実行の手続の中止に係るものに限る。)は、担保権者に不当な損害を及ぼさないために必要な条件を付して発することができる。

  • AddedArticle 516, paragraph (3)

    When an order to suspend under the provisions of paragraph (1) prohibiting the enforcement of a pledge over a claim has been issued, prescription is not completed with respect to the claim secured by that pledge until the day on which two months have elapsed from the day following the day on which that order ceased to be effective.

    債権を目的とする質権の実行を禁止する第一項の規定による中止の命令が発せられたときは、当該質権の被担保債権については、当該命令が効力を失った日の翌日から二月を経過する日までの間は、時効は、完成しない。

Article 516-2第五百十六条の二

Read it in the amended law
  • AddedArticle 516-2, paragraph (1)

    If the court has ordered, pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article, the suspension of procedures to enforce a pledge over a claim (including the prohibition of enforcement; the same applies in Article 891, paragraphs (1) and (2)), the third-party obligor may not assert, in relation to the special liquidation, the effect of a payment made to the pledgee or of any other act extinguishing the obligation; provided, however, that this is limited to when the third-party obligor knew, at the time of that act, that the order had been issued.

    裁判所が前条第一項の規定により債権を目的とする質権の実行の手続の中止(実行の禁止を含む。第八百九十一条第一項及び第二項において同じ。)を命じた場合には、第三債務者は、特別清算の関係においては、質権者に対してした弁済その他の債務を消滅させる行為の効力を主張することができない。ただし、第三債務者が、その行為の当時、その命令があったことを知っていたときに限る。

  • AddedArticle 516-2, paragraph (2)

    In the case prescribed in the main clause of the preceding paragraph (limited to the case where the subject matter of the claim is money), the third-party obligor may be released from the obligation by depositing money equivalent to the full amount of the claim.

    前項本文に規定する場合(債権の目的物が金銭である場合に限る。)には、第三債務者は、債権の全額に相当する金銭を供託して、その債務を免れることができる。

  • AddedArticle 516-2, paragraph (3)

    When a deposit under the provisions of the preceding paragraph has been made, the pledgee who held a pledge over the claim referred to in that paragraph has the same rights with respect to the deposited money as a pledgee.

    前項の規定による供託がされたときは、同項の債権を目的とする質権を有していた質権者は、供託金につき質権者と同一の権利を有する。

Article 891 · (Order to Suspend Procedures to Enforce Security Interests)第八百九十一条担保権の実行の手続等の中止命令

Read it in the amended law
  • ChangedArticle 891, paragraph (1)

    The court must, when issuing an order to suspend under the provisions of Article 516, paragraph (1) (excluding an order to suspend procedures to enforce a pledge over a claim), hear statements by the security interest holders, the petitioner of the procedures to enforce security interests prescribed in that Articlecharge on whole company assets or the general lien holders, etc.

    裁判所は、第五百十六条第一項の規定による中止の命令(債権を目的とする質権の実行の手続の中止の命令を除く。)を発する場合には、同条に規定する担保権者、企業担保権の実行の手続等手続の申立人又は一般先取特権者等の陳述を聴かなければならない。

  • ChangedArticle 891, paragraph (2)

    The court may change or revoke the must, when it has issued an order to suspend referredprocedures to in enforce a pledge over a claim under the preceding provisions of Article 516, paragraph (1), promptly hear statements by the pledgee; provided, however, that this does not apply if the court has heard statements by the pledgee in advance.

    裁判所は、前項の第五百十六条第一項の規定による債権を目的とする質権の実行の手続の中止の命令を変更し、又は取り消すことができる発した場合には、速やかに、質権者の陳述を聴かなければならない。ただし、あらかじめ質権者の陳述を聴いたときは、この限りでない

  • ChangedArticle 891, paragraph (3)

    Only the petitioner referred to in paragraph (1)The court may enter an immediate appeal againstchange or revoke the order to suspend referred to in paragraph (1) and a ruling to change under the provisions of the preceding paragraphtwo paragraphs.

    第一裁判所は、前二項の中止の命令及び前項の規定による変更の決定に対しては、第一項の申立人に限り、即時抗告をするを変更し、又は取り消すことができる。

  • ChangedArticle 891, paragraph (4)

    The Only the security interest holders, the petitioner of the procedures to enforce charge on whole company assets or the general lien holders, etc. may enter an immediate appeal against the order to suspend referred to in the preceding paragraph does not have paragraphs (1) and (2) and a ruling to change under the effectprovisions of staying executionthe preceding paragraph.

    第一項及び第二項の中止の命令並びに前項の即時抗告は、執行停止の効力を有しない規定による変更の決定に対しては、担保権者、企業担保権の実行手続の申立人又は一般先取特権者等に限り、即時抗告をすることができる

  • ChangedArticle 891, paragraph (5)

    If the judicial decision prescribed in paragraph (3) or a judicial decision on theThe immediate appeal referred to in that paragraph is made, the written judgment thereof must be served on the partiespreceding paragraph does not have the effect of staying execution.

    第三項に規定する裁判及び同項の即時抗告についての裁判があった場合には、その裁判書を当事者に送達しなければならは、執行停止の効力を有しない。

  • AddedArticle 891, paragraph (6)

    If the judicial decision prescribed in paragraph (4) or a judicial decision on the immediate appeal referred to in that paragraph is made, the written judgment thereof must be served on the parties.

    第四項に規定する裁判及び同項の即時抗告についての裁判があった場合には、その裁判書を当事者に送達しなければならない。