Even after the approval of Article 48-3, paragraph (3), the Japan Fair Trade Commission may take the measure, or order its staff members to take the measures pursuant to the provisions of Article 47, necessary to ascertain whether either of the items of Article 48-5, paragraph (1) applies if it considers particularly necessary.
公正取引委員会は、第四十八条の三第三項の認定をした後においても、特に必要があるときは、第四十七条の規定により、第四十八条の五第一項各号のいずれかに該当しているかどうかを確かめるために必要な処分をし、又はその職員をして処分をさせることができる。
Even after the approval of Article 48-7, paragraph (3), the Japan Fair Trade Commission may take the measure, or order its staff members to take the measures pursuant to the provisions of Article 47, necessary to ascertain whether either of the items of Article 48-9, paragraph (1) applies if it considers particularly necessary.
公正取引委員会は、第四十八条の七第三項の認定をした後においても、特に必要があるときは、第四十七条の規定により、第四十八条の九第一項各号のいずれかに該当しているかどうかを確かめるために必要な処分をし、又はその職員をして処分をさせることができる。
Even after issuing a cease and desist order or a competition restoration order becoming final and binding, the Japan Fair Trade Commission may take the measures, or order its staff members to take the measures pursuant to the provisions of Article 47, necessary to ascertain whether the measures ordered in that order are being taken if it considers particularly necessary.
Read this with the articles around it
cease and desist order
「排除措置命令」
An order the Japan Fair Trade Commission makes under Article 7, paragraph (1) or (2) (including as applied by Article 8-2, paragraph (2) and Article 20, paragraph (2)), Article 8-2, paragraph (1) or (3), Article 17-2 or Article 20, paragraph (1), requiring the measures needed to end a violation.
Short name set inArticle 49, paragraph (1)
competition restoration order
「競争回復措置命令」
An order the Japan Fair Trade Commission makes under Article 8-4, paragraph (1) where a monopolistic situation (独占的状態) exists, requiring an enterprise to transfer part of its business or take other measures needed to restore competition.
Short name set inArticle 64, paragraph (1)
Fair Trade Commission
公正取引委員会
The body the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (独占禁止法, the Antimonopoly Act) sets up to achieve that Act's purpose — among other things, to promote fair and free competition by banning private monopolization, unreasonable restraint of trade and unfair trade practices, and so to protect the interests of general consumers and the democratic and sound development of the national economy (Antimonopoly Act, Articles 1 and 27, paragraph (1)). It comes under the Prime Minister's jurisdiction, but its chairperson and four commissioners — appointed by the Prime Minister with the consent of both Houses of the Diet — exercise their authority independently (Articles 27, paragraph (2), 28 and 29). Under the Act against Unjustifiable Premiums and Misleading Representations, businesses and trade associations may, with the approval of both the Prime Minister and the Fair Trade Commission, conclude or set agreements or rules (協定又は規約) on premiums or representations (Article 36, paragraph (1)).
Written by AI using Antimonopoly Act, Arts. 1, 27, 28, 29 and Act against Unjustifiable Premiums and Misleading Representations, Art. 36 as a reference.