When an attaching obligee has filed an action seeking performance of a seized claim (referred to as a "suit for collection" below) against a third party obligor, the court in charge of the case may, upon petition by the third party obligor, order any other obligee who has seized the claim by the time of the service of the complaint to intervene on the plaintiff's side as a co-litigants
The court may render the judicial decision referred to in the preceding paragraph without hearing oral arguments.
前項の裁判は、口頭弁論を経ないですることができる。
Effects of a judgment in a suit for collection extend even to any attaching obligees who had been ordered to intervene pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1) but had failed to intervene.
When upholding the plaintiff's claim in a suit for collection against a third party obligor who is obligated to make a statutory deposit pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (2) or (3) of the preceding Article, the court in charge of the case must include a statement that the payment of money for the claim should be made by the method of a statutory deposit in the main text of the judgment.
When the plaintiff of the judgment prescribed in the preceding paragraph is to receive distribution or payment in judicial enforcement or an auction, a statutory deposit of money equivalent to the amount of the distribution or payment must be made.
Read this with the articles around it