The provisions of Article 7, paragraphs (1) and (2) (including when these are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 8-2, paragraph (2) and Article 20, paragraph (2)), Article 7-2, paragraph (1) (including when these are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 8-3 following the deemed replacement of terms), Article 7-9, paragraph (1) and (2), Article 8-2, paragraph (1) and (3), Article 17-2, Article 20, paragraph (1), and Article 20-2 through Article 20-6 do not apply for the act that was the reason for suspicion related to that approval and the act related to the cessation measures, if the Japan Fair Trade Commission gave the approval of paragraph (3) of the preceding Article (including approval for changes pursuant to Article 48-3, paragraph (8); the same applies in the following Article, Article 65, Article 68, paragraph (1), and Article 76, paragraph (2)) provided, however, that this does not apply if there is a decision pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1) of the following Article.
第七条第一項及び第二項（第八条の二第二項及び第二十条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）、第七条の二第一項（第八条の三において読み替えて準用する場合を含む。）、第七条の九第一項及び第二項、第八条の二第一項及び第三項、第十七条の二、第二十条第一項並びに第二十条の二から第二十条の六までの規定は、公正取引委員会が前条第三項の認定（同条第八項の規定による変更の認定を含む。次条、第六十五条、第六十八条第一項及び第七十六条第二項において同じ。）をした場合において、当該認定に係る疑いの理由となつた行為及び排除措置に係る行為については、適用しない。ただし、次条第一項の規定による決定があつた場合は、この限りでない。
Read this with the articles around it
cessation measuresmachine translation
「排除措置」
In Articles 48-3 to 48-5, the measures that a person notified under Article 48-2 of a suspected violation draws up itself and intends to carry out to end the act that gave rise to the suspicion.
Short name set inArticle 48-3, paragraph (1)· applies only in this article and in Articles 48-4 and 48-5
Fair Trade Commission
公正取引委員会
The body the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (独占禁止法, the Antimonopoly Act) sets up to achieve that Act's purpose — among other things, to promote fair and free competition by banning private monopolization, unreasonable restraint of trade and unfair trade practices, and so to protect the interests of general consumers and the democratic and sound development of the national economy (Antimonopoly Act, Articles 1 and 27, paragraph (1)). It comes under the Prime Minister's jurisdiction, but its chairperson and four commissioners — appointed by the Prime Minister with the consent of both Houses of the Diet — exercise their authority independently (Articles 27, paragraph (2), 28 and 29). Under the Act against Unjustifiable Premiums and Misleading Representations, businesses and trade associations may, with the approval of both the Prime Minister and the Fair Trade Commission, conclude or set agreements or rules (協定又は規約) on premiums or representations (Article 36, paragraph (1)).
Written by AI using Antimonopoly Act, Arts. 1, 27, 28, 29 and Act against Unjustifiable Premiums and Misleading Representations, Art. 36 as a reference.