If the seized object is a recording medium which was seized after transferring the electronic or magnetic records or having the electronic or magnetic records transferred pursuant to the provisions of Article 103-3 and does not need to be placed in custody, where the person who underwent the seizure and the owner, possessor, or custodian of the recording medium differ, the Japan Fair Trade Commission must deliver the recording medium to the person who underwent the seizure or must allow the copying of the electronic or magnetic records.
The provisions of paragraph (2) of the preceding Article apply mutatis mutandis to the delivery or duplication pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph.
If neither delivery nor duplication is requested under the preceding paragraph even after six months have elapsed from the date of public notice pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (2) of the preceding Article as applied mutatis mutandis under the preceding paragraph, neither delivery nor duplication is required to be made.
Read this with the articles around it
electronic or magnetic recordcorrected by this site
「電磁的記録」
A record made in electronic, magnetic or any other form people cannot perceive directly, for use in computer processing.
Defined inArticle 80, paragraph (1)
Fair Trade Commission
公正取引委員会
The body the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (独占禁止法, the Antimonopoly Act) sets up to achieve that Act's purpose — among other things, to promote fair and free competition by banning private monopolization, unreasonable restraint of trade and unfair trade practices, and so to protect the interests of general consumers and the democratic and sound development of the national economy (Antimonopoly Act, Articles 1 and 27, paragraph (1)). It comes under the Prime Minister's jurisdiction, but its chairperson and four commissioners — appointed by the Prime Minister with the consent of both Houses of the Diet — exercise their authority independently (Articles 27, paragraph (2), 28 and 29). Under the Act against Unjustifiable Premiums and Misleading Representations, businesses and trade associations may, with the approval of both the Prime Minister and the Fair Trade Commission, conclude or set agreements or rules (協定又は規約) on premiums or representations (Article 36, paragraph (1)).
Written by AI using Antimonopoly Act, Arts. 1, 27, 28, 29 and Act against Unjustifiable Premiums and Misleading Representations, Art. 36 as a reference.