If no purchase offer has been made even though the court clerk has had a sale implemented three times through bidding or an auction, and if the enforcement court, taking into consideration the shape of the immovable property, its intended use, regulations on its use under laws and regulations, and any other circumstances, finds that the property is unlikely to be sold even if the court clerk has a sale implemented again, the enforcement court may stay the proceedings for the compulsory auction. In this case, the enforcement court must notify the attaching obligee to that effect.
執行裁判所は、裁判所書記官が入札又は競り売りの方法による売却を三回実施させても買受けの申出がなかつた場合において、不動産の形状、用途、法令による利用の規制その他の事情を考慮して、更に売却を実施させても売却の見込みがないと認めるときは、強制競売の手続を停止することができる。この場合においては、差押債権者に対し、その旨を通知しなければならない。
If, within three months from the day of receipt of notice under the preceding paragraph, an attaching obligee has made an offer to the enforcement court seeking to have a sale implemented on the basis that there is a person seeking to make a purchase offer, a court clerk must have a sale implemented pursuant to the provisions of Article 64.
If an attaching obligee does not make an offer seeking to have a sale implemented under the preceding paragraph within the period referred to in that paragraph, the enforcement court may cancel the proceedings for the compulsory auction. The same applies if no purchase offer is made when a court clerk has a sale implemented pursuant to the provisions of that paragraph.
Read this with the articles around it