1 article
A further appeal may be filed against the ruling of the court in charge of an appeal against a ruling, but only on the grounds that the ruling reflects an error in the interpretation of the Constitution or is otherwise unconstitutional, or that a violation of law or regulation has clearly influenced the ruling.
抗告裁判所の決定に対しては、その決定に憲法の解釈の誤りがあることその他憲法の違反があること、又は決定に影響を及ぼすことが明らかな法令の違反があることを理由とするときに限り、更に抗告をすることができる。
This names a provision as it read when this amending Act was made. It may have been amended since, so today's text can say something else. That is why it is not a link.This names a law that is not in this collection, so there is nothing here to open.We could not tell which provision this names, so it is not a link.