The Federation may revoke the registration of a person who has been registered as a labor and social security attorney, on the basis of a resolution of the Qualifications Screening Board prescribed in Article 25-37, if the person falls under any of the following items:
When it has become clear that the person obtained the registration without disclosing, or by making a false disclosure of, important matters concerning qualification to receive registration;
登録を受ける資格に関する重要事項について、告知せず又は不実の告知を行つて当該登録を受けたことが判明したとき。
When the person has come to fall under the category of persons prescribed in Article 14-7, item (iii);
第十四条の七第三号に規定する者に該当するに至つたとき。
When the person's whereabouts have been unknown continuously for two years or more.
二年以上継続して所在が不明であるとき。
When the Federation has revoked a registration under the preceding paragraph on the ground that the person has come to fall under item (i) or item (ii) of that paragraph, it must notify the person subject to that disposition to that effect in a document stating the reasons.
A person whose registration has been revoked under paragraph (1) and who is dissatisfied with that disposition may file a request for review with the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare. In this case, the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare is deemed to be a superior administrative agency of the Federation for the purpose of applying Article 25, paragraphs (2) and (3) and Article 46, paragraph (1) of the Administrative Complaint Review Act.
第一項の規定により登録を取り消された者は、当該処分に不服があるときは、厚生労働大臣に対して審査請求をすることができる。この場合において、厚生労働大臣は、行政不服審査法第二十五条第二項及び第三項並びに第四十六条第一項の規定の適用については、連合会の上級行政庁とみなす。
Grounds for Refusal of Registration
a person who is unable to perform the business of a labor and social security attorney due to a mental or physical disorder;
心身の故障により社会保険労務士の業務を行うことができない者
Open this provisionCancellation of Registration
The Federation may revoke the registration of a person who has been registered as a labor and social security attorney, on the basis of a resolution of the Qualifications Screening Board prescribed…
連合会は、社会保険労務士の登録を受けた者が、次の各号のいずれかに該当するときは、第二十五条の三十七に規定する資格審査会の議決に基づき、当該登録を取り消すことができる。
Open this provisionCancellation of Registration
When it has become clear that the person obtained the registration without disclosing, or by making a false disclosure of, important matters concerning qualification to receive registration;
登録を受ける資格に関する重要事項について、告知せず又は不実の告知を行つて当該登録を受けたことが判明したとき。
Open this provisionCancellation of Registration
When the person has come to fall under the category of persons prescribed in Article 14-7, item (iii);
第十四条の七第三号に規定する者に該当するに至つたとき。
Open this provisionQualifications Screening Board
The Federation has a Qualifications Screening Board.
連合会に、資格審査会を置く。
Open this provision(Stay of Enforcement)
When finding it necessary, the higher administrative agency of the administrative agency reaching the disposition or the reviewing agency that is the administrative agency reaching the disposition…
処分庁の上級行政庁又は処分庁である審査庁は、必要があると認める場合には、審査請求人の申立てにより又は職権で、処分の効力、処分の執行又は手続の続行の全部又は一部の停止その他の措置（以下「執行停止」という。）をとることができる。
Open this provision(Stay of Enforcement)
When finding it necessary, the reviewing agency that is neither the higher administrative agency of the administrative agency reaching the disposition nor the administrative agency reaching the…
処分庁の上級行政庁又は処分庁のいずれでもない審査庁は、必要があると認める場合には、審査請求人の申立てにより、処分庁の意見を聴取した上、執行停止をすることができる。ただし、処分の効力、処分の執行又は手続の続行の全部又は一部の停止以外の措置をとることはできない。
Open this provision(Approval of Requests for Review of Dispositions)
When there are grounds for a request for review of a disposition (excluding de facto acts; the same applies below in this Article and Article 48)…
処分（事実上の行為を除く。以下この条及び第四十八条において同じ。）についての審査請求が理由がある場合（前条第三項の規定の適用がある場合を除く。）には、審査庁は、裁決で、当該処分の全部若しくは一部を取り消し、又はこれを変更する。
Open this provisionFederationmachine translation
「連合会」
The Japan Federation of Labor and Social Security Attorney's Associations (全国社会保険労務士会連合会), which the labor and social security attorney's associations (社会保険労務士会) across the country must set up together with the approval of the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare, and which, among other work, guides the associations and their members and registers labor and social security attorneys (社会保険労務士) (Article 25-34).
Short name set inArticle 10-2, paragraph (1)
request for review
審査請求
A request to an administrative agency (行政庁) to review a disposition (処分) the person objects to, or, where the person applied for a disposition under a law or regulation and a reasonable time has passed with none made, the agency's failure to act (不作為) (Administrative Complaint Review Act, Articles 2 and 3). Unless an Act, or for a disposition based on a local ordinance (条例) that ordinance, provides otherwise, it is made to the agency that made the disposition or failed to act where that agency has no superior agency or is itself the competent minister (主任の大臣) or the head of certain agencies; where such a minister or head is the agency above it, to that minister or head; and otherwise to its highest superior agency (Article 4). Another Act can set rules of its own for it, naming another body to make it to or another route (Article 1, paragraph (2); Article 4): the Employees' Pension Insurance Act, for instance, has a request about a disposition (処分) of the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare (厚生労働大臣) on a person's status as insured, standard remuneration or insurance benefits, other than a decision on a request to correct the pension insurance register, made to a social insurance examiner (社会保険審査官), and disapplies most of the Administrative Complaint Review Act's rules for it (Employees' Pension Insurance Act, Articles 90, paragraph (1), and 91-2). Under the Administrative Complaint Review Act, a request about a disposition must be made within three months of the day after the person learned of it — or one month after learning of the decision, where a request for re-investigation (再調査の請求) was made first — and within a year of the disposition or that decision, unless there is a justifiable reason (Administrative Complaint Review Act, Article 18, paragraphs (1) and (2)). Making one does not by itself stop the disposition taking effect or being carried out, or the proceedings going on (Article 25, paragraph (1)), but the agency reviewing it can suspend them in whole or in part on the application of the person who made the request — and, where it made the disposition or is the agency above the one that did, of its own motion — and, once the person who made the request has applied, must where that is urgently needed to avoid serious harm, unless that would seriously affect the public welfare or the request appears to have no grounds (Article 25, paragraphs (2) to (4)). The agency reviewing it (審査庁) decides it by a determination (裁決): it dismisses a request that is unlawful, for instance one made too late, rejects one that is groundless, and, where one is well founded, revokes the disposition in whole or in part or changes it — though never to the disadvantage of the person who made the request, and an agency that neither made the disposition nor is above the agency that did cannot change it (Articles 45, paragraphs (1) and (2), 46, paragraph (1), and 48). Where the request is about a de facto act (事実上の行為), the determination instead declares the act unlawful or unjust and orders it abolished in whole or in part or changed, or abolishes or changes it (Article 47). A well-founded request about a failure to act ends instead in a determination declaring the failure unlawful or unjust, and, where the agency finds a disposition should be made, an order to make it or the disposition itself (Article 49, paragraph (3)). Where revoking an unlawful or unjust disposition, or abolishing an unlawful or unjust de facto act, would seriously harm the public interest, the agency can reject the request while declaring in the determination that it is unlawful or unjust (Article 45, paragraph (3)). The determination takes effect when it is served on the person who made the request — or, where someone other than the disposition's addressee made it and the determination revokes or changes the disposition or deals with a de facto act, once it is served on the addressee too — and binds the agencies concerned (Articles 51, paragraph (1), and 52, paragraph (1)).
Written by AI using Administrative Complaint Review Act, Arts. 1 to 4, 18, 25, 45 to 49, 51, 52 and Employees' Pension Insurance Act, Arts. 90, 91-2 as a reference.