Chapter II Special Provisions for Marital Relationship Litigation (Articles 35 to 40)
The law as Act on the Arrangement of Related Acts to Promote the Use of Information and Communications Technology in Civil Procedures, etc. (Act No. 53 of 2023) leaves it, with the words it changes marked.
The main text is read a page at a time: a chapter to a page, and a long chapter in runs of articles. The whole main text, and the supplementary provisions and appended tables this amendment changes. Those it leaves untouched are on the page for the text in force.
Article 35第三十五条
Access to Parts of Case Records Concerning Examination of Facts(事実調査部分の閲覧等)
Article 35, paragraph (1)(事実調査部分の閲覧等)(Access to Parts of Case Records Concerning Examination of Facts)Changed
A person may file a request under Article 91, paragraph (1), (3) or (4) of the Code of Civil Procedure for inspection or copying, delivery of an authenticated copy, transcript or extract of it, or reproduction of it (referred to below as "inspection, etc."for access to the case records (meaning access to the case records prescribed in Article 92, paragraph (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure; the same applies in this Article below) with respect to a part of the case record that concerns an examination of the facts (referred to below as the "part of the record concerning an examination of the facts" in this Article and paragraph (1) of the following Article) only if the court gives its permission pursuant to the provisions of the following paragraph (3) or paragraph (3)(4).
Article 35, paragraph (2)(事実調査部分の閲覧等)(Access to Parts of Case Records Concerning Examination of Facts)Added
Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, a party may file a request with the court clerk for access to the case records concerning those portions of the part of the record concerning an examination of the facts set forth below without obtaining the court's approval.
Article 35, paragraph (2), item (i)(事実調査部分の閲覧等)(Access to Parts of Case Records Concerning Examination of Facts)Added
paper documents, etc. (meaning a paper document, written material, transcript, extract, authenticated copy, duplicate copy, extra copy, or any other paper or other tangible object into which information that can be perceived with the human senses, such as characters and shapes, has been entered; the same applies below), audiotapes, or videotapes (including objects on which certain matters are recorded by any means equivalent thereto) submitted by the party;
Article 35, paragraph (2), item (ii)(事実調査部分の閲覧等)(Access to Parts of Case Records Concerning Examination of Facts)Added
information recorded in a file using an electronic data processing system specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court by the party pursuant to the provisions of this Act or other laws and regulations;
Article 35, paragraph (2), item (iii)(事実調査部分の閲覧等)(Access to Parts of Case Records Concerning Examination of Facts)Added
if the information stated or recorded in a paper document, etc. or recording media submitted by the party were recorded in a file by the court clerk pursuant to the provisions of Article 132-13 of the Code of Civil Procedure applied by replacing terms pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (3) of the following Article, those matters; or
Article 35, paragraph (2), item (iv)(事実調査部分の閲覧等)(Access to Parts of Case Records Concerning Examination of Facts)Added
regarding information set forth in the preceding two items, if measures are taken to output the contents to a document or to record those contents in a different recording medium pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1) of the following Article or Article 92, paragraph (9) of the Code of Civil Procedure, that document or recording medium.
Article 35, paragraph (3)(事実調査部分の閲覧等)(Access to Parts of Case Records Concerning Examination of Facts)Changed
If a party files a petition for permission for inspection, etc. of the access to the case records, etc. with respect to a part of the record concerning that concerns an examination of the facts, the court must permit that inspection, etc.it provided, however, that as it relates to a part of the record concerning an examination of the facts for which it is found that the following risks could arise from conducting the inspection, etc.the party having access to the case records, the court may permit that inspection, etc.access only if the court finds this to be appropriate:
a risk of harming the interests of a child the parties have who has not yet reached adulthood, if applicable;
当事者間に成年に達しない子がある場合におけるその子の利益を害するおそれ
Article 35, paragraph (3), item (ii)(事実調査部分の閲覧等)
a risk of disrupting the private life or business of a party or a third party; or
当事者又は第三者の私生活又は業務の平穏を害するおそれ
Article 35, paragraph (3), item (iii)(事実調査部分の閲覧等)
the risk that revealing a deep personal secret from the private life of a party or a third party could substantially interfere with their life in the community or cause substantial harm to their reputation.
Article 35, paragraph (4)(事実調査部分の閲覧等)(Access to Parts of Case Records Concerning Examination of Facts)Changed
If a third party makes a prima facie showing of interest and files a petition for permission for inspection, etc. of the access to the case records with respect to a part of the record concerning an examination of the facts, the court may permit that inspection, etc.it if it finds this to be appropriate.
Article 35, paragraph (5)(事実調査部分の閲覧等)(Access to Parts of Case Records Concerning Examination of Facts)Changed
An immediate appeal may be filed against a judicial decision denying thedismissing a petition as referred to in paragraph (2)(3).
第二項第三項の申立てを却下した裁判に対しては、即時抗告をすることができる。
Article 35, paragraph (6)(事実調査部分の閲覧等)
If it is found that the immediate appeal under the provisions of the preceding paragraph has been filed for the purpose of unjustly delaying personal status litigation procedures, the court of first instance must dismiss it.
An immediate appeal may be filed against an order under the provisions of the preceding paragraph.
前項の規定による決定に対しては、即時抗告をすることができる。
Article 35, paragraph (8)(事実調査部分の閲覧等)(Access to Parts of Case Records Concerning Examination of Facts)Changed
No appeal may be entered against a judicial decision to dismiss the petition referred to in paragraph (3)(4).
第三項第四項の申立てを却下した裁判に対しては、不服を申し立てることができない。
Article 35, paragraph (9)(事実調査部分の閲覧等)
The provisions of Article 133-2 and Article 133-3 of the Code of Civil Procedure do not apply to the part of the case record that concerns an examination of the facts.
事実調査部分については、民事訴訟法第百三十三条の二及び第百三十三条の三の規定は、適用しない。
Article 35-2第三十五条の二Caption added
Security Control Measures for the Part of a Record Concerning an Investigation
Article 35-2, paragraph (1)(事実調査部分の安全管理措置等)(Security Control Measures for the Part of a Record Concerning an Investigation)Added
When a court makes a decision referred to in Article 133, paragraph (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure and determines that it is necessary, the court may output to a document the information of the portion of electronic or magnetic case records (meaning electronic or magnetic case records prescribed in Article 91-2, paragraph (1) of that Code; the same applies in this Article below) recording concealed information (meaning personal information of a person seeking anonymity prescribed in Article 133, paragraph (2) of that Code; the same applies in this paragraph below) within the part of the case record that concerns an examination of the facts or any information that can identify by inference any concealed information or record that information in other recording media and take measures to erase those portions from the electronic or magnetic case records and other measures specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court as necessary and appropriate for the security control of those portions.
Article 35-2, paragraph (2)(事実調査部分の安全管理措置等)(Security Control Measures for the Part of a Record Concerning an Investigation)Added
If measures are taken to erase information from electronic or magnetic case records under the provisions of the preceding paragraph and a subsequent judicial decision to cancel the order referred to in that paragraph becomes final and binding or the court otherwise determines that it is no longer necessary to take the measures, the court clerk must record that portion in a file.
Article 35-2, paragraph (3)(事実調査部分の安全管理措置等)(Security Control Measures for the Part of a Record Concerning an Investigation)Added
Regarding the application of the provisions of Article 132-13 of the Code of Civil Procedure to matters stated or recorded in a paper document, etc. or recording media containing electronic or magnetic records submitted to the court in accordance with the provisions of this Act or other laws and regulations in an examination of the facts, in item (iv) of that Article, the phrase "under the provisions of Article 133-3, paragraph (1)" is deemed to be replaced with "referred to in Article 133, paragraph (1)," the phrase "of the decision" is deemed to be replaced with "that", the phrase "and containing electronic or magnetic records" is deemed to be replaced with "or that" and "the information" is deemed to be replaced with "concealed information (meaning concealed matters prescribed in paragraph (2) of that Article; the same applies in this item) or any information that can identify by inference any concealed information."
Judicial Decisions on Ancillary Disposition in Cases of Termination of Marriage Other Than by Judgment(判決によらない婚姻の終了の場合の附帯処分についての裁判)
Article 36, paragraph (1)
In litigation involving an action to rescind a marriage or an action for divorce, if the marriage that is the subject of that action has been terminated other than by a judgment, but a petition on an ancillary disposition has already been filed and any matter in question was not determined when the marriage was terminated, the court in charge of the case must conduct the trial and make a judicial decision on the ancillary disposition.
Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 19, paragraph (2), the provisions of Article 266 of the Code of Civil Procedure (excluding the part related to the acknowledgement of a claim in paragraph (2)) and of Article 267, paragraph (1) and ArticleArticles 267 and 267-2 of that Code apply to a settlement (limited to a settlement by which divorce is effected; the same applies in this Article below) and the waiver or acknowledgement of a claim in litigation connected with an action for divorce provided, however, that, with regard to the acknowledgement of claims, this is limited to cases in which it is not necessary to make a judicial decision on ancillary disposition, as referred to in Article 32, paragraph (1) or a judicial decision designating the person with parental authority, as referred to in paragraph (3) of that Article.
With regard to the application of Article 267, paragraph (1) and Article 267-2, paragraph (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure in the case referred to in the preceding paragraph, the phrase "creates an electronic record of a settlement or of the waiver or acknowledgment of a claim and records it in the court's computer files" in Article 267, paragraph (1) of that Code is deemed to be replaced with "enters a settlement or the waiver or acknowledgment of a claim in a record", the phrase "that entry" is deemed to be replaced with "that statement", and the phrase "an electronic record recorded in the court's computer files pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article" in Article 267-2, paragraph (1) of that Code is deemed to be replaced with "a record referred to in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article".
A settlement under the provisions of Article 264 and Article 265 of the Code of Civil Procedure may not be effected in litigation connected with a divorce action.
The parties referred to in Article 89, paragraph (3) and Article 170, paragraph (4) of the Code of Civil Procedure may not effect a settlement or acknowledge a claim on the date provided in Article 89, paragraph (2) and Article 170, paragraph (3) in litigation connected with an action for divorce provided, however, that this does not apply if the proceedings on that date are conducted by a method that allows both the court and each of the parties to communicate with one another through audio and visual transmissions while gaining an awareness of one another's situation.
If requested by the obligee in connection with an obligation established through a judicial decision under the provisions of Article 32, paragraph (1) or (2) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (3) of that Article; the same applies below), the family court that made that judicial decision (or the family court constituting the court of first instance, if it was an appellate court that made that decision) may investigate the status of performance of the obligation and issue the obligor a recommendation to perform under the obligation.
The family court referred to in the preceding paragraph may commission another family court to conduct the investigation or issue the recommendation under the provisions of that paragraph.
前項の家庭裁判所は、他の家庭裁判所に同項の規定による調査及び勧告を嘱託することができる。
Article 38, paragraph (3)
The family court referred to in paragraph (1) or the family court that has been commissioned as referred to in the preceding paragraph may have a family court investigator conduct the investigation or make the recommendation under the provisions of paragraph (1).
The provisions of the preceding three paragraphs apply mutatis mutandis to the performance of an obligation that may be established through a judicial decision under Article 32, paragraph (1) or (2) but that has been established through a settlement in litigation connected with an action to rescind a marriage or with an action for divorce.
At the request of the obligee, if a person has neglected to perform an obligation to pay money or provide any other economic benefit that has been established through a judicial decision under the provisions of Article 32, paragraph (2), the family court that made that decision (or the family court constituting the court of first instance, if it was an appellate court that made the decision) may issue an order to the obligor to perform under the obligation, specifying a reasonable period for performance. In that case, the court is to issue the order for all or part of the obligation that the obligor has neglected to perform by the time of the order.
The family court referred to in the preceding paragraph must hear a statement from the obligor in order to issue an order to perform the obligation pursuant to the provisions of that paragraph.
前項の家庭裁判所は、同項の規定により義務の履行を命ずるには、義務者の陳述を聴かなければならない。
Article 39, paragraph (3)
The provisions of the preceding two paragraphs apply mutatis mutandis to an obligation to pay money or provide any other such economic benefit that may be established through a judicial decision under the provisions of Article 32, paragraph (2) but that has been established through a settlement in litigation connected with an action to rescind a marriage or with an action for divorce.
If a person ordered to perform an obligation pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the preceding paragraph) does not comply with the order and is without legitimate grounds for their non-compliance, the family court that ordered performance of the obligation issues a ruling imposing a civil fine of not more than 100,000 yen.
An immediate appeal may be filed against the ruling referred to in the preceding paragraph.
前項の決定に対しては、即時抗告をすることができる。
Article 39, paragraph (6)
The provisions of Article 189 of the Code of Civil Procedure apply mutatis mutandis to the ruling referred to in paragraph (4).
民事訴訟法第百八十九条の規定は、第四項の決定について準用する。
Article 40第四十条
Article 40, paragraph (1)
Deleted
削除
Change 1 of 15
Copy link
Coming into force施行
The day a law or an amendment starts to apply. It is often months or years after promulgation, so that people have time to prepare. The Ministry of Justice's English usually says a law "comes into force" or "comes into effect", and sometimes calls the day its "enforcement date". Its "enforcement" more often means the word's other sense, carrying a law out, as in an Order for Enforcement (施行令), the Cabinet Order (政令) that sets out the details for carrying out an Act.
Rules made by the Cabinet to carry out the Constitution and Acts. A Cabinet Order cannot impose duties, restrict rights or set penalties unless an Act delegates that to it.
Machine translation, corrected on review, not official
After
Written for this site with AI
Corrected by this site — After
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
A person may file a request for access to the court records, (meaning access to the case records prescribed in Article 92, paragraph (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure; the same applies in this Article below) with respect to a part of the case record that concerns an examination of the facts ( referred to below as the "part of the record concerning an examination of the facts" in this Article and paragraph (1) of the following Article) only if the court gives its permission pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (3) or paragraph (4).
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 53 of 2023 (令和五年法律第五十三号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
paper documents, etc. (meaning a paper document, piece of documents, transcript, extract, authenticated copy, or duplicate copy, extra copy, or any other paper or other tangible object into which information that can be perceived with the human senses, such as characters and shapes, has been entered; the same applies below), audiotapes, or videotapes (including objects on which certain matters are recorded by any means equivalent thereto) submitted by the party;
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 53 of 2023 (令和五年法律第五十三号)
An amending law usually leaves every article's number alone: a new article takes a branch number such as Article 32-2, and a repealed one leaves 削除 (Deleted) at its number. Sometimes it moves a run of articles to new numbers instead — 繰下げ (moving them down) to make room, or 繰上げ (moving them up) to close a gap. The words of a moved article need not change, but books, court decisions and contracts written before cite it by its old number. This site marks a moved article with the number it had before the amendment: Act No. 53 of 2023 (令和五年法律第五十三号) makes Article 55 of the Act on Land and Building Leases (借地借家法) Article 58.
Machine translation, corrected on review, not official
After
Written for this site with AI
Corrected by this site — After
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
If a party files a petition for permission for access to the case records, etc. of case records with respect to a part of the record that concerns an examination of the facts, the court must permit it provided, however, that as it relates to a part of the record concerning an examination for which it is found that the following risks could arise from the party having access to the case records, the court may permit that access only if the court finds this to be appropriate:
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 53 of 2023 (令和五年法律第五十三号)
An amending law usually leaves every article's number alone: a new article takes a branch number such as Article 32-2, and a repealed one leaves 削除 (Deleted) at its number. Sometimes it moves a run of articles to new numbers instead — 繰下げ (moving them down) to make room, or 繰上げ (moving them up) to close a gap. The words of a moved article need not change, but books, court decisions and contracts written before cite it by its old number. This site marks a moved article with the number it had before the amendment: Act No. 53 of 2023 (令和五年法律第五十三号) makes Article 55 of the Act on Land and Building Leases (借地借家法) Article 58.
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
If a third party makes a prima facie showing of interest and files a petition for permission for access to the case records with respect to a part of the record concerning an examination, the court may permit it if it finds this to be appropriate.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 53 of 2023 (令和五年法律第五十三号)
An amending law usually leaves every article's number alone: a new article takes a branch number such as Article 32-2, and a repealed one leaves 削除 (Deleted) at its number. Sometimes it moves a run of articles to new numbers instead — 繰下げ (moving them down) to make room, or 繰上げ (moving them up) to close a gap. The words of a moved article need not change, but books, court decisions and contracts written before cite it by its old number. This site marks a moved article with the number it had before the amendment: Act No. 53 of 2023 (令和五年法律第五十三号) makes Article 55 of the Act on Land and Building Leases (借地借家法) Article 58.
An amending law usually leaves every article's number alone: a new article takes a branch number such as Article 32-2, and a repealed one leaves 削除 (Deleted) at its number. Sometimes it moves a run of articles to new numbers instead — 繰下げ (moving them down) to make room, or 繰上げ (moving them up) to close a gap. The words of a moved article need not change, but books, court decisions and contracts written before cite it by its old number. This site marks a moved article with the number it had before the amendment: Act No. 53 of 2023 (令和五年法律第五十三号) makes Article 55 of the Act on Land and Building Leases (借地借家法) Article 58.
An amending law usually leaves every article's number alone: a new article takes a branch number such as Article 32-2, and a repealed one leaves 削除 (Deleted) at its number. Sometimes it moves a run of articles to new numbers instead — 繰下げ (moving them down) to make room, or 繰上げ (moving them up) to close a gap. The words of a moved article need not change, but books, court decisions and contracts written before cite it by its old number. This site marks a moved article with the number it had before the amendment: Act No. 53 of 2023 (令和五年法律第五十三号) makes Article 55 of the Act on Land and Building Leases (借地借家法) Article 58.
An amending law usually leaves every article's number alone: a new article takes a branch number such as Article 32-2, and a repealed one leaves 削除 (Deleted) at its number. Sometimes it moves a run of articles to new numbers instead — 繰下げ (moving them down) to make room, or 繰上げ (moving them up) to close a gap. The words of a moved article need not change, but books, court decisions and contracts written before cite it by its old number. This site marks a moved article with the number it had before the amendment: Act No. 53 of 2023 (令和五年法律第五十三号) makes Article 55 of the Act on Land and Building Leases (借地借家法) Article 58.
An amending law usually leaves every article's number alone: a new article takes a branch number such as Article 32-2, and a repealed one leaves 削除 (Deleted) at its number. Sometimes it moves a run of articles to new numbers instead — 繰下げ (moving them down) to make room, or 繰上げ (moving them up) to close a gap. The words of a moved article need not change, but books, court decisions and contracts written before cite it by its old number. This site marks a moved article with the number it had before the amendment: Act No. 53 of 2023 (令和五年法律第五十三号) makes Article 55 of the Act on Land and Building Leases (借地借家法) Article 58.
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
When a court makes a decision referred to in Article 133, paragraph (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure and determines that it is necessary, the court may output to a document the information of the portion of electronic or magnetic case records (meaning electronic or magnetic case records prescribed in Article 91-2, paragraph (1) of that Code; the same applies in this Article below) recording concealed information (meaning personal information of a person seeking anonymity prescribed in Article 133, paragraph (2) of that Code; the same applies in this paragraph below) within the part of the case record that concerns an examination or any information that can identify by inference any concealed information or record those information in other recording media and take measures to erase those portions from the electronic or magnetic case records and other measures specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court as necessary and appropriate for the security control of those portions.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 53 of 2023 (令和五年法律第五十三号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
Regarding the application of the provisions of Article 132-13 of the Code of Civil Procedure to matters stated or recorded in a paper document, etc. or recording media containing electronic or magnetic records submitted to the court in accordance with the provisions of this Act or other laws and regulations in an examination of the facts, in item (iv) of that Article, the phrase "under the provisions of Article 133-3, paragraph (1)" is deemed to be replaced with "referred to in Article 133, paragraph (1)," the phrase "of the decision" is deemed to be replaced with "that", the phrase "and containing electro or magnetic records" is deemed to be replaced with "or that" and "the information" is deemed to be replaced with "concealed information (meaning concealed matters prescribed in paragraph (2) of that Article; the same applies in this item) or any information that can identify by inference any concealed information."
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 53 of 2023 (令和五年法律第五十三号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
In litigation involving an action to rescind a marriage or an action for divorce, if the marriage that is the subject of that action has been terminated other than by a judgment, but a petition on an ancillary disposition has already been filed and any matter in question was not determined when the marriage was terminated, the court in charge of the case must conduct the trial and make a judicial decision on the ancillary disposition..
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 53 of 2023 (令和五年法律第五十三号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 19, paragraph (2), the provisions of Article 266 of the Code of Civil Procedure (excluding the part related to the acknowledgement of a claim in paragraph (2)) and of Article 267 and 267-2 of that Code apply to a settlement (limited to a settlement by which divorce is effected; the same applies in this Article below) and the waiver or acknowledgement of a claim in litigation connected with an action for divorce provided, however, that, with regard to the acknowledgement of claims, this is limited to cases in which it is not necessary to make a judicial decision on ancillary disposition, as referred to in Article 32, paragraph (1) or a judicial decision designating the person with parental authority, as referred to in paragraph (3) of that Article.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 53 of 2023 (令和五年法律第五十三号)
Machine translation, corrected on review, not official
English translation
Written for this site with AI
Corrected by this site
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
A settlement under the provisions of Article 264 and Article 265 of the Code of Civil Procedure may not be effected in litigation connected with a divorce actionn.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 53 of 2023 (令和五年法律第五十三号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
The parties referred to in Article 89, paragraph (3) and Article 170, paragraph (4) of the Code of Civil Procedure may not effect a settlement or acknowledge a claim on the date provided in Article 89, paragraph (2) and Article 170, paragraph (3) in litigation connected with an action for divorce provided, however, that this does not apply if the proceedings on that date are conducted by a method that allows both the court and each of the parties to communicate with one another , through audio and visual transmissions while gaining an awareness of one another' situation.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 53 of 2023 (令和五年法律第五十三号)