Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

This text is not in force yetIt by 31 March 2027, on a day set by — at the latest in 5 months

Read the text in force →

Code of Criminal Procedure

刑事訴訟法(けいじそしょうほう)

Chapter II Appeal to the Court of Second Instance (Articles 372 to 391)

The law as Act Partially Amending the Code of Criminal Procedure, etc. to Respond to Advances in Information and Communications Technology, etc. (Act No. 39 of 2025) leaves it, with the words it changes marked.

The main text is read a page at a time: a chapter to a page, and a long chapter in runs of articles. The whole main text, and the supplementary provisions and appended tables this amendment changes. Those it leaves untouched are on the page for the text in force.

How the changes are shown

Underlined: words the amendment adds. A bar: where it removes words.Underlined: words the amendment adds. Struck through: the words it removes.Underlined: words the amendment adds. Struck through: the words it removes.

Chapter II Appeal to the Court of Second Instance第二章 控訴

Article 372第三百七十二条

Article 372, paragraph (1)

An appeal to the court of second instance may be filed against the judgment that a district court or the summary court has made in the first instance.

控訴は、地方裁判所又は簡易裁判所がした第一審の判決に対してこれをすることができる。

Article 373第三百七十三条

Article 373, paragraph (1)

The period for appeal to the court of second instance shall be 14 days.

控訴の提起期間は、十四日とする。

Article 374第三百七十四条

Article 374, paragraph (1)

An appeal to the court of second instance shall be filed by submitting a written application to the court of first instance.

控訴をするには、申立書を第一審裁判所に差し出さなければならない。

Article 375第三百七十五条

Article 375, paragraph (1)

When it is clear that an appeal to the court of second instance has been filed after the right to appeal has expired, the court of first instance shall, on a ruling, dismiss such an appeal. An immediate appeal against such a ruling may be filed.

控訴の申立が明らかに控訴権の消滅後にされたものであるときは、第一審裁判所は、決定でこれを棄却しなければならない。この決定に対しては、即時抗告をすることができる。

Article 376第三百七十六条

1 change in this article
Article 376, paragraph (1)

A person who has filed an appeal to the court of second instance shall submit to the court of second instance a statement of the reasons for said appeal within the period of time set forth in the Rules of Court.

控訴申立人は、裁判所の規則で定める期間内に控訴趣意書を控訴裁判所に差し出さなければならない。

Article 376, paragraph (2)Changed

The statement of the reasons for appeal shall be accompanied by any necessary material or a written guarantee from the public prosecutor or defense counsel (including an electronic or magnetic record; the same applies in the following Article and Article 386, paragraph (1), item (ii)) in accordance with this Code or the Rules of Court.

控訴趣意書には、この法律又は裁判所の規則の定めるところにより、必要な疎明資料又は検察官若しくは弁護人の保証書を添附し(電磁的記録を含む。次条及び第三百八十六条第一項第二号において同じ。)を添えなければならない。

Article 377第三百七十七条

1 change in this article
Article 377, paragraph (1)Changed

When an appeal to the court of second instance has been filed based on one of the grounds listed in the following items, the statement of the reasons for appeal shall be accompanied by a written guarantee from the public prosecutor or defense counsel which indicates that there is sufficient proof of the existence of the itemsgrounds:

左の次に掲げる事由があることを理由として控訴の申立てをした場合には、控訴趣意書に、その事由があることの充十分な証明をすることができる旨の検察官又は弁護人の保証書を添附しえなければならない。

Article 377, paragraph (1), item (i)

The court that rendered the judgment was not configured in accordance with law;

法律に従つて判決裁判所を構成しなかつたこと。

Article 377, paragraph (1), item (ii)

A judge who cannot take part in a judgment in accordance with laws and regulations took part in the judgment; or

法令により判決に関与することができない裁判官が判決に関与したこと。

Article 377, paragraph (1), item (iii)

There was a violation of legal provisions pertaining to the trial being open to the public.

審判の公開に関する規定に違反したこと。

Article 378第三百七十八条

Article 378, paragraph (1)

When an appeal to the court of second instance has been filed based on any of the grounds listed in the following items, facts which appear in the case records and evidence examined by the court of first instance which are sufficient to show the existence of the grounds in the item shall be cited in the statement of the reasons for appeal:

左の事由があることを理由として控訴の申立をした場合には、控訴趣意書に、訴訟記録及び原裁判所において取り調べた証拠に現われている事実であつてその事由があることを信ずるに足りるものを援用しなければならない。

Article 378, paragraph (1), item (i)

The court unlawfully found jurisdiction or lack of jurisdiction;

不法に管轄又は管轄違を認めたこと。

Article 378, paragraph (1), item (ii)

The court unlawfully accepted or dismissed prosecution;

不法に、公訴を受理し、又はこれを棄却したこと。

Article 378, paragraph (1), item (iii)

The court did not reach a judgment in a case for which a trial had been requested, or did reach a judgment in a case for which a trial had not been requested; or

審判の請求を受けた事件について判決をせず、又は審判の請求を受けない事件について判決をしたこと。

Article 378, paragraph (1), item (iv)

The judgment stated no reasons, or there was a discrepancy in its reasons.

判決に理由を附せず、又は理由にくいちがいがあること。

Article 379第三百七十九条

Article 379, paragraph (1)

Other than the cases set forth in the provisions of the preceding two articles, when an appeal to the court of second instance has been made on the grounds that there was a violation of laws and regulations in the court proceedings and it is clear that that violation has affected the judgment, facts which appear in the case records and evidence examined by the court of first instance which are sufficient to show that there was a violation of laws and regulations which would clearly affect the judgment shall be cited in the statement of the reasons for appeal.

前二条の場合を除いて、訴訟手続に法令の違反があつてその違反が判決に影響を及ぼすことが明らかであることを理由として控訴の申立をした場合には、控訴趣意書に、訴訟記録及び原裁判所において取り調べた証拠に現われている事実であつて明らかに判決に影響を及ぼすべき法令の違反があることを信ずるに足りるものを援用しなければならない。

Article 380第三百八十条

Article 380, paragraph (1)

When an appeal to the court of second instance has been made on the grounds that there was an error in the application of laws and regulations and it is clear that that error has affected the judgment, the error and the fact that said error would clearly affect the judgment shall be indicated in the statement of the reasons for appeal.

法令の適用に誤があつてその誤が判決に影響を及ぼすことが明らかであることを理由として控訴の申立をした場合には、控訴趣意書に、その誤及びその誤が明らかに判決に影響を及ぼすべきことを示さなければならない。

Article 381第三百八十一条

Article 381, paragraph (1)

When an appeal to the court of second instance has been made on the grounds that a sentence is unreasonable, facts which appear in the case records and evidence examined by the court of first instance which are sufficient to show that the sentence is unreasonable shall be cited in the statement of the reasons for appeal.

刑の量定が不当であることを理由として控訴の申立をした場合には、控訴趣意書に、訴訟記録及び原裁判所において取り調べた証拠に現われている事実であつて刑の量定が不当であることを信ずるに足りるものを援用しなければならない。

Article 382第三百八十二条

Article 382, paragraph (1)

When an appeal to the court of second instance has been made on the grounds that there was an error in the finding of facts and it is clear that that error has affected the judgment, facts which appear in the case records and evidence examined by the court of first instance which are sufficient to show that there is an error which would clearly affect the judgment shall be cited in the statement of the reasons for appeal.

事実の誤認があつてその誤認が判決に影響を及ぼすことが明らかであることを理由として控訴の申立をした場合には、控訴趣意書に、訴訟記録及び原裁判所において取り調べた証拠に現われている事実であつて明らかに判決に影響を及ぼすべき誤認があることを信ずるに足りるものを援用しなければならない。

Article 382-2第三百八十二条の二

3 changes in this article
Article 382-2, paragraph (1)Changed

Facts which can be proven by evidence whose examination could not be requested before oral arguments were concluded in the first instance due to unavoidable circumstances, and which are sufficient to show that there are grounds for an appeal to the court of second instance as set forth in the provisions of the two preceding articles may be cited in the statement of the reasons for appeal even if such facts do not appear in the case records or are based on evidence not examined by the court of first instance.

やむを得ない事由によつて第一審の弁論終結前に取調べを請求することができなかつた証拠によつて証明することのできる事実であつて前二条に規定する控訴申立ての理由があることを信ずるに足りるものは、訴訟記録及び原裁判所において取り調べた証拠に現われている事実以外の事実であつても、控訴趣意書にこれを援用することができる。

Article 382-2, paragraph (2)Changed

Facts which occurred before the rendering of a judgment and after the oral arguments were concluded in the first instance, and which are sufficient to show that there are grounds for appeal to the court of second instance as set forth in the provisions of the two preceding articles may be cited in the statement of the reasons for appeal even if such facts do not appear in the case records or are based on evidence not examined by the court of first instance.

第一審の弁論終結後判決前に生じた事実であつて前二条に規定する控訴申立ての理由があることを信ずるに足りるものについても、前項と同様であとする。

Article 382-2, paragraph (3)Changed

In the cases set forth in the provisions of the two preceding paragraphs, the statement of the reasons for appeal to the court of second instance shall be accompanied by material which makes prima facie showing of the facts. In a case set forth in the provisions of the paragraph (1), the paper also shall be accompanied by material which makes prima facie showing that examination could not be requested due to unavoidable circumstances.

前二項の場合には、控訴趣意書に、その事実を疎明する資料を添附しえなければならない。第一項の場合には、やむを得ない事由によつてその証拠の取調べを請求することができなかつた旨を疎明する資料をも添附しえなければならない。

Article 383第三百八十三条

2 changes in this article
Article 383, paragraph (1)Changed

When an appeal to the court of second instance has been filed on the grounds listed in the following items, the statement of the reasons for appeal shall be accompanied by material which makes prima facie showing of the existence of the grounds of one of those items:

左の次に掲げる事由があることを理由として控訴の申立てをした場合には、控訴趣意書に、その事由があることを疎明する資料を添附しえなければならない。

Article 383, paragraph (1), item (i)Changed

There are grounds on which it is possible to request a retrial; or

再審の請求をすることができる場合にあ当たる事由があること。

Article 383, paragraph (1), item (ii)

There was abolition or a change of punishment or a general pardon was granted after the judgment was rendered.

判決があつた後に刑の廃止若しくは変更又は大赦があつたこと。

Article 384第三百八十四条

Article 384, paragraph (1)

An appeal to the court of second instance can be filed only when the reason for the appeal is the existence of at least one of the grounds set forth in the provisions of Articles 377 through Article 382, and Article 383.

控訴の申立は、第三百七十七条乃至第三百八十二条及び前条に規定する事由があることを理由とするときに限り、これをすることができる。

Article 385第三百八十五条

Article 385, paragraph (1)

When it is clear that an appeal to the court of second instance violates a form specified in laws and regulations, or that it was filed after the expiration of the right to appeal, the court of second instance shall, on a ruling, dismiss said appeal.

控訴の申立が法令上の方式に違反し、又は控訴権の消滅後にされたものであることが明らかなときは、控訴裁判所は、決定でこれを棄却しなければならない。

Article 385, paragraph (2)

An objection as in paragraph (2) of Article 428 may be filed against the ruling prescribed in the preceding paragraph. In this case, the provisions concerning an immediate appeal shall also apply mutatis mutandis.

前項の決定に対しては、第四百二十八条第二項の異議の申立をすることができる。この場合には、即時抗告に関する規定をも準用する。

Article 386第三百八十六条

4 changes in this article
Article 386, paragraph (1)Changed

The court of second instance shall, on a ruling, dismiss an appeal to the court of second instance when:

左の次に掲げる場合には、控訴裁判所は、決定で控訴を棄却しなければならない。

Article 386, paragraph (1), item (i)

The statement of the reasons for appeal is not submitted within the period of time set forth in paragraph (1) of Article 376;

第三百七十六条第一項に定める期間内に控訴趣意書を差し出さないとき。

Article 386, paragraph (1), item (ii)Changed

The statement of the reasons for appeal violates a form set forth in this Code or the Rules of Court, or the statement of the reasons for appeal is not accompanied by the necessary materials or a written guarantee pursuant to this Code or the Rules of Court; or

控訴趣意書がこの法律若しくは裁判所の規則で定める方式に違反しているとき、又は控訴趣意書にこの法律若しくは裁判所の規則の定めるところに従い必要な疎明資料若しくは保証書を添附しが添えられていないとき。

Article 386, paragraph (1), item (iii)Changed

The grounds for appeal to the court of second instance in the statement of the reasons for appeal clearly do not apply to the items set forth in the provisions of Article 377 through Article 382 and Article 383.

控訴趣意書に記載された控訴の申立ての理由が、明らかに第三百七十七条乃至から第三百八十二条まで及び第三百八十三条に規定する事由に該当しないとき。

Article 386, paragraph (2)Changed

The provisions of paragraph (2) of the preceding article shall apply mutatis mutandis to a ruling as set forth in the preceding paragraph.

前条第二項の規定は、前項の決定についてこれを準用する。

Article 387第三百八十七条

Article 387, paragraph (1)

Persons other than attorneys may not be appointed as defense counsel at the court of second instance.

控訴審では、弁護士以外の者を弁護人に選任することはできない。

Article 388第三百八十八条

Article 388, paragraph (1)

Arguments for the defendant at the court of second instance cannot be made by persons other than defense counsel.

控訴審では、被告人のためにする弁論は、弁護人でなければ、これをすることができない。

Article 389第三百八十九条

Article 389, paragraph (1)

During the trial, the public prosecutor and defense counsel shall base their arguments on the statement of the reasons for appeal to the court of second instance.

公判期日には、検察官及び弁護人は、控訴趣意書に基いて弁論をしなければならない。

Article 390第三百九十条

Article 390, paragraph (1)

The defendant need not appear at the trial at the court of second instance; provided, however, that for offenses other than those punishable by a fine not exceeding 500,000 yen (50,000 yen for offenses other than those prescribed in the Penal Code, the Law concerning Punishment of Physical Violence and Others and the Act on Penal Provisions related to Economic Activities, until otherwise stipulated) or a petty fine, the court may order him/her to appear when it deems this to be essential for the protection of his/her rights.

控訴審においては、被告人は、公判期日に出頭することを要しない。ただし、裁判所は、五十万円(刑法、暴力行為等処罰に関する法律及び経済関係罰則の整備に関する法律の罪以外の罪については、当分の間、五万円)以下の罰金又は科料に当たる事件以外の事件について、被告人の出頭がその権利の保護のため重要であると認めるときは、被告人の出頭を命ずることができる。

Article 390-2第三百九十条の二

Article 390-2, paragraph (1)

Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding Article, the court of second instance must order a defendant who has been indicted for a crime punishable by imprisonment or a heavier sentence and who has been granted bail or suspension of execution of detention to appear on the trial date on which the judgment is to be pronounced; provided, however, that this does not apply when it finds that it is difficult for the defendant to appear on that trial date due to a serious illness or injury or any other unavoidable grounds.

前条の規定にかかわらず、控訴裁判所は、拘禁刑以上の刑に当たる罪で起訴されている被告人であつて、保釈又は勾留の執行停止をされているものについては、判決を宣告する公判期日への出頭を命じなければならない。ただし、重い疾病又は傷害その他やむを得ない事由により被告人が当該公判期日に出頭することが困難であると認めるときは、この限りでない。

Article 391第三百九十一条

Article 391, paragraph (1)

When defense counsel does not appear or has not been appointed, the court may render a judgment after hearing the opinion of the public prosecutor, except when the appointment of defense counsel is necessary pursuant to this Code or when the court, on a ruling, appoints defense counsel.

弁護人が出頭しないとき、又は弁護人の選任がないときは、この法律により弁護人を要する場合又は決定で弁護人を附した場合を除いては、検察官の陳述を聴いて判決をすることができる。

Change 1 of 11
© 2026 japanlaw.orgA copy for reading and reference — not an official source, and not legal advice. Only the Japanese text published by the government has legal effect.Run by Genjido LLC (源氏道合同会社) · contact@genjido.comContactSourcesTermsPrivacy