When the Japan Fair Trade Commission has granted the approval set forth in Article 11, paragraph (1) or (2), if the Japan Fair Trade Commission finds that the facts required for the approval have ceased to exist or have changed, it may rescind or modify the approval by a decision.
The provisions of Articles 49 through 60 and, Article 63, paragraphs (3) and (4) apply mutatis mutandis to a decision under the provisions of the preceding paragraph.
第四十九条から第六十条まで並びに第六十三条第三項及び第四項の規定は、前項の規定による決定について準用する。
If the Japan Fair Trade Commission finds that maintenance of a cease and desist order or a competition restoration order is inappropriate due to changes in economic conditions or other reasons, it may rescind or modify the cease and desist order or the competition restoration order by a decision provided, however, that this does not apply if the action harms the interests of the addressee of the cease and desist order or the competition restoration order.
The provisions of Article 63, paragraphs (3) and (4) apply mutatis mutandis to a decision under the provisions of the preceding paragraph.
Read this with the articles around it
cease and desist order
「排除措置命令」
An order the Japan Fair Trade Commission makes under Article 7, paragraph (1) or (2) (including as applied by Article 8-2, paragraph (2) and Article 20, paragraph (2)), Article 8-2, paragraph (1) or (3), Article 17-2 or Article 20, paragraph (1), requiring the measures needed to end a violation.
Short name set inArticle 49, paragraph (1)
competition restoration order
「競争回復措置命令」
An order the Japan Fair Trade Commission makes under Article 8-4, paragraph (1) where a monopolistic situation (独占的状態) exists, requiring an enterprise to transfer part of its business or take other measures needed to restore competition.
Short name set inArticle 64, paragraph (1)
Fair Trade Commission
公正取引委員会
The body the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (独占禁止法, the Antimonopoly Act) sets up to achieve that Act's purpose — among other things, to promote fair and free competition by banning private monopolization, unreasonable restraint of trade and unfair trade practices, and so to protect the interests of general consumers and the democratic and sound development of the national economy (Antimonopoly Act, Articles 1 and 27, paragraph (1)). It comes under the Prime Minister's jurisdiction, but its chairperson and four commissioners — appointed by the Prime Minister with the consent of both Houses of the Diet — exercise their authority independently (Articles 27, paragraph (2), 28 and 29). Under the Act against Unjustifiable Premiums and Misleading Representations, businesses and trade associations may, with the approval of both the Prime Minister and the Fair Trade Commission, conclude or set agreements or rules (協定又は規約) on premiums or representations (Article 36, paragraph (1)).
Written by AI using Antimonopoly Act, Arts. 1, 27, 28, 29 and Act against Unjustifiable Premiums and Misleading Representations, Art. 36 as a reference.