When an association referred to in Article 33, item (vi) or an employer referred to in item (vii) of that Article files a claim for a person specified in item (vi) or (vii) of that Article as a person eligible to receive insurance proceeds for an occupational accident, multiple-job-related accident or commuting accident covered by this insurance, based on the relationship between this insurance and the insured business (excluding businesses for which the period of business is predetermined) carried out by the association or employer in the area where this Act is enforced, and the approval of the government has been given, the application of the provisions of Chapter III, Sections 1 through 3 and Chapter III-2 is provided as follows:
a person specified in Article 33, items (vi) or (vii) is deemed to be a worker used for the relevant business.
the provisions of Article 34, paragraph (1), item (ii) apply mutatis mutandis to the grounds for insurance proceeds for an occupational accident occurred to a person specified in Article 33, item (vi) or (vii), and the provisions of item (iii) of that paragraph apply mutatis mutandis to the basic daily payment amount for a person specified in item (vi) or (vii) of that Article. In this case, the term the "business" in item (ii) of that paragraph is deemed to be replaced with a "business to be carried out in a developing area prescribed in Article 33, item (vi) or (vii) or in an area outside the area where this Act is enforced."
When an accident occurred to a person specified in Article 33, item (vi) or (vii) occurs during a period in which the Type 3 special insurance premiums set forth in Article 10, paragraph (2), item (iii)-2 of the Premiums Collection Act were unpaid, the government may decide not to pay the whole or a part of the insurance proceeds pertaining to the relevant accident.
The provisions of Article 34, paragraphs (2) and (3) apply mutatis mutandis to an association referred to in Article 33, item (vi) or an employer referred to in item (vii) of that Article that has obtained the approval of the government set forth in the preceding paragraph, and the provisions of Article 34, paragraph (4) apply mutatis mutandis to the right of a person specified in Article 33, item (vi) or (vii) to receive insurance proceeds. In this case, the term the "approval referred to in the preceding paragraph" and the "approval referred to in paragraph (1)" in these provisions is deemed to be replaced with the "approval referred to in Article 36, paragraph (1)", and the term "the persons specified in that item and item (ii) of that Article collectively" in Article 34, paragraph (2) is deemed to be replaced with a "person specified in items (vi) or (vii) of that Article", and the term "items (i) and (ii) of that Article" in paragraph (4) of that Article is deemed to be replaced with "Article 33, item (vi) or (vii)".