①If a person who convenes a meeting held by owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. (hereinafter referred to as a "meeting of owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc.") cannot ascertain the whereabouts of an owner of buildings in a housing complex, etc. (excluding one who has notified the place where they are to receive notices pursuant to the provisions of Article 35, paragraph (3) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the preceding Article), the notice under Article 35, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the preceding Article may be given by posting it somewhere conspicuous within the housing complex.

②In the case referred to in the preceding paragraph, the notice is deemed to have arrived at the time when it was posted pursuant to the provisions of that paragraph; provided, however, that if the person who convenes the meeting of owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. was negligent in not knowing the whereabouts of that owner of buildings in a housing complex, etc., the notice does not have the effect of arrival.

①In the case prescribed in Article 78, if the land on which a specific building among the destroyed buildings (hereinafter referred to as a "specific destroyed building" in this Article and Article 83) was located (including rights related to that land) is co-owned by the owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. of the relevant buildings in the housing complex (including destroyed buildings; the same applies hereinafter), and, where the requirements specified in the following items for the categories of cases set forth in those items are satisfied, a resolution of approval (hereinafter referred to as a "resolution to approve rebuilding" in this Article) has been obtained by at least a three-fourths majority of the voting rights of the owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. present at a meeting of owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. consisting of the owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. of the relevant buildings in the housing complex who are co-owners of that land (including rights related to it), at which owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. who hold a majority of the voting rights (or, if a higher proportion is specified in the bylaws referred to in Article 30, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 79, at least that proportion) are present, the owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. of that specific destroyed building may newly construct a building on that land or on land located in the housing complex that is managed or used together with that land (limited to land co-owned by the owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. of the relevant buildings in the housing complex).

②Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 38 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 79, the voting rights of each owner of buildings in a housing complex, etc. at the meeting of owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. referred to in the preceding paragraph are to be in proportion to the value of the share in the land on which the specific destroyed building was located (including rights related to that land), even if it is otherwise provided for in the bylaws referred to in Article 30, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 79.

③The owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. of the specific destroyed building for which the requirements specified in the items of paragraph (1) are satisfied are deemed to have exercised voting rights in favor of the resolution to approve rebuilding; provided, however, that this does not apply to the exercise of voting rights held by the co-owners of the grounds, etc. pertaining to the specific destroyed building based on the right to use the grounds of, or the co-ownership interest in the grounds, etc. pertaining to, a building other than the specific destroyed building from among the buildings in the housing complex, in the case set forth in item (i) of that paragraph.

④Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 35, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 79, when convening a meeting of owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. referred to in paragraph (1), the notice under that paragraph must indicate an outline of the design of the building that is to be newly constructed (including the place in the housing complex where the building is to be located) in addition to the subject matter of the meeting and the outline of the proposal, and be sent at least two months prior to the date of that meeting of owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc.

⑤In the case referred to in paragraph (1), if the rebuilding under a resolution to approve rebuilding will have a particular influence on the reconstruction or rebuilding of a building other than the specific destroyed building (including a destroyed building; hereinafter referred to as "the other building" in this paragraph), the rebuilding of the specific destroyed building may only be carried out if the persons specified in the relevant of the following items for the case set forth in that item are in favor of that resolution to approve rebuilding:

⑥In the case referred to in paragraph (1), if there are two or more specific destroyed buildings, the owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. of those two or more specific destroyed buildings may, with the agreement of the owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. of each specific destroyed building, bring the rebuilding of those two or more specific destroyed buildings collectively to a resolution to approve rebuilding.

⑦In the case referred to in the preceding paragraph, if the specific destroyed buildings were buildings with exclusively-owned areas, a resolution to bring the rebuilding of those two or more specific destroyed buildings collectively to a resolution to approve rebuilding may be adopted, at a meeting of co-owners of the grounds, etc. for which the rebuilding of the specific destroyed buildings is the subject matter, by at least a four-fifths majority of the voting rights of the co-owners of the grounds, etc. pertaining to the specific destroyed buildings. In such a case, if the resolution is adopted, the agreement prescribed in that paragraph is deemed to have been reached by the owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. of the specific destroyed buildings (limited to co-owners of the grounds, etc.).

①In the case prescribed in Article 78, if the land on which a specific building other than the destroyed buildings (hereinafter referred to as a "specific building" in this Article and the following Article) is located (including rights related to that land) is co-owned by the owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. of the relevant buildings in the housing complex, and, where the requirements specified in the following items for the categories of cases set forth in those items are satisfied, a resolution of approval (referred to as a "resolution to approve reconstruction" in the following paragraph and paragraph (3)) has been obtained by at least a three-fourths majority of the voting rights of the owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. present at a meeting of owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. consisting of the owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. of the relevant buildings in the housing complex who are co-owners of that land (including rights related to it), at which owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. who hold a majority of the voting rights (or, if a higher proportion is specified in the bylaws referred to in Article 30, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 79, at least that proportion) are present, the owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. of that specific building may demolish that specific building and newly construct a building on that land or on land located in the housing complex that is managed or used together with that land (limited to land co-owned by the owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. of the relevant buildings in the housing complex).

②The provisions of paragraphs (2) through (7) of the preceding Article apply mutatis mutandis to a resolution to approve reconstruction. In such a case, the term "specific destroyed building" in those provisions (excluding paragraph (2) of that Article) is deemed to be replaced with "specific building"; the phrase "the preceding paragraph" in paragraph (2) of that Article and the phrase "paragraph (1)" in paragraphs (5) and (6) of that Article are deemed to be replaced with "paragraph (1) of the following Article"; the term "specific destroyed building" in paragraph (2) of that Article is deemed to be replaced with "specific building (meaning the specific building prescribed in paragraph (1) of the following Article; the same applies hereinafter)", and the phrase "was located" in that paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "is located"; the phrase "the items of paragraph (1)" in paragraph (3) of that Article is deemed to be replaced with "the items of paragraph (1) of the following Article", and the phrase "co-owners of the grounds, etc. pertaining to" in the proviso to that paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "unit owners of"; the phrase "meeting of owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. referred to in paragraph (1)" in paragraph (4) of that Article is deemed to be replaced with "meeting of owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. referred to in paragraph (1) of the following Article"; the phrase "the rebuilding under" in paragraph (5) of that Article is deemed to be replaced with "the reconstruction under"; the phrase "the rebuilding of the specific" in that paragraph and paragraph (7) of that Article is deemed to be replaced with "the reconstruction of the specific"; the phrase "the rebuilding of those two or more" in paragraphs (6) and (7) of that Article is deemed to be replaced with "the reconstruction of those two or more"; and, in paragraph (7) of that Article, the phrase "were buildings with exclusively-owned areas" is deemed to be replaced with "are buildings with exclusively-owned areas", the phrase "a meeting of co-owners of the grounds, etc." is deemed to be replaced with "a meeting referred to in Article 62, paragraph (1)", the phrase "a four-fifths majority of the voting rights of the co-owners of the grounds, etc." is deemed to be replaced with "a four-fifths majority (or, if the specific building falls under any of the items of paragraph (2) of that Article, a three-fourths majority) each of the unit owners (excluding those who do not hold voting rights) and of the voting rights", the phrase "limited to co-owners of the grounds, etc." is deemed to be replaced with "limited to unit owners", and the phrase "that paragraph" is deemed to be replaced with "the preceding paragraph".

③For the purpose of applying the provisions of paragraph (1) in the case where the specific building subject to the reconstruction under a resolution to approve reconstruction (or, in the case referred to in paragraph (6) of the preceding Article as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the preceding paragraph, all of the specific buildings subject to the reconstruction under the resolution to approve reconstruction) falls under any of the items of Article 62, paragraph (2), the term "three-fourths" in paragraph (1) is deemed to be replaced with "two-thirds".