Whistleblower Protection Act
Article 3, paragraph (1)
第三条第一項
Each amendment that changed this provision, and each that will, oldest first. Each is shown against the wording just before it; where an amendment gives the provision another number, it is followed under the new one. Read it as it stands today
In force today
The dismissal of a worker carried out by a business operator provided for in Article 2, paragraph (1), item (i) (limited to one that directly employs the worker; the same applies in Article 9) is void if it is on the grounds that the worker, being a whistleblower, has conducted whistleblowing provided for in the respective following items in the cases stated in those items.
労働者である公益通報者が次の各号に掲げる場合においてそれぞれ当該各号に定める公益通報をしたことを理由として前条第一項第一号に定める事業者（当該労働者を自ら使用するものに限る。第九条において同じ。）が行った解雇は、無効とする。
The
dismissal of a worker carried out by abusiness operator provided for inArticle 2,paragraph (1), item (i)(limited to one that directly employs the worker; the same applies in Article 9) is void if it is on the grounds that the worker, being a whistleblower, has conductedof the preceding Article must not dismiss or otherwise treat in a disadvantageous manner a whistleblower who is or was employed by the business operator on the grounds of conducting whistleblowing provided for inthe respectiveeach of the following items in the cases stated inthosethe respective items.:労働者である前条第一項第一号に定める事業者は、その使用し、又は使用していた公益通報者が次の各号に掲げる場合においてそれぞれ当該各号に定める公益通報をしたことを理由として前条第一項第一号に定める事業者（当該労働者を自ら使用するものに限る。第九条において同じ。）が行った解雇は、無効とする、当該公益通報者に対して、解雇その他不利益な取扱いをしてはならない。