If a petition for the designation of a person to have custody of a child or for other matters related to child custody as referred to in Article 32, paragraph (1) (excluding matters related to the sharing of expenses required for child custody) has been filed, and there are no circumstances found to make it inappropriate in light of the child's physical and mental condition, and the court finds it necessary for an examination of the facts, the court may encourage the parties to carry out a trial implementation of contact with the child.
In encouraging the trial implementation under the preceding paragraph, the court may specify the method of contact, the date, time and place of contact, and whether a family court investigator or another person is to be present or otherwise involved, and may also impose on the parties a condition prohibiting words or conduct that have a harmful effect on the mind and body of the child, or any other condition it finds appropriate.
裁判所は、前項の試行的実施を促すに当たっては、交流の方法、交流をする日時及び場所並びに家庭裁判所調査官その他の者の立会いその他の関与の有無を定めるとともに、当事者に対して子の心身に有害な影響を及ぼす言動を禁止することその他適当と認める条件を付することができる。
If the court has encouraged the trial implementation referred to in paragraph (1), it may request the parties to report the result (or, if the trial implementation was not carried out, to explain the reason).
裁判所は、第一項の試行的実施を促したときは、当事者に対してその結果の報告（当該試行的実施をしなかったときは、その理由の説明）を求めることができる。
Read this with the articles around it
examination of the facts
「事実の調査」
An inquiry into the facts that the court may make, itself or by having a member of its panel or a family court or summary court make it, when it decides on an ancillary disposition (附帯処分) or designates the person with parental authority (親権者) in a judgment on an action to rescind a marriage or for divorce.
Short name set inArticle 33, paragraph (2)