Chapter III Non-Contentious Cases (Articles 872-2 to 886)
The law as Act on the Arrangement of Related Acts to Promote the Use of Information and Communications Technology in Civil Procedures, etc. (Act No. 53 of 2023) leaves it, with the words it changes marked.
The main text is read a page at a time: a chapter to a page, and a long chapter in runs of articles. The whole main text, and the supplementary provisions and appended tables this amendment changes. Those it leaves untouched are on the page for the text in force.
Article 872-2第八百七十二条の二
Sending of a Copy of Petition for Appeal(抗告状の写しの送付等)
Article 872-2, paragraph (1)
When an immediate appeal against the judicial decision set forth in the items of Article 870, paragraph (2) is made, the court must send a copy of the petition for appeal to the petitioner and the persons specified in each of those items (excluding the appellant). In this case, the provisions of Article 870-2, paragraphs (2) and (3) apply mutatis mutandis.
The provisions of Article 870-2, paragraphs (5) through (8) apply mutatis mutandis to cases where an immediate appeal referred to in the preceding paragraph is made.
第八百七十条の二第五項から第八項までの規定は、前項の即時抗告があった場合について準用する。
Article 873第八百七十三条
Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance(原裁判の執行停止)
Article 873, paragraph (1)
The immediate appeal referred to in Article 872 has the effect of staying execution; provided, however, that this does not apply to an immediate appeal against the following judicial decisions set forth in Article 870, paragraph (1), items (i) through (iv) and (viii).
No appeal may be entered against the following judicial decisions:
次に掲げる裁判に対しては、不服を申し立てることができない。
Article 874, paragraph (1), item (i)
a judicial decision on the appointment or selection of a person who is temporarily to perform the duties of a director, accounting advisor, company auditor, representative director, committee member, executive officer or representative executive officer prescribed in Article 870, paragraph (1), item (i), a liquidator, a representative liquidator, a liquidator who represents a liquidating membership company, a person who is temporarily to perform the duties of a liquidator or representative liquidator prescribed in that item, an inspector, the appraiser set forth in Article 501, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 822, paragraph (3)) or Article 662, paragraph (1), the person who retains accounting materials set forth in Article 508, paragraph (2) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 822, paragraph (3)) or Article 672, paragraph (3), a special agent of a bond administrator or an assistant bond administrator or the bond administrator or an assistant bond administrator to succeed to the administration of bonds set forth in Article 714, paragraph (3) (including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 714-7);
a judicial decision on appointment or dismissal of the administrator referred to in Article 825, paragraph (2) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 827, paragraph (2));
a judicial decision under the provisions of Article 825, paragraph (6) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 827, paragraph (2)); and
第八百二十五条第六項(第八百二十七条第二項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定による裁判
Article 874, paragraph (1), item (iv)
a judicial decision upholding a petition for permission under the provisions of this Act (excluding the judicial decisions set forth in Article 870, paragraph (1), item (ix) and paragraph (2), item (i) of the same Article).
Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act(非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外)
Article 875, paragraph (1)
The provisions of Article 40 and Article 57, paragraph (2), item (ii) of the non-contentious cases procedures Act do not apply to non-contentious cases under the provisions of this Act.
Beyond what is specified in this Act, necessary matters concerning the procedures of non-contentious cases under the provisions of this Act are specified by the Supreme Court Rules.
Section 2 Special Provisions on the Procedures of Increasing or Decreasing the Refund after a Judgment of Invalidation of a New Share Issue第二節 新株発行の無効判決後の払戻金増減の手続に関する特則
Article 877第八百七十七条
Mandatory Consolidation of Hearings(審問等の必要的併合)
Article 877, paragraph (1)
When several cases relating to the petition referred to in Article 840, paragraph (2) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 841, paragraph (2) and Article 842, paragraph (2)) are pending simultaneously, the hearings and judicial decisions thereof must be made in consolidation.
A judicial decision on the petition referred to in Article 840, paragraph (2) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 841, paragraph (2)) is effective against all of the shareholders.
A judicial decision on the petition referred to in Article 840, paragraph (2) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 842, paragraph (2) is effective against all of the share option holders.
Section 3 Special Provisions on the Proceedings of Special Liquidation第三節 特別清算の手続に関する特則
Subsection 1 Common Provisions第一款 通則
Article 879第八百七十九条
Jurisdiction over a Special Liquidation Case(特別清算事件の管轄)
Article 879, paragraph (1)
Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1), if a corporation has a majority of the voting rights of all shareholders of a stock company (excluding shareholders who are unable to exercise voting rights on all the matters which may be resolved at the shareholders meeting; the same applies in the following paragraph), if a special liquidation case, a bankruptcy case, a rehabilitation case or a reorganization case (hereinafter referred to as a "special liquidation case, etc." in this Article) is pending with regard to relevant corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "parent corporation" in this Article), a petition for commencement of special liquidation relating to relevant stock company may be filed alternatively with the district court before which the special liquidation case, etc. of the parent corporation is pending.
If the stock company prescribed in the preceding paragraph, or the parent corporation and the stock company prescribed in that paragraph have a majority of the voting rights of all shareholders of another stock company, a petition for commencement of special liquidation relating to relevant other stock company may be filed alternatively with the district court before which the special liquidation case, etc. of the parent corporation is pending.
With regard to application of the preceding two paragraphs, the shareholder prescribed by Ministry of Justice Order referred to in Article 308, paragraph (1) is deemed to have voting rights with respect to the shares which the shareholder holds.
Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1), if a stock company has, pursuant to the provisions of Article 444, prepared consolidated financial statements of that stock company or another stock company for the most recent business year and the contents thereof have been reported to the annual shareholders meeting of that stock company, if a special liquidation case, etc. is pending with regard to that stock company, a petition for commencement of special liquidation relating to relevant other stock company may be filed alternatively with the district court before which the special liquidation case, etc. of that stock company is pending.
Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Ordinary Liquidation Case after Commencement of Special Liquidation(特別清算開始後の通常清算事件の管轄及び移送)
Article 880, paragraph (1)
Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1), if an order to commence special liquidation is issued with regard to a liquidating stock company, a case relating to a petition under the provisions of Part II, Chapter IX, Section 1 (excluding Article 508) (referred to as an "ordinary liquidation case" in the following paragraph) relating to relevant liquidating stock company is under the jurisdiction of the district court (hereinafter referred to as the "special liquidation court" in this Section) before which the special liquidation case of relevant liquidating stock company is pending.
If a special liquidation case relating to a liquidating stock company is pending before a district court other than the district court before which an ordinary liquidation case relating to the same liquidating stock company is pending and an order to commence special liquidation has been issued, if it is found reasonable for processing relevant ordinary liquidation case, the court (meaning a judge or a panel of judges handling the ordinary liquidation case) may transfer relevant ordinary liquidation case to the special liquidation court ex officio.
The provisions of Article 869 do not apply to a petition for permission under the provisions of Part II, Chapter IX, Section 2 (excluding Article 547, paragraph (3)).
A ruling concerning proceedings of special liquidation against which an immediate appeal may be entered must append the reason thereof; provided, however, that this does not apply to a ruling under the provisions of Article 526, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (2) of that Article) and Article 532, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 534).
Article 883, paragraph (1)(電子裁判書の送達)Service of an Electronic Written JudgmentChanged
The provisions of Part I, Chapter V, Section 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure (excluding Article 100, paragraph (2), Article 104, Subsection 3, Article 111 and Article 113104) apply mutatis mutandis to the service of a an electronic written judgment under the provisions of this Section. In these cases, in the main clause of (meaning an electronic written judgment prescribed in Article 11257, paragraph (1) of that Code, the phrase "commenced the measures under the provisions of the preceding Article" is deemed to be replaced with "a court clerk commenced posting on the notice board of the court a notice to the effect that the court clerk keeps the written judgment to be served and will deliver it at any time to the person who is to receive service"; and in the proviso to that paragraph, the phrase "commenced the measures under the provisions of the preceding Article" is deemed to be replaced with "the relevant posting commencedthe Non-Contentious Case Procedures Act that has been recorded in a file pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (3) of that Article; the same applies hereinafter in this Section). In these cases, in Article 109-4, paragraph (1) of that Code, the phrase "each item of Article 132-11, paragraph (1)" is deemed to be replaced with "each item of Article 132-11, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis following the deemed replacement of terms pursuant to Article 42, paragraph (1) of the Non-Contentious Case Procedures Act as applied following the deemed replacement of terms pursuant to the provisions of Article 887-2, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act".
Article 883, paragraph (2)(裁判書の送達)(Service of a Written Judgment)Removed
Service by publication under the provisions of Article 110, paragraph (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the preceding paragraph is effected by posting on the notice board of the court a notice to the effect that a court clerk keeps the written judgment to be served and will deliver it at any time to the person who is to receive service.
A person who has an interest in a judicial decision concerning proceedings of special liquidation may enter an immediate appeal against relevant judicial decision only if there are special provisions in this Section.
Article 886, paragraph (1)(事件に関する文書の閲覧等)(Inspection of Case Documents)Changed
An interested party may make a request to a court clerk for inspection of the documents or any other articles (hereinafter referred to as the "documents, etc." in this Article and paragraph (1) of the following ArticleArticle 887, paragraph (1)) submitted to the court or prepared by the court based on the provisions of Part II, Chapter IX, Section 2 or this Section or Part II of the Non-Contentious CasesCase Procedures Act (or, if an order to commence special liquidation has been issued, Part II, Chapter IX, Section 1 or Section 2, or Section 1 of this Chapter (limited to the portion relating to a case relating to a petition under the provisions of Part II, Chapter IX, Section 1) or this Section, or Part II of the Non-Contentious CasesCase Procedures Act; the same applies in paragraph (1) of the following Article) (including the provisions of this Act or any other Acts applied mutatis mutandis under these provisions; the same applies in that paragraph).
Article 886, paragraph (2)(事件に関する文書の閲覧等)(Inspection of Case Documents)Changed
An interested party may make a request to a court clerk for copying of the documents, etc., or delivery of the original, a transcript or an extract thereof, or delivery of a certificate of matters concerning the case.
The provisions of the preceding paragraph do not apply to sound recording tapes or video tapes (including objects on which certain matters are recorded by a method equivalent thereto) among the documents, etc. In these cases, a court clerk must permit reproduction of these objects if there is a request from an interested party for these objects.
Article 886, paragraph (4)(事件に関する文書の閲覧等)(Inspection of Case Documents)Changed
Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding three paragraphs, the persons set forth in the following items may not make a request under the provisions of the preceding three paragraphs until any one of the orders, provisional orders, dispositions or judicial decisions specified respectively in those items has been issued; provided, however, that this does not apply if any that person is a petitioner with respect to commencement of special liquidation:The provisions of Article 91, paragraph (5) of the Code of Civil Procedure apply mutatis mutandis to a request under the provisions of the preceding three paragraphs.
Article 886, paragraph (4), item (i)(事件に関する文書の閲覧等)(Inspection of Case Documents)Removed
an interested party other than the liquidating stock company:an order to suspend under the provisions of Article 512, a provisional order under the provisions of Article 540, paragraph (2), a disposition under the provisions of Article 541, paragraph (2), or a judicial decision relating to a petition for commencement of special liquidation; or
Article 886, paragraph (4), item (ii)(事件に関する文書の閲覧等)(Inspection of Case Documents)Removed
the liquidating stock company:a judicial decision designating the date of the hearing on which the liquidating stock company is to be summoned concerning a petition for commencement of special liquidation or the order, provisional order, disposition or judicial decision specified in the preceding item.
Article 886, paragraph (5)(事件に関する文書の閲覧等)(Inspection of Case Documents)Removed
The provisions of Article 32, paragraphs (1) through (4) of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act do not apply to the special liquidation proceedings.
非訟事件手続法第三十二条第一項から第四項までの規定は、特別清算の手続には、適用しない。
Change 1 of 9
Copy link
Coming into force施行
The day a law or an amendment starts to apply. It is often months or years after promulgation, so that people have time to prepare. The Ministry of Justice's English usually says a law "comes into force" or "comes into effect", and sometimes calls the day its "enforcement date". Its "enforcement" more often means the word's other sense, carrying a law out, as in an Order for Enforcement (施行令), the Cabinet Order (政令) that sets out the details for carrying out an Act.
Rules made by the Cabinet to carry out the Constitution and Acts. A Cabinet Order cannot impose duties, restrict rights or set penalties unless an Act delegates that to it.