Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

Its wordings

Domestic Relations Case Procedure Act

Article 119, paragraph (2)

第百十九条第二項

Each amendment that changed this provision, and each that will, oldest first. Each is shown against the wording just before it; where an amendment gives the provision another number, it is followed under the new one. Read it as it stands today

How the changes are shown

Underlined: words the amendment adds. A bar: where it removes words.Underlined: words the amendment adds. Struck through: the words it removes.Underlined: words the amendment adds. Struck through: the words it removes.

  1. In force today

    A family court may not make a ruling to revoke a ruling of the commencement of guardianship under the provisions of Article 10 of the Civil Code unless it hears the opinion of a physician concerning the mental state of an adult under guardianship; provided, however, that this does not apply if it finds the hearing of opinions to be obviously unnecessary.

    家庭裁判所は、成年被後見人の精神の状況につき医師の意見を聴かなければ、民法第十条の規定による後見開始の審判の取消しの審判をすることができない。ただし、明らかにその必要がないと認めるときは、この限りでない。

  2. Not yet in force Act No. 45 of 2026 Moved to paragraph (3) and reworded

    A family court may not make a ruling to revoke a ruling of the commencement of guardianship a disposition appointing a specified assistant under the provisions of Article 10 12, paragraph (3) of the Civil Code unless it hears the opinion of a physician concerning the mental state of an adult under guardianshipa person subject to a ruling of a disposition appointing a specified assistant; provided, however, that this does not apply if it finds the hearing of opinions to be obviously unnecessary.

    家庭裁判所は、成年被後見人の特定補助人を付する処分の審判を受けた者の精神の状況につき医師の意見を聴かなければ、民法第十条の規定による後見開始第十二条第三項の規定による特定補助人を付する処分の審判の取消しの審判をすることができない。ただし、明らかにその必要がないと認めるときは、この限りでない。

Compare any two wordings