A court that has issued a protection order must revoke the order when the person who petitioned for the order has filed a petition for its revocation; the same applies if the person subject to a protection order files a petition for the revocation of the order and the court confirms that the person who petitioned for the order does not object, on or after the day on which three months have elapsed from the day on which the stay-away order became effective in the case of a stay-away order or an order under the provisions of Article 10, paragraphs (2) through (4), or on or after the day two weeks have elapsed from the day on which the eviction order became effective in the case of an eviction order.
保護命令を発した裁判所は、当該保護命令の申立てをした者の申立てがあった場合には、当該保護命令を取り消さなければならない。接近禁止命令又は第十条第二項から第四項までの規定による命令にあっては接近禁止命令が効力を生じた日から起算して三月を経過した日以後において、退去等命令にあっては当該退去等命令が効力を生じた日から起算して二週間を経過した日以後において、これらの命令を受けた者が申し立て、当該裁判所がこれらの命令の申立てをした者に異議がないことを確認したときも、同様とする。
The provisions of paragraph (6) of the preceding Article apply mutatis mutandis to cases where the court that issued a stay-away order revokes the stay-away order pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph.
A person subject to a paragraph (3) order may file a petition for revocation of the paragraph (3) order with the court that issued the paragraph (3) order on the grounds that a requirement prescribed in Article 10, paragraph (3) is no longer being met on or after the day on which six months have elapsed from the day on which the stay-away order became effective or the day on which three months have elapsed from the day on which the paragraph (3) order became effective, whichever comes later.
When rendering a judicial decision on the revocation referred to in the preceding paragraph, the court must hear the opinion of the person who filed the paragraph (3) order pertaining to the revocation.
An immediate appeal may be lodged against a judicial decision on a petition for revocation referred to in paragraph (3).
第三項の取消しの申立てについての裁判に対しては、即時抗告をすることができる。
A judicial decision on the revocation referred to in paragraph (3) does not become effective until it becomes final and binding.
第三項の取消しの裁判は、確定しなければその効力を生じない。
The provisions of Article 15, paragraph (3) and paragraph (7) of the preceding Article apply mutatis mutandis to the cases referred to in paragraphs (1) through (3).
第十五条第三項及び前条第七項の規定は、第一項から第三項までの場合について準用する。