Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

1 article

Article 30-3Prohibition on Unreasonable Treatment

第三十条の三(不合理な待遇の禁止等)

A worker dispatching provider must not create differences between the base pay, bonuses, and other treatment of the dispatched workers it employs and the corresponding treatment of regular workers that the client employs that are found to be unreasonable in consideration of the circumstances, including the dispatched workers' and regular workers' job descriptions and the scope of changes in their job descriptions and assignment, that are found to be appropriate in light of the nature of the treatment and the purpose of treating workers in that way.

派遣元事業主は、その雇用する派遣労働者の基本給、賞与その他の待遇のそれぞれについて、当該待遇に対応する派遣先に雇用される通常の労働者の待遇との間において、当該派遣労働者及び通常の労働者の職務の内容、当該職務の内容及び配置の変更の範囲その他の事情のうち、当該待遇の性質及び当該待遇を行う目的に照らして適切と認められるものを考慮して、不合理と認められる相違を設けてはならない。

A worker dispatching provider must not, without legitimate grounds, subject a dispatched worker to treatment that is disadvantageous in terms of base pay, bonuses, or other such treatment when compared to the treatment accorded to a regular worker employed by the client, if the dispatched worker's job description is the same as that of the regular worker, and their job description and assignment throughout the entire period until the end of their assigned work for the client are expected, in light of the worker dispatching contract, the client's customary practices, and other such circumstances, to be changed within the same scope as the job description and assignment of the regular worker throughout the entire period until the end of their employment relationship with the client.

派遣元事業主は、職務の内容が派遣先に雇用される通常の労働者と同一の派遣労働者であつて、当該労働者派遣契約及び当該派遣先における慣行その他の事情からみて、当該派遣先における派遣就業が終了するまでの全期間において、その職務の内容及び配置が当該派遣先との雇用関係が終了するまでの全期間における当該通常の労働者の職務の内容及び配置の変更の範囲と同一の範囲で変更されることが見込まれるものについては、正当な理由がなく、基本給、賞与その他の待遇のそれぞれについて、当該待遇に対応する当該通常の労働者の待遇に比して不利なものとしてはならない。

Read this in its chapter

© 2026 japanlaw.orgA copy for reading and reference — not an official source, and not legal advice. Only the Japanese text published by the government has legal effect.SourcesTermsPrivacy