Article 32Special Provisions on Requests for Reassessment

一the fact that, where the taxable value for property that has not been divided pursuant to the provisions of Article 55 was calculated in accordance with the share of inheritance under the provisions of the Civil Code (excluding Article 904-2 (Amount of Contribution to the Estate)) or the proportion of the universal legacy, and that property has subsequently been divided, the taxable value relating to the property acquired by a co-heir or universal legatee through that division has come to differ from the taxable value calculated in accordance with that share of inheritance or the proportion of the universal legacy;

三the finalization of the amount of money to be paid based on a claim for the amount of infringement of the statutory reserved share;

四the discovery of a will concerning a bequest, or the renunciation of a bequest;

五the occurrence, in the case where permission for payment in kind has been granted subject to conditions pursuant to the provisions of Article 42, paragraph (30) (including the case where it applies mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 45, paragraph (2)) (limited to the case where that permission is rescinded or is to be rescinded pursuant to the provisions of Article 48, paragraph (2)), of a matter specified by Cabinet Order concerning the nature of the property applied to the payment in kind relating to those conditions or other circumstances;

六the occurrence of a cause specified by Cabinet Order as being equivalent to the causes prescribed in the preceding items;

七the occurrence of a cause prescribed in Article 4, paragraph (1) or (2);

八the fact that, by falling under the proviso to Article 19-2, paragraph (2), the amount of inheritance tax calculated by applying the provisions of paragraph (1) of that Article on or after the time when the division referred to in that paragraph was made has come to differ from the amount of inheritance tax calculated by applying the provisions of that paragraph before that time (excluding the case falling under item (i));

九the occurrence of any of the following causes:

イthe fact that the heir of the person who made a departure from Japan as prescribed in Article 137-2, paragraph (1) of the Income Tax Act and who is subject to the application of that paragraph, having succeeded, pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (13) of that Article (Tax Payment Grace Period Where the Special Provisions on Capital Gains and Similar Income upon Departure from Japan Apply), to the obligation to pay the amount of income tax subject to the tax payment grace period prescribed in paragraph (1) of that Article relating to that person, has come to pay income tax equivalent to that amount of income tax subject to the tax payment grace period;

ロthe fact that the heir of the applicable donor, etc. prescribed in Article 137-3, paragraph (7) of the Income Tax Act, having succeeded, pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (15) of that Article (Tax Payment Grace Period Where the Special Provisions on Capital Gains and Similar Income Apply in Cases Where Assets Are Transferred to a Nonresident by Gift, etc.), to the obligation to pay the amount of income tax subject to the tax payment grace period prescribed in paragraph (4) of that Article relating to that applicable donor, etc., has come to pay income tax equivalent to that amount of income tax subject to the tax payment grace period;

ハa cause specified by Cabinet Order as being similar to the causes in (a) and (b).

十the fact that, among the property included in the basis for calculating the taxable value for gift tax, there is property that falls under the provisions of Article 21-2, paragraph (4).