The provisions of Article 7, paragraphs (1) and (2) (including when these are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 8-2, paragraph (2) and Article 20, paragraph (2)), Article 7-2, paragraph (1) (including when these are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 8-3 following the deemed replacement of terms), Article 7-9, paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 8-2, paragraphs (1) and (3), Article 20, paragraph (1), and Article 20-2 through Article 20-6 do not apply for the act that was the reason for the suspicion related to that approval and the act related to the measures to ensure cessation, if the Japan Fair Trade Commission gave the approval of Article 48-7, paragraph (3) (including approval for changes pursuant to the provisions of Article 48-7, paragraph (7); the same applies in the following Article, Article 65, Article 68, paragraph (2) and Article 76, paragraph (2)) provided, however, that this does not apply if there is a decision pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1) of the following Article.
Read this with the articles around it
measures to ensure cessationmachine translation
「排除確保措置」
In Articles 48-7 to 48-9, the measures that a person notified under Article 48-6 of a suspected violation draws up itself and intends to carry out to ensure that the act that gave rise to the suspicion has ended.
Short name set inArticle 48-7, paragraph (1)· applies only in this article and in Articles 48-8 and 48-9
Fair Trade Commission
公正取引委員会
The body the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (独占禁止法, the Antimonopoly Act) sets up to achieve that Act's purpose — among other things, to promote fair and free competition by banning private monopolization, unreasonable restraint of trade and unfair trade practices, and so to protect the interests of general consumers and the democratic and sound development of the national economy (Antimonopoly Act, Articles 1 and 27, paragraph (1)). It comes under the Prime Minister's jurisdiction, but its chairperson and four commissioners — appointed by the Prime Minister with the consent of both Houses of the Diet — exercise their authority independently (Articles 27, paragraph (2), 28 and 29). Under the Act against Unjustifiable Premiums and Misleading Representations, businesses and trade associations may, with the approval of both the Prime Minister and the Fair Trade Commission, conclude or set agreements or rules (協定又は規約) on premiums or representations (Article 36, paragraph (1)).
Written by AI using Antimonopoly Act, Arts. 1, 27, 28, 29 and Act against Unjustifiable Premiums and Misleading Representations, Art. 36 as a reference.