Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

1 article

Article 197Order of Implementation

第百九十七条(実施決定)

An enforcement court, when either of the following items applies, must order implementation of an asset disclosure procedure against an obligor, upon petition by an obligee of a monetary claim who has an authenticated copy of an enforceable title of obligation; provided, however, that this does not apply when it is not possible to commence judicial enforcement based on the authenticated copy of an enforceable title of obligation:

執行裁判所は、次の各号のいずれかに該当するときは、執行力のある債務名義の正本を有する金銭債権の債権者の申立てにより、債務者について、財産開示手続を実施する旨の決定をしなければならない。ただし、当該執行力のある債務名義の正本に基づく強制執行を開始することができないときは、この限りでない。

when the petitioner is unable to obtain full performance of that monetary claim in the procedure of distribution or payment (excluding a procedure that is terminated by at least six months before the day of filing the petition) in judicial enforcement or enforcement of a security interest; or

強制執行又は担保権の実行における配当等の手続(申立ての日より六月以上前に終了したものを除く。)において、申立人が当該金銭債権の完全な弁済を得ることができなかつたとき。

when a prima facie showing is made that the petitioner is unable to obtain full performance of the relevant monetary claim even by implementing judicial enforcement against known property.

知れている財産に対する強制執行を実施しても、申立人が当該金銭債権の完全な弁済を得られないことの疎明があつたとき。

An enforcement court must, when either of the following items applies, order implementation of an asset disclosure procedure against an obligor, upon petition by an obligee who has submitted a document proving that the obligee has a general statutory lien for property of the obligor:

執行裁判所は、次の各号のいずれかに該当するときは、債務者の財産について一般の先取特権を有することを証する文書を提出した債権者の申立てにより、当該債務者について、財産開示手続を実施する旨の決定をしなければならない。

when the petitioner is unable to obtain full performance of the secured claim related to the statutory lien in the procedure of distribution or payment (excluding a procedure that is terminated by at least six months before the day of filing the petition) in judicial enforcement or enforcement of a security interest; or

強制執行又は担保権の実行における配当等の手続(申立ての日より六月以上前に終了したものを除く。)において、申立人が当該先取特権の被担保債権の完全な弁済を得ることができなかつたとき。

when a prima facie showing is made that the petitioner is unable to obtain full performance of the secured claim referred to in the preceding item even by implementing the enforcement of a security interest against known property.

知れている財産に対する担保権の実行を実施しても、申立人が前号の被担保債権の完全な弁済を得られないことの疎明があつたとき。

Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding two paragraphs, when the obligor (or, if the obligor has a statutory agent, the statutory agent, and if the obligor is a corporation, its representative; the same applies in item (i)) has made a statement on their property on the asset disclosure date (the date on which asset is to be disclosed; the same applies below) within three years before the day of filing the petition referred to in the preceding two paragraphs, an order to implement an asset disclosure procedure may not be issued; provided, however, that this does not apply if any ground of the following items exist:

前二項の規定にかかわらず、債務者(債務者に法定代理人がある場合にあつては当該法定代理人、債務者が法人である場合にあつてはその代表者。第一号において同じ。)が前二項の申立ての日前三年以内に財産開示期日(財産を開示すべき期日をいう。以下同じ。)においてその財産について陳述をしたものであるときは、財産開示手続を実施する旨の決定をすることができない。ただし、次の各号に掲げる事由のいずれかがある場合は、この限りでない。

if the obligor failed to disclose part of their property on the relevant asset disclosure date;

債務者が当該財産開示期日において一部の財産を開示しなかつたとき。

if the obligor acquired new property after the relevant asset disclosure date; or

債務者が当該財産開示期日の後に新たに財産を取得したとき。

if the employment relationship between the obligor and their employer is terminated after the relevant asset disclosure date.

当該財産開示期日の後に債務者と使用者との雇用関係が終了したとき。

When the order referred to in paragraph (1) or paragraph (2) has been issued, the relevant order (or, for the order referred to in the paragraph, the order and a copy of the document referred to in the paragraph) must be served upon the obligor.

第一項又は第二項の決定がされたときは、当該決定(同項の決定にあつては、当該決定及び同項の文書の写し)を債務者に送達しなければならない。

An appeal may be filed against a judicial decision on the petition referred to in paragraph (1) or paragraph (2).

第一項又は第二項の申立てについての裁判に対しては、執行抗告をすることができる。

The order referred to in paragraph (1) or paragraph (2) is not effective until it becomes final and binding.

第一項又は第二項の決定は、確定しなければその効力を生じない。

Read this with the articles around it

© 2026 japanlaw.orgA copy for reading and reference — not an official source, and not legal advice. Only the Japanese text published by the government has legal effect.Run by Genjido LLC (Genjido 合同会社) · [email protected]ContactSourcesTermsPrivacy