Chapter IV Agreement on Cooperation in Collection of Evidence and Prosecution (Articles 350-2 to 350-7)
The law as Act Partially Amending the Code of Criminal Procedure, etc. to Respond to Advances in Information and Communications Technology, etc. (Act No. 39 of 2025) leaves it, with the words it changes marked.
The main text is read a page at a time: a chapter to a page, and a long chapter in runs of articles. The whole main text, and the supplementary provisions and appended tables this amendment changes. Those it leaves untouched are on the page for the text in force.
Chapter IV Agreement on Cooperation in Collection of Evidence and Prosecution第四章 証拠収集等への協力及び訴追に関する合意
Section 1 Procedures for Agreement and Consultation第一節 合意及び協議の手続
Article 350-2第三百五十条の二
Article 350-2, paragraph (1)
When a public prosecutor finds it necessary taking into account the importance of evidence obtained if a suspect or the defendant in a case involving the specific crime performs one or more than one of the acts set forth in item (i) with regard to another person's criminal case involving the specific crime (hereinafter simply referred to as "another person's criminal case"), the gravity and circumstances of the crime concerned, the extent of the relevance of that crime concerned and other circumstances, the public prosecutor may reach an agreement with the suspect or defendant to the effect that the suspect or defendant performs one or more than one of the acts set forth in the same item with regard to that another person's criminal case, and the public prosecutor performs one or more than one of the acts set forth in item (ii) with regard to the case of the suspect or defendant.
making a true statement in an interrogation conducted by the public prosecutor, the public prosecutor's assistant officer or a judicial police official pursuant to the provisions of Article 198, paragraph (1) or Article 223, paragraph (1);
making a true statement when the suspect or defendant is examined as a witness; or
証人として尋問を受ける場合において真実の供述をすること。
Article 350-2, paragraph (1), item (i), (c)
in relation to the collection of evidence by the public prosecutor, the public prosecutor's assistant officer or a judicial police official, submitting evidence or providing other necessary cooperation (except those set forth in (a) and (b)).
instituting or maintaining prosecution using the specific count and applicable penal statute;
特定の訴因及び罰条により公訴を提起し、又はこれを維持すること。
Article 350-2, paragraph (1), item (ii), (d)
requesting the addition or withdrawal of the specific count or applicable penal statute, or the alteration of a count or an applicable penal statute to the specific count or applicable penal statute;
特定の訴因若しくは罰条の追加若しくは撤回又は特定の訴因若しくは罰条への変更を請求すること。
Article 350-2, paragraph (1), item (ii), (e)
stating an opinion to the effect that the specific sentence should be rendered to the defendant, in the statement of opinions pursuant to the provisions of Article 293, paragraph (1);
filing a petition for expedited trial proceedings; or
即決裁判手続の申立てをすること。
Article 350-2, paragraph (1), item (ii), (g)
filing a request for a summary order.
略式命令の請求をすること。
Article 350-2, paragraph (2)
The "specific crime" provided in the preceding paragraph means one of the following crimes (except those punishable by the death penalty or imprisonment for life):
前項に規定する「特定犯罪」とは、次に掲げる罪(死刑又は無期拘禁刑に当たるものを除く。)をいう。
Article 350-2, paragraph (2), item (i)
crimes under Articles 96 through 96-6 or Article 155 of the Penal Code, crimes that should be dealt with in the same manner as the same Article, crimes under Article 157 of the same Code, crimes under Article 158 of the same Code (limited to those pertaining to crimes under Article 155 of the same Code, crimes that should be dealt with in the same manner as the same Article, or crimes under Article 157, paragraph (1) or (2) of the same Code), or crimes under Articles 159 through 163-5, Articles 197 through 197-4, Article 198, Articles 246 through 250, or Articles 252 through 254 of the same Code;
crimes under Article 3 of the Act on Punishment of Organized Crimes and Control of Crime Proceeds (Act No. 136 of 1999; hereinafter referred to as the "Organized Crime Punishment Act") pertaining to the crimes under paragraph (1), items (i) through (iv), item (xiii) or item (xiv) of the same Article, attempts of crimes under the same Article pertaining to the crimes under item (xiii) or (xiv) of the same paragraph, or crimes under Article 10 or 11 of the Organized Crime Punishment Act;
in addition to those set forth in the preceding two items, crimes under laws related to taxes, the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (Act No. 54 of 1947) or the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (Act No. 25 of 1948), or other crimes provided by Cabinet Order as finance and economy-related crimes;
Criminal Regulations to Control Explosives (Cabinet Ordinance No. 32 of 1884);
爆発物取締罰則(明治十七年太政官布告第三十二号)
Article 350-2, paragraph (2), item (iv), (b)
Act on Regulation of Cannabis Cultivation (Act No. 124 of 1948);
大麻草の栽培の規制に関する法律(昭和二十三年法律第百二十四号)
Article 350-2, paragraph (2), item (iv), (c)
Stimulants Control Act (Act No. 252 of 1951);
覚醒剤取締法(昭和二十六年法律第二百五十二号)
Article 350-2, paragraph (2), item (iv), (d)
Narcotics and Psychotropics Control Act (Act No. 14 of 1953);
麻薬及び向精神薬取締法(昭和二十八年法律第十四号)
Article 350-2, paragraph (2), item (iv), (e)
Ordnance Manufacturing Act (Act No. 145 of 1953);
武器等製造法(昭和二十八年法律第百四十五号)
Article 350-2, paragraph (2), item (iv), (f)
Opium Control Act (Act No. 71 of 1954);
あへん法(昭和二十九年法律第七十一号)
Article 350-2, paragraph (2), item (iv), (g)
Act for Controlling the Possession of Firearms or Swords and Other Such Weapons (Act No. 6 of 1958);
銃砲刀剣類所持等取締法(昭和三十三年法律第六号)
Article 350-2, paragraph (2), item (iv), (h)
Act Concerning Special Provisions for the Narcotics and Psychotropics Control Act, etc. and Other Matters for the Prevention of Activities Encouraging Illicit Conducts and Other Activities Involving Controlled Substances through International Cooperation (Act No. 94 of 1991); or
crimes under Article 103, 104 or 105-2 of the Penal Code, or crimes under Article 7 of the Organized Crime Punishment Act (limited to those involving persons set forth in paragraph (1), items (i) through (iii) of the same Article) or Article 7-2 of the same Act (for any of these crimes, limited to those listed in the preceding items, which are regarded as the crimes of the principal offenders).
In an agreement under paragraph (1), matters incidental to the acts performed by the suspect or defendant as set forth in item (i) of the same paragraph, or the acts performed by the public prosecutor as set forth in item (ii) of the same paragraph, and other necessary matters to achieve the purpose of the agreement may be contained.
An agreement under paragraph (1) of the preceding Article must be made with the consent of the defense counsel.
前条第一項の合意をするには、弁護人の同意がなければならない。
Article 350-3, paragraph (2)Changed
An agreement under paragraph (1) of the preceding Article must be made in writing jointly signed by a public prosecutor, and a suspect or the defendant and the defense counsel, or in an electronic or magnetic record on which these persons have taken the measures prescribed by the Rules of Court in lieu of joint signature, clearly stating the content of the agreement.
The necessary consultation to make an agreement under Article 350-2, paragraph (1) shall be held between a public prosecutor, and a suspect or the defendant and the defense counsel; provided, however, that when the suspect or defendant and the defense counsel do not raise an objection, the public prosecutor may consult only with the defense counsel in part.
In a consultation under the preceding Article, a public prosecutor may request that a suspect or the defendant should make a statement on another person's criminal case. In this case, the provisions of Article 198, paragraph (2) apply mutatis mutandis.
A statement made by a suspect or the defendant during a consultation under the preceding Article may not be used as evidence if the agreement under Article 350-2, paragraph (1) is not reached.
The provisions of the preceding paragraph do not apply when any act performed by a suspect or the defendant during a consultation thereunder falls under a crime under Article 103, 104 or 172 of the Penal Code or a crime under Article 7 of the Organized Crime Punishment Act pertaining to the persons set forth in provisions of paragraph (1), item (i) or (ii) of the same Article, and a statement made during the consultation is used in the cases involving these crimes.
When a public prosecutor intends to start consultation under Article 350-4 with a suspect in a case referred or sent by a judicial police officer or a case the public prosecutor finds that a judicial police officer is actually investigating, the public prosecutor must consult with the judicial police officer in advance.
When a public prosecutor finds it necessary for the investigation of another person's criminal case pertaining to a consultation under Article 350-4 taking into account that a judicial police officer is actually investigating that another person's criminal case and other circumstances, the public prosecutor may have the judicial police officer request a statement pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article and perform other necessary acts for the consultation. In this case, the judicial police officer may present the content of the act set forth in item (ii) of Article 350-2, paragraph (1), which is proposed by the public prosecutor to be the content of the agreement under the same paragraph, to the extent that the public prosecutor individually delegates powers to the judicial police officer.
When a public prosecutor reaches an agreement with a suspect under Article 350-2, paragraph (1), and institutes prosecution with regard to the suspect's case pertaining to the agreement, the public prosecutor must request the examination of the document or electronic or magnetic record referred to in Article 350-3, paragraph (2) (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "statement of agreement, etc.") as evidence without delay after the completion of the procedure under Article 291 (or if it has been ruled that the case be subject to a pretrial arrangement proceeding, after that time). The same applies when a public prosecutor reaches an agreement with the defendant with regard to the defendant's case after institution of prosecution under Article 350-2, paragraph (1).
When a public prosecutor requests the examination of the statement of agreement, etc. pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph, and is notified by the party to the agreement that the party is to pull out of the agreement pursuant to the provisions of Article 350-10, paragraph (2), the public prosecutor must request the examination of the document or electronic or magnetic record referred to in the same paragraph together with that statement of agreement, etc.
After a public prosecutor has requested the examination of the statement of agreement, etc. pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1), if the public prosecutor is notified by the party to the agreement that the party is to pull out of the agreement pursuant to the provisions of Article 350-10, paragraph (2), the public prosecutor must request the examination of the document or electronic or magnetic record referred to in the same paragraph without delay.
The day a law or an amendment starts to apply. It is often months or years after promulgation, so that people have time to prepare. The Ministry of Justice's English usually says a law "comes into force" or "comes into effect", and sometimes calls the day its "enforcement date". Its "enforcement" more often means the word's other sense, carrying a law out, as in an Order for Enforcement (施行令), the Cabinet Order (政令) that sets out the details for carrying out an Act.
Rules made by the Cabinet to carry out the Constitution and Acts. A Cabinet Order cannot impose duties, restrict rights or set penalties unless an Act delegates that to it.
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
When a public prosecutor finds it necessary taking into account the importance of evidence obtained if a suspect or the accused in a case involving the specific crime performs one or more than one of the acts set forth in item (i) with regard to another person's criminal case involving the specific crime (hereinafter simply referred to as "another person's criminal case"), the gravity and circumstances of the crime concerned, the extent of the relevance of that crime concerned and other circumstances, the public prosecutor may reach an agreement with the suspect or accused to the effect that the suspect or accused performs one or more than one of the acts set forth in the same item with regard to that another person's criminal case, and the public prosecutor performs one or more than one of the acts set forth in item (ii) with regard to the case of the suspect or accused.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 63 of 2019 (令和元年法律第六十三号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
stating an opinion to the effect that the specific sentence should be rendered to the accused, in the statement of opinions pursuant to the provisions of Article 293, paragraph (1);
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 63 of 2019 (令和元年法律第六十三号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
In an agreement under paragraph (1), matters incidental to the acts performed by the suspect or accused as set forth in item (i) of the same paragraph, or the acts performed by the public prosecutor as set forth in item (ii) of the same paragraph, and other necessary matters to achieve the purpose of the agreement may be contained.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 63 of 2019 (令和元年法律第六十三号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
An agreement under paragraph (1) of the preceding Article must be made in writing signed by both of a public prosecutor, and a suspect or the accused and the defense counsel, clearly stating the content of the agreement.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 63 of 2019 (令和元年法律第六十三号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
The necessary consultation to make an agreement under Article 350-2, paragraph (1) shall be held between a public prosecutor, and a suspect or the accused and the defense counsel; provided, however, that when the suspect or accused and the defense counsel do not raise an objection, the public prosecutor may consult only with the defense counsel in part.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 63 of 2019 (令和元年法律第六十三号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
In a consultation under the preceding Article, a public prosecutor may request that a suspect or the accused should make a statement on another person's criminal case. In this case, the provisions of Article 198, paragraph (2) apply mutatis mutandis.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 63 of 2019 (令和元年法律第六十三号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
A statement made by a suspect or the accused during a consultation under the preceding Article may not be used as evidence if the agreement under Article 350-2, paragraph (1) is not reached.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 63 of 2019 (令和元年法律第六十三号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
The provisions of the preceding paragraph do not apply when any act performed by a suspect or the accused during a consultation thereunder falls under a crime under Article 103, 104 or 172 of the Penal Code or a crime under Article 7 of the Organized Crime Punishment Act pertaining to the persons set forth in provisions of paragraph (1), item (i) or (ii) of the same Article, and a statement made during the consultation is used in the cases involving these crimes.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 63 of 2019 (令和元年法律第六十三号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
When a public prosecutor is start consultation under Article 350-4 with a suspect in a case referred or sent by a judicial police officer or a case the public prosecutor finds that a judicial police officer is actually investigating, the public prosecutor must consult with the judicial public officer in advance.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 63 of 2019 (令和元年法律第六十三号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
When a public prosecutor reaches an agreement with a suspect under Article 350-2, paragraph (1), and institutes prosecution with regard to the suspect's case pertaining to the agreement, the public prosecutor must request the examination of the document referred to in Article 350-3, paragraph (2) (hereinafter referred to as the "statement of agreement") as evidence without delay after the completion of the procedure under Article 291 (or if it has been ruled that the case be subject to a pretrial arrangement proceeding, after that time). The same applies when a public prosecutor reaches an agreement with the accused with regard to the accused's case after institution of prosecution under Article 350-2, paragraph (1).
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 63 of 2019 (令和元年法律第六十三号)