The execution of a judicial decision under the provisions of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article may be stayed by depositing the security deposits or securities (including book-entry transfer bonds, etc., provided in Article 278, paragraph (1) of the Act on Book-Entry Transfer of Corporate Bonds and Shares; the same applies in the following paragraph) as the court may fix.
If a deposit has been made pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph and the judicial decision pursuant to the preceding Article, paragraph (1) has become final and binding, the court may impose a non-penal confiscation of the whole or a part of the security deposits or securities deposited upon the petition of the Japan Fair Trade Commission.
The provisions of the preceding Article, paragraph (2) apply mutatis mutandis to the judicial decision pursuant to the preceding two paragraphs.
Read this with the articles around it
Fair Trade Commission
公正取引委員会
The body the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (独占禁止法, the Antimonopoly Act) sets up to achieve that Act's purpose — among other things, to promote fair and free competition by banning private monopolization, unreasonable restraint of trade and unfair trade practices, and so to protect the interests of general consumers and the democratic and sound development of the national economy (Antimonopoly Act, Articles 1 and 27, paragraph (1)). It comes under the Prime Minister's jurisdiction, but its chairperson and four commissioners — appointed by the Prime Minister with the consent of both Houses of the Diet — exercise their authority independently (Articles 27, paragraph (2), 28 and 29). Under the Act against Unjustifiable Premiums and Misleading Representations, businesses and trade associations may, with the approval of both the Prime Minister and the Fair Trade Commission, conclude or set agreements or rules (協定又は規約) on premiums or representations (Article 36, paragraph (1)).
Written by AI using Antimonopoly Act, Arts. 1, 27, 28, 29 and Act against Unjustifiable Premiums and Misleading Representations, Art. 36 as a reference.