Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

This text is not in force yetIt by 13 June 2028, on a day set by — at the latest in 2 years

Read the text in force →

Personal Status Litigation Act

人事訴訟法(じんじそしょうほう)

Chapter II Special Provisions for Marital Relationship Litigation (Articles 35 to 40)

The law as Act on the Arrangement of Related Acts to Promote the Use of Information and Communications Technology in Civil Procedures, etc. (Act No. 53 of 2023) leaves it, with the words it changes marked.

The main text is read a page at a time: a chapter to a page, and a long chapter in runs of articles. The whole main text, and the supplementary provisions and appended tables this amendment changes. Those it leaves untouched are on the page for the text in force.

How the changes are shown

Underlined: words the amendment adds. A bar: where it removes words.Underlined: words the amendment adds. Struck through: the words it removes.Underlined: words the amendment adds. Struck through: the words it removes.

Article 35第三十五条

Access to Parts of Case Records Concerning Examination of Facts(事実調査部分の閲覧等)
10 changes in this article
Article 35, paragraph (1)(事実調査部分の閲覧等)(Access to Parts of Case Records Concerning Examination of Facts)Changed

A person may file a request under Article 91, paragraph (1), (3) or (4) of the Code of Civil Procedure for inspection or copying, delivery of an authenticated copy, transcript or extract of it, or reproduction of it (referred to below as "inspection, etc."for access to the case records (meaning access to the case records prescribed in Article 92, paragraph (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure; the same applies in this Article below) with respect to a part of the case record that concerns an examination of the facts (referred to below as the "part of the record concerning an examination of the facts" in this Article and paragraph (1) of the following Article) only if the court gives its permission pursuant to the provisions of the following paragraph (3) or paragraph (3)(4).

訴訟記録中事実の調査に係る部分(以下この条及び次条第一項において「事実調査部分」という。)についての民事訴訟法第九十一条第一項、第三項又は第四項の規定による閲覧若しくは謄写、その正本、謄本若しくは抄本の交付又はその複製(訴訟記録の閲覧等(民事訴訟法第九十二条第一項に規定する訴訟記録の閲覧等をいう。以下この条において「閲覧等」という同じ。)の請求は、裁判所が次項又は第三項第三項又は第四項の規定により許可したときに限り、することができる。

Article 35, paragraph (2)(事実調査部分の閲覧等)(Access to Parts of Case Records Concerning Examination of Facts)Added

Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, a party may file a request with the court clerk for access to the case records concerning those portions of the part of the record concerning an examination of the facts set forth below without obtaining the court's approval.

当事者は、事実調査部分のうち、次に掲げるものについては、前項の規定にかかわらず、裁判所の許可を得ないで、裁判所書記官に対し、訴訟記録の閲覧等の請求をすることができる。

Article 35, paragraph (2), item (i)(事実調査部分の閲覧等)(Access to Parts of Case Records Concerning Examination of Facts)Added

paper documents, etc. (meaning a paper document, written material, transcript, extract, authenticated copy, duplicate copy, extra copy, or any other paper or other tangible object into which information that can be perceived with the human senses, such as characters and shapes, has been entered; the same applies below), audiotapes, or videotapes (including objects on which certain matters are recorded by any means equivalent thereto) submitted by the party;

当該当事者が提出した書面等(書面、書類、文書、謄本、抄本、正本、副本、複本その他文字、図形等人の知覚によって認識することができる情報が記載された紙その他の有体物をいう。以下同じ。)又は録音テープ若しくはビデオテープ(これらに準ずる方法により一定の事項を記録した物を含む。)

Article 35, paragraph (2), item (ii)(事実調査部分の閲覧等)(Access to Parts of Case Records Concerning Examination of Facts)Added

information recorded in a file using an electronic data processing system specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court by the party pursuant to the provisions of this Act or other laws and regulations;

当該当事者がこの法律その他の法令の規定により最高裁判所規則で定める電子情報処理組織を使用してファイルに記録した事項

Article 35, paragraph (2), item (iii)(事実調査部分の閲覧等)(Access to Parts of Case Records Concerning Examination of Facts)Added

if the information stated or recorded in a paper document, etc. or recording media submitted by the party were recorded in a file by the court clerk pursuant to the provisions of Article 132-13 of the Code of Civil Procedure applied by replacing terms pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (3) of the following Article, those matters; or

当該当事者が提出した書面等又は記録媒体に記載され、又は記録された事項を次条第三項の規定により読み替えて適用する民事訴訟法第百三十二条の十三の規定により裁判所書記官がファイルに記録した場合における当該事項

Article 35, paragraph (2), item (iv)(事実調査部分の閲覧等)(Access to Parts of Case Records Concerning Examination of Facts)Added

regarding information set forth in the preceding two items, if measures are taken to output the contents to a document or to record those contents in a different recording medium pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1) of the following Article or Article 92, paragraph (9) of the Code of Civil Procedure, that document or recording medium.

前二号に掲げる事項について次条第一項又は民事訴訟法第九十二条第九項の規定によりその内容を書面に出力し、又はこれを他の記録媒体に記録する措置を講じた場合の当該書面又は当該記録媒体

Article 35, paragraph (3)(事実調査部分の閲覧等)(Access to Parts of Case Records Concerning Examination of Facts)Changed

If a party files a petition for permission for inspection, etc. of the access to the case records, etc. with respect to a part of the record concerning that concerns an examination of the facts, the court must permit that inspection, etc.it provided, however, that as it relates to a part of the record concerning an examination of the facts for which it is found that the following risks could arise from conducting the inspection, etc.the party having access to the case records, the court may permit that inspection, etc.access only if the court finds this to be appropriate:

裁判所は、当事者から事実調査部分のについての訴訟記録の閲覧等の許可の申立てがあった場合においては、その閲覧等これを許可しなければならない。ただし、当該事実調査部分中訴訟記録の閲覧等を行うことにより次に掲げるおそれがあると認められる部分については、相当と認めるときに限り、その閲覧等これを許可することができる。

Article 35, paragraph (3), item (i)(事実調査部分の閲覧等)

a risk of harming the interests of a child the parties have who has not yet reached adulthood, if applicable;

当事者間に成年に達しない子がある場合におけるその子の利益を害するおそれ

Article 35, paragraph (3), item (ii)(事実調査部分の閲覧等)

a risk of disrupting the private life or business of a party or a third party; or

当事者又は第三者の私生活又は業務の平穏を害するおそれ

Article 35, paragraph (3), item (iii)(事実調査部分の閲覧等)

the risk that revealing a deep personal secret from the private life of a party or a third party could substantially interfere with their life in the community or cause substantial harm to their reputation.

当事者又は第三者の私生活についての重大な秘密が明らかにされることにより、その者が社会生活を営むのに著しい支障を生じ、又はその者の名誉を著しく害するおそれ

Article 35, paragraph (4)(事実調査部分の閲覧等)(Access to Parts of Case Records Concerning Examination of Facts)Changed

If a third party makes a prima facie showing of interest and files a petition for permission for inspection, etc. of the access to the case records with respect to a part of the record concerning an examination of the facts, the court may permit that inspection, etc.it if it finds this to be appropriate.

裁判所は、利害関係を疎明した第三者から事実調査部分のについての訴訟記録の閲覧等の許可の申立てがあった場合においては、相当と認めるときは、その閲覧等これを許可することができる。

Article 35, paragraph (5)(事実調査部分の閲覧等)(Access to Parts of Case Records Concerning Examination of Facts)Changed

An immediate appeal may be filed against a judicial decision denying thedismissing a petition as referred to in paragraph (2)(3).

第二項第三項の申立てを却下した裁判に対しては、即時抗告をすることができる。

Article 35, paragraph (6)(事実調査部分の閲覧等)

If it is found that the immediate appeal under the provisions of the preceding paragraph has been filed for the purpose of unjustly delaying personal status litigation procedures, the court of first instance must dismiss it.

前項の規定による即時抗告が人事訴訟に関する手続を不当に遅延させることを目的としてされたものであると認められるときは、原裁判所は、その即時抗告を却下しなければならない。

Article 35, paragraph (7)(事実調査部分の閲覧等)

An immediate appeal may be filed against an order under the provisions of the preceding paragraph.

前項の規定による決定に対しては、即時抗告をすることができる。

Article 35, paragraph (8)(事実調査部分の閲覧等)(Access to Parts of Case Records Concerning Examination of Facts)Changed

No appeal may be entered against a judicial decision to dismiss the petition referred to in paragraph (3)(4).

第三項第四項の申立てを却下した裁判に対しては、不服を申し立てることができない。

Article 35, paragraph (9)(事実調査部分の閲覧等)

The provisions of Article 133-2 and Article 133-3 of the Code of Civil Procedure do not apply to the part of the case record that concerns an examination of the facts.

事実調査部分については、民事訴訟法第百三十三条の二及び第百三十三条の三の規定は、適用しない。

Article 35-2第三十五条の二Caption added

Security Control Measures for the Part of a Record Concerning an Investigation

事実調査部分の安全管理措置等

3 changes in this article
Article 35-2, paragraph (1)(事実調査部分の安全管理措置等)(Security Control Measures for the Part of a Record Concerning an Investigation)Added

When a court makes a decision referred to in Article 133, paragraph (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure and determines that it is necessary, the court may output to a document the information of the portion of electronic or magnetic case records (meaning electronic or magnetic case records prescribed in Article 91-2, paragraph (1) of that Code; the same applies in this Article below) recording concealed information (meaning personal information of a person seeking anonymity prescribed in Article 133, paragraph (2) of that Code; the same applies in this paragraph below) within the part of the case record that concerns an examination of the facts or any information that can identify by inference any concealed information or record that information in other recording media and take measures to erase those portions from the electronic or magnetic case records and other measures specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court as necessary and appropriate for the security control of those portions.

裁判所は、民事訴訟法第百三十三条第一項の決定があった場合において、必要があると認めるときは、電磁的訴訟記録(同法第九十一条の二第一項に規定する電磁的訴訟記録をいう。以下この条において同じ。)のうち、事実調査部分中秘匿事項(同法第百三十三条第二項に規定する秘匿事項をいう。以下この項において同じ。)又は秘匿事項を推知することができる事項が記録された部分につき、その内容を書面に出力し、又はこれを他の記録媒体に記録するとともに、当該部分を電磁的訴訟記録から消去する措置その他の当該部分の安全管理のために必要かつ適切なものとして最高裁判所規則で定める措置を講ずることができる。

Article 35-2, paragraph (2)(事実調査部分の安全管理措置等)(Security Control Measures for the Part of a Record Concerning an Investigation)Added

If measures are taken to erase information from electronic or magnetic case records under the provisions of the preceding paragraph and a subsequent judicial decision to cancel the order referred to in that paragraph becomes final and binding or the court otherwise determines that it is no longer necessary to take the measures, the court clerk must record that portion in a file.

前項の規定による電磁的訴訟記録から消去する措置が講じられた場合において、その後に同項の決定を取り消す裁判が確定したときその他裁判所が当該措置を講ずる必要がなくなったと認めたときは、裁判所書記官は、当該部分をファイルに記録しなければならない。

Article 35-2, paragraph (3)(事実調査部分の安全管理措置等)(Security Control Measures for the Part of a Record Concerning an Investigation)Added

Regarding the application of the provisions of Article 132-13 of the Code of Civil Procedure to matters stated or recorded in a paper document, etc. or recording media containing electronic or magnetic records submitted to the court in accordance with the provisions of this Act or other laws and regulations in an examination of the facts, in item (iv) of that Article, the phrase "under the provisions of Article 133-3, paragraph (1)" is deemed to be replaced with "referred to in Article 133, paragraph (1)," the phrase "of the decision" is deemed to be replaced with "that", the phrase "and containing electronic or magnetic records" is deemed to be replaced with "or that" and "the information" is deemed to be replaced with "concealed information (meaning concealed matters prescribed in paragraph (2) of that Article; the same applies in this item) or any information that can identify by inference any concealed information."

事実の調査においてこの法律その他の法令の規定に基づき裁判所に提出された書面等又は電磁的記録を記録した記録媒体に記載され、又は記録されている事項についての民事訴訟法第百三十二条の十三の規定の適用については、同条第四号中「第百三十三条の三第一項の規定による」とあるのは「第百三十三条第一項の」と、「当該決定に係る」とあるのは「当該」と、「及び電磁的記録を記録した」とあるのは「又は当該」と、「事項」とあるのは「秘匿事項(同条第二項に規定する秘匿事項をいう。以下この号において同じ。)又は秘匿事項を推知することができる事項」とする。

Article 36第三十六条

Judicial Decisions on Ancillary Disposition in Cases of Termination of Marriage Other Than by Judgment(判決によらない婚姻の終了の場合の附帯処分についての裁判)
Article 36, paragraph (1)

In litigation involving an action to rescind a marriage or an action for divorce, if the marriage that is the subject of that action has been terminated other than by a judgment, but a petition on an ancillary disposition has already been filed and any matter in question was not determined when the marriage was terminated, the court in charge of the case must conduct the trial and make a judicial decision on the ancillary disposition.

婚姻の取消し又は離婚の訴えに係る訴訟において判決によらないで当該訴えに係る婚姻が終了した場合において、既に附帯処分の申立てがされているときであって、その附帯処分に係る事項がその婚姻の終了に際し定められていないときは、受訴裁判所は、その附帯処分についての審理及び裁判をしなければならない。

Section 3 Settlements; Waiver and Acknowledgement of Claims第三節 和解並びに請求の放棄及び認諾

Article 37第三十七条

2 changes in this article
Article 37, paragraph (1)Changed

Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 19, paragraph (2), the provisions of Article 266 of the Code of Civil Procedure (excluding the part related to the acknowledgement of a claim in paragraph (2)) and of Article 267, paragraph (1) and ArticleArticles 267 and 267-2 of that Code apply to a settlement (limited to a settlement by which divorce is effected; the same applies in this Article below) and the waiver or acknowledgement of a claim in litigation connected with an action for divorce provided, however, that, with regard to the acknowledgement of claims, this is limited to cases in which it is not necessary to make a judicial decision on ancillary disposition, as referred to in Article 32, paragraph (1) or a judicial decision designating the person with parental authority, as referred to in paragraph (3) of that Article.

離婚の訴えに係る訴訟における和解(これにより離婚がされるものに限る。以下この条において同じ。)並びに請求の放棄及び認諾については、第十九条第二項の規定にかかわらず、民事訴訟法第二百六十六条(第二項中請求の認諾に関する部分を除く。)、第二百六十七条第一項及び第二百六十七条の二の規定を適用する。ただし、請求の認諾については、第三十二条第一項の附帯処分についての裁判又は同条第三項の親権者の指定についての裁判をすることを要しない場合に限る。

Article 37, paragraph (2)Removed

With regard to the application of Article 267, paragraph (1) and Article 267-2, paragraph (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure in the case referred to in the preceding paragraph, the phrase "creates an electronic record of a settlement or of the waiver or acknowledgment of a claim and records it in the court's computer files" in Article 267, paragraph (1) of that Code is deemed to be replaced with "enters a settlement or the waiver or acknowledgment of a claim in a record", the phrase "that entry" is deemed to be replaced with "that statement", and the phrase "an electronic record recorded in the court's computer files pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article" in Article 267-2, paragraph (1) of that Code is deemed to be replaced with "a record referred to in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article".

前項の場合における民事訴訟法第二百六十七条第一項及び第二百六十七条の二第一項の規定の適用については、同法第二百六十七条第一項中「について電子調書を作成し、これをファイルに記録した」とあるのは「を調書に記載した」と、「その記録」とあるのは「その記載」と、同法第二百六十七条の二第一項中「規定によりファイルに記録された電子調書」とあるのは「調書」とする。

Article 37, paragraph (2)

A settlement under the provisions of Article 264 and Article 265 of the Code of Civil Procedure may not be effected in litigation connected with a divorce action.

離婚の訴えに係る訴訟においては、民事訴訟法第二百六十四条及び第二百六十五条の規定による和解をすることができない。

Article 37, paragraph (3)

The parties referred to in Article 89, paragraph (3) and Article 170, paragraph (4) of the Code of Civil Procedure may not effect a settlement or acknowledge a claim on the date provided in Article 89, paragraph (2) and Article 170, paragraph (3) in litigation connected with an action for divorce provided, however, that this does not apply if the proceedings on that date are conducted by a method that allows both the court and each of the parties to communicate with one another through audio and visual transmissions while gaining an awareness of one another's situation.

離婚の訴えに係る訴訟における民事訴訟法第八十九条第二項及び第百七十条第三項の期日においては、同法第八十九条第三項及び第百七十条第四項の当事者は、和解及び請求の認諾をすることができない。ただし、当該期日における手続が裁判所及び当事者双方が映像と音声の送受信により相手の状態を相互に認識しながら通話をすることができる方法によって行われた場合には、この限りでない。

Section 4 Securing Performance第四節 履行の確保

Article 38第三十八条

Issuing Recommendations to Perform(履行の勧告)
Article 38, paragraph (1)

If requested by the obligee in connection with an obligation established through a judicial decision under the provisions of Article 32, paragraph (1) or (2) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (3) of that Article; the same applies below), the family court that made that judicial decision (or the family court constituting the court of first instance, if it was an appellate court that made that decision) may investigate the status of performance of the obligation and issue the obligor a recommendation to perform under the obligation.

第三十二条第一項又は第二項(同条第三項において準用する場合を含む。以下同じ。)の規定による裁判で定められた義務については、当該裁判をした家庭裁判所(上訴裁判所が当該裁判をした場合にあっては、第一審裁判所である家庭裁判所)は、権利者の申出があるときは、その義務の履行状況を調査し、義務者に対し、その義務の履行を勧告することができる。

Article 38, paragraph (2)

The family court referred to in the preceding paragraph may commission another family court to conduct the investigation or issue the recommendation under the provisions of that paragraph.

前項の家庭裁判所は、他の家庭裁判所に同項の規定による調査及び勧告を嘱託することができる。

Article 38, paragraph (3)

The family court referred to in paragraph (1) or the family court that has been commissioned as referred to in the preceding paragraph may have a family court investigator conduct the investigation or make the recommendation under the provisions of paragraph (1).

第一項の家庭裁判所及び前項の嘱託を受けた家庭裁判所は、家庭裁判所調査官に第一項の規定による調査及び勧告をさせることができる。

Article 38, paragraph (4)

The provisions of the preceding three paragraphs apply mutatis mutandis to the performance of an obligation that may be established through a judicial decision under Article 32, paragraph (1) or (2) but that has been established through a settlement in litigation connected with an action to rescind a marriage or with an action for divorce.

前三項の規定は、第三十二条第一項又は第二項の規定による裁判で定めることができる義務であって、婚姻の取消し又は離婚の訴えに係る訴訟における和解で定められたものの履行について準用する。

Article 39第三十九条

Issuing Orders to Perform(履行命令)
Article 39, paragraph (1)

At the request of the obligee, if a person has neglected to perform an obligation to pay money or provide any other economic benefit that has been established through a judicial decision under the provisions of Article 32, paragraph (2), the family court that made that decision (or the family court constituting the court of first instance, if it was an appellate court that made the decision) may issue an order to the obligor to perform under the obligation, specifying a reasonable period for performance. In that case, the court is to issue the order for all or part of the obligation that the obligor has neglected to perform by the time of the order.

第三十二条第二項の規定による裁判で定められた金銭の支払その他の財産上の給付を目的とする義務の履行を怠った者がある場合において、相当と認めるときは、当該裁判をした家庭裁判所(上訴裁判所が当該裁判をした場合にあっては、第一審裁判所である家庭裁判所)は、権利者の申立てにより、義務者に対し、相当の期限を定めてその義務の履行をすべきことを命ずることができる。この場合において、その命令は、その命令をする時までに義務者が履行を怠った義務の全部又は一部についてするものとする。

Article 39, paragraph (2)

The family court referred to in the preceding paragraph must hear a statement from the obligor in order to issue an order to perform the obligation pursuant to the provisions of that paragraph.

前項の家庭裁判所は、同項の規定により義務の履行を命ずるには、義務者の陳述を聴かなければならない。

Article 39, paragraph (3)

The provisions of the preceding two paragraphs apply mutatis mutandis to an obligation to pay money or provide any other such economic benefit that may be established through a judicial decision under the provisions of Article 32, paragraph (2) but that has been established through a settlement in litigation connected with an action to rescind a marriage or with an action for divorce.

前二項の規定は、第三十二条第二項の規定による裁判で定めることができる金銭の支払その他の財産上の給付を目的とする義務であって、婚姻の取消し又は離婚の訴えに係る訴訟における和解で定められたものの履行について準用する。

Article 39, paragraph (4)

If a person ordered to perform an obligation pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the preceding paragraph) does not comply with the order and is without legitimate grounds for their non-compliance, the family court that ordered performance of the obligation issues a ruling imposing a civil fine of not more than 100,000 yen.

第一項(前項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定により義務の履行を命じられた者が正当な理由なくその命令に従わないときは、その義務の履行を命じた家庭裁判所は、決定で、十万円以下の過料に処する。

Article 39, paragraph (5)

An immediate appeal may be filed against the ruling referred to in the preceding paragraph.

前項の決定に対しては、即時抗告をすることができる。

Article 39, paragraph (6)

The provisions of Article 189 of the Code of Civil Procedure apply mutatis mutandis to the ruling referred to in paragraph (4).

民事訴訟法第百八十九条の規定は、第四項の決定について準用する。

Article 40第四十条

Article 40, paragraph (1)

Deleted

削除

Change 1 of 15
© 2026 japanlaw.orgA copy for reading and reference — not an official source, and not legal advice. Only the Japanese text published by the government has legal effect.Run by Genjido LLC (源氏道合同会社) · contact@genjido.comContactSourcesTermsPrivacy