Code of Criminal Procedure
Article 513, paragraph (10)
第五百十三条第十項
Each amendment that changed this provision, and each that will, oldest first. Each is shown against the wording just before it; where an amendment gives the provision another number, it is followed under the new one. Read it as it stands today
In force today
The provisions of Article 105-2, Article 111, paragraph (3), Article 120, paragraphs (2) and (3), Article 123-2, paragraph (1), and Article 125, paragraphs (1) through (3) and paragraph (4) (main clause) apply mutatis mutandis to an order to provide electronic or magnetic records (limited to an order for provision by the method set forth in Article 102-2, paragraph (1), item (i), (b)) that a court or a judge issues pursuant to Article 511-2 (including having electronic or magnetic records provided under that order to provide electronic or magnetic records). In this case, the term "defendant" in the proviso to Article 105 as applied mutatis mutandis with replacement of terms in Article 105-2 is deemed to be replaced with "person subject to the execution of a decision", and the phrase "the case" in Article 123-2, paragraph (1) is deemed to be replaced with "the execution of a decision".
第百五条の二、第百十一条第三項、第百二十条第二項及び第三項、第百二十三条の二第一項並びに第百二十五条第一項から第三項まで及び第四項本文の規定は、裁判所又は裁判官が第五百十一条の二の規定によつてする電磁的記録提供命令（第百二条の二第一項第一号ロに掲げる方法による提供を命ずるものに限る。）（当該電磁的記録提供命令により電磁的記録を提供させることを含む。）について準用する。この場合において、第百五条の二において読み替えて準用する第百五条ただし書中「被告人」とあるのは「裁判の執行を受ける者」と、第百二十三条の二第一項中「被告事件」とあるのは「裁判の執行」と読み替えるものとする。
The provisions of Article 105-2, Article 111, paragraph (3), Article 120, paragraphs (2) and (3), Article 123-2, paragraph (1), and Article 125, paragraphs (1) through (3) and paragraph (4) (main clause) apply mutatis mutandis to an order to provide electronic or magnetic records (limited to an order for provision by the method set forth in Article 102-2, paragraph (1), item (i), (b)) that a court or a judge issues pursuant to Article 511-2 (including having electronic or magnetic records provided under that order to provide electronic or magnetic records). In this case, the term "defendant" in the proviso to Article 105 as applied mutatis mutandis with replacement of terms in Article 105-2 is deemed to be replaced with "person subject to the execution of a decision", the phrase "the preceding two paragraphs" in Article 120, paragraph (3) is deemed to be replaced with "paragraph (2) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 513, paragraph (10)", and the phrase "the case" in Article 123-2, paragraph (1) is deemed to be replaced with "the execution of a decision".
第百五条の二、第百十一条第三項、第百二十条第二項及び第三項、第百二十三条の二第一項並びに第百二十五条第一項から第三項まで及び第四項本文の規定は、裁判所又は裁判官が第五百十一条の二の規定によつてする電磁的記録提供命令（第百二条の二第一項第一号ロに掲げる方法による提供を命ずるものに限る。）（当該電磁的記録提供命令により電磁的記録を提供させることを含む。）について準用する。この場合において、第百五条の二において読み替えて準用する第百五条ただし書中「被告人」とあるのは「裁判の執行を受ける者」と、第百二十条第三項中「前二項」とあるのは「第五百十三条第十項において準用する第二項」と、第百二十三条の二第一項中「被告事件」とあるのは「裁判の執行」と読み替えるものとする。