Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

This text is not in force yetIt by 16 May 2028, on a day set by — at the latest in 2 years

Read the text in force →

Code of Criminal Procedure

刑事訴訟法(けいじそしょうほう)

Chapter XI Examination of Witnesses (Articles 157-5 to 164)

The law as Act Partially Amending the Code of Criminal Procedure, etc. (Act No. 28 of 2023) leaves it, with the words it changes marked.

The main text is read a page at a time: a chapter to a page, and a long chapter in runs of articles. The whole main text, and the supplementary provisions and appended tables this amendment changes. Those it leaves untouched are on the page for the text in force.

How the changes are shown

Underlined: words the amendment adds. A bar: where it removes words.Underlined: words the amendment adds. Struck through: the words it removes.Underlined: words the amendment adds. Struck through: the words it removes.

Article 157-5第百五十七条の五

Article 157-5, paragraph (1)

In the examination of a witness, when it is found that the witness is likely to feel pressure and the witness's mental peace of mind is likely to be seriously harmed while testifying in the presence of the defendant (including cases using means that allows the recognition of each other's presence and communication through the transmission of images and sound) due to the nature of the crime, the witness's age, mental or physical condition or relationship with the defendant, or other circumstances, and a court finds it appropriate, the court may take measures so that it is impossible for the defendant and the witness to be aware of each other's presence either from one side or from both sides, after hearing the opinions of the public prosecutor and the defendant or the defense counsel; provided, however, that measures to make it impossible for the defendant to be aware of the presence of the witness may only be taken when the defense counsel is present.

裁判所は、証人を尋問する場合において、犯罪の性質、証人の年齢、心身の状態、被告人との関係その他の事情により、証人が被告人の面前(映像と音声の送受信により相手の状態を相互に認識しながら通話をすることができる方法による場合を含む。)において供述するときは圧迫を受け精神の平穏を著しく害されるおそれがあると認める場合であつて、相当と認めるときは、検察官及び被告人又は弁護人の意見を聴き、被告人とその証人との間で、一方から又は相互に相手の状態を認識することができないようにするための措置を採ることができる。ただし、被告人から証人の状態を認識することができないようにするための措置については、弁護人が出頭している場合に限り、採ることができる。

Article 157-5, paragraph (2)

In the examination of a witness, when a court finds it appropriate taking into account the nature of the crime, the witness's age or mental or physical condition, the effect on the witness's reputation, or other circumstances, the court may take measures so that it is impossible for court observers and the witness to be aware of each other's presence, after hearing the opinions of the public prosecutor and the defendant or the defense counsel.

裁判所は、証人を尋問する場合において、犯罪の性質、証人の年齢、心身の状態、名誉に対する影響その他の事情を考慮し、相当と認めるときは、検察官及び被告人又は弁護人の意見を聴き、傍聴人とその証人との間で、相互に相手の状態を認識することができないようにするための措置を採ることができる。

Article 157-6第百五十七条の六

Article 157-6, paragraph (1)

In the examination of the person set forth in the following items as a witness, when a court finds it appropriate, the court may, after hearing the opinions of the public prosecutor and the defendant or the defense counsel, have the witness be present in a place located in the same premises other than the place where the judge and persons concerned in the case are present for the examination of the witness, and examine the witness by means that allows the recognition of each other's presence and communication through the transmission of images and sound:

裁判所は、次に掲げる者を証人として尋問する場合において、相当と認めるときは、検察官及び被告人又は弁護人の意見を聴き、裁判官及び訴訟関係人が証人を尋問するために在席する場所以外の場所であつて、同一構内にあるものにその証人を在席させ、映像と音声の送受信により相手の状態を相互に認識しながら通話をすることができる方法によつて、尋問することができる。

Article 157-6, paragraph (1), item (i)

the victim of the crimes or attempts of the crimes under Articles 176, 177, 179, 181 or 182 of the Penal Code, Article 225 or Article 226-2, paragraph (3) of the same Code (limited to cases with the purpose of indecency or marriage; hereinafter the same applies in this item), Article 227, paragraph (1) of the same Code (limited to cases with the purpose of being an accessory to a person who commits the crime under Article 225 or Article 226-2, paragraph (3) of the same Code) or paragraph (3) of that Article (limited to cases with the purpose of indecency), or Article 241, paragraph (1) or (3) of the same Code;

刑法第百七十六条、第百七十七条、第百七十九条、第百八十一条若しくは第百八十二条の罪、同法第二百二十五条若しくは第二百二十六条の二第三項の罪(わいせつ又は結婚の目的に係る部分に限る。以下この号において同じ。)、同法第二百二十七条第一項(同法第二百二十五条又は第二百二十六条の二第三項の罪を犯した者を幇助する目的に係る部分に限る。)若しくは第三項(わいせつの目的に係る部分に限る。)の罪若しくは同法第二百四十一条第一項若しくは第三項の罪又はこれらの罪の未遂罪の被害者

Article 157-6, paragraph (1), item (ii)

the victim of the crimes under Article 60, paragraph (1) of the Child Welfare Act (Act No. 164 of 1947) or paragraph (2) of the same Article pertaining to Article 34, paragraph (1), item (ix) of the same Act, Articles 4 through 8 of the Act on Regulation and Punishment of Acts Relating to Child Prostitution and Child Pornography, and the Protection of Children (Act No. 52 of 1999), or Articles 2 through 6 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Photographing Sexual Poses, etc. and the Erasure, etc. of Electronic or Magnetic Records of Images of Sexual Poses Recorded on Seized Articles (Act No. 67 of 2023); or

児童福祉法(昭和二十二年法律第百六十四号)第六十条第一項の罪若しくは同法第三十四条第一項第九号に係る同法第六十条第二項の罪、児童買春、児童ポルノに係る行為等の規制及び処罰並びに児童の保護等に関する法律(平成十一年法律第五十二号)第四条から第八条までの罪又は性的な姿態を撮影する行為等の処罰及び押収物に記録された性的な姿態の影像に係る電磁的記録の消去等に関する法律(令和五年法律第六十七号)第二条から第六条までの罪の被害者

Article 157-6, paragraph (1), item (iii)

in addition to those set forth in the preceding two items, a person who is likely to feel pressure and the person's mental peace of mind is likely to be seriously harmed while testifying at the place where the judge and persons concerned in the case are present for the examination of the witness, due to the nature of the crime, the person's age, mental or physical condition or relationship with the defendant, or other circumstances.

前二号に掲げる者のほか、犯罪の性質、証人の年齢、心身の状態、被告人との関係その他の事情により、裁判官及び訴訟関係人が証人を尋問するために在席する場所において供述するときは圧迫を受け精神の平穏を著しく害されるおそれがあると認められる者

Article 157-6, paragraph (2)

In the examination of a witness (limited to a person who is in Japan; the same applies in this paragraph and the following paragraph), when a court finds it appropriate in the following cases, the court may, after hearing the opinions of the public prosecutor and the defendant or the defense counsel, have the witness be present in a place that it finds appropriate, such as a place within the premises of another court or any other place not in the same premises, and examine the witness by means that allows the recognition of each other's presence and communication through the transmission of images and sound:

裁判所は、証人(国内にいる者に限る。以下この項及び次項において同じ。)を尋問する場合において、次に掲げる場合であつて、相当と認めるときは、検察官及び被告人又は弁護人の意見を聴き、他の裁判所の構内にある場所その他の同一構内以外にある場所であつて、適当と認めるものに証人を在席させ、映像と音声の送受信により相手の状態を相互に認識しながら通話をすることができる方法によつて、尋問することができる。

Article 157-6, paragraph (2), item (i)

when the court finds that the witness's peace of mind is likely to be seriously harmed if the witness appears in the same premises, due to the nature of the crime, the witness's age, mental or physical condition or relationship with the defendant, or other circumstances;

犯罪の性質、証人の年齢、心身の状態、被告人との関係その他の事情により、証人が同一構内に出頭するときは精神の平穏を著しく害されるおそれがあると認めるとき。

Article 157-6, paragraph (2), item (ii)

when the court finds that the body or property of the witness is likely to be harmed or the witness may be threatened or confused while moving to a place in the same premises to appear there;

同一構内への出頭に伴う移動に際し、証人の身体若しくは財産に害を加え又は証人を畏怖させ若しくは困惑させる行為がなされるおそれがあると認めるとき。

Article 157-6, paragraph (2), item (iii)

when the court finds that the body or property of the witness or the witness's relative is likely to be harmed or either of these persons is likely to be threatened or confused due to the identification of the witness's address, workplace and other ordinary whereabouts by following the witness or other means while the witness moves after appearing in the same premises;

同一構内への出頭後の移動に際し尾行その他の方法で証人の住居、勤務先その他その通常所在する場所が特定されることにより、証人若しくはその親族の身体若しくは財産に害を加え又はこれらの者を畏怖させ若しくは困惑させる行為がなされるおそれがあると認めるとき。

Article 157-6, paragraph (2), item (iv)

when the court finds that it is extremely difficult for the witness to appear at the same premises due to injury, illness or mental or physical disorder;

証人がその傷病又は心身の障害により同一構内に出頭することが著しく困難であると認めるとき。

Article 157-6, paragraph (2), item (v)

when the court finds it extremely difficult that the witness appears in the same premises due to the witness's residence in a remote place, and his/her age, occupation, physical condition or other circumstances;

証人が遠隔地に居住し、その年齢、職業、健康状態その他の事情により、同一構内に出頭することが著しく困難であると認めるとき。

Article 157-6, paragraph (2), item (vi)

when the witness is under physical restraint and the court finds that, due to the witness's age, mental or physical condition, the status of the implementation of treatment or other circumstances, the witness's peace of mind is likely to be seriously harmed by the travel accompanying appearance at the same premises, and that serious hindrance is likely to arise to the proper implementation of the witness's treatment;

証人が身体の拘束を受けている場合であつて、その年齢、心身の状態、処遇の実施状況その他の事情により、同一構内への出頭に伴う移動により証人が精神の平穏を著しく害され、その処遇の適切な実施に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがあると認めるとき。

Article 157-6, paragraph (2), item (vii)

when the witness is under physical restraint and the court finds that an act of taking the witness away or freeing the witness is likely to be committed during the travel accompanying appearance at the same premises;

証人が身体の拘束を受けている場合であつて、同一構内への出頭に伴う移動に際し、証人を奪取し又は解放する行為がなされるおそれがあると認めるとき。

Article 157-6, paragraph (2), item (viii)

when the testimony to be given by the witness pertains to expert examination, and the court finds that it is extremely difficult for the witness to appear at the same premises on the date and time of the examination due to the witness's occupation, health condition or other circumstances, and that examination on that date and time is particularly necessary due to the importance of the witness, the state of the proceedings or other circumstances.

証人にさせる供述が鑑定に属するものである場合であつて、その職業、健康状態その他の事情により証人がその尋問の日時に同一構内に出頭することが著しく困難であり、かつ、証人の重要性、審理の状況その他の事情により当該日時に尋問することが特に必要であると認めるとき。

Article 157-6, paragraph (3)

In addition to the cases prescribed in the preceding two paragraphs, when examining a witness, the court may, if neither the public prosecutor nor the defendant has any objection to examining the witness by either of the means prescribed in the preceding two paragraphs, and the court finds it appropriate taking into consideration the importance of the witness, the necessity of examining the witness by that means and other circumstances, examine the witness by that means.

前二項に規定する場合のほか、裁判所は、証人を尋問する場合において、前二項に規定する方法のいずれかによつて尋問することについて検察官及び被告人に異議がなく、証人の重要性、当該方法によつて尋問することの必要性その他の事情を考慮し、相当と認めるときは、当該方法によつて、尋問することができる。

Article 157-6, paragraph (4)

In the examination of a witness using the means provided in paragraph (1) or (2) (excluding the case of examination pursuant to the provisions of items (v) through (viii) of that paragraph), when it is considered that the witness will be requested to testify on the same facts again in another criminal procedure thereafter, and the consent of the witness is obtained, the court may, after hearing the opinions of the public prosecutor and the defendant or the defense counsel, record the examination and testimony of and the circumstances surrounding the witness as an electronic or magnetic record by the method of simultaneously making an audio recording and a video recording, and record it in the file.

第一項又は第二項に規定する方法により証人尋問を行う場合(同項第五号から第八号までの規定による場合を除く。)において、裁判所は、その証人が後の刑事手続において同一の事実につき再び証人として供述を求められることがあると思料する場合であつて、証人の同意があるときは、検察官及び被告人又は弁護人の意見を聴き、その証人の尋問及び供述並びにその状況を録音及び録画を同時に行う方法により電磁的記録として記録し、これをファイルに記録することができる。

Article 157-6, paragraph (5)

The electronic or magnetic record recorded in the file pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph is to be made part of the record.

前項の規定によりファイルに記録した電磁的記録は、調書の一部とするものとする。

Article 158第百五十八条

Article 158, paragraph (1)

The court may, after hearing the opinions of the public prosecutor and the defendant or the defense counsel, and when the court deems it to be necessary, taking into account the importance of the witness, said witness's age, occupation, physical condition and other circumstances and the gravity of the factual background, summon a witness for examination to a place outside of the court or examine said person at said person's present location.

裁判所は、証人の重要性、年齢、職業、健康状態その他の事情と事案の軽重とを考慮した上、検察官及び被告人又は弁護人の意見を聴き、必要と認めるときは、裁判所外にこれを召喚し、又はその現在場所でこれを尋問することができる。

Article 158, paragraph (2)

In the case prescribed in the preceding paragraph, the court must give the public prosecutor, the defendant and the defense counsel an opportunity to know in advance of the particulars to be examined.

前項の場合には、裁判所は、あらかじめ、検察官、被告人及び弁護人に、尋問事項を知る機会を与えなければならない。

Article 158, paragraph (3)

The public prosecutor and the defendant or the defense counsel may request the court to examine other necessary particulars in addition to the particulars for examination prescribed in the preceding paragraph.

検察官、被告人又は弁護人は、前項の尋問事項に附加して、必要な事項の尋問を請求することができる。

Article 159第百五十九条

Article 159, paragraph (1)

The court must, when the public prosecutor, the defendant or the defense counsel was absent from the examination prescribed in the preceding Article, give said person an opportunity to know of the details of the testimony of the witness.

裁判所は、検察官、被告人又は弁護人が前条の証人尋問に立ち会わなかつたときは、立ち会わなかつた者に、証人の供述の内容を知る機会を与えなければならない。

Article 159, paragraph (2)

When the testimony of the witness prescribed in the preceding paragraph is unexpected and extremely disadvantageous to the defendant, the defendant or the defense counsel may request the court to examine other necessary additional particulars.

前項の証人の供述が被告人に予期しなかつた著しい不利益なものである場合には、被告人又は弁護人は、更に必要な事項の尋問を請求することができる。

Article 159, paragraph (3)

If the request prescribed in the preceding paragraph is deemed to be without good reason, the court may dismiss said request.

裁判所は、前項の請求を理由がないものと認めるときは、これを却下することができる。

Article 160第百六十条

Article 160, paragraph (1)

When a witness refuses to swear an oath or testify without a justifiable reason, the court may punish said person by making a ruling for a non-criminal fine of not more than 100,000 yen and order said person to compensate for the expenses incurred due to said refusal.

証人が正当な理由がなく宣誓又は証言を拒んだときは、決定で、十万円以下の過料に処し、かつ、その拒絶により生じた費用の賠償を命ずることができる。

Article 160, paragraph (2)

An immediate appeal against the ruling prescribed in the preceding paragraph may be filed.

前項の決定に対しては、即時抗告をすることができる。

Article 161第百六十一条

Article 161, paragraph (1)

Any person who refuses to swear an oath or testify without a justifiable reason is punished by imprisonment for not more than a year or a fine of not more than 300,000 yen.

正当な理由がなく宣誓又は証言を拒んだ者は、一年以下の拘禁刑又は三十万円以下の罰金に処する。

Article 162第百六十二条

Article 162, paragraph (1)

The court may, when it is necessary, order the witness to be accompanied to a designated place by making a ruling. If said witness disobeys the order without a justifiable reason, the court may subpoena said witness.

裁判所は、必要があるときは、決定で指定の場所に証人の同行を命ずることができる。証人が正当な理由がなく同行に応じないときは、これを勾引することができる。

Article 163第百六十三条

Article 163, paragraph (1)

When a witness is to be examined outside the court, the court may commission a judge of a panel to examine said witness, or delegate questioning to a judge of the district court, family court or summary court of the present location of said witness.

裁判所外で証人を尋問すべきときは、合議体の構成員にこれをさせ、又は証人の現在地の地方裁判所、家庭裁判所若しくは簡易裁判所の裁判官にこれを嘱託することができる。

Article 163, paragraph (2)

A delegated judge may re-delegate a judge of another district court, family court or summary court who has the competence to be delegated to.

受託裁判官は、受託の権限を有する他の地方裁判所、家庭裁判所又は簡易裁判所の裁判官に転嘱することができる。

Article 163, paragraph (3)

A delegated judge may, when lacking the competence to handle delegated particulars, transfer them to a judge of another district court, family court or summary court who has the competence to be delegated to.

受託裁判官は、受託事項について権限を有しないときは、受託の権限を有する他の地方裁判所、家庭裁判所又は簡易裁判所の裁判官に嘱託を移送することができる。

Article 163, paragraph (4)

A commissioned or delegated judge may, with respect to examination of a witness, take the measures belonging to a court or a presiding judge; provided however, that the court also may render the rulings prescribed in Articles 150 and 160.

受命裁判官又は受託裁判官は、証人の尋問に関し、裁判所又は裁判長に属する処分をすることができる。但し、第百五十条及び第百六十条の決定は、裁判所もこれをすることができる。

Article 163, paragraph (5)

The proceedings provided in Article 158, paragraphs (2) and (3) and Article 159 must, notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, be exercised by the court.

第百五十八条第二項及び第三項並びに第百五十九条に規定する手続は、前項の規定にかかわらず、裁判所がこれをしなければならない。

Article 164第百六十四条

Article 164, paragraph (1)

A witness may request travel expenses, a daily allowance and accommodation fees; provided however, that this does not apply when said witness refuses to swear an oath or testify without a justifiable reason.

証人は、旅費、日当及び宿泊料を請求することができる。但し、正当な理由がなく宣誓又は証言を拒んだ者は、この限りでない。

Article 164, paragraph (2)

If a witness has received payment of travel expenses, a daily allowance or accommodation fees in advance, but does not appear in court or refuses to swear an oath or testify without a justifiable reason, said witness must return all received expenses.

証人は、あらかじめ旅費、日当又は宿泊料の支給を受けた場合において、正当な理由がなく、出頭せず又は宣誓若しくは証言を拒んだときは、その支給を受けた費用を返納しなければならない。

© 2026 japanlaw.orgA copy for reading and reference — not an official source, and not legal advice. Only the Japanese text published by the government has legal effect.Run by Genjido LLC (源氏道合同会社) · contact@genjido.comContactSourcesTermsPrivacy