Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

1 article

Article 39Issuing Orders to Perform

第三十九条(履行命令)

At the request of the obligee, if a person has neglected to perform an obligation to pay money or provide any other economic benefit that has been established through a judicial decision under the provisions of Article 32, paragraph (2), the family court that made that decision (or the family court constituting the court of first instance, if it was an appellate court that made the decision) may issue an order to the obligor to perform under the obligation, specifying a reasonable period for performance. In that case, the court is to issue the order for all or part of the obligation that the obligor has neglected to perform by the time of the order.

第三十二条第二項の規定による裁判で定められた金銭の支払その他の財産上の給付を目的とする義務の履行を怠った者がある場合において、相当と認めるときは、当該裁判をした家庭裁判所(上訴裁判所が当該裁判をした場合にあっては、第一審裁判所である家庭裁判所)は、権利者の申立てにより、義務者に対し、相当の期限を定めてその義務の履行をすべきことを命ずることができる。この場合において、その命令は、その命令をする時までに義務者が履行を怠った義務の全部又は一部についてするものとする。

The family court referred to in the preceding paragraph must hear a statement from the obligor in order to issue an order to perform the obligation pursuant to the provisions of that paragraph.

前項の家庭裁判所は、同項の規定により義務の履行を命ずるには、義務者の陳述を聴かなければならない。

The provisions of the preceding two paragraphs apply mutatis mutandis to an obligation to pay money or provide any other such economic benefit that may be established through a judicial decision under the provisions of Article 32, paragraph (2) but that has been established through a settlement in litigation connected with an action to rescind a marriage or with an action for divorce.

前二項の規定は、第三十二条第二項の規定による裁判で定めることができる金銭の支払その他の財産上の給付を目的とする義務であって、婚姻の取消し又は離婚の訴えに係る訴訟における和解で定められたものの履行について準用する。

If a person ordered to perform an obligation pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the preceding paragraph) does not comply with the order and is without legitimate grounds for their non-compliance, the family court that ordered performance of the obligation issues a ruling imposing a civil fine of not more than 100,000 yen.

第一項(前項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定により義務の履行を命じられた者が正当な理由なくその命令に従わないときは、その義務の履行を命じた家庭裁判所は、決定で、十万円以下の過料に処する。

An immediate appeal may be filed against the ruling referred to in the preceding paragraph.

前項の決定に対しては、即時抗告をすることができる。

The provisions of Article 189 of the Code of Civil Procedure apply mutatis mutandis to the ruling referred to in paragraph (4).

民事訴訟法第百八十九条の規定は、第四項の決定について準用する。

Read this with the articles around it

© 2026 japanlaw.orgA copy for reading and reference — not an official source, and not legal advice. Only the Japanese text published by the government has legal effect.Run by Genjido LLC (源氏道合同会社) · contact@genjido.comContactSourcesTermsPrivacy