Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

1 article

Article 189Enforcement of a Judicial Decision for a Civil Fine

第百八十九条(過料の裁判の執行)

A judicial decision for a civil fine under the provisions of this Chapter is executed by order of the public prosecutor. This order has the same effect as an enforceable title of obligation.

この章の規定による過料の裁判は、検察官の命令で執行する。この命令は、執行力のある債務名義と同一の効力を有する。

A judicial decision for a civil fine is enforced pursuant to the provisions of the Civil Enforcement Act (Act No. 4 of 1979) and other laws and regulations concerning procedures for judicial enforcement; provided, however, that it is not necessary to serve a person with the judicial decision before executing it.

過料の裁判の執行は、民事執行法(昭和五十四年法律第四号)その他強制執行の手続に関する法令の規定に従ってする。ただし、執行をする前に裁判の送達をすることを要しない。

The provisions of Part VII, (excluding and and ) apply mutatis mutandis to the execution of a judicial decision for a civil fine. In such a case, in , the phrase "person or the thing that is the subject of the execution of the judicial decision" is deemed to be replaced with "person", and the phrase "the thing that is the subject of the execution of the judicial decision or the judicial decision" is deemed to be replaced with "the judicial decision".

第七編第二章(、及びを除く。)の規定は、過料の裁判の執行について準用する。この場合において、中「者若しくは裁判の執行の対象となるもの」とあるのは「者」と、「裁判の執行の対象となるもの若しくは裁判」とあるのは「裁判」と読み替えるものとする。

If an immediate appeal is filed against a judicial decision for a civil fine after that judicial decision (referred to below as a "original judicial decision" in this paragraph) is executed, and the court in charge of the appeal finds there to be grounds for immediate appeal, sets aside the original judicial decision, and reaches another judicial decision for a civil fine, its judicial decision for that civil fine is deemed to have been executed to the extent of the amount of the original judicial decision. In such a case, if the amount obtained as a result of the enforcement of the original judicial decision exceeds the amount of that civil fine, the amount in excess must be refunded.

過料の裁判の執行があった後に当該裁判(以下この項において「原裁判」という。)に対して即時抗告があった場合において、抗告裁判所が当該即時抗告を理由があると認めて原裁判を取り消して更に過料の裁判をしたときは、その金額の限度において当該過料の裁判の執行があったものとみなす。この場合において、原裁判の執行によって得た金額が当該過料の金額を超えるときは、その超過額は、これを還付しなければならない。

Read this with the articles around it

© 2026 japanlaw.orgA copy for reading and reference — not an official source, and not legal advice. Only the Japanese text published by the government has legal effect.Run by Genjido LLC (Genjido 合同会社) · [email protected]ContactSourcesTermsPrivacy