After the Japan Fair Trade Commission has issued a payment order pursuant to the provisions of Article 7-2, paragraph (1), or Article 7-9, paragraph (1) or (2), if a final and binding decision on the same case imposes a fine on the person who received the relevant payment order, the Japan Fair Trade Commission must issue a decision to modify the amount of the surcharge in the payment order by reducing the amount by an amount equivalent to one-half of the amount of the fine imposed in the final and binding decision provided, however, that this does not apply if the amount of the surcharge in the payment order does not exceed the amount equivalent to one-half of the amount of the fine or if the amount after the modification is less than one million yen.
In the case under the proviso to the preceding paragraph, the Japan Fair Trade Commission must render a decision to rescind the payment order pursuant to the provisions of Article 7-2, paragraph (1), or Article 7-9, paragraph (1) or (2).
A decision under the provisions of the preceding two paragraphs must be rendered in writing, and the written decision is to indicate the facts found by the Japan Fair Trade Commission and the application of laws and regulations thereto, and the Chair and Commissioners who attended the meeting pursuant to the provisions of Article 65, paragraph (1) must affix their names and seals thereto.
A decision under the provisions of paragraphs (1) and (2) is to take effect by serving a copy of the written decision on the addressee.
In cases under paragraphs (1) and (2), the Japan Fair Trade Commission must refund in money any amount already paid pursuant to the pre-modification or pre-rescission payment order (excluding delinquency charges as provided in Article 69, paragraph (2)), if there is some portion that should be refunded.
Read this with the articles around it
payment order
「納付命令」
An order the Japan Fair Trade Commission makes under Article 7-2, paragraph (1) (including as applied by Article 8-3), Article 7-9, paragraph (1) or (2) or Articles 20-2 to 20-6, requiring an enterprise to pay a surcharge (課徴金) to the national treasury; it is given in a written payment order stating the amount, its basis, the violation and the deadline.
Short name set inArticle 62, paragraph (1)
fine
罰金
A criminal punishment of paying money to the state, of 10,000 yen or more, or less where it is reduced (Penal Code, Article 15). It ranks below imprisonment (拘禁刑) and above penal detention (拘留) and a petty fine (科料) (Articles 9 and 10, paragraph (1)). A person who cannot pay it in full is held in a workhouse (労役場) for one day to two years, or up to three years where fines are imposed together, a period set when the sentence is passed (Article 18, paragraphs (1), (3) and (4)); not within thirty days of the sentence becoming final without the person's consent (paragraph (5)). If it is not enforced for three years after the sentence becomes final, the person is released from it by prescription (Articles 31 and 32, item (v)); the three years do not run while its execution is suspended under law or the person is abroad, and an act of execution interrupts them (Articles 33 and 34, paragraph (2)).
Written by AI using Penal Code, Arts. 9, 10, 15, 18, 31 to 34 as a reference.
Fair Trade Commission
公正取引委員会
The body the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (独占禁止法, the Antimonopoly Act) sets up to achieve that Act's purpose — among other things, to promote fair and free competition by banning private monopolization, unreasonable restraint of trade and unfair trade practices, and so to protect the interests of general consumers and the democratic and sound development of the national economy (Antimonopoly Act, Articles 1 and 27, paragraph (1)). It comes under the Prime Minister's jurisdiction, but its chairperson and four commissioners — appointed by the Prime Minister with the consent of both Houses of the Diet — exercise their authority independently (Articles 27, paragraph (2), 28 and 29). Under the Act against Unjustifiable Premiums and Misleading Representations, businesses and trade associations may, with the approval of both the Prime Minister and the Fair Trade Commission, conclude or set agreements or rules (協定又は規約) on premiums or representations (Article 36, paragraph (1)).
Written by AI using Antimonopoly Act, Arts. 1, 27, 28, 29 and Act against Unjustifiable Premiums and Misleading Representations, Art. 36 as a reference.