If the Japan Fair Trade Commission finds that a fact falling under any of the following items exists before issuing an order pursuant to the provisions of Article 7-2, paragraph (1) or a notice pursuant to the provisions of Article 7-4, paragraph (7) to an enterprise that reported facts and submitted materials regarding the fact pursuant to the provisions of Article 7-4, paragraph (1), item (i), paragraph (2), items (i) through (iv), or paragraph (3), item (i) or (ii), these provisions do not apply, notwithstanding the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (3) of the article and paragraph (3) of the preceding Article:
公正取引委員会が、第七条の四第一項第一号、第二項第一号から第四号まで又は第三項第一号若しくは第二号に規定する事実の報告及び資料の提出を行つた事業者に対し第七条の二第一項の規定による命令又は第七条の四第七項の規定による通知をするまでの間に、次の各号のいずれかに該当する事実があると認めるときは、同条第一項から第三項まで及び前条第三項の規定にかかわらず、これらの規定は、適用しない。
that the facts reported or materials submitted by the enterprise (meaning the enterprise and any one or more other enterprises that reported the facts and submitted the materials jointly with the enterprise, if the relevant enterprise is the person who reported the facts and submitted the materials pursuant to the provisions of Article 7-4, paragraph (4); the same applies from this item through item (iii).), or the facts or materials obtained from the acts listed in Article 7-5, paragraph (1), item (i) or paragraph (2), item (i) engaged by the enterprise, contained false information;
that the enterprise (limited to the enterprise that reported facts and submitted materials regarding the facts pursuant to the provisions of Article 7-4, paragraph (1), item (i)) failed to report facts or submit materials, or reported false facts or submitted false materials in response to the request pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (6) of the article;
当該事業者（第七条の四第一項第一号に規定する事実の報告及び資料の提出を行つた事業者に限る。）が、同条第六項の規定による求めに対し、事実の報告若しくは資料の提出をせず、又は虚偽の事実の報告若しくは資料の提出をしたこと。
that the enterprise (limited to the enterprise that reported facts and submitted materials regarding the facts pursuant to the provisions of Article 7-4, paragraph (2), items (i) through (iv) or paragraph (3), item (i) or (ii)) reported false facts or submitted false materials in response to the request pursuant to the provisions in paragraph (6) of the article;
当該事業者（第七条の四第二項第一号から第四号まで又は第三項第一号若しくは第二号に規定する事実の報告及び資料の提出を行つた事業者に限る。）が、同条第六項の規定による求めに対し、虚偽の事実の報告又は資料の提出をしたこと。
that, in the case concerned with the violation committed by the relevant enterprise, the enterprise coerced another enterprise (limited to one other than the relevant enterprise and other than any other enterprise that reported the facts and submitted the materials jointly with the enterprise if the enterprise is the person that reported the facts and submitted the materials pursuant to the provisions of Article 7-4, paragraph (4) among the enterprises and any other one or more enterprises that reported the facts and submitted the materials jointly with the enterprise; the same applies in this item) to commit the violation provided in Article 7-2, paragraph (1) or blocked another enterprise from discontinuing the relevant violation;
that the enterprise blocked another enterprise (limited to one other than the relevant enterprise and other than any other enterprise that reported the facts and submitted the materials jointly with the enterprise if the enterprise is the person that reported the facts and submitted the materials pursuant to the provisions of Article 7-4, paragraph (4), among the enterprise and any other one or more enterprises that reported the facts and submitted the materials jointly with the enterprise) from reporting facts and submitting materials regarding the fact pursuant to the provisions of Article 7-4, paragraph (1), item (i), paragraph (2), items (i) through (iv), or paragraph (3), item (i) or (ii) or applying for the consultation provided in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article;
that the enterprise disclosed to a third party (limited to one other than the relevant enterprise and other than any one or more enterprises that reported the facts and submitted the materials jointly with the enterprise if the enterprise is the person that reported the facts and submitted the materials pursuant to the provisions of Article 7-4, paragraph (4) among the enterprise and any other one or more enterprises that reported the facts and submitted the materials jointly with the enterprise), without justifiable grounds, the fact that the enterprise reported the facts and submitted the materials regarding the fact pursuant to the provisions of Article 7-4, paragraph (1), item (i), paragraph (2), items (i) through (iv), or paragraph (3), item (i) or (ii) or concluded the agreement or conducted the consultation set forth in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article; or
当該事業者が、正当な理由なく、第七条の四第一項第一号、第二項第一号から第四号まで若しくは第三項第一号若しくは第二号に規定する事実の報告及び資料の提出を行つた旨又は前条第一項の合意若しくは協議を行つた旨を第三者に対し（当該事業者が第七条の四第四項に規定する事実の報告及び資料の提出を行つた者であるときは、当該事業者及び当該事業者と共同して当該事実の報告及び資料の提出を行つた他の事業者のうちいずれか一以上の事業者が、当該事業者及び当該事業者と共同して当該事実の報告及び資料の提出を行つた他の事業者以外の者に対し）明らかにしたこと。
that the enterprise, in violation of the agreement set forth in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article, failed to conduct the acts relevant to the agreement.
Read this with the articles around it
enterprise
「事業者」
Anyone who carries on a commercial, industrial, financial or other business; an officer, employee, agent or other person acting for the benefit of an enterprise is also treated as one for the purposes of Article 2, paragraph (2) and Chapter 3 (trade associations).
Defined inArticle 2, paragraph (1)· applies throughout the law
Fair Trade Commission
公正取引委員会
The body the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (独占禁止法, the Antimonopoly Act) sets up to achieve that Act's purpose — among other things, to promote fair and free competition by banning private monopolization, unreasonable restraint of trade and unfair trade practices, and so to protect the interests of general consumers and the democratic and sound development of the national economy (Antimonopoly Act, Articles 1 and 27, paragraph (1)). It comes under the Prime Minister's jurisdiction, but its chairperson and four commissioners — appointed by the Prime Minister with the consent of both Houses of the Diet — exercise their authority independently (Articles 27, paragraph (2), 28 and 29). Under the Act against Unjustifiable Premiums and Misleading Representations, businesses and trade associations may, with the approval of both the Prime Minister and the Fair Trade Commission, conclude or set agreements or rules (協定又は規約) on premiums or representations (Article 36, paragraph (1)).
Written by AI using Antimonopoly Act, Arts. 1, 27, 28, 29 and Act against Unjustifiable Premiums and Misleading Representations, Art. 36 as a reference.