When either of the following items applies, the Japan Fair Trade Commission must render a decision to rescind the approval of Article 48-3, paragraph (3):
公正取引委員会は、次の各号のいずれかに該当するときは、決定で、第四十八条の三第三項の認定を取り消さなければならない。
when the Japan Fair Trade Commission recognizes that the cessation measures are not being conducted according to the cessation measure plan that received the approval of Article 48-3, paragraph (3); or
第四十八条の三第三項の認定を受けた排除措置計画に従つて排除措置が実施されていないと認めるとき。
when it has been revealed that the party that received the approval of Article 48-3, paragraph (3) received that approval based on false or wrongful facts.
第四十八条の三第三項の認定を受けた者が虚偽又は不正の事実に基づいて当該認定を受けたことが判明したとき。
The provisions of Article 48-3, paragraphs (4) and (5) apply mutatis mutandis to a decision pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph. In this case, the term "statement of approval" in Article 48-3, paragraphs (4) and (5) is deemed to be replaced with "statement of decision".
第四十八条の三第四項及び第五項の規定は、前項の規定による決定について準用する。この場合において、同条第四項及び第五項中「認定書」とあるのは、「決定書」と読み替えるものとする。
When there has been rescission of the approval of Article 48-3, paragraph (3) pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1), when that rescission was on or after the date two years before the expiration date of the period stipulated in proviso to Article 7, paragraph (2) (including when these are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 8-2, paragraph (2) and Article 20, paragraph (2); the same applies hereinafter in this paragraph), an order pursuant to the provisions of Article 7, paragraph (2) (including when these are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 8-2, paragraph (2) and Article 20, paragraph (2)) or Article 8-2, paragraph (3) may be issued for the act that was the reason for the suspicion related to that approval, notwithstanding the provisions of proviso to Article 7, paragraph (2), also within the two-year period from the date of the decision for rescission.
The provisions of the preceding paragraph apply mutatis mutandis to an order pursuant to the provisions of Article 7-2, paragraph (1) (including when applied mutatis mutandis following the deemed replacement of terms pursuant to Article 8-3), Article 7-9, paragraph (1) or (2), or Articles 20-2 through 20-6. In this case, the phrase "proviso to Article 7, paragraph (2) (including when these are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 8-2, paragraph (2) and Article 20, paragraph (2)" in the preceding paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "Article 7-8, paragraph (6) (including when these are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 7-9, paragraph (3) and Article 8-3 and when they are applied mutatis mutandis following the deemed replacement of terms pursuant to Article 7-9, paragraph (4) and Article 20-7", and the phrase "the provisions of proviso to Article 7, paragraph (2)" with "the provisions of Article 7-8, paragraph (6)".
Read this with the articles around it
cessation measuresmachine translation
「排除措置」
In Articles 48-3 to 48-5, the measures that a person notified under Article 48-2 of a suspected violation draws up itself and intends to carry out to end the act that gave rise to the suspicion.
Short name set inArticle 48-3, paragraph (1)· applies only in this article and in Articles 48-4 and 48-5
cessation measure planmachine translation
「排除措置計画」
In Articles 48-3 and 48-5, the plan for cessation measures (排除措置) that a person notified under Article 48-2 of a suspected violation draws up and submits to the Japan Fair Trade Commission within 60 days of the notice, applying for its approval.
Short name set inArticle 48-3, paragraph (1)· applies only in this article and in Article 48-5
Fair Trade Commission
公正取引委員会
The body the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (独占禁止法, the Antimonopoly Act) sets up to achieve that Act's purpose — among other things, to promote fair and free competition by banning private monopolization, unreasonable restraint of trade and unfair trade practices, and so to protect the interests of general consumers and the democratic and sound development of the national economy (Antimonopoly Act, Articles 1 and 27, paragraph (1)). It comes under the Prime Minister's jurisdiction, but its chairperson and four commissioners — appointed by the Prime Minister with the consent of both Houses of the Diet — exercise their authority independently (Articles 27, paragraph (2), 28 and 29). Under the Act against Unjustifiable Premiums and Misleading Representations, businesses and trade associations may, with the approval of both the Prime Minister and the Fair Trade Commission, conclude or set agreements or rules (協定又は規約) on premiums or representations (Article 36, paragraph (1)).
Written by AI using Antimonopoly Act, Arts. 1, 27, 28, 29 and Act against Unjustifiable Premiums and Misleading Representations, Art. 36 as a reference.