If an accusation is filed pursuant to the provisions of Article 74, paragraph (1) as a result of the investigation of a criminal case, if there are any objects retained, seized, or seized by ordering records, the Japan Fair Trade Commission must hand over the objects together with the inventory thereof.
If any object retained, seized, or seized by ordering records set forth in the preceding paragraph is being stored pursuant to the provisions of Article 113, the Japan Fair Trade Commission must hand over the safekeeping receipt set forth in that Article and notify the person storing the object pursuant to that Article to that effect.
When any object retained, seized, or seized by ordering records is handed over pursuant to the provisions of the preceding two paragraphs, the object is deemed to have been seized pursuant to the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Read this with the articles around it
criminal casemachine translation
「犯則事件」
In Chapter 12, a case concerning the offences in Articles 89 to 91 (among them private monopolization and unreasonable restraint of trade, prohibited international agreements, failing to obey a final cease and desist order, and shareholding in breach of Article 11), which designated Japan Fair Trade Commission staff members (委員会職員) may investigate.
Defined inArticle 101, paragraph (1)· applies only in this chapter
Fair Trade Commission
公正取引委員会
The body the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (独占禁止法, the Antimonopoly Act) sets up to achieve that Act's purpose — among other things, to promote fair and free competition by banning private monopolization, unreasonable restraint of trade and unfair trade practices, and so to protect the interests of general consumers and the democratic and sound development of the national economy (Antimonopoly Act, Articles 1 and 27, paragraph (1)). It comes under the Prime Minister's jurisdiction, but its chairperson and four commissioners — appointed by the Prime Minister with the consent of both Houses of the Diet — exercise their authority independently (Articles 27, paragraph (2), 28 and 29). Under the Act against Unjustifiable Premiums and Misleading Representations, businesses and trade associations may, with the approval of both the Prime Minister and the Fair Trade Commission, conclude or set agreements or rules (協定又は規約) on premiums or representations (Article 36, paragraph (1)).
Written by AI using Antimonopoly Act, Arts. 1, 27, 28, 29 and Act against Unjustifiable Premiums and Misleading Representations, Art. 36 as a reference.