Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

by 23 December 2028, on a day set by

Domestic Relations Case Procedure Act

家事事件手続法(かじじけんてつづきほう)

Amended by

Act Partially Amending the Civil Code, etc.

民法等の一部を改正する法律

The whole text as amended, on e-Gov

On a day set by , no later than 23 December 2028 — the amending law allows up to 30 months from . The exact day is not fixed yet.

The same amending law also changes

134 provisions changed · 109 provisions added · 130 provisions removed · 11 provisions in the supplementary provisions · 12 articles renumbered · 4 provisions moved to another number

Each provision the amendment changes, as it will read: the words it adds are underlined, and a bar marks where it removes words. “Show removed words” strikes those through in place; “Before and after” sets the two wordings side by side. A provision that only moves to another number says the number it had. The Japanese is the law; the icon beside each English column says whose English it is. The 12 articles it renumbers are marked with the number each had before.

How the changes are shown

Underlined: words the amendment adds. A bar: where it removes words.Underlined: words the amendment adds. Struck through: the words it removes.Underlined: words the amendment adds. Struck through: the words it removes.

Article 123-2 · (Exception to Hearing of Statements)第百二十三条の二(陳述の聴取の例外)

  • RemovedArticle 123-2, paragraph (1)

    Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 89, paragraph (1) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 96, paragraph (1) and Article 98, paragraph (1)), in an adjudication case for the commission of, or the rescission or change of the commission of, delivery of a postal item, etc. addressed to an adult under guardianship, the court in charge of an appeal is not required to hear statements of a person engaged in the correspondence delivery service.

    成年被後見人に宛てた郵便物等の配達の嘱託等の審判事件においては、第八十九条第一項の規定(第九十六条第一項及び第九十八条第一項において準用する場合を含む。)にかかわらず、抗告裁判所は、信書の送達の事業を行う者の陳述を聴くことを要しない。

Article 123 · (Immediate Appeals)第百二十三条(即時抗告)

3 added
Read it in the amended law
  • AddedArticle 123, paragraph (3), item (i)

    a ruling of the commencement of assistance (limited to the case where it is made simultaneously with a ruling of a disposition appointing a specified assistant):the person who is appointed as an assistant pursuant to the provisions of Article 876-2, paragraph (1) of the Civil Code;

    補助開始の審判(特定補助人を付する処分の審判と同時にされる場合に限る。) 民法第八百七十六条の二第一項の規定により補助人に選任される者

  • AddedArticle 123, paragraph (3), item (ii)

    a ruling of a disposition appointing a specified assistant:the person who is appointed as a specified assistant; and

    特定補助人を付する処分の審判 特定補助人として付される者

  • AddedArticle 123, paragraph (3), item (iii)

    a ruling to determine acts which may be rescinded:the specified assistant (if this ruling is made simultaneously upon making a ruling of a disposition appointing a specified assistant, the person who is appointed as a specified assistant).

    取り消すことのできる行為の定めの審判 特定補助人(当該審判が特定補助人を付する処分の審判と同時にされる場合にあっては、特定補助人として付される者)

Article 124 · Exception to Hearing of Statements第百二十四条(陳述の聴取の例外)

1 reworded · 3 removed
Read it in the amended law
  • ChangedCaption

    (Supervision of the Affairs of Guardianship of Adults)Exception to Hearing of Statements

    成年後見の事務の監督陳述の聴取の例外

  • ChangedArticle 124, paragraph (1)

    A family court may have an appropriate person examine the affairs of the guardianship of an adult or the status of the property of an adult under guardianship, or administer such property temporarilyNotwithstanding the provisions of Article 89, paragraph (1) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 96, paragraph (1) and Article 98, paragraph (1)), in an adjudication case for the commission of, or the rescission or change of the commission of, delivery of a postal item, etc. addressed to a person subject to a ruling of a disposition appointing a specified assistant, the court in charge of an appeal is not required to hear statements of a person engaged in the correspondence delivery service.

    家庭裁判所は、適当な者に、成年後見の事務若しくは成年被後見人の財産の状況を調査させ、又は臨時に財産の管理をさせることができる特定補助人を付する処分の審判を受けた者に宛てた郵便物等の配達の嘱託等の審判事件においては、第八十九条第一項(第九十六条第一項及び第九十八条第一項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定にかかわらず、抗告裁判所は、信書の送達の事業を行う者の陳述を聴くことを要しない。

  • RemovedArticle 124, paragraph (2)

    A family court may grant a reasonable remuneration to the person who has conducted an examination or administration pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph, out of the property of the adult under guardianship.

    家庭裁判所は、前項の規定により調査又は管理をした者に対し、成年被後見人の財産の中から、相当な報酬を与えることができる。

  • RemovedArticle 124, paragraph (3)

    A family court may have a family court investigating officer conduct an examination under the provisions of paragraph (1).

    家庭裁判所は、家庭裁判所調査官に第一項の規定による調査をさせることができる。

  • RemovedArticle 124, paragraph (4)

    The provisions of Articles 644, 646, 647, and 650 of the Civil Code apply mutatis mutandis to the person who administers property pursuant to paragraph (1).

    民法第六百四十四条、第六百四十六条、第六百四十七条及び第六百五十条の規定は、第一項の規定により財産を管理する者について準用する。

Article 125 · Supervision of the Affairs of Assistance第百二十五条(補助の事務の監督)

4 reworded · 3 removed
Read it in the amended law
  • ChangedCaption

    (Replacement of Administrators)Supervision of the Affairs of Assistance

    管理者の改任等補助の事務の監督

  • ChangedArticle 125, paragraph (1)

    A family court may, at any time, replace an administrator whom it has appointed in an adjudication case for a disposition regarding the administration of property offered to an adult under guardianship by a third party, with another have an appropriate person examine the affairs of assistance or the status of the property of a person under assistance, or administer such property temporarily.

    家庭裁判所は、いつでも、第三者が成年被後見人に与えた財産の管理に関する処分の審判事件において選任した管理者を改任す適当な者に、補助の事務若しくは補助開始の審判を受けた者の財産の状況を調査させ、又は臨時に財産の管理をさせることができる。

  • ChangedArticle 125, paragraph (2)

    A family court may order an administrator whom it has appointed in an adjudication case for a disposition regarding the administration of property offered to an adult under guardianship by a third party (including an administrator appointed as a replacement pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph; hereinafter referred to as an "administrator of property" in this Article) to report on the status of the property and settle the account for administrationaward reasonable remuneration to a person who has conducted the examination or administration pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph, out of the property of a person under assistance.

    家庭裁判所は、第三者が成年被後見人に与えた財産の管理に関する処分の審判事件において選任した管理者(前項の規定により改任された管理者を含む。以下この条において「財産の管理者」という。)に対し、財産の状況の報告及び管理の計算を命ず前項の規定により調査又は管理をした者に対し、補助開始の審判を受けた者の財産の中から、相当な報酬を与えることができる。

  • RemovedArticle 125, paragraph (3)

    The costs required for the report and settlement of the account set forth in the preceding paragraph are paid out of the property of an adult under guardianship.

    前項の報告及び計算に要する費用は、成年被後見人の財産の中から支弁する。

  • ChangedArticle 125, paragraph (3)

    A family court may issue an order to an Administrator of Property for an increase or decrease in or a change to the security that the administrator has provided, or an exemption from providing the securityhave a family court investigating officer conduct the examination under the provisions of paragraph (1).

    家庭裁判所は、財産の管理者に対し、その提供した担保の増減、変更又は免除を命ず家庭裁判所調査官に第一項の規定による調査をさせることができる。

  • RemovedArticle 125, paragraph (5)

    When a ruling to order a mortgage to be established on the real property or a vessel owned by an administrator of property becomes effective, a court clerk must commission the registration of the establishment thereof. The same applies to a registration of change or the extinction of a mortgage thus established.

    財産の管理者の不動産又は船舶の上に抵当権の設定を命ずる審判が効力を生じたときは、裁判所書記官は、その設定の登記を嘱託しなければならない。設定した抵当権の変更又は消滅の登記についても、同様とする。

  • ChangedArticle 125, paragraph (4)

    The provisions of Articles 644, 646, 647, and 650 of the Civil Code apply mutatis mutandis to an Administrator of Propertya person who administers property pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1).

    民法第六百四十四条、第六百四十六条、第六百四十七条及び第六百五十条の規定は、財産の管理第一項の規定により財産を管理する者について準用する。

  • RemovedArticle 125, paragraph (7)

    When an adult under guardianship has become able to administer their own property, the property under administration no longer exists, or it has otherwise become inappropriate to continue to place the property of the adult under guardianship under administration, the family court must make a ruling to revoke the appointment of an administrator of property or any other disposition regarding the administration of property, upon the petition of the adult under guardianship, the administrator of property or any interested party or by its own authority.

    家庭裁判所は、成年被後見人が財産を管理することができるようになったとき、管理すべき財産がなくなったときその他財産の管理を継続することが相当でなくなったときは、成年被後見人、財産の管理者若しくは利害関係人の申立てにより又は職権で、財産の管理者の選任その他の財産の管理に関する処分の取消しの審判をしなければならない。

Article 126 · Provisional Order Sought by Designating an Adjudication Case for the Commencement of Assistance as a Case on the Merits第百二十六条(補助開始の審判事件を本案とする保全処分)

8 reworded · 11 added
Read it in the amended law
  • ChangedCaption

    (Provisional Order during a Case on the Merits to Adjudicate Commencement of Guardianship)Sought by Designating an Adjudication Case for the Commencement of Assistance as a Case on the Merits

    後見補助開始の審判事件を本案とする保全処分

  • ChangedArticle 126, paragraph (1)

    When a petition for the commencement of guardianshipassistance is filed, and when it is necessary for daily life, medical treatment, and nursing care or administration of the property of a person who is to be an adult under guardianshipa person under assistance, the family court (or a high court in the case set forth in Article 105, paragraph (2); hereinafter the same applies in this Article and the following Article) may, upon petition or by its own authority, appoint an administrator of property or give instructions to a party concerned with the case with regard to the matters regarding daily life, medical treatment, and nursing care or administration of the property of the person who is to be an adult under guardianshipa person under assistance, while not requiring the provision of security, until a ruling on the petition for the commencement of guardianshipassistance becomes effective.

    家庭裁判所(第百五条第二項の場合にあっては、高等裁判所。以下この条及び次条において同じ。)は、後見補助開始の申立てがあった場合において、成年被後見人補助開始の審判を受ける者となるべき者の生活、療養看護又は財産の管理のため必要があるときは、申立てにより又は職権で、担保を立てさせないで、後見補助開始の申立てについての審判が効力を生ずるまでの間、財産の管理者を選任し、又は事件の関係人に対し、成年被後見人補助開始の審判を受ける者となるべき者の生活、療養看護若しくは財産の管理に関する事項を指示することができる。

  • ChangedArticle 126, paragraph (2)

    When a petition for the commencement of guardianship assistance and a petition for the determination of acts which require the consent of an assistant is filed, and when it is particularly necessary for the preservation of the property of a person who is to be an adult under guardianshipa person under assistance, the family court may, upon the petition of the person who has filed the petition, order that the person who is to be an adult under guardianship becomesa person under assistance be subject to the guardianshipassistance of the administrator of property set forth in the preceding paragraph in to be appointed pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph (hereinafter simply referred to as an "administrator of property" in this Article) in performing acts in relation to property (excluding limited to the acts prescribed in the proviso to Article 9 of the Civil CodeArticle 9, paragraph (1) of the Civil Code, which are addressed in the petition for the determination of acts which require the consent of an assistant; the same applies in paragraph (7)(11)), until a ruling on the petition for the commencement of guardianshipassistance becomes effective.

    家庭裁判所は、後見開始の補助開始及び補助人の同意を得なければならない行為の定めの申立てがあった場合において、成年被後見人補助開始の審判を受ける者となるべき者の財産の保全のため特に必要があるときは、当該申立てをした者の申立てにより、後見補助開始の申立てについての審判が効力を生ずるまでの間、成年被後見人補助開始の審判を受ける者となるべき者の財産上の行為(民法第九条ただし書第一項に規定する行為を除く。第七項において同じ。)につき、前項の財産の管理者の後見であって、当該補助人の同意を得なければならない行為の定めの申立てに係るものに限る。第十一項において同じ。)につき、前項の規定により選任される財産の管理者(以下この条において単に「財産の管理者」という。)の補助を受けることを命ずることができる。

  • AddedArticle 126, paragraph (3)

    When a petition for a ruling of the commencement of assistance and a ruling of a disposition appointing a specified assistant is filed, and when it is particularly necessary for the preservation of the property of a person who is to be subject to a ruling of a disposition appointing a specified assistant, the family court may, upon the petition of the person who has filed the petition, order that the person who is to be subject to a ruling of a disposition appointing a specified assistant receive the assistance of an administrator of property in performing the acts set forth in the items of Article 9, paragraph (2) of the Civil Code (excluding the purchase of daily necessities and other acts relating to daily life; the same applies in paragraph (12)), until a ruling on the petition for the commencement of assistance becomes effective.

    家庭裁判所は、補助開始及び特定補助人を付する処分の審判の申立てがあった場合において、特定補助人を付する処分の審判を受ける者となるべき者の財産の保全のため特に必要があるときは、当該申立てをした者の申立てにより、補助開始の申立てについての審判が効力を生ずるまでの間、特定補助人を付する処分の審判を受ける者となるべき者の民法第九条第二項各号に掲げる行為(日用品の購入その他日常生活に関する行為を除く。第十二項において同じ。)につき、財産の管理者の補助を受けることを命ずることができる。

  • ChangedArticle 126, paragraph (4)

    When it is impossible to hear the opinionsstatements of a person who is to be an adult under guardianship due to the person's mental or physical disabilitya person under assistance for mental reasons on the part of that person, the family court may, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 107, make a ruling under the provisions of the preceding paragraph (referred to as a "ruling to order guardianship" in the following paragraph through paragraph (7)paragraph (2) (hereinafter referred to as a "ruling of an order for assistance" in this Article) or a ruling under the provisions of the preceding paragraph (hereinafter referred to as a "ruling of an order for specified assistance" in this Article) without taking the step of hearing the person's statements.

    家庭裁判所は、成年被後見人補助開始の審判を受ける者となるべき者の心身の障害精神上の理由によりその者の陳述を聴くことができないときは、第百七条の規定にかかわらず、その者の陳述を聴く手続を経ずに、第二項の規定による審判(以下この条において「補助命令の審判」という。)又は前項の規定による審判(次項から第七項まで以下この条において「後見特定補助命令の審判」という。)をすることができる。

  • AddedArticle 126, paragraph (5)

    Notice of a ruling of an order for assistance must be given to an administrator of property, in addition to the persons prescribed in Article 74, paragraph (1).

    補助命令の審判は、第七十四条第一項に規定する者のほか、財産の管理者に告知しなければならない。

  • AddedArticle 126, paragraph (6)

    If a document relating to notice of a ruling of an order for assistance is sent to a person who is to be a person under assistance, and the person lacks the capacity to participate in proceedings at the time of receiving it, the person is deemed to have been given notice at the time of receiving it, for the purpose of the application of Article 74, paragraphs (1) and (2) and paragraph (9) of this Article to the ruling.

    補助命令の審判の告知に係る書面が補助開始の審判を受ける者となるべき者に送付された場合において、その送付を受けた時にその者が手続行為能力を欠くときは、当該審判についての第七十四条第一項及び第二項並びにこの条第九項の規定の適用については、その送付を受けた時にその者に告知がされたものとみなす。

  • ChangedArticle 126, paragraph (7)

    A ruling to order guardianship of an order for specified assistance becomes effective when notice thereof is given to the administrator of the property set forth in paragraph (1) (if there are two or more such administrators, one of them).

    後見特定補助命令の審判は、第一項の財産の管理者(数人あるときは、そのうちの一人)に告知することによって、その効力を生ずる。

  • ChangedArticle 126, paragraph (8)

    Notice of a ruling to order guardianship of an order for specified assistance must be given to a person who is to be an adult under guardianshipsubject to a ruling of a disposition appointing a specified assistant. In this case, the provisions of Article 74, paragraph (1) do not apply to a person who is to be an adult under guardianshipsubject to a ruling of a disposition appointing a specified assistant.

    後見特定補助命令の審判は、成年被後見人特定補助人を付する処分の審判を受ける者となるべき者に通知しなければならない。この場合においては、成年被後見人特定補助人を付する処分の審判を受ける者となるべき者については、第七十四条第一項の規定は、適用しない。

  • AddedArticle 126, paragraph (9)

    The period for filing an immediate appeal against a ruling of an order for assistance to be filed by a person other than a person who receives notice of a ruling and by a person who is to be a person under assistance runs from the latest of the day on which the person who is to be a person under assistance receives notice of the ruling and the day on which the administrator of property receives notice of the ruling under the provisions of paragraph (5).

    審判の告知を受ける者でない者及び補助開始の審判を受ける者となるべき者による補助命令の審判に対する即時抗告の期間は、補助開始の審判を受ける者となるべき者が審判の告知を受けた日及び財産の管理者が第五項の規定による審判の告知を受けた日のうち最も遅い日から進行する。

  • ChangedArticle 126, paragraph (10)

    The period for filing an immediate appeal against a ruling to order guardianship of an order for specified assistance to be filed by a person other than a person who receives notice of a ruling runs from the day on which the administrator of property set forth in paragraph (1) receives notice under the provisions of paragraph (4)(7) (if there are two or more such days, the latest day).

    審判の告知を受ける者でない者による後見特定補助命令の審判に対する即時抗告の期間は、第一項の財産の管理者が第四項第七項の規定による告知を受けた日(二以上あるときは、当該日のうち最も遅い日)から進行する。

  • ChangedArticle 126, paragraph (11)

    When a ruling to order guardianship of an order for assistance is made, the person who is to be an adult under guardianshipa person under assistance and the administrator of property set forth in paragraph (1) may rescind acts performed in relation to property by the person who is to be an adult under guardianship. In this case, the provisions of the Civil Code concerning the rescission of acts performed by a person with limited capacity to act apply mutatis mutandisa person under assistance without obtaining the consent of the administrator of property.

    後見補助命令の審判があったときは、成年被後見人補助開始の審判を受ける者となるべき者及び第一項の財産の管理者は、成年被後見人となるべき者がした財産上の行為を取り消すことができる。この場合においては、制限行為能力者の行為の取消しに関する民法の規定を準用す補助開始の審判を受ける者となるべき者が財産の管理者の同意を得ないでした財産上の行為を取り消すことができる。

  • AddedArticle 126, paragraph (12)

    When a ruling of an order for specified assistance is made, the person who is to be subject to a ruling of a disposition appointing a specified assistant and the administrator of property may rescind the acts set forth in the items of Article 9, paragraph (2) of the Civil Code performed by the person who is to be subject to a ruling of a disposition appointing a specified assistant.

    特定補助命令の審判があったときは、特定補助人を付する処分の審判を受ける者となるべき者及び財産の管理者は、特定補助人を付する処分の審判を受ける者となるべき者がした民法第九条第二項各号に掲げる行為を取り消すことができる。

  • AddedArticle 126, paragraph (13)

    In the cases referred to in the preceding two paragraphs, the provisions of the Civil Code concerning the rescission of acts performed by a person with limited capacity to act apply mutatis mutandis.

    前二項の場合においては、制限行為能力者の行為の取消しに関する民法の規定を準用する。

  • AddedArticle 126, paragraph (14)

    A family court may replace the administrator of property at any time.

    家庭裁判所は、いつでも財産の管理者を改任することができる。

  • AddedArticle 126, paragraph (15)

    A family court may order an administrator of property (including an administrator appointed as a replacement pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph) to report on the status of the property and settle the account for administration.

    家庭裁判所は、財産の管理者(前項の規定により改任された者を含む。)に対し、財産の状況の報告及び管理の計算を命ずることができる。

  • AddedArticle 126, paragraph (16)

    The expenses required for the report and the settlement of the account under the preceding paragraph are to be defrayed out of the property of the person who is to be a person under assistance.

    前項の報告及び計算に要する費用は、補助開始の審判を受ける者となるべき者の財産の中から支弁する。

  • AddedArticle 126, paragraph (17)

    A family court may issue an order to an administrator of property for an increase or decrease in or a change to the security that the administrator has provided, or an exemption from providing the security.

    家庭裁判所は、財産の管理者に対し、その提供した担保の増減、変更又は免除を命ずることができる。

  • AddedArticle 126, paragraph (18)

    When a ruling to order a mortgage to be established on the real property or vessel owned by an administrator of property becomes effective, a court clerk must commission the registration of the establishment thereof. The same applies to a registration of a change or the extinction of a mortgage thus established.

    財産の管理者の不動産又は船舶の上に抵当権の設定を命ずる審判が効力を生じたときは、裁判所書記官は、その設定の登記を嘱託しなければならない。設定した抵当権の変更又は消滅の登記についても、同様とする。

  • ChangedArticle 126, paragraph (19)

    The provisions of paragraphs (1) through (6) of the preceding Article, and the provisions of Articles 27 through 29 of the Civil Code (excluding Article 27, paragraph (2) of the Code) apply mutatis mutandis to the administrator of property set forth in paragraph (1). In this case, the term "an adult under guardianship" in paragraph (3) of the preceding Article is deemed to be replaced with "a person who is to be an adult under guardianship", and the provisions of Articles 644, 646, 647 and 650 of the Code apply mutatis mutandis to the administrator of property.

    前条第一項から第六項までの規定及び民法第二十七条から第二十九条まで(同法第二十七条第二項を除く。)、第六百四十四条、第六百四十六条、第六百四十七条及び第六百五十条の規定は、第一項の財産の管理者について準用する。この場合において、前条第三項中「成年被後見人」とあるのは、「成年被後見人となるべき者」と読み替えるものとする。

Article 127 · Provisional Order during a Case on the Merits to Adjudicate Dismissal of an Assistant第百二十七条(補助人の解任の審判事件等を本案とする保全処分)

4 reworded
Read it in the amended law
  • ChangedCaption

    (Provisional Order during a Case on the Merits to Adjudicate Dismissal of a Guardian of an Adult)an Assistant

    成年後見補助人の解任の審判事件等を本案とする保全処分

  • ChangedArticle 127, paragraph (1)

    When an adjudication case for the dismissal of a guardian of an adultan assistant is pending before a family court, and when it is necessary for the interests of the adultperson under guardianshipassistance, the family court may, upon the petition of the person who has filed a petition for the dismissal of the guardian of the adultassistant or by its own authority, suspend the performance of duties by the guardian of the adultassistant or appoint a person acting as the representative thereof, until a ruling on the dismissal of the guardian of the adultassistant becomes effective.

    家庭裁判所は、成年後見補助人の解任の審判事件が係属している場合において、成年被後見人の補助開始の審判を受けた者の利益のため必要があるときは、成年後見補助人の解任の申立てをした者の申立てにより又は職権で、成年後見補助人の解任についての審判が効力を生ずるまでの間、成年後見補助人の職務の執行を停止し、又はその職務代行者を選任することができる。

  • ChangedArticle 127, paragraph (2)

    A ruling to suspend the performance of duties by a guardian of an adultan assistant under the provisions of the preceding paragraph becomes effective when notice thereof is given to the guardian of the adultassistant who is to be suspended from performing duties, any other guardian of the adultassistant or a person acting as a representative appointed pursuant to the provisions of the paragraph.

    前項の規定による成年後見補助人の職務の執行を停止する審判は、職務の執行を停止される成年後見人、他の成年後見補助人、他の補助人又は同項の規定により選任した職務代行者に告知することによって、その効力を生ずる。

  • ChangedArticle 127, paragraph (4)

    A family court may grant a reasonable remuneration to a person acting as a representative appointed pursuant to paragraph (1) or a person acting as a representative appointed as a replacement pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph, out of the property of the adultperson under guardianshipassistance.

    家庭裁判所は、第一項の規定により選任し、又は前項の規定により改任した職務代行者に対し、成年被後見人補助開始の審判を受けた者の財産の中から、相当な報酬を与えることができる。

  • ChangedArticle 127, paragraph (5)

    The provisions of the preceding paragraphs apply mutatis mutandis to a provisional order sought by designating an adjudication case for the dismissal of a supervisor of a guardian of an adultan assistant as a case on the merits.

    前各項の規定は、成年後見補助監督人の解任の審判事件を本案とする保全処分について準用する。

Article 128 · Provisional Order Sought by Designating an Adjudication Case for the Supervision of the Affairs of Assistance as a Case on the Merits第百二十八条(補助の事務の監督の審判事件を本案とする保全処分)

2 reworded
Read it in the amended law
  • ChangedCaption

    (Jurisdiction)Provisional Order Sought by Designating an Adjudication Case for the Supervision of the Affairs of Assistance as a Case on the Merits

    管轄補助の事務の監督の審判事件を本案とする保全処分

  • ChangedArticle 128, paragraph (1)

    An When an adjudication case for the commencement of curatorship (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (17); the same applies hereinafter) is subject to the jurisdiction of the family court which has jurisdiction over the place of domicile of a person who is to be a person under curatorshipsupervision of the affairs of assistance is pending before a family court (limited to the case where the court has ordered an assistant who has received a ruling to vest the authority of representation to submit an inventory of property), and when it is necessary for the interests of the person under assistance, the family court may, upon the petition of the person who has filed a petition for the supervision of the affairs of assistance or by its own authority, suspend the performance of duties by the assistant or appoint a person acting as the representative thereof, until the assistant submits an inventory of property.

    保佐開始の審判事件(別表第一の十七の項の事項についての審判事件をいう。以下同じ。)は、被保佐人となるべき者の住所地を管轄する家庭裁判所の管轄に属す家庭裁判所は、補助の事務の監督の審判事件が係属している場合(代理権の付与の審判を受けた補助人に財産の目録の提出を命じた場合に限る。)において、補助開始の審判を受けた者の利益のため必要があるときは、補助の事務の監督の申立てをした者の申立てにより又は職権で、補助人が財産の目録を提出するまでの間、補助人の職務の執行を停止し、又はその職務代行者を選任することができる。

  • ChangedArticle 128, paragraph (2)

    Adjudication cases regarding curatorship (meaning the adjudication cases regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, rows (17) through (35)), except for an adjudication case for the commencement of curatorship, are subject to the jurisdiction of a family court that has made a ruling of the commencement of curatorship (if the court in charge of an appeal has made a judicial decision of commencement of curatorship, the family court that is the court of first instance); provided, however, that if an adjudication case for the commencement of curatorship is pending before a family court, these cases are subject to the jurisdiction of that family courtThe provisions of paragraphs (2) through (4) of the preceding Article apply mutatis mutandis to a provisional order sought by designating an adjudication case for the supervision of the affairs of assistance as a case on the merits.

    保佐に関する審判事件(別表第一の十七の項から三十五の項までの事項についての審判事件をいう。)は、保佐開始の審判事件を除き、保佐開始の審判をした家庭裁判所(抗告裁判所が保佐開始の裁判をした場合にあっては、その第一審裁判所である家庭裁判所)の管轄に属する。ただし、保佐開始の審判事件が家庭裁判所に係属しているときは、その家庭裁判所の管轄に属前条第二項から第四項までの規定は、補助の事務の監督の審判事件を本案とする保全処分について準用する。

Article 129 · (Capacity to Participate in Proceedings)第百二十九条(手続行為能力)

13 removed
  • RemovedArticle 129, paragraph (1)

    The provisions of Article 118 apply mutatis mutandis to a person who is to be a person under curatorship and to a person under curatorship in the following adjudication cases (including adjudication cases for a provisional order sought by designating the adjudication cases set forth in items (i), (vii), and (ix) as cases on the merits):

    第百十八条の規定は、次に掲げる審判事件(第一号、第七号及び第九号の審判事件を本案とする保全処分についての審判事件を含む。)における被保佐人となるべき者及び被保佐人について準用する。

  • RemovedArticle 129, paragraph (1), item (i)

    an adjudication case for the commencement of curatorship;

    保佐開始の審判事件

  • RemovedArticle 129, paragraph (1), item (ii)

    an adjudication case for the determination of acts which require the consent of a curator (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (18));

    保佐人の同意を得なければならない行為の定めの審判事件(別表第一の十八の項の事項についての審判事件をいう。)

  • RemovedArticle 129, paragraph (1), item (iii)

    an adjudication case for permission in lieu of the consent of a curator (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (19));

    保佐人の同意に代わる許可の審判事件(別表第一の十九の項の事項についての審判事件をいう。)

  • RemovedArticle 129, paragraph (1), item (iv)

    an adjudication case for the revocation of a ruling of the commencement of curatorship (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (20));

    保佐開始の審判の取消しの審判事件(別表第一の二十の項の事項についての審判事件をいう。)

  • RemovedArticle 129, paragraph (1), item (v)

    an adjudication case for the revocation of a ruling to determine acts which require the consent of a curator (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (21));

    保佐人の同意を得なければならない行為の定めの審判の取消しの審判事件(別表第一の二十一の項の事項についての審判事件をいう。)

  • RemovedArticle 129, paragraph (1), item (vi)

    an adjudication case for the appointment of a curator (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (22));

    保佐人の選任の審判事件(別表第一の二十二の項の事項についての審判事件をいう。)

  • RemovedArticle 129, paragraph (1), item (vii)

    an adjudication case for the dismissal of a curator (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (24); the same applies in Article 135);

    保佐人の解任の審判事件(別表第一の二十四の項の事項についての審判事件をいう。第百三十五条において同じ。)

  • RemovedArticle 129, paragraph (1), item (viii)

    an adjudication case for the appointment of a supervisor of a curator (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (26));

    保佐監督人の選任の審判事件(別表第一の二十六の項の事項についての審判事件をいう。)

  • RemovedArticle 129, paragraph (1), item (ix)

    an adjudication case for the dismissal of a supervisor of a curator (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (28); the same applies in Article 135);

    保佐監督人の解任の審判事件(別表第一の二十八の項の事項についての審判事件をいう。第百三十五条において同じ。)

  • RemovedArticle 129, paragraph (1), item (x)

    an adjudication case for vesting the authority of representation in a curator (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (32));

    保佐人に対する代理権の付与の審判事件(別表第一の三十二の項の事項についての審判事件をいう。)

  • RemovedArticle 129, paragraph (1), item (xi)

    an adjudication case for the revocation of a ruling to vest the authority of representation in a curator (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (33)); and

    保佐人に対する代理権の付与の審判の取消しの審判事件(別表第一の三十三の項の事項についての審判事件をいう。)

  • RemovedArticle 129, paragraph (1), item (xii)

    an adjudication case for the supervision of the affairs of curatorship (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (34)).

    保佐の事務の監督の審判事件(別表第一の三十四の項の事項についての審判事件をいう。)

Article 130 · (Hearing Statements and Opinions)第百三十条(陳述及び意見の聴取)

11 removed
  • RemovedArticle 130, paragraph (1)

    When making the rulings set forth in the following items, the family court must hear statements from the persons specified respectively in these items (in items (i), (ii), (iv), and (v), excluding the petitioner):

    家庭裁判所は、次の各号に掲げる審判をする場合には、当該各号に定める者(第一号、第二号、第四号及び第五号にあっては、申立人を除く。)の陳述を聴かなければならない。

  • RemovedArticle 130, paragraph (1), item (i)

    a ruling of the commencement of curatorship:the person who is to be a person under curatorship;

    保佐開始の審判 被保佐人となるべき者

  • RemovedArticle 130, paragraph (1), item (ii)

    a ruling to determine acts which require the consent of a curator:the person who is or is to be a person under curatorship;

    保佐人の同意を得なければならない行為の定めの審判 被保佐人となるべき者又は被保佐人

  • RemovedArticle 130, paragraph (1), item (iii)

    a ruling of permission in lieu of the consent of a curator:the curator;

    保佐人の同意に代わる許可の審判 保佐人

  • RemovedArticle 130, paragraph (1), item (iv)

    a ruling to revoke a ruling of the commencement of curatorship (limited to the case under the provisions of Article 14, paragraph (1) of the Civil Code):the person under curatorship and the curator;

    保佐開始の審判の取消しの審判(民法第十四条第一項の規定による場合に限る。) 被保佐人及び保佐人

  • RemovedArticle 130, paragraph (1), item (v)

    a ruling of the appointment of a curator or a supervisor of a curator:the person who is or is to be a person under curatorship;

    保佐人又は保佐監督人の選任の審判 被保佐人となるべき者又は被保佐人

  • RemovedArticle 130, paragraph (1), item (vi)

    a ruling of the dismissal of a curator:the curator; and

    保佐人の解任の審判 保佐人

  • RemovedArticle 130, paragraph (1), item (vii)

    a ruling of the dismissal of a supervisor of a curator:the supervisor of a curator.

    保佐監督人の解任の審判 保佐監督人

  • RemovedArticle 130, paragraph (2)

    When making the rulings set forth in the following items, the family court must hear the opinions of the persons specified respectively in these items:

    家庭裁判所は、次の各号に掲げる審判をする場合には、当該各号に定める者の意見を聴かなければならない。

  • RemovedArticle 130, paragraph (2), item (i)

    a ruling of the appointment of a curator:the person who is to be a curator; and

    保佐人の選任の審判 保佐人となるべき者

  • RemovedArticle 130, paragraph (2), item (ii)

    a ruling of the appointment of a supervisor of a curator:the person who is to be a supervisor of a curator.

    保佐監督人の選任の審判 保佐監督人となるべき者

Article 131 · (Notice of Rulings)第百三十一条(審判の告知)

8 removed
  • RemovedArticle 131, paragraph (1)

    Notice of the rulings set forth in the following items must be given to the persons specified respectively in these items, beyond the persons prescribed in Article 74, paragraph (1):

    次の各号に掲げる審判は、第七十四条第一項に規定する者のほか、当該各号に定める者に告知しなければならない。

  • RemovedArticle 131, paragraph (1), item (i)

    a ruling of the commencement of curatorship:the person who is appointed as a curator pursuant to the provisions of Article 876-2, paragraph (1) of the Civil Code, and the voluntarily appointed guardian and the supervisor of the voluntarily appointed guardian under a voluntary guardianship contract that is to terminate pursuant to Article 10, paragraph (3) of the Voluntary Guardianship Contract Act;

    保佐開始の審判 民法第八百七十六条の二第一項の規定により保佐人に選任される者並びに任意後見契約法第十条第三項の規定により終了する任意後見契約に係る任意後見人及び任意後見監督人

  • RemovedArticle 131, paragraph (1), item (ii)

    a ruling to determine acts which require the consent of a curator:the curator and the supervisor of the curator (if this ruling is made simultaneously upon making a ruling of the appointment of a curator or a supervisor of a curator, the person who is to be a curator or the person who is to be a supervisor of a curator);

    保佐人の同意を得なければならない行為の定めの審判 保佐人及び保佐監督人(当該審判が保佐人又は保佐監督人の選任の審判と同時にされる場合にあっては、保佐人となるべき者又は保佐監督人となるべき者)

  • RemovedArticle 131, paragraph (1), item (iii)

    a ruling of permission in lieu of the consent of a curator:the curator and the supervisor of the curator;

    保佐人の同意に代わる許可の審判 保佐人及び保佐監督人

  • RemovedArticle 131, paragraph (1), item (iv)

    a ruling to revoke a ruling of the commencement of curatorship:the curator and the supervisor of the curator;

    保佐開始の審判の取消しの審判 保佐人及び保佐監督人

  • RemovedArticle 131, paragraph (1), item (v)

    a ruling to revoke a ruling to determine acts which require the consent of a curator:the curator and the supervisor of the curator;

    保佐人の同意を得なければならない行為の定めの審判の取消しの審判 保佐人及び保佐監督人

  • RemovedArticle 131, paragraph (1), item (vi)

    a ruling to vest the authority of representation in a curator:the person under curatorship and the supervisor of a curator (if this ruling is made simultaneously upon making a ruling of the appointment of a supervisor of a curator, the person who is to be a supervisor of a curator); and

    保佐人に対する代理権の付与の審判 被保佐人及び保佐監督人(当該審判が保佐監督人の選任の審判と同時にされる場合にあっては、保佐監督人となるべき者)

  • RemovedArticle 131, paragraph (1), item (vii)

    a ruling to revoke a ruling to vest the authority of representation in a curator:the person under curatorship and the supervisor of a curator.

    保佐人に対する代理権の付与の審判の取消しの審判 被保佐人及び保佐監督人

Article 132 · (Immediate Appeals)第百三十二条(即時抗告)

11 removed
  • RemovedArticle 132, paragraph (1)

    An immediate appeal may be filed against the rulings set forth in the following items by the persons specified respectively in these items (in items (i) and (iv), excluding the petitioner):

    次の各号に掲げる審判に対しては、当該各号に定める者(第一号及び第四号にあっては、申立人を除く。)は、即時抗告をすることができる。

  • RemovedArticle 132, paragraph (1), item (i)

    a ruling of the commencement of curatorship:the persons prescribed in the main clause of Article 11 of the Civil Code and those prescribed in Article 10, paragraph (2) of the Voluntary Guardianship Contract Act;

    保佐開始の審判 民法第十一条本文及び任意後見契約法第十条第二項に規定する者

  • RemovedArticle 132, paragraph (1), item (ii)

    a ruling to dismiss a petition for the commencement of curatorship:the petitioner;

    保佐開始の申立てを却下する審判 申立人

  • RemovedArticle 132, paragraph (1), item (iii)

    a ruling to dismiss a petition for revocation of a ruling of the commencement of curatorship:the persons prescribed in Article 14, paragraph (1) of the Civil Code;

    保佐開始の審判の取消しの申立てを却下する審判 民法第十四条第一項に規定する者

  • RemovedArticle 132, paragraph (1), item (iv)

    a ruling to determine acts which require the consent of a curator:the person under curatorship;

    保佐人の同意を得なければならない行為の定めの審判 被保佐人

  • RemovedArticle 132, paragraph (1), item (v)

    a ruling to dismiss a petition for permission in lieu of the consent of a curator:the petitioner;

    保佐人の同意に代わる許可の申立てを却下する審判 申立人

  • RemovedArticle 132, paragraph (1), item (vi)

    a ruling of the dismissal of a curator:the curator;

    保佐人の解任の審判 保佐人

  • RemovedArticle 132, paragraph (1), item (vii)

    a ruling to dismiss a petition for the dismissal of a curator:the petitioner, the supervisor of the curator, as well as the person under curatorship and their relative;

    保佐人の解任の申立てを却下する審判 申立人、保佐監督人並びに被保佐人及びその親族

  • RemovedArticle 132, paragraph (1), item (viii)

    a ruling of the dismissal of a supervisor of a curator:the supervisor of a curator; and

    保佐監督人の解任の審判 保佐監督人

  • RemovedArticle 132, paragraph (1), item (ix)

    a ruling to dismiss a petition for the dismissal of a supervisor of a curator:the petitioner, as well as the person under curatorship and the person's relative.

    保佐監督人の解任の申立てを却下する審判 申立人並びに被保佐人及びその親族

  • RemovedArticle 132, paragraph (2)

    The period for filing an immediate appeal against a ruling of the commencement of curatorship to be filed by a person other than a person who receives notice of a ruling and by a person who is to be a person under curatorship runs from the latest day, out of the day on which the person who is to be a person under curatorship received notice of a ruling and the day on which the person who is appointed as a curator pursuant to the provisions of Article 876-2, paragraph (1) of the Civil Code received notice of a ruling.

    審判の告知を受ける者でない者及び被保佐人となるべき者による保佐開始の審判に対する即時抗告の期間は、被保佐人となるべき者が審判の告知を受けた日及び民法第八百七十六条の二第一項の規定により保佐人に選任される者が審判の告知を受けた日のうち最も遅い日から進行する。

Article 133 · (Application Mutatis Mutandis of Provisions Concerning Adjudication Cases Regarding Guardianship of Adults)第百三十三条(成年後見に関する審判事件の規定の準用)

  • RemovedArticle 133, paragraph (1)

    The provisions of Article 119 apply mutatis mutandis to the expert examination and hearing of opinions concerning the mental state of a person who is or is to be a person under curatorship; the provisions of Article 121 apply mutatis mutandis to the withdrawal of a petition for the commencement of curatorship and the withdrawal of a petition for the appointment of a curator; and the provisions of Article 124 apply mutatis mutandis to the supervision of the affairs of curatorship.

    第百十九条の規定は被保佐人となるべき者及び被保佐人の精神の状況に関する鑑定及び意見の聴取について、第百二十一条の規定は保佐開始の申立ての取下げ及び保佐人の選任の申立ての取下げについて、第百二十四条の規定は保佐の事務の監督について準用する。

Article 134 · (Provisional Order during a Case on the Merits to Adjudicate Commencement of Curatorship)第百三十四条(保佐開始の審判事件を本案とする保全処分)

6 removed
  • RemovedArticle 134, paragraph (1)

    The provisions of Article 126, paragraph (1) apply mutatis mutandis to a provisional order sought by designating an adjudication case for the commencement of curatorship as a case on the merits.

    保佐開始の審判事件を本案とする保全処分については、第百二十六条第一項の規定を準用する。

  • RemovedArticle 134, paragraph (2)

    When a petition for the commencement of curatorship is filed, and when it is particularly necessary for the preservation of the property of a person who is to be a person under curatorship, the family court (or a high court in the case set forth in Article 105, paragraph (2)) may, upon the petition of the person who has filed the petition, order that the person who is to be a person under curatorship be subject to the curatorship of the administrator of property to be appointed pursuant to the provisions of Article 126, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the preceding paragraph (hereinafter simply referred to as an "administrator of property" in this Article) in performing acts in relation to property (limited to the acts prescribed in Article 13, paragraph (1) of the Civil Code; the same applies in paragraph (5)), until a ruling on the petition for the commencement of curatorship becomes effective.

    家庭裁判所(第百五条第二項の場合にあっては、高等裁判所)は、保佐開始の申立てがあった場合において、被保佐人となるべき者の財産の保全のため特に必要があるときは、当該申立てをした者の申立てにより、保佐開始の申立てについての審判が効力を生ずるまでの間、被保佐人となるべき者の財産上の行為(民法第十三条第一項に規定する行為に限る。第五項において同じ。)につき、前項において準用する第百二十六条第一項の規定により選任される財産の管理者(以下この条において単に「財産の管理者」という。)の保佐を受けることを命ずることができる。

  • RemovedArticle 134, paragraph (3)

    Notice of a ruling under the provisions of the preceding paragraph (hereinafter referred to as a "ruling to order curatorship" in the following paragraph and paragraph (5)) must be given to an administrator of property, beyond the persons prescribed in Article 74, paragraph (1).

    前項の規定による審判(次項及び第五項において「保佐命令の審判」という。)は、第七十四条第一項に規定する者のほか、財産の管理者に告知しなければならない。

  • RemovedArticle 134, paragraph (4)

    The period for filing an immediate appeal against a ruling to order curatorship to be filed by a person other than a person who receives notice of a ruling and by a person who is to be a person under curatorship runs from the latest day, out of the day on which the person who is to be a person under curatorship receives notice of a ruling and the day on which the administrator of property receives notice of a ruling under the provisions of the preceding paragraph.

    審判の告知を受ける者でない者及び被保佐人となるべき者による保佐命令の審判に対する即時抗告の期間は、被保佐人となるべき者が審判の告知を受けた日及び財産の管理者が前項の規定による審判の告知を受けた日のうち最も遅い日から進行する。

  • RemovedArticle 134, paragraph (5)

    When a ruling to order curatorship is made, the person who is to be a person under curatorship and the administrator of property may rescind acts performed in relation to property by the person who is to be a person under curatorship without obtaining consent from the administrator of property. In this case, the provisions of the Civil Code concerning the rescission of acts performed by a person with limited capacity to act apply mutatis mutandis.

    保佐命令の審判があったときは、被保佐人となるべき者及び財産の管理者は、被保佐人となるべき者が財産の管理者の同意を得ないでした財産上の行為を取り消すことができる。この場合においては、制限行為能力者の行為の取消しに関する民法の規定を準用する。

  • RemovedArticle 134, paragraph (6)

    The provisions of Article 125, paragraphs (1) through (6), as well as the provisions of Articles 27 through 29 of the Civil Code (excluding Article 27, paragraph (2) of the Code) apply mutatis mutandis to an administrator of property. In this case, the term "an adult under guardianship" in Article 125, paragraph (3) is deemed to be replaced with "a person who is to be a person under curatorship."

    第百二十五条第一項から第六項までの規定及び民法第二十七条から第二十九条まで(同法第二十七条第二項を除く。)の規定は、財産の管理者について準用する。この場合において、第百二十五条第三項中「成年被後見人」とあるのは、「被保佐人となるべき者」と読み替えるものとする。

Article 135 · (Provisional Order Sought by Designating an Adjudication Case for the Dismissal of Curators as a Case on Merits)第百三十五条(保佐人の解任の審判事件等を本案とする保全処分)

  • RemovedArticle 135, paragraph (1)

    The provisions of Article 127, paragraphs (1) through (4) apply mutatis mutandis to a provisional order sought by designating an adjudication case for the dismissal of a curator or an adjudication case for the dismissal of a supervisor of a curator as a case on the merits.

    第百二十七条第一項から第四項までの規定は、保佐人の解任の審判事件又は保佐監督人の解任の審判事件を本案とする保全処分について準用する。

Articles 129 to 144第百二十九条から第百四十四条まで

Read it in the amended law
  • AddedArticles 129 to 144, paragraph (1)

    Deleted

    削除

Part 2, Chapter 2, Section 2第二編第二章第二節

Read it in the amended law
  • ChangedPart 2, Chapter 2, Section 2

    Section 2 Adjudication Cases Regarding Curatorshipfor Dispositions Regarding Administration of Property of Absentee

    第二節 保佐不在者の財産の管理に関する処分の審判事件

Part 2, Chapter 2, Section 3第二編第二章第三節

Read it in the amended law
  • ChangedPart 2, Chapter 2, Section 3

    Section 3 Adjudication Cases Regarding AssistanceDeclaration of Presumed Death

    第三節 補助失踪の宣告に関する審判事件

Article 136 · (Jurisdiction)第百三十六条(管轄)

2 removed
  • RemovedArticle 136, paragraph (1)

    An adjudication case for the commencement of assistance (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (36); the same applies hereinafter) is subject to the jurisdiction of the family court which has jurisdiction over the place of domicile of a person who is to be a person under assistance.

    補助開始の審判事件(別表第一の三十六の項の事項についての審判事件をいう。以下同じ。)は、被補助人となるべき者の住所地を管轄する家庭裁判所の管轄に属する。

  • RemovedArticle 136, paragraph (2)

    Adjudication cases regarding assistance (meaning the adjudication cases regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, rows (36) through (54)), except for an adjudication case for the commencement of assistance, are subject to the jurisdiction of a family court that has made a ruling of the commencement of assistance (if the court in charge of an appeal has made a judicial decision of the commencement of assistance, the family court that is the court of first instance); provided, however, that if an adjudication case for the commencement of assistance is pending before a family court, these cases are subject to the jurisdiction of that family court.

    補助に関する審判事件(別表第一の三十六の項から五十四の項までの事項についての審判事件をいう。)は、補助開始の審判事件を除き、補助開始の審判をした家庭裁判所(抗告裁判所が補助開始の裁判をした場合にあっては、その第一審裁判所である家庭裁判所)の管轄に属する。ただし、補助開始の審判事件が家庭裁判所に係属しているときは、その家庭裁判所の管轄に属する。

Article 137 · (Capacity to Participate in Proceedings)第百三十七条(手続行為能力)

13 removed
  • RemovedArticle 137, paragraph (1)

    The provisions of Article 118 apply mutatis mutandis to a person who is to be a person under assistance and to a person under assistance in the following adjudication cases (including adjudication cases for a provisional order sought by designating the adjudication cases set forth in items (i), (vii), and (ix) as cases on the merits):

    第百十八条の規定は、次に掲げる審判事件(第一号、第七号及び第九号の審判事件を本案とする保全処分についての審判事件を含む。)における被補助人となるべき者及び被補助人について準用する。

  • RemovedArticle 137, paragraph (1), item (i)

    an adjudication case for the commencement of assistance;

    補助開始の審判事件

  • RemovedArticle 137, paragraph (1), item (ii)

    an adjudication case for the determination of acts which require the consent of an assistant (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (37));

    補助人の同意を得なければならない行為の定めの審判事件(別表第一の三十七の項の事項についての審判事件をいう。)

  • RemovedArticle 137, paragraph (1), item (iii)

    an adjudication case for permission in lieu of the consent of an assistant (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (38));

    補助人の同意に代わる許可の審判事件(別表第一の三十八の項の事項についての審判事件をいう。)

  • RemovedArticle 137, paragraph (1), item (iv)

    an adjudication case for the revocation of a ruling of the commencement of assistance (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (39));

    補助開始の審判の取消しの審判事件(別表第一の三十九の項の事項についての審判事件をいう。)

  • RemovedArticle 137, paragraph (1), item (v)

    an adjudication case for the revocation of a ruling to determine acts which require the consent of an assistant (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (40));

    補助人の同意を得なければならない行為の定めの審判の取消しの審判事件(別表第一の四十の項の事項についての審判事件をいう。)

  • RemovedArticle 137, paragraph (1), item (vi)

    an adjudication case for the appointment of an assistant (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (41));

    補助人の選任の審判事件(別表第一の四十一の項の事項についての審判事件をいう。)

  • RemovedArticle 137, paragraph (1), item (vii)

    an adjudication case for the dismissal of an assistant (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (43); the same applies in Article 144);

    補助人の解任の審判事件(別表第一の四十三の項の事項についての審判事件をいう。第百四十四条において同じ。)

  • RemovedArticle 137, paragraph (1), item (viii)

    an adjudication case for the appointment of a supervisor of an assistant (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (45));

    補助監督人の選任の審判事件(別表第一の四十五の項の事項についての審判事件をいう。)

  • RemovedArticle 137, paragraph (1), item (ix)

    an adjudication case for the dismissal of a supervisor of an assistant (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (47); the same applies in Article 144);

    補助監督人の解任の審判事件(別表第一の四十七の項の事項についての審判事件をいう。第百四十四条において同じ。)

  • RemovedArticle 137, paragraph (1), item (x)

    an adjudication case for vesting the authority of representation in an assistant (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (51));

    補助人に対する代理権の付与の審判事件(別表第一の五十一の項の事項についての審判事件をいう。)

  • RemovedArticle 137, paragraph (1), item (xi)

    an adjudication case for the revocation of a ruling to vest the authority of representation in an assistant (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (52)); and

    補助人に対する代理権の付与の審判の取消しの審判事件(別表第一の五十二の項の事項についての審判事件をいう。)

  • RemovedArticle 137, paragraph (1), item (xii)

    an adjudication case for the supervision of the affairs of assistance (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (53)).

    補助の事務の監督の審判事件(別表第一の五十三の項の事項についての審判事件をいう。)

Article 138 · (Hearing of Opinions Concerning Mental State)第百三十八条(精神の状況に関する意見の聴取)

  • RemovedArticle 138, paragraph (1)

    A family court may not make a ruling of the commencement of assistance unless it hears the opinion of a physician or any other appropriate person concerning the mental state of the person who is to be a person under assistance.

    家庭裁判所は、被補助人となるべき者の精神の状況につき医師その他適当な者の意見を聴かなければ、補助開始の審判をすることができない。

Article 139 · (Hearing Statements and Opinions)第百三十九条(陳述及び意見の聴取)

10 removed
  • RemovedArticle 139, paragraph (1)

    When making the rulings set forth in the following items, the family court must hear statements from the persons specified respectively in these items (in items (i), (iii), and (iv), excluding the petitioner):

    家庭裁判所は、次の各号に掲げる審判をする場合には、当該各号に定める者(第一号、第三号及び第四号にあっては、申立人を除く。)の陳述を聴かなければならない。

  • RemovedArticle 139, paragraph (1), item (i)

    a ruling of the commencement of assistance:the person who is to be a person under assistance;

    補助開始の審判 被補助人となるべき者

  • RemovedArticle 139, paragraph (1), item (ii)

    a ruling of permission in lieu of the consent of an assistant:the assistant;

    補助人の同意に代わる許可の審判 補助人

  • RemovedArticle 139, paragraph (1), item (iii)

    a ruling to revoke a ruling of the commencement of assistance (limited to the case under the provisions of Article 18, paragraph (1) or (3) of the Civil Code):the person under assistance and the assistant;

    補助開始の審判の取消しの審判(民法第十八条第一項又は第三項の規定による場合に限る。) 被補助人及び補助人

  • RemovedArticle 139, paragraph (1), item (iv)

    a ruling of the appointment of an assistant or a supervisor of an assistant:the person who is to be a person under assistance or the person under assistance;

    補助人又は補助監督人の選任の審判 被補助人となるべき者又は被補助人

  • RemovedArticle 139, paragraph (1), item (v)

    a ruling of the dismissal of an assistant:the assistant; and

    補助人の解任の審判 補助人

  • RemovedArticle 139, paragraph (1), item (vi)

    a ruling of the dismissal of a supervisor of an assistant:the supervisor of an assistant.

    補助監督人の解任の審判 補助監督人

  • RemovedArticle 139, paragraph (2)

    When making the rulings set forth in the following items, the family court must hear the opinions of the persons specified respectively in these items:

    家庭裁判所は、次の各号に掲げる審判をする場合には、当該各号に定める者の意見を聴かなければならない。

  • RemovedArticle 139, paragraph (2), item (i)

    a ruling of the appointment of an assistant:the person who is to be an assistant; and

    補助人の選任の審判 補助人となるべき者

  • RemovedArticle 139, paragraph (2), item (ii)

    a ruling of the appointment of a supervisor of an assistant:the person who is to be a supervisor of an assistant.

    補助監督人の選任の審判 補助監督人となるべき者

Article 140 · (Notice of Rulings)第百四十条(審判の告知)

8 removed
  • RemovedArticle 140, paragraph (1)

    Notice of the rulings set forth in the following items must be given to the persons specified respectively in these items, beyond the persons prescribed in Article 74, paragraph (1):

    次の各号に掲げる審判は、第七十四条第一項に規定する者のほか、当該各号に定める者に告知しなければならない。

  • RemovedArticle 140, paragraph (1), item (i)

    a ruling of the commencement of assistance:the person who is appointed as an assistant pursuant to the provisions of Article 876-7, paragraph (1) of the Civil Code, and the voluntarily appointed guardian and the supervisor of the voluntarily appointed guardian under a voluntary guardianship contract that is to terminate pursuant to Article 10, paragraph (3) of the Voluntary Guardianship Contract Act;

    補助開始の審判 民法第八百七十六条の七第一項の規定により補助人に選任される者並びに任意後見契約法第十条第三項の規定により終了する任意後見契約に係る任意後見人及び任意後見監督人

  • RemovedArticle 140, paragraph (1), item (ii)

    a ruling to determine acts which require the consent of an assistant:the assistant and the supervisor of the assistant (if this ruling is made simultaneously upon making a ruling of the appointment of an assistant or a supervisor of an assistant, the person who is to be an assistant or the person who is to be a supervisor of an assistant);

    補助人の同意を得なければならない行為の定めの審判 補助人及び補助監督人(当該審判が補助人又は補助監督人の選任の審判と同時にされる場合にあっては、補助人となるべき者又は補助監督人となるべき者)

  • RemovedArticle 140, paragraph (1), item (iii)

    a ruling of permission in lieu of the consent of an assistant:the assistant and the supervisor of the assistant;

    補助人の同意に代わる許可の審判 補助人及び補助監督人

  • RemovedArticle 140, paragraph (1), item (iv)

    a ruling to revoke a ruling of the commencement of assistance:the assistant and the supervisor of the assistant;

    補助開始の審判の取消しの審判 補助人及び補助監督人

  • RemovedArticle 140, paragraph (1), item (v)

    a ruling to revoke a ruling to determine acts which require the consent of an assistant:the assistant and the supervisor of the assistant;

    補助人の同意を得なければならない行為の定めの審判の取消しの審判 補助人及び補助監督人

  • RemovedArticle 140, paragraph (1), item (vi)

    a ruling to vest the authority of representation in an assistant:the person under assistance and the supervisor of an assistant (if this ruling is made simultaneously upon making a ruling of the appointment of a supervisor of an assistant, the person who is to be a supervisor of an assistant); and

    補助人に対する代理権の付与の審判 被補助人及び補助監督人(当該審判が補助監督人の選任の審判と同時にされる場合にあっては、補助監督人となるべき者)

  • RemovedArticle 140, paragraph (1), item (vii)

    a ruling to revoke a ruling to vest the authority of representation in an assistant:the person under assistance and the supervisor of an assistant.

    補助人に対する代理権の付与の審判の取消しの審判 被補助人及び補助監督人

Article 141 · (Immediate Appeals)第百四十一条(即時抗告)

10 removed
  • RemovedArticle 141, paragraph (1)

    An immediate appeal may be filed against the rulings set forth in the following items by the persons specified respectively in these items (in item (i), excluding the petitioner):

    次の各号に掲げる審判に対しては、当該各号に定める者(第一号にあっては、申立人を除く。)は、即時抗告をすることができる。

  • RemovedArticle 141, paragraph (1), item (i)

    a ruling of the commencement of assistance:the persons prescribed in the main clause of Article 15, paragraph (1) of the Civil Code and those prescribed in Article 10, paragraph (2) of the Voluntary Guardianship Contract Act;

    補助開始の審判 民法第十五条第一項本文及び任意後見契約法第十条第二項に規定する者

  • RemovedArticle 141, paragraph (1), item (ii)

    a ruling to dismiss a petition for the commencement of assistance:the petitioner;

    補助開始の申立てを却下する審判 申立人

  • RemovedArticle 141, paragraph (1), item (iii)

    a ruling to dismiss a petition for the revocation of a ruling of the commencement of assistance:the persons prescribed in Article 18, paragraph (1) of the Civil Code;

    補助開始の審判の取消しの申立てを却下する審判 民法第十八条第一項に規定する者

  • RemovedArticle 141, paragraph (1), item (iv)

    a ruling to dismiss a petition for permission in lieu of the consent of an assistant:the petitioner;

    補助人の同意に代わる許可の申立てを却下する審判 申立人

  • RemovedArticle 141, paragraph (1), item (v)

    a ruling of the dismissal of an assistant:the assistant;

    補助人の解任の審判 補助人

  • RemovedArticle 141, paragraph (1), item (vi)

    a ruling to dismiss a petition for the dismissal of an assistant:the petitioner, the supervisor of the assistant, as well as the person under assistance and the person's relative;

    補助人の解任の申立てを却下する審判 申立人、補助監督人並びに被補助人及びその親族

  • RemovedArticle 141, paragraph (1), item (vii)

    a ruling of the dismissal of a supervisor of an assistant:the supervisor of an assistant; and

    補助監督人の解任の審判 補助監督人

  • RemovedArticle 141, paragraph (1), item (viii)

    a ruling to dismiss a petition for the dismissal of a supervisor of an assistant:the petitioner, as well as the person under assistance and the person's relative.

    補助監督人の解任の申立てを却下する審判 申立人並びに被補助人及びその親族

  • RemovedArticle 141, paragraph (2)

    The period for filing an immediate appeal against a ruling of the commencement of assistance to be filed by a person other than a person who receives notice of a ruling and by the person who is to be a person under assistance runs from the latest day, out of the day on which the person who is to be a person under assistance received notice of a ruling and the day on which a person who is appointed as an assistant pursuant to the provisions of Article 876-7, paragraph (1) of the Civil Code received notice of a ruling.

    審判の告知を受ける者でない者及び被補助人となるべき者による補助開始の審判に対する即時抗告の期間は、被補助人となるべき者が審判の告知を受けた日及び民法第八百七十六条の七第一項の規定により補助人に選任される者が審判の告知を受けた日のうち最も遅い日から進行する。