The Japan Fair Trade Commission is the defendant in the action for the judicial review of an administrative disposition provided for in Article 3, paragraph (1) of the Administrative Case Litigation Act (Act No. 139 of 1962) in connection with a cease and desist order, etc.
排除措置命令等に係る行政事件訴訟法（昭和三十七年法律第百三十九号）第三条第一項に規定する抗告訴訟については、公正取引委員会を被告とする。
Read this with the articles around it
cease and desist order, etc.
「排除措置命令等」
Cease and desist orders (排除措置命令), payment orders (納付命令), competition restoration orders (競争回復措置命令), the approvals under Article 48-3, paragraph (3) and Article 48-7, paragraph (3), and the decisions made under Section 2 of Chapter 8.
Short name set inArticle 76, paragraph (2)
Fair Trade Commission
公正取引委員会
The body the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (独占禁止法, the Antimonopoly Act) sets up to achieve that Act's purpose — among other things, to promote fair and free competition by banning private monopolization, unreasonable restraint of trade and unfair trade practices, and so to protect the interests of general consumers and the democratic and sound development of the national economy (Antimonopoly Act, Articles 1 and 27, paragraph (1)). It comes under the Prime Minister's jurisdiction, but its chairperson and four commissioners — appointed by the Prime Minister with the consent of both Houses of the Diet — exercise their authority independently (Articles 27, paragraph (2), 28 and 29). Under the Act against Unjustifiable Premiums and Misleading Representations, businesses and trade associations may, with the approval of both the Prime Minister and the Fair Trade Commission, conclude or set agreements or rules (協定又は規約) on premiums or representations (Article 36, paragraph (1)).
Written by AI using Antimonopoly Act, Arts. 1, 27, 28, 29 and Act against Unjustifiable Premiums and Misleading Representations, Art. 36 as a reference.