①If the dispute resolution mediators terminate dispute resolution procedures due to the reason that there is no prospect of reaching a settlement between the parties to a dispute related to banking services, etc. through dispute resolution procedures, and the party to the dispute related to banking services, etc. which filed the request for dispute resolution procedures files an action on a claim that was subject to the dispute resolution procedures within one month from the day on which the party receives notice of the termination, the action is deemed to have been filed at the time that the claim was filed for dispute resolution procedures, in terms of the postponement of expiry of the prescription period.

②The provisions of the preceding paragraph also apply if the discontinuation of dispute resolution services by a designated dispute resolution organization is authorized pursuant to the provisions of Article 52-83, paragraph (1), or the designation under the provisions of Article 52-62, paragraph (1) is revoked pursuant to the provisions of Article 52-84, paragraph (1), and there is a dispute related to banking services, etc. for which dispute resolution procedures have been implemented on the day of authorization or revocation, and the party to the dispute related to banking services, etc. which has filed the request for dispute resolution procedures files an action on a claim that was subject to those dispute resolution procedures within one month from the day on which the party receives the notice under Article 52-83, paragraph (3) or Article 52-84, paragraph (3), or within one month from the day on which the party comes to know of the authorization or revocation, whichever comes earlier.